A Oneindia Venture

Auditor Report of Nicco Uco Alliance Credit Ltd.

Mar 31, 2025

We have audited the standalone financial statements of Nicco Uco Alliance Credit Limited ("the
Company”), which comprise the balance sheet as at March 31, 2025, the statement of Profit and
Loss and the statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements,
including a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us,
except for the effects of the matter described in the
Basis for Qualified Opinion section of our report,
the aforesaid financial statements give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting
principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at Mai ch 31st, 2025
the loss, and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Basis for Qualified Opinion

a) Note No. 27.1 regarding cancellation of certificate of registration of the company to carry
out non-banking financial activities by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide its order dated 31st
March 2005, against which the company has preferred an appeal before the Appellate
Authority for Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC), Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance,
Govt, of India, New Delhi, which, as stated, is pending. Notwithstanding this read with
negative net worth of the company, accounts have been compiled under going concern
concept.

Considering cancellation of license has been contested in appeal still pending, the accounts
of the company have been claimed to have been prepared on going concern assumption on
the basis of legal opinion obtained by company in earlier years. In the event of adverse
decision/development predicament the financial statements may require necessary
adjustments in the value of its assets and liabilities, the quantum of which is not readily
ascertainable.

b) Note No. 13(d) regarding non-confirmation of balances by Banks and Financial Institutions
(FI''s) in whose Books the account of Company has turned Non Performing Assets (NPAs).

Statutory Audit Report for the year ended 31st March, 2025 of Nicco Uco, Alliance Credit Limited

Page 1 of 1G iff

c) Note No.27.3(a) regarding non-charging of interest on dues to banks and financial
institution coming under the purview of consortium resulting in reduction of loss by
Rs.2044 crores.

d) Actuarial valuation not done in this financial year as per IND-AS-19.

In absence of adequate details necessary adjustment could not be made as per relevant
provision of 1ND-AS.

We conducted our audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under
section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013. Our responsibilities under those Standards are
further described in the
Auditor''s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of
Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with the ethical
requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements under the provisions
of the Companies Act, 2013 and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in
accordance with these requirements and the ICAl''s Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit
evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified
opinion.

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in
our audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the
context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and
we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. In addition to the matter desciibed in the
Basis for Qualified Opinion section we have determined the matters described below to be the key
audit matters to be communicated in our report.

Sr.

No.

Key Audit Matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matters

1.

Litigations and claims -provisions and
contingent liabilities

Our key procedures included the following:

As disclosed in Notes detailing contingent
liability and provision for contingencies,
the company is involved in direct, indirect
tax and other litigations (''litigations''] that
are pending with different statutory
authorities.

• Assessed the appropriates of the company
accounting policies, including those relating to
provision and contingent liability by comparing
with the applicable accounting standards
ensuring inter-alia, adherence of IRAC norms
meant for NBFC''s as promulgated by RBI.

Whether a liability is recognized or
disclosed as a contingent liability in the
financial statements Is inherently
judgmental and dependent on a number of
significant assumptions and assessments.

The amounts involved are potentially
significant and determining the amount, if
any, to he recognized or disclosed in the
Standalone financial statements, is

® Assessed the company process for
identification of the pending litigations and
completeness for financial reporting and also
for monitoring of significant developments in
relation to such pending litigations;

• Engaged subject matter specialists to gain an
understanding of the current status of
litigations and monitored changes in the
disputes, if any, through discussions with the
management and by reading external advice
received by the company, where relevant, to
establish that the provisions had been
appropriately recognized or disclosed as
required;

inherently subjective.

• Assessed the company assumptions and
estimates in respect of litigations, including the
liabilities or provisions recognized or
contingent liabilities disclosed in the Financial
statements. This involved assessing the
probability of an unfavourable outcome of a
given proceeding and the reliability of
estimates of related amounts;

• Performed substantive procedures on the
underlying calculations supporting the
provisions recorded;

• Assessed the management''s conclusions
through understanding precedents set in
similar cases; and considering the
appropriateness of the company''s description
of the disclosures related to litigations and
whether these adequately presented in the
Standalone financial statements,

2.

The company has not provided interest
on dues to Banks and financial
institutions coming within the purview
of consortium arrangement with effect
from 01.04.2015 in anticipation of a
favorable outcome of the ongoing
negotiation for one-time settlement of
such dues. The un-provided interest
amounts to Rs.2044 crores up to
31.03.2025.

We have checked the details calculation of such un¬
provided Interest

|

3.

