Mar 31, 2013
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of SHREE
ASHTAVINAYAK CINE VISION LIMITED as at 31st March 2013, which comprise
of the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2013, and the Statement of Profit
and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on
that date annexed thereto, and a summary of significant accounting
policies and other explanatory information.
ManagementÂs Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position and
financial performance in accordance with the Accounting Standards
referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act,
1956. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and
maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and
presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view
and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
AuditorÂs Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements, and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditorÂs judgment, including the assessment
of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements,
whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the
auditor considers internal control relevant to the CompanyÂs
preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order
to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances.
An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting
policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, and to the best of our information, and according to
the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the
information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a
true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(i) in case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March 2013;
(ii) in case of Statement of Profit and Loss, of the loss of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
(iii) in case of cash flow statement, of cash flow of the Company for
the year ended on that date.
Emphasis of Matter
Attention is invited to Sub Note no. 6 of Note No. 31 of Annual
Accounts as regards the challenges that the Company is facing on
financial front; and thus has not been able to repay the loans, secured
and unsecured, statutory dues, and other unsecured creditors. A few
parties have filed a suits against the Company for recovery of debts
including winding up of the Company. One of the main reasons for the
financial challenges is moneys raised by the Company through various
sources are deployed in various projects of production and distribution
of films which have delayed owing to various reasons. The moneys
advanced to Indian and foreign subsidiaries of the Company are deployed
by the said subsidiaries in various production and distribution of
films projects which are also delayed. The management is hopeful to
overcome the challenges that are in way. The management is of the view
that amounts realizable by the Company are larger than the liabilities
of the Company, and the present financial challenges are part of a
temporary phase. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this
matter.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued by
the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section
227 of the Companies Act 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement
on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.
As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) we have obtained all the information and explanation except
information as to confirmation of secured and unsecured creditors as
described in sub-note no. 6 of Note No. 31 to the Annual Accounts,
which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the
purpose of our audit;
(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss,
and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred
to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(e) on the basis of written representations received from the
Directors, as on the date of balance sheet, and taken on record by the
board of directors, we report that none of the directors is
disqualified as on the said date from being appointed as a director in
terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies
Act 1956;
(f) since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to
the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the
Companies Act, 1956, nor has it issued any Rules under the said
section, prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no
cess is due and payable by the Company;
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE SHREE
ASHTAVINAYAK CINE VISION LIMITED
(i) (a) The Company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars of, including quantitative details and situation, of fixed
assets.
(b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its
fixed assets by which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over
a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of physical
verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and
the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification.
(c) The Company has not disposed substantial portion of its fixed
assets during the year; accordingly the going concern status of the
Company is not affected.
(ii) As explained by the Management, the production of films requires
various types, qualities and quantities of materials, consumables and
inputs in different denominations generally pertaining to the specific
films under production. Due to multiplicity and complexity of items,
many of which are used across various films under production at the
same time, it is not practicable to maintain the stock register, as the
process of making films is not amenable to it. All the purchases of
films related consumable/ consumables are treated as consumed. In view
of this, the Company does not maintain inventory register and also does
not carry out physical verification of inventory. Hence information
relating to clause (ii) (a) and (b) of the order has not been given.
(iii) (a) As explained to us, the Company has granted unsecured
loan(s), to Four subsidiary companies (Three 100% Subsidiary in India
and one overseas), of which loans to four Indian subsidiaries are
interest free. Aggregate amount involved as loans to all the
subsidiaries at the balance sheet date and maximum amount so involved
of these loans are as under:
Name of the Company Amount at the Maximum Amount
year end (Amount in Crore)
(Amount in Crore)
Shree Ashtavinayak Cine Vision
FZE (Foreign Subsidiary) 567.78 595.38
Shree Ashtavinayak Dream
Pictures Limited 0.01 0.01
Shree Ashtavinayak Light Camera
Action Limited 23.84 23.84
Shree Ashtavinayak Passion
Movies Limited 5.02 5.01
596.64 624.24
(b) As explained to us, the terms and conditions of unsecured loans
granted by the Company to above subsidiaries are not prima-facie
prejudicial to interest of the Company. The Management is of the view
that all loans and advances granted to the subsidiaries are good in
nature; and in accounts of the respective subsidiaries, assets of such
subsidiaries, wherein the funds advanced by the Company are applied,
have been considered good in nature.
