Auditor Report of Perfectpac Ltd.

Mar 31, 2025

To the Members of Perfectpac Limited

Report on the audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements Opinion

We have audited the Ind AS Financial Statements of Perfectpac Limited (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2025, the Statement of Profit and Loss, Statement of Changes in Equity and Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended, and notes to the Financial Statements, including a summary of material accounting policies and other explanatory information.

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid Ind AS Financial Statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2025 and its profit, changes in Equity and its Cash Flows for the year ended on that date.

Basis for Opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Rules there-under, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

We have determined that there are no key audit matters to communicate in our report.

Management’s Responsibility for the Ind AS Financial Statements

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134 (5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these Ind AS Financial Statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance including Other Comprehensive Income, changes in Equity and Cash Flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) prescribed under Section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial

controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the Ind AS Financial Statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the Ind AS Financial Statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

The Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Ind AS Financial Statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these Ind AS Financial Statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the Ind AS Financial Statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the Company has adequate internal financial controls system in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.

Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.

Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the Ind AS Financial Statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained upto the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the Ind

AS Financial Statements, including the disclosures and whether the Ind AS Financial Statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outway the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020 (“the Order”) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, we give in the “Annexure-A”, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order to the extent applicable.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss including Other Comprehensive Income and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

d) In our opinion, the aforesaid Ind AS Financial Statements comply with the Indian Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors, as on 31st March, 2025 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2025, from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in “Annexure B”.

g) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the remuneration paid by the Company to its directors during the current year is in accordance with the provisions of Section 197 of the Act. The remuneration paid to any director is not in excess of the limit laid down under Section 197 of the Act. The

Ministry of Corporate Affairs has not prescribed other details under Section 197(16) which are to be required to be commented upon by us.

h) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i) The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its Ind AS Financial Statements - refer Note 32 to Ind AS Financial Statements.

ii) The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii) There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

iv) (i) The management has represented that to the

best of its knowledge and belief, other than as disclosed in the Notes to the Accounts, no funds have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or share premium or any other source of funds) by the Company to or in any other person(s) or entity(ies) including foreign entities (“intermediaries”) with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the intermediaries shall, whether, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries.

(ii) The management has represented that to the best of its knowledge and belief, other than as disclosed in the Notes to the Accounts, no funds have been received by the Company from any person(s) or entity(ies) including foreign entities (“funding parties”) with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, whether directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the funding party (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries and

(iii) Based on such audit procedures that we have considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances nothing has come to our notice that has caused us to believe that the representations under sub-clause (i) and (ii) contain any material mis-statement.

v) The dividend declared/paid during the year by the Company is in compliance with Section 123 of the Companies Act, 2013.

vi) Based on our examination, which included test checks, the Company has used an accounting software for maintaining its books of account for the financial year ended March 31,2025 which has a

feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility and the same has operated throughout the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the software. Further, during the course of our audit we did not come across any instance of the audit trail feature being tampered with. Additionally, the audit trail has been preserved by the Company as per the statutory requirements for record retention.

For V S S A & Associates

Chartered Accountants {Firm Registration No 012421N}

(CA Samir Vaid)

Partner

Place: New Delhi Membership No. 091309

Dated: May 09, 2025 UDIN: 25091309BMJQCG3120

---

Mar 31, 2024

We have audited the Ind AS Financial Statements of Perfectpac Limited (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2024, the Statement of Profit and Loss, Statement of Changes in Equity and Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended, and notes to the Financial Statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid Ind AS Financial Statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2024 and its profit, changes in Equity and its Cash Flows for the year ended on that date.

Basis for Opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Rules there-under, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

We have determined that there are no key audit matters to communicate in our report.