Valuation of Investments:

Quoted Investments have been valued at
market price.

Un-quoted Investments have been valued
on the basis of Net Worth of the respective
investees.

• Necessary papers have been verified by us.

• We have checked the basis of valuation in detail.

Management’s Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements

The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters staled in section 134(5) of the
Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect to the preparation of these standalone Financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial pei foi mance, changes in
equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally
accepted in India, including the accounting Standards specified under section 133 of the Act. This
responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the
provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and
detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appiopriate accounting
policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design,
implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating
effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the
preparation and presentation of the financial statement that give a true and fair view and are free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern

and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management cither intends to liquidate the
Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

Those Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Company''s financial reporting
process.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a
whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s
report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a
guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered
material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably he expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain
professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

. identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and
obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The
risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one
resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(i] of the
Companies Act, 2013, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the
company has adequate internal financial controls system in place and the operating
effectiveness of such controls.

« Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.

• Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of
accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists

related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required
to draw attention in our auditor''s report to the related disclosuies in the financial statements
or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on
the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor''s report. However, future events or
conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including
the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions
and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

• Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the
entities or business activities within the company to express an opinion on the financial
statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and the performance of the
audit of the financial statements of such entit ies included in the financial statements.

• We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the
planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant
deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

• We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with
relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all
relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence,
and where applicable, related safeguards.

• From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those
matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current
period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s
report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in
extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in
our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to
outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2020 ("the Order") issued by the

Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(ii) of the Act, we give in the Annexure-2 a

statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the order.

2. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:

(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best
of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.

(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the
Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books but financial
statement lias not been presented as per Division-Ill, Schedule-111 of Companies Act,
2013 meant for NBFC.

(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.

(cl) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone Financial statements comply with the
Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the
Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.

(e) Considering our comment in para (c) of "basis of qualified opinion" above we are
unable to comment whether the directors of the company are disqualifiable as on
31.03.2021 within the meaning of Sec.l64(2) of Companies Act, 2013.

(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial
reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to
our separate Report in "Annexure 1”.

(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in Auditor’s Report in accordance
with the requirements of Section-197(16) of the Act, as amended, in our opinion and
to the best of our information and according to the explanation given to us the
entire remuneration of the Managing Director pertaining to the period 01.05.2017
to 30.04.2020 has not been approved by the lender''s as required under Schedule-V
ofCompanies Act, 2013.

[h] With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditors Report in
accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our
opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given

to us:

i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial
position in its financial statements - Refer Note 28.1 to the financial
statements.

/''/. The Company does not have any material foreseeable loss arising out of
derivative contract

Hi. No money is required to be transferred by the company to Investors
Education and Protection Fund.

Iv (a) Management has represented that to the best of its knowledge
and belief no funds other than those disclosed in accounts has been
advanced or loaned or invested by the Company to or in any other person
or entity including foreign entity with the understanding that the
intermediary shall directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or
entity identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of Company or
providing any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the ultimate
beneficiary.

(b) The management has represented that to the best of its knowledge and
belief no funds other than those disclosed in the notes has been
received from any person or entity including foreign entity with the
understanding that the Company shall directly or indirectly lend or
invest in other persons or entity identified in any manner whatsoever

by or on behalf of funding party or provide any guarantee, security or
the like on behalf of funding party.

(c) During application of Audit procedure as being considered reasonable

and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to our notice
that has caused us to believe that the representations under (a) and
(b) above contain any material mis-statement.

(d) No dividend declared or paid during the year by the company.

(e) Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014

The company has used an accounting software for maintaining its books of account
that does not have the feature of recording the audit trail. We are also unable to rely
on automated controls related to financial reporting in the accounting software.
Consequently, we are unable to comment on compliance of audit trail requirements
by the said software as envisaged under Rule 11(g)-

UDIN : 25051800BMIWTD1658

Place : Kolkata ForEASUCHAHCHANl&DEB

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Date : n r.no,304049E

U 8 MAY 202F

Partnef

(!,!. tto.-051t00)


Mar 31, 2014

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Nicco Uco Alliance Credit Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31,2014, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") read with General Circular 15/2013 dated 15th September, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors'' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified audit opinion.

Basis for Qualified Opinion

a) Note No. 2.21 regarding cancellation of certificate of registration of the company to carry out non-banking financial activities by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide its order dated 31stMarch 2005, against which the company has preferred an appeal before the Appellate Authority for Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC), Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi, which, as stated, is pending.