(c) As explained to us, the loans to Indian subsidiaries are demand
loans; and hence the sub-clause dealing with receipt of the principal
amount and interest on regular basis is not applicable. Loan to the
foreign subsidiary and interest thereon is has fallen due on the
balance sheet date as the same was repayable along with interest after
60 months from February 18, 2008, the date of loan agreement. The
Company has reversed the interest charged to its foreign subsidiary
during the year as explained in sub-note no. 7 of Note No. 31 of the
accounts.
(d) Since the loans granted to Indian subsidiaries are in nature of
demand loan(s), the sub-clause dealing with overdue amount more than
rupees one lakh is not applicable. As regards loan to foreign
subsidiary, the same has fallen due. The management has explained that,
it is taking necessary steps to recover the amount.
(e) The Company has taken interest free unsecured loans from two
parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Act. The amount involved at end of the year in aggregate was RS. 82.56
Crore, and the maximum amount involved in the transaction during the
year was RS. 82.56 Crore.
(f) Other terms and conditions of unsecured loans taken by the Company,
are prima facie not prejudicial to interest of the Company.
(g) The unsecured loans taken are repayable on demand. The Company has
paid the loan amount as and when demanded by the lender, thus, we are
explained, there has been no default on the part of the Company.
(iv) In our view, there is an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business,
for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets, and for sale of goods
and services, though, the Company does not maintain any physical
inventories or sales of goods owing to the nature of its business. In
our view, there has been no continuing failure to correct major
weakness in internal control systems of the Company. view, there has
been no continuing failure to correct major weakness in internal
control systems of the Company.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanation given to us and on
the basis of representation received from the Management, the
transactions that need to be entered into register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.
(b) As explained to us, there are no transactions made in pursuance of
such contracts or arrangements made during the year, and accordingly,
the clause as to entering the transactions at prices which are
reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the
relevant time is not applicable.
(vi) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the provisions of
section 58A and section 58AA or any other provisions of the Companies
Act, 1956 and the rules made there under. We have been informed by the
management that there has been no order passed by the Company law Board
or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court
or any other Tribunal on the Company with respect to compliance of the
provisions of section 58A or 58AA or any other provisions of the
Companies Act 1956.
(vii) On the basis of internal audit reports broadly reviewed by us, we
are of the opinion that, the coverage of internal audit functions
carried out by an Internal Auditor of the Company is adequate and
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.
(viii) We have been informed by the management that, the Central
Government has not prescribed the method of maintenance of cost records
u/s. 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 to the industry to which
the Company pertains.
(ix) (a) We have been informed by the management that, the Company not
regular in depositing the undisputed statutory dues with the
appropriate authorities, and there have been material arrears of
outstanding dues as at the last day of this financial year for more
than six months from the date they became payable as under:
PARTICULARS (Amount in
Crore)
Tax deducted at source for Assessment Year 2012-13 3.19
Tax deducted at source for Assessment Year 2013-14 1.56
Income Tax for Assessment Year 2010-11 2.37
Income Tax for Assessment Year 2012-13 4.83
Wealth tax for Assessment Year 2012-13 0.05
Service Tax for Financial Year 2012-13 0.07
The management has informed us that, the default with respect to
income-tax for Assessment Year 2010-11 was to be made good by making
adjustment againt refund for Assessment year 2011-12. However, this
refund was adjusted against earlier Assessment Years by the Income-tax
Department. The Company has informed us that, it is taking necessary
action against this adjustment.