Management’s Responsibility for the Ind AS Financial Statements

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134 (5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these Ind AS Financial Statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance including Other Comprehensive Income, changes in Equity and Cash Flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) prescribed under Section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial

controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the Ind AS Financial Statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the Ind AS Financial Statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

The Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Ind AS Financial Statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these Ind AS Financial Statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the Ind AS Financial Statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the Company has adequate internal financial controls system in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.

Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.

Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the Ind AS Financial Statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained upto the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the Ind

AS Financial Statements, including the disclosures and whether the Ind AS Financial Statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the Ind AS Financial Statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outway the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020 (“the Order”) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, we give in the “Annexure-A”, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order to the extent applicable.

2. As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:

a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss including Other Comprehensive Income and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

d) In our opinion, the aforesaid Ind AS Financial Statements comply with the Indian Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors, as on 31st March, 2024 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2024, from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in “Annexure B”.

g) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the remuneration paid by the Company to its directors during the current year is in accordance with the provisions of Section 197 of the Act. The remuneration paid to any director is not in excess of the limit laid down under Section 197 of the Act. The

Ministry of Corporate Affairs has not prescribed other details under Section 197(16) which are to be required to be commented upon by us.

h) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i) The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its Ind AS Financial Statements - refer Note 32 to Ind AS Financial Statements.

ii) The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii) There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

iv) (i) The management has represented that to the

best of its knowledge and belief, other than as disclosed in the Notes to the Accounts, no funds have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or share premium or any other source of funds) by the Company to or in any other person(s) or entity(ies) including foreign entities (“intermediaries”) with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the intermediaries shall, whether, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries.

(ii) The management has represented that to the best of its knowledge and belief, other than as disclosed in the Notes to the Accounts, no funds have been received by the Company from any person(s) or entity(ies) including foreign entities (“funding parties”) with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, whether directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the funding party (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries and

(iii) Based on such audit procedures that we have considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances nothing has come to our notice that has caused us to believe that the representations under sub-clause (i) and (ii) contain any material mis-statement.

v) The dividend declared/paid during the year by the Company is in compliance with Section 123 of the Companies Act, 2013.

vi) Based on our examination, which included test checks, the Company has used accounting softwares for maintaining its books of account for the financial year ended March 31,2024 which has a feature of

recording audit trail (edit log) facility and the same has operated throughout the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the softwares. Further, during the course of our audit we did not come across any instance of the audit trail feature being tampered with.

As proviso to Rule 3(1) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 is applicable from April 1, 2023, reporting under Rule 11 (g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 on preservation of audit trail as per the statutory requirements for record retention is not applicable for the financial year ended March 31,2024.

For V S S A & Associates

Chartered Accountants {Firm Registration No 012421N}

(CA Samir Vaid)

Partner

Place: New Delhi Membership No. 091309

Dated: 20.05.2024 UDIN: 24091309BKEQOF9427

---

Mar 31, 2015

Report on other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report), Order, 2015 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143 (11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

2. As required by section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that :

a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.

c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on March 31, 2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31 , 2015, from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.

f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i) The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations in Note 29(Contingent Liabilities) on its financial statements.

ii) The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses.

iii) There were no amounts which were required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.

(Referred to in paragraph 1 under Report on other Legal & Regulatory requirements' of our Report of even date)

i. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its fixed assets through which all fixed assets are verified, in a phased manner over a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. As informed to us , no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification as carried out under the above programme during the current year.

ii. a) The inventories except goods in transit have been physically verified by the management at reasonable intervals during the year.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.

iii. The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013 as per information and explanations given to us. Consequently the provisions of clauses 3(iii)(a) and (iii)(b) of the Order are not applicable.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventories, fixed assets and for the sale of goods & services. During the course of our audit we have not observed any major weakness in such internal control system.

v. As the company has not accepted any deposits from the public, the provisions of clause 3 (v) of the Order are not applicable.

vi. The Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records u/s 148(1) of the Companies Act 2013 and the rules framed there under.