(b) According to the information and explanation given to us, there are
no dues of Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth Tax, and Service tax, Custom
Duty, Excise Duty or Cess, as applicable to it which have not been
deposited on account of any dispute except the following:
PARTICULARS (Amount in Forum where
Crore) the dispute is
pending
Income Tax Assessed dues for
Assessment Year 2010-11 13.94 CIT (A)
(x) According to the information and explanation given to us, there are
no accumulated losses at end of the financial year in excess of fifty
percent of net worth of the Company. The Company has incurred cash
losses during the year, but did not incur cash losses in the
immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) The Company has defaulted in repayment of dues to financial
institutions and banks for a period ranging from three months to
fifteen months. As informed to us, the amount involved in these loans
on account of principal repayment and interest is Rs. 105.98 Crore.
(xii) As informed to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances
on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and
other securities; accordingly, there is no necessity as to maintaining
documents and records in this respect.
(xiii) The provisions of any special statute in respect of chit fund,
nidhi, mutual benefit funds or societies are not applicable to the
Company.
(xiv) The Company has not dealt or traded in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments; hence maintenance of records for the
same does not arise.
(xv) The management has informed us that, the Company has not given any
guarantee for loans taken by others from any bank or financial
institutions.
(xvi) As per the explanation given by the management, the term loans
were applied for the purposes for which they were obtained. We are
explained that, the Company is in to the business of production and
distribution of films, and the term loans are raised for different
projects of making films and are used inter changeably depending upon
need of the concerned project; however that, entire film production
segment is treated as one segment for the purpose of this clause. One
of the working capital loans was partly concerted into term loan of
Rupees Six Crore by the bank without extending any funds under capital
restructuring plan. Hence, in our view, the same is treated as in
compliance with this clause.
(xvii) As explained to us by the management, there were no funds that
were raised on a short-term basis, which have been applied for
long-term investment.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act 1956.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures; hence no security or
charges have been created in respect of the same.
(xx) The Company has not made any public issues of shares during the
year; hence disclosure requirement as to end utilization of public
issue money is not required
(xxi) As informed by the management, there has not been noticed or
reported any fraud on or by the Company during the year.
FOR SHAH, SHAH & SHAH
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
(Mehul Shah)
PARTNER
Firm Regd. No: 116457W
Membership No.: 049361
Mumbai: May 30, 2013
Mar 31, 2012
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Shree Ashtavinayak Cine
Vision Limited as at March 31, 2012, Statement of Profit and Loss for
the year ended on that date annexed thereto, and Cash Flow Statement of
the Company for the period ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's Management
Our Responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on the test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis of
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditors' Report) Order, 2003 issued by
the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section
227 of the Companies Act 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement
on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
(a) we have obtained all the information and explanation, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit. Attention is invited to Sub Note No. 5 of Note No. 31 of the
Annual Accounts, in view of which loans, advances, and other assets due
from subsidiary companies of the Company are treated as good in nature.
Attention is invited to Sub Note No. 6 (a) & (b) of Note No. 31 of the
Annual Accounts as regards non receipt of loan confirmations form
certain parties owing to dispute with them or default in repayment.
(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) the balance sheet and profit and loss account dealt with by this
report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) in our opinion, the Balance sheet and profit and loss account read
with notes there on dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act 1956.
(e) on the basis of written representations received from the
Directors, as on the date of balance sheet, and taken on record by the
board of directors, we report that none of the directors is
disqualified as on the said date from being appointed as a director in
terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies
Act 1956;
(f) in our opinion, and to the best of information, and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act 1956 in the manner so required, and give
a true and fair view in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in India.
(i) in case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2012;
(ii) in case of Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
(ii) in case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flow of the Company
for the year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE IN CASE
OF SHREE ASHTAVINAYAK CINE VISION LIMITED
(i) (a) The Company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars of, including quantitative details and situation, of fixed
assets.
(b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its
fixed assets by which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over
a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of physical
verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and
the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification.
(c) The Company has not disposed substantial portion of its fixed
assets during the year; accordingly the going concern status of the
Company is not affected.
(ii) As explained by the Management, the production of films requires
various types, qualities and quantities of materials, consumables and
inputs in different denominations generally pertaining to the specific
films under production. Due to multiplicity and complexity of items,
many of which are used across various films under production at the
same time, it is not practicable to maintain the stock register, as the
process of making films is not amenable to it. All the purchases of
films related consumable/ consumables are treated as consumed. In view
of this, the Company does not maintain inventory register and also does
not carry out physical verification of inventory. Hence information
relating to clause (ii) (a) and (b) of the order has not been given.
(iii) (a) As explained to us, the Company has granted unsecured
loan(s), to Five subsidiary companies (four 100% Subsidiary in India
and one overseas), of which loans to four Indian subsidiaries are
interest free. Aggregate amount involved as loans to all the
subsidiaries at the balance sheet date was RS. 548.56 Crore, and
maximum amount so involved RS. 557.71 Crore. The details of these loans
are as under:
Name of the Company Amount at the Maximum Amount
year end (Amount in Crore)
(Amount in
Shree Ashtavinayak Cine Vision FZE
(Foreign Subsidiary) 532.12 532.12
Shree Ashtavinayak LFS Infra Limited 0.66 0.66
Shree Ashtavinayak Dream Pictures Limited 0.01 0.01
Shree Ashtavinayak Light Camera Action
Limited 10.76 19.81
Shree Ashtavinayak Passion Movies Limited 5.02 5.12
(b) As explained to us, the terms and conditions of unsecured loans
granted by the Company to above subsidiaries are not prima-facie
prejudicial to interest of the Company. The Management is of the view
that all loans and advances granted to the subsidiaries are good in
nature; and in accounts of the respective subsidiaries, assets of such
subsidiaries, wherein the funds advanced by the Company are applied,
have been considered good in nature.
(c) As explained to us, the loans to Indian subsidiaries are demand
loans; and hence the sub-clause dealing with receipt of the principal
amount and interest on regular basis is not applicable. Loan to the
foreign subsidiary and interest thereon is not due on the balance sheet
date; and the same is repayable along with interest after 60 months
from February 18, 2008, the date of loan agreement.
(d) Since the loans granted to Indian subsidiaries are in nature of
demand loan(s), the sub-clause dealing with overdue amount more than
rupees one lakh is not applicable.
(e) The Company has taken interest free unsecured loans from two
parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Act. The amount involved at end of the year in aggregate was RS. 76.55
Crore, and the maximum amount involved in the transaction during the
year was RS. 78.14 Crore.
(f) Other terms and conditions of unsecured loans taken by the company,
are prima facie not prejudicial to interest of the Company.
(g) The unsecured loans taken are repayable on demand. The Company has
paid the loan amount as and when demanded by the lender, thus, we are
explained, there has been no default on the part of the Company.
(iv) In our view, there is an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business,
for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets, and for sale of goods
and services, though, the Company does not maintain any physical
inventories or sales of goods owing to the nature of its business. In
our view, there has been no continuing failure to correct major
weakness in internal control systems of the Company.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanation given to us and on
the basis of representation received from the Management, the
transactions that need to be entered into register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered.
(b) As explained to us, there are no transactions made in pursuance of
such contracts or arrangements made during the year, and accordingly,
the clause as to entering the transactions at prices which are
reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the
relevant time is not applicable.
(vi) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the provisions of
section 58A and section 58AA or any other provisions of the Companies
Act, 1956 and the rules made there under. We have been informed by the
management that there has been no order passed by the Company law Board
or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court
or any other Tribunal on the Company with respect to compliance of the
provisions of section 58A or 58AA or any other provisions of the
Companies Act 1956.