vii. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and the records of the company examined by us, the company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Duty of Customs, Duty of Excise, Value Added Tax, Cess, and other statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year except some delays in respect of Service Tax, Sales Tax, Excise duty and Tax deducted at source . We are informed that there are no undisputed statutory dues as at the year end, outstanding for a period of more than six months from the date they become payable except Income tax Rs 170044.

b) There are no dues in respect of income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of custom, duty of excise, value added tax and cess that have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of any dispute other than those mentioned below:-

Nature of dues Amount (Rs.) Period to which Forum where amount relates the dispute is pending

ESIC 154,649 1985-86 & High Court of 1986-87 Punjab & Haryana

Income Tax & 51,114 2006-07, 2007-08, Deputy Fringe benefit Tax 2010-11 Commissioner of Income Tax

c) There is no amount required to be transferred to investor education and protection fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made there-under.

viii. The company does not have any accumulated losses as at the end of the financial year. The company has not incurred cash losses during the current year but had incurred cash losses in the immediately preceding financial year.

ix. According to the records of the Company examined by us and on the basis of information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks & financial institutions. The company has not obtained any borrowings by way of debentures.

x. As per information & explanations given to us the company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institution.

xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were obtained.

xii. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For JAGDISH SAPRA & CO.

(Firm Registration No. 001378N)

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

PLACE : NEW DELHI (JAGDISH SAPRA)

DATED : 28th May, 2015 PARTNER

Membership No. 009194

---

Mar 31, 2014

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Perfectpac Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2014, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Managements'' Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards notified under the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated 13 th September, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors'' judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditors consider internal controls relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company''s internal controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

a. In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2014;

b. In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the loss for the year ended on that date; and

c. In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227 (3) of the Act, we report that:

a. We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards notified under the Companies Act, 1956 read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated 13th September, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013;

e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on March 31, 2014 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2014, from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

i. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) Verification of fixed assets is being conducted in a phased programme by the management designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year are not significant and therefore do not affect the going concern status of the Company.

ii. a) As explained to us, inventories (except in transit) have been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of inventory and the discrepancies noticed on such verification between physical stocks and book records were not material.

iii. a) There are no companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 to which the company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured, as per information & explanations given to us and Register u/s 301 produced before us.

b) Since no loans were granted to parties covered in Register u/s 301, Paras 4(iii) (b), (iii) (c) & (iii) (d) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

c) The Company has taken unsecured loans from Managing Director and three Companies covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved in the transaction was Rs 5.29 Crores and balance outstanding at the year end was Rs 1.60 Crores.

d) In our opinion the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans taken by the Company are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

e) The Company is regular in payment of interest on the above loans but as there is no stipulation for repayment of loan we are not in a position to make specific comments for the same.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods & services. During the course of our audit we have not observed any weakness in such internal control system.

v. a) According to the information & explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the Register required to be maintained under that section.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are prima facie reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time. However, for sales made as per customers'' specifications comparable prices are not available.

vi. As the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public, within the meaning of section 58A and 58AA of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 paragraph 4 (vi) of the Order is not applicable.

vii. In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.

viii. We have broadly reviewed the books of account relating to materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules, 2011 prescribed by the Central Government for maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of Sub Section (1) of Section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we are not required to and have not carried out any detailed examination of such accounts and records.

ix. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and the records of the Company examined by us, the Company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess, Service Tax and other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year.