(vii) On the basis of internal audit reports broadly reviewed by us, we
are of the opinion that, the coverage of internal audit functions
carried out by an Internal Auditor of the Company is adequate and
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.
(viii) We have been informed by the management that, the Central
Government has not prescribed the method of maintenance of cost records
u/s. 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 to the industry to which
the Company pertains.
(ix) (a) We have been informed by the management that, the Company is
generally regular in depositing all undisputed statutory dues with the
appropriate authorities and there have been no material arrears of
outstanding dues as at the last day of this financial year for more
than six months from the date they became payable except wealth-tax and
tax deducted at source as under:
PARTICULARS (Amount in
Crore)
Tax deducted at source for Assessment Year
2012-13 1.39
Income Tax for Assessment Year 2010-11 2.37
Wealth tax for Assessment Year 2011 -12 0.03
The management has informed us that, the default with respect to wealth
tax for Assessment Year 2011-12 is made good by making the payment
along with interest on the date of this report.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, there are no dues of Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth Tax,
and Service tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty or Cess, as applicable to it
which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.
(x) According to the information and explanation given to us, there are
no accumulated losses at end of the financial year in excess of fifty
percent of net worth of the Company. The Company has not incurred cash
losses during the year, but incurred cash losses in the immediately
preceding financial period.
(xi) The Company is to pay amount due but unpaid on account of interest
amounting to RS. 92.33 Lac to the financial institutions for a period
of three months on the date of Balance Sheet. The Management has
explained us that, it is in process of renegotiating the terms of these
loans with the Institutions.
(xii) As informed to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances
on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and
other securities; accordingly, there is no necessity as to maintaining
documents and records in this respect.
(xiii) The provisions of any special statute in respect of chit fund,
nidhi, mutual benefit funds or societies are not applicable to the
Company.
(xiv) The Company has not dealt or traded in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments; hence maintenance of records for the
same does not arise.
(xv) The management has informed us that, the Company has not given any
guarantee for loans taken by others from any bank or financial
institutions.
(xvi) As per the explanation given by the management, the term loans
were applied for the purposes for which they were obtained. We are
explained that, the Company is in to the business of production and
distribution of films, and the term loans are raised for different
projects of making films and are used inter changeably depending upon
need of the concerned project; however that, entire film production
segment is treated as one segment for the purpose of this clause.
(xvii) As explained to us by the management, there were no funds that
were raised on a short-term basis, which have been applied for
long-term investment
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act 1956.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures; hence no security or
charges have been created in respect of the same.
(xx) The Company has not made any public issues of shares during the
year; hence disclosure requirement as to end utilization of public
issue money is not required
(xxi) As informed by the management, there has not been noticed or
reported any fraud on or by the Company during the year
FOR SHAH, SHAH & SHAH
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
(Mehul Shan)
PARTNER
Firm Regd. No: 116457W
Membership No.: 049361
Mumbai: May 30, 2012
Mar 31, 2011
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Shree Ashtavinayak Cine
Vision Limited as at March 31, 2011 Profit and Loss account for the
period ended on that date annexed thereto, and Cash Flow Statement of
the Company for the period ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
Management. Our Responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on the test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis of
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditors' Report) Order, 2003 issued by
the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section
227 of the Companies Act 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement
on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
(a) we have obtained all the information and explanation, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) the balance sheet and profit and loss account dealt with by this
report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) in our opinion, the Balance sheet and profit and loss account read
with notes there on dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act 1956.
(e) on the basis of written representations received from the
Directors, as on the dated of balance sheet, and taken on record by the
board of directors, we report that none of the directors is
disqualified as on the said date from being appointed as a director in
terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies
Act 1956;
(f) in our opinion, and to the best of information, and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act 1956 in the manner so required, and give
a true and fair view in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in India.
(i) in case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2011;
(ii) in case of Profit and Loss Account, of the loss of the Company for
the period ended on that date.
(ii) in case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flow of the Company
for the period ended on that date.
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE IN CASE
OF SHREE ASHTAVINAYAK CINE VISION LIMITED
(i) (a) The Company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars of, including quantitative details and situation, of fixed
assets.
(b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its
fixed assets by which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over
a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of physical
verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and
the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification.
(c) The Company has not disposed substantial portion of its fixed
assets during the period; accordingly the going concern status of the
Company is not affected.
(ii) As explained by the Management, the production of films requires
various types, qualities and quantities of materials, consumables and
inputs in different denominations generally pertaining to the specific
films under production. Due to multiplicity and complexity of items,
many of which are used across various films under production at the
same time, it is not practicable to maintain the stock register, as the
process of making films is not amenable to it. All the purchases of
films related consumable/ consumables are treated as consumed. In view
of this, the Company does not maintain inventory register and also does
not carry out physical verification of inventory. Hence information
relating to clause (ii) (a) and (b) of the order has not been given.
(iii) (a) As explained to us, the Company has granted interest free
unsecured loan(s), to THREE companies (100% Subsidary in India) covered
in the register maintained under section 301 of the Act.
The amount involved at the balance sheet date was Rs. 0.25 Million, and
maximum amount so involved Rs. 0.25 Million.
(b) The terms and conditions of unsecured loans granted by the Company
are not prima-facie prejudicial to interest of the Company.
(c) As explained to us, the said loan(s) are demand loans; and hence
the sub-clause dealing with receipt of the principal amount and
interest on regular basis is not applicable.
(d) Since the loan(s) granted are in nature of demand loan(s), the
sub-clause dealing with overdue amount more than rupees one lakh is not
applicable.
(e) The Company has taken unsecured loans from two parties covered in
the register maintained under section 301 of the Act; some of which are
interest free. The amount involved at end of the year in aggredgate was
R s . 764.56 Million,and the maximum amount involved in the transaction
was R s . 764.56 Million.
(f) Other terms and conditions of unsecured loans taken by the company,
are prima facie not prejudicial to interest of the Company.
(g) The loans taken are repayable on demand. As informed, the Company
has paid the loan amount as and when demanded by the lender, thus there
has been no default on the part of the Company.
(iv) In our view, there is an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business,
for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets, and for sale of goods
and services, though, the Company does not maintain any physical
inventories or sales of goods owing to the nature of its business. In
our view, there has been no continuing failure to correct major
weakness in internal control systems of the Company.
(v) According to the information and explanation given to us and on the
basis of representation received from the Management, the transactions
that need to be entered into register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered and the transactions made
in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements have been made at prices
which are reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at
the relevant time.
(vi) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the provisions of
section 58A and section 58AA or any other provisions of the Companies
Act, 1956 and the rules made there under. We have been informed by the
management that there has been no order passed by the Company law Board
or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court
or any other Tribunal on the Company with respect to compliance of the
provisions of section 58A or 58AA or any other provisions of the
Companies Act 1956.
(vii) On the basis of internal audit reports broadly reviewed by us, we
are of the opinion that, the coverage of internal audit functions
carried out by an Internal Auditor of the Company is adequate and
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.
(viii) We have been informed by the management that, the Central
Government has not prescribed the method of maintenance of cost records
u/s. 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 to the industry to which
the Company pertains.
(ix) (a) We have been informed by the management that, the Company is
generally regular in depositing all undisputed statutory dues with the
appropriate authorities and there have been no material arrears of
outstanding dues as at the last day of this financial period for more
than six months from the date they became payable except income-tax and
tax deducted at source as mentioned in Note No. 5.9 of Notes on
accounts.
PARTICULARS Amount
in Rs.
Millions
Tax deducted at source Rs. 25.94
Income-tax for Assessent Year 2010-11 Rs. 23.67
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, there are no dues of Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth Tax,
and Service tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty or Cess, as applicable to it
which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.