We are informed that there are no undisputed statutory dues as at the year end outstanding for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable. except Employees'' State Insurance dues of Rs. 20,722/- b) According to the books of account and records as produced and examined by us in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, there are no dues of Income Tax, Wealth tax, Sales tax, Service tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty & Cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute other than those mentioned below:

Nature of Dues Period to which Forum where Amount the amount the dispute (Rs.) relates is pending

ESIC 1985-86 & 1986-87 High Court of 154,649 Punjab & Haryana

Income Tax & 2002-03, 2005-06, Deputy 190,387 Fringe Benefit 2009-10, 2010-11 Commissioner Tax

x. The Company has no accumulated losses as at the end of the financial year. The Company has incurred cash losses during the current year but not in the immediately preceding financial year.

xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks & financial institution. The Company has not obtained any borrowings by way of debentures.

xii. Based on our examination of documents and records of the Company and as per information & explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii. In our opinion the Company is not a chit fund or nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society and hence clause (xiii) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

xiv. In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments and hence clause (xiv) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

xv. As per information & explanations given to us the Company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

xvi. In our opinion and according to information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were raised.

xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we report that no funds raised on short term basis have been used for long term investment.

xviii. According to the information & explanations given to us no preferential allotment of shares has been made by the company to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

xix. According to the information & explanations given to us, no debentures have been issued by the company during the year.

xx. Based on our examination of books and records of the Company, no public issue was made by the company during the year.

xxi. During the course of our examination of the books of account carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, we have not come across any instance of fraud on or by the company nor have we been informed by the management of any such instance being noticed or reported during the year.

For JAGDISH SAPRA & CO. (Firm Registration No. 001378N) CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

PLACE : NEW DELHI (CA : VIPAL KALRA) DATED : May 30, 2014 PARTNER Membership No. 084583

---

Mar 31, 2013

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Perfectpac Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31,2013, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Managements''Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Ac- counting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. ,

Auditors''Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors'' judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditors consider internal controls relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

a. In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2013;

b. In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Profit for the year ended on that date; and

c. In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Report on other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terrrr -'' sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.

2. As required by section 227 (3) of the Act, we report that: , . ..

a. We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on March 31, 2013 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31 , 2013, from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956r >

f. Since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the Companies Act, 1956 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section, prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due and payable by the company.

ANNEXURE TO INDEPENDENT AUDITORS''REPORT

(Referred to in our Report of even date)

i. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) Verification of fixed assets is being conducted in a phased programme by the management designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year are not significant and therefore do not affect the going concern status of the Company.

ii. a) As explained to us, inventories (except in transit) have been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of inventdry and the discrepancies noticed on such verification between physical stocks and book records were not material.

iii. a) There are no companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 to which the company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured, as per information & explanations given to us and Register u/s 301 produced before us.

b) Since no loans were granted to parties covered in Register u/s 301, Paras 4(iii) (b), (iii) (c) & (iii) (d) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

c) The Company has taken unsecured loan from Managing Director and two companies covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved in the transaction was Rs 6.14 Crores and balance outstanding at the year end was Rs 2.87 Crores.

d) In our opinion the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans taken by the company are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

e) The company is regular in payment of interest on the above loans but as there is no stipulation for repayment of loan we are not in a position to make specific comments for the same.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business with regard to purchases Of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods & services. During the course of our audit we have not come across any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal controls. v. a) According to the information & explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the Register required to be maintained under that section. b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are prima facie reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time. However, for sales made as per customers'' specifications comparable prices are not available. vi. As the company has not accepted any deposits from the public, within the meaning of section 58A and 58AA of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 paragraph 4 (vi) of the Order is not applicable. ¦ ''

vii. In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed b/ the management have been commensurate with the size of the Company arid nature of its business. * ¦ ,

viii. We have broadly reviewed the books of account relating to materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of Sub Section (1) of Section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we are not required to and have not carried out any detailed examination of such accounts and records.

ix. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and the records of the Company examined by us, the Company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess, Service Tax and other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year.

We are informed that there are no undisputed statutory dues as at the year end outstanding for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable. b) According to the books of account and records as produced and examined by us in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India , there are no dues of Income Tax, Wealth tax, Sales tax, Service tax, Customs Duty.

x. The Company has no accumulated losses as at the end of the financial year. The Company has not incurred

cash losses during the current and the immediately preceding financial year. xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted

in repayment of dues to banks & financial institution. The Company has not obtained any borrowings by way of debentures. xii. Based on our examination of documents and records of the Company and as per information & explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xi. In pur opinion the company is not a chit fund or nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society and hence clause (xiii) of the Order is not applicable to the company. xiv. In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments and hence clause (xiv) of the Order is not applicable to the company.

xv. As per information & explanations given to us the company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

xvi. In our opinion and according to information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were raised.

xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the company, we report that no funds raised on short term basis have been used for long term investment.

xviii. According to the information & explanations given to us no preferential allotment of shares has been made by the company to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301. of the Companies Act, 1956.

xix. According to the informatidn & explanations given to us, no debentures have been, issued by the company during the year.

xx. Based on our examination of books and records of the company, no public issue was made by the company during the year.

xxi. During the course of our examination of the books of accourit carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, we have not come across any instance of fraud onior by the company nor have we been informed by the management of any such instance being noticed or reported during the year-

For JAGDISH SAPRA & CO. (Firm Registration No. 001378N)

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

PUCE : NEW DELHI (CA VIPAL KALRA)

DATED: 30.05..2013 PARTNER

Membership No. 084583

---

Mar 31, 2012

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Perfectpac Limited as at 31st March, 2012, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors' Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 31 st March, 2012 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2012 from being appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956 on the said date;

(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the Notes thereon, and attached thereto give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India :

(i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2012;

(ii) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit of the Company for the year ended on that date; and

(iii) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS' REPORT (Referred to in paragraph 3 of Auditors' Report of even date)

i. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and

situation of fixed assets.

b) Verification of fixed assets is being conducted in a phased programme by the management designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of assets No material discrepancies were noticed on such

verification.

c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year are not significant and therefore do not affect the going concern status of the Company.

ii. a) As explained to us, inventories (except in transit) have been physically verified during the year by the

management In our opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of inventory and the discrepancies noticed on such verification between physical stocks and book records were not material.

iii. a) There are no companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the

Companies Act, 1956 to which the company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured, as per information & explanations given to us and Register u/s 301 produced before us.

b) Since no loans were granted to parties covered in Register u/s 301, Paras 4(iii) (b), (iii) (c) & (iii) (d) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

c) The Company has taken unsecured loan from Managing Director and 2(two) companies covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved in the transaction was Rs 4.20 Crores and balance outstanding at the year end was Rs 3.71 Crores.

d) In our opinion the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans taken by the company are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

e) The company is regular in payment of interest on the above loans but as there is no stipulation for repayment of loan we are not in a position to make specific comments for the same.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods & services. During the course of our audit we have not come across any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal controls.

v a) According to the information & explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the Register required to be maintained under that section, b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are prima facie reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time. However, for sales made as per customers' specifications comparable prices are not available.

vi. As the company has not accepted any deposits from the public, within the meaning of section 58A and 58AA of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 paragraph 4 (vi) of the Order is not applicable.

vii. In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.

viii. We have broadly reviewed the books of account relating to materials, labours and other items of cost

maintained by the company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government loi maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of Sub Section (1) of Section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of ;he opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we are not required to and have not carried out any detailed examination of such accounts and lecoids

ix. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and the records of the Company examined

by us, the Company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess, Service Tax and other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year.

We are informed that there are no undisputed statutory dues as at the year end outstanding for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable,

b) According to the books of account and records as produced and examined by us in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India , there are no dues of Income Tax, Wealth tax, Sales tax, Service tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty & Cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

x. The Company has no accumulated losses as at the end of the financial year. The Company lias not incurred cash losses during the current and the immediately preceding financial year.

xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks & financial institution. The Company has not obtained any borrowings by way of debentures.

xii. Based on our examination of documents and records of the Company and as per information & explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii. In our opinion the company is not a chit fund or nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society arid hence clause (xiii) of the Order is not applicable to the company.

xiv. In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments and hence clause (xiv) of the Order is not applicable to the company.

xv. As per information & explanations given to us the company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

xvi. In our opinion and according to information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were raised.

xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the company, we report that no funds raised on short term basis have been used for long term investment.

xviii. According to the information & explanations given to us no preferential allotment of shares has been made by the company to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act within the meaning of SEBI (Disclosure & Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000.

xix. According to the information & explanations given to us, no debentures have been issued by the company during the year.

xx. Based on our examination of books and records of the company, no public issue was made by the company during the year.

xxi. During the course of our examination of the books of account carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, we have not come across any instance of fraud on or by the company nor have we been informed by the management of any such instance being noticed or reported during the year.