(x) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
accumulated losses at the end of the financial period are not in excess
of fifty percent of net worth of the Company. The Company has incurred
cash losses during the period, and not incurred cash losses in the
immediately preceding financial period.
(xi) As informed to us by the management, the Company is to pay amount
due but unpaid on account of principal and interest amount of Rs. 77.79
million to the financial institution for a period more than two months.
(xii) As informed to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances
on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and
other securities; accordingly, there is no necessity as to maintaining
documents and records in this respect.
(xiii) The provisions of any special statute in respect of chit fund,
nidhi, mutual benefit funds or societies are not applicable to the
Company.
(xiv) The Company has not dealt or traded in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments; hence maintenance of records for the
same does not arise.
(xv) The management has informed us that, the Company has not given any
guarantee for loans taken by others from any bank or financial
institutions.
(xvi) As per the explanation given by the management, the term loans
were applied for the purposes for which they were obtained.
(xvii) As explained to us by the management, there were no funds that
were raised on a short-term basis, which have been applied for
long-term investment.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act 1956.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures; hence no security or
charges have been created in respect of the same.
(xx) The Company has not made any public issues of shares; hence
disclosure requirement as to end utilization of public issue money is
not required
(xxi) As informed by the management, there has not been noticed or
reported any fraud on or by the Company during the period.
FOR SHAH, SHAH & SHAH
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
(Mehul Shah)
PARTNER
Firm Regd. No: 116457W
Membership No.:049361
Mumbai: May 27, 2011
Sep 30, 2010
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Shree Ashtavinayak Cine
Vision Limited as at 30th September 2010, Profit and Loss account for
the period ended on that date annexed thereto, and Cash Flow Statement
of the Company for the period ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
Management. Our Responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on the test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis of
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued by
the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section
227 of the Companies Act 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement
on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
(a) we have obtained all the information and explanation, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) the balance sheet and profit and loss account dealt with by this
report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) in our opinion, the Balance sheet and profit and loss account read
with notes there on dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act 1956.
(e) on the basis of written representations received from the
Directors, as on the dated of balance sheet, and taken on record by the
board of directors, we report that none of the directors is
disqualified as on the said date from being appointed as a director in
terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies
Act 1956;
(f) in our opinion, and to the best of information, and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act 1956 in the manner so required, and give
a true and fair view in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in India:
(i) in case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 30th September 2010;
(ii) in case of Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the Company
for the period ended on that date.
(iii) in case of cash flow statement, of cash flow of the Company for
the period ended on that date.
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE IN CASE
OF SHREE ASHTAVINAYAK CINE VISION LIMITED
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars of, including quantitative details and situation, of fixed
assets.
(b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its
fixed assets by which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over
a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of physicai
verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and
the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification.
(c) The Company has not disposed substantial portion of its fixed
assets during the year; accordingly the going concern status of the
Company is not affected.
(ii) As explained by the Management, the production of films requires
various types, qualities and quantities of materials, consumables and
inputs in different denominations generally pertaining to the specific
films under production. Due to multiplicity and complexity of items,
many of which are used across various films under production at the
same time, it is not practicable to maintain the stock register, as the
process of making films is not amenable to it. All the purchases of
films related consumable/ consumables are treated as consumed. In view
of this, the Company does not maintain inventory register and also does
not carry out physical verification of inventory. Hence information
relating to clause (ii) (a) and (b) of the order has not been given.
(iii) (a) As explained to us, the Company has granted interest free
unsecured loan(s) to one company (100% subsidiary in India) covered in
the register maintained under section 301 of the Act. The amount
involved at the balance sheet date was - 58 Million, and maximum amount
so involved was - 85 Million.
(b) The terms and conditions of unsecured loans granted by the Company
are not prima-facie prejudicial to interest of the Company.
(c) As explained to us, the said loan(s) are demand loans; and hence
the sub-clause dealing with receipt of the principal amount and
interest on regular basis is not applicable.