For JAGDISH SAPRA & CO.

(FRN 001378N)

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

PLACE : NEW DELHI (CA : JAGDISH SAPRA)

DATED : May 30, 2012 PARTNER

Membership No. 009194

---

Mar 31, 2011

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Perfectpac Limited as at 31st March, 2011, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors' Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 31st March, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2011 from being appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956 on the said date;

(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the Notes thereon, and attached thereto give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India :

(i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2011;

(ii) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit of the Company for the year ended on that date; and

(iii) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS' REPORT (Referred to in paragraph 3 of Auditors' Report of even date)

i. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) Verification of fixed assets is being conducted in a phased programme by the management designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year are not significant and therefore do not affect the going concern status of the Company.

ii. a) As explained to us, inventories have been physically verified during the year by the management. In our opinion the frequency of verification Is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of inventory and the discrepancies noticed on such verification between physical stocks and book records were not material.

iii. a) There are no companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 to which the company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured, as per information & explanations given to us and Register u/s 301 produced before us.

b) Since no loans were granted to parties covered in Register u/s 301, Paras 4(iii) (b), (iii) (c) & (iii) (d) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

c) The Company has taken unsecured loan from Managing Director and 2(two) companies covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved in the transaction was Rs 2.14 Crores and balance outstanding at the year end was Rs 2.07 Crores.

d) In our opinion the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loans taken by the company are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

e) The company is regular in payment of interest on the above loans but as there is no stipulation for repayment of loan we are not in a position to make specific comments for the same.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods & services. During the course of our audit we have not come across any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal controls.

v. a) According to the information & explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the Register required to be maintained under that section.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are prima facie reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time. However, for sales made as per customers' specifications comparable prices are not available.

vi. As the company has not accepted any deposits from the public, within the meaning of section 58A and 58AA of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 paragraph 4 (vi) of the Order is not applicable.

vii. In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.

viii. The Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records for the products of the Company under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for the year under review.

ix. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and the records of the Company examined by us, the Company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Employees' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess, Service Tax and other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year. We are informed that there are no undisputed statutory dues as at the year end outstanding for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

b) According to the books of account and records as produced and examined by us in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India , there are no dues of Income Tax, Wealth tax, Sales tax, Service tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty & Cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

x. The Company has no accumulated losses as at the end of the financial year. The Company has not incurred cash losses during the current and the immediately preceding financial year.

xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations give to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks & financial institution. The Company has not obtained any borrowings by way of debentures.

xii. Based on our examination of documents and records of the Company and as per information & explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii. In our opinion the company is not a chit fund or nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society and hence clause (xiii) of the Order is not applicable to the company.

xiv. In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments and hence clause (xiv) of the Order is not applicable to the company.

xv. As per information & explanations given to us the company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

xvi. In our opinion and according to information and explanations given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were raised.

xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the company, we report that no funds raised on short term basis have been used for long term investment.

xviii. According to the information & explanations given to us no preferential allotment of shares has been made by the company to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act within the meaning of SEBI (Disclosure & Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000.

xix. According to the information & explanations given to us, no debentures have been issued by the company during the year.

xx. Based on our examination of books and records of the company, no public issue was made by the company during the year.

xxi. During the course of our examination of the books of account carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, we have not come across any instance of fraud on or by the company nor have we been informed by the management of any such instance being noticed or reported during the year.