(d) Since the loan(s) granted are in nature of demand loan(s), the sub-
clause dealing with overdue amount more than rupees one lakh is not
applicable.
(e) The Company has taken interest free unsecured loans from two
party(s) covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Act. The amount involved at the balance sheet date was - 45 Million,
and maximum amount so involved - 172.50 Million.
(f) The terms and conditions of unsecured loans taken by the Company,
are prima facie not prejudicial to the interest of the Company
(g) The loans taken are repayable on demand. As informed, the Company
has paid the loan amount as and when demanded by the lender, thus there
has been no default on the part of the Company.
(iv) In our view, there is an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business,
for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets, and for sale of goods
and services, though, the Company does not maintain any physical
inventories or sales of goods owing to the nature of its business. In
our view, there has been no continuing failure to correct major
weakness in internal control systems of the Company.
(v) According to the information and explanation given to us and on the
basis of representation received from the Management, the transactions
that need to be entered into register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 have been so entered and the transactions made
in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements have been made at prices
which are reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at
the relevant time.
(vi) In our opinion, the Company has complied with the provisions of
section 58A and section 58AA or any other provisions of the Companies
Act, 1956 and the rules made there under. We have been informed by the
management that there has been no order passed by the Company law Board
or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any Court
or any other Tribunal on the Company with respect to compliance of the
provisions of section 58A or 58AA or any other provisions of the
Companies Act 1956.
(vii) On the basis of internal audit reports broadly reviewed by us, we
are of the opinion that, the coverage of internal audit functions
carried out by an Internal Audit Department of the Company is adequate
and commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its
business.
(viii) We have been informed by the management that, the Central
Government has not prescribed the method of maintenance of cost records
u/s. 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 to the industry to which
the Company pertains.
(ix) (a) We have been informed by the management that, the Company is
generally regular in depositing all undisputed statutory dues, with the
appropriate authorities and there have been no material arrears of
outstanding dues as at the last day of this financial year for more
than six months from the date they became payable except income-tax and
tax deducted at source as mentioned in Note No. 5.12 of Notes on
accounts, and service tax where there have been significant delays are
noted in payment by the Company. As explained in Note No. 5.11 of the
Notes to Accounts, no amount has accrued in respect of Maharashtra
Value Added Tax.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, there are no dues of Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth Tax,
and Service tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty or Cess, as applicable to it
which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.
(x) In our opinion, the Company has no accumulated losses at end of the
financial year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and
the immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) As informed to us by the management, the Company has not defaulted
in repayment of any dues to financial institution or banks; whereas
there are no debenture holders.
(xii) As informed to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances
on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and
other securities; accordingly, there is no necessity as to maintaining
documents and records in this respect.
(xiii) The provisions of any special statute in respect of chit fund,
nidhi, mutual benefit funds or societies are not applicable to the
Company.
(xiv) The Company has not dealt or traded in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments; hence maintenance of records for the
same does not arise.
(xv) The management has informed us that, the Company has not given any
guarantee for loans taken by others from any bank or financial
institutions.
(xvi) As per the explanation given by the management, the term loans
were applied for the purposes of film making and distribution for which
they were obtained.
(xvii) As explained to us by the management, there were no funds that
were raised on a short-term basis, which have been applied for
long-term investment.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act 1956.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures; hence no security or
charges have been created in respect of the same.
(xx) We have verified that the end use of money raised by public issues
is as disclosed in the notes to the financial statements covered by our
audit report.
(xxi) During the period of audit, there was an attempt to defraud the
Company by misuse of power of attorney given. We are informed that, the
Company has been able to recover the full amount. Attention is invited
to Note No, 5.2 of the Notes to Accounts for details. As explained to
us, the Company has not suffered any material loss as the entire amount
sought to be misappropriated was recovered by the Company.
FOR SHAH, SHAH &SHAH
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
(Mehul Shah)
PARTNER
M. No. 49361
FRN: 116457W
Mumbai: January 10, 2011
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article