For JAGDISH SAPRA & CO. (Firm Regn. No. 001378N) CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS



PLACE : NEW DELHI (CA: VJPAL KALRA) DATED :30th May, 2011 PARTNER M.NO. 084583

---

Mar 31, 2010

1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Perfectpac Limited as at 31st March, 201 Clothe Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;

(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as on 31st March, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2010 from being appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956 on the said date;

(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the Notes thereon, and attached thereto give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India ;

(i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 st March, 2010; (ii) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit of the Company for the year ended on that date; and

(iii) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT (Referred to in paragraph 3 of Auditors Report of even date)

i. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) Verification of fixed assets is being conducted in a phased programme by the management designed to cover all assets over a period of three years, which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) The assets disposed off during the year are not significant and therefore do not affect the going concern status of the Company.

ii. a) As explained to us, inventories have been physically verified during the year by the management, except for inventories lying with outside parties, which have been confirmed by them. In our opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of inventory and the discrepancies noticed on such verification between physical stocks and book records were not material.

iii. a) There are no companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 to which the company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured, as per information & explanations given to us and Register u/s 301 produced before us.

b) Since no loans were granted to parties covered in Register u/s 301, Paras 4(iii) (b), (iii) (c) & (iii) (d) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.

c) The Company has taken unsecured loan from Managing Director and five companies covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved in the transaction was Rs 4.54 Crores and balance outstanding at the year end was Rs 1.40 Crores.

d) In our opinion the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of loan taken by the company are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

e) The company is regular in payment of interest on the above loan but as there is no stipulation for repayment of loan we are not in a position to make specific comments for the same.

iv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods & services. During the course of our audit we have not come across any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal controls.

v. a) According to the information & explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the Register required to be maintained under that section.

b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the transactions made in - pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are prima facie reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time. However, for sales made as per customers specifications comparable prices are not available.

vi. As the company has not accepted any deposits from the public, within the meaning of section 58A and 58AA of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 paragraph 4 (vi) of the Order is not applicable.

vii. In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during the year by a firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the management have been commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business.

viii. The Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records for the products of the Company under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for the year under review.

ix. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and the records of the Company examined by us, the Company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues, including Provident Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess, Service Tax and other material statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year.

According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, excise duty and customs duty were in arrears, as at 31s March 2010 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

b) According to the books of account and records as produced and examined by us in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India there are no dues of Income Tax, Wealth tax, Sales tax Service tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty & Cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.

x. The Company has no accumulated losses as at the end of the financial year. The Company has not incurred cash losses during the current and the immediately preceding financial year.

xi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations give to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks. The Company has not obtained any borrowings by way of debentures.

xii. Based on our examination of documents and records of the Company and as per information & explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that the company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

xiii. In our opinion the company is not a chit fund or nidhi/mutual benefit fund/society and hence clause (xiii) of the Order is not applicable to the company.

xiv. In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments and hence clause (xiv) of the Order is not applicable to the company.

xv. As per our information & explanations given to us the company has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions.

xvi. In our opinion and according to information and explanations given to us the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were raised.

xvii. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the company, we report that no funds raised on short term basis have been used for long term investment.

xviii. According to the information & explanations given to us no preferential allotment of shares has been made by the company to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act within the meaning of SEBI (Disclosure & Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000.

xix. According to the information & explanations given to us, no debentures have been issued by the company during the year.

xx. Based on our examination of books and records of the company, no public issue was made by the company during the year. However, the company has allotted shares on Rights basis during the year.

xxi. During the course of our examination of the books of account carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practices in India, we have not come across any instance of fraud on or by the company nor have we been informed by the management of any such instance being noticed or reported during the year.

For JAGDISH SAPRA & CO.

(FRN 001378N)

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

PLACE : NEW DELHI (CA : JAGDISH SAPRA)

DATED : 31st May, 2010 PARTNER

M.NO. 09194