As the decision with regard to appeal against cancellation of license is pending for reasons as stated in the note above, the accounts of the company have been prepared on going concern assumption on the basis of legal opinion obtained. In the event of adverse decision/ development the financial statements may require necessary adjustments in the value of its assets and liabilities.

b) Note No. 2.3.x regarding default made by the Company in repayment of its Fixed Deposits liability as per order of Company Law Board (CLB) against which legal proceedings have been initiated by Serious Fraud Investigation Office. Please refer Clause 6(c) of annexure to the Auditors Reports.

c) Note No. 2.3.ix regarding non-confirmation of balances by Banks and Financial Institutions (FI''s) in whose Books the account of Company has turned Non Performing Assets (NPAs).

d) Non ascertainment of impairment of assets as required by Accounting Standard (AS)-28 issued by The Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006. Refer Note No. 2.24.

The impact of above paragraphs on the "Loss After Tax" and "Shareholder''s Funds" of the company is unascertainable. Qualified Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matters described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India :

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31,2014;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the loss for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of matter

Attention is invited to the following points :

(i) Note no. 2.3 and 2.5 regarding application filed by different banks forming the consortium of bankers with Debt Recovery Tribunal for and by International Finance Corporation, Washington with hon''ble Calcutta High Court for recovery of their dues.

(ii) Note no. 2.11 regarding Serious Fraud Investigation against the company on recommendation of Registrars of Companies.

(iii) Note No. 2.36 regarding writ petition pending before Hon''ble High Court at Calcutta challenging the decision of Ministry of Corporate Affairs in regard to extension of term of appointment of Mr. L. N. Kaul, Managing director.

All the above notes are self-explanatory.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of subsection (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that :

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations, subject to our observations made in the above Para which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, subject to our observations made in the above Para, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Reportare in agreement with the books of account;

d. Except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with General Circular 15/2013 dated 15th September, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013.

e. In view of default in repayment of fixed deposits and interest thereon, all the directors of the company are disqualified as on 31st March, 2014 from being appointed as directors in other public companies in terms of clause (g) of subsection (1) of section 274 of The Companies Act, 1956.

Annexure to the Auditors'' Report

The Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 of Our Report of even date to the members of Nicco Uco Alliance Credit Limited on the financial statements of the company for the year ended 31st March, 2014.

1. (a) Consequent upon the destruction of relevant records due to a fire at office premises the company is not yet been able to

update it records in regard to its fixed assets. However we have been given to understand that the necessary action is in process.

(b) No part of fixed assets has been disposed off during the year.

2. (a) There is no live agreement for lease and hire purchase stock as on date. All such assets have turned Non-performing and necessary provision has been made for the same. Physical verification for the same has not been done during the year. However as explained to us by the management, there is little scope for doing the same.

(b) Since the company has not conducted the physical verification of its inventories the question of following proper procedure does not arise.

3. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us by the management, the company has not given any loan secured or unsecured during the year to Companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 except interest free unsecured advances (net) given to its subsidiary company, the maximum amount outstanding at any time during the year and closing balance as on 31.03.2014 were Rs. 0.40 Lacs and Rs. 0.40 Lacs respectively. As explained to us the above advance is repayable on demand. Accordingly clauses 4(III) (b) to (d) of the order are not applicable.

(e) According to the information and explanations given to us by the management, the company has not taken any loan secured or unsecured during the year from Companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly clause 4(NI)(f) and (g) of the order are not applicable.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, considering the financial position, size and the nature of the business of the company, we observed certain areas which requires improvement in internal control.

5. According to the information and explanations provided by the management, there are no contracts or arrangements the particulars of which need to be entered into the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956. Accordingly, clause 4(v)(b) of the order is not applicable.

6. The Company has not accepted any deposit during the year from the public as per the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of Section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules made there under. However the balance of the deposits as on 31st of March, 2014 exceeded the ceiling limit fixed by Reserve Bank of India by Rs. 1510.08 Lacs (refer note no. 2.3.vii) excluding interest payable on that. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by National Company Law Tribunal or any court or any other Tribunal on the company except the following orders passed by Reserve Bank of India and Company Law Board :

a) Consequent upon failure of the company to repay its dues to the depositors in terms of CLB orders legal proceedings have been initiated by SFIO against the company for violation of Sec 58(a) of Companies Act, 1956. The total dues including interest as on 31.03.2014 is Rs. 1510.08 lacs.

b) The Company has submitted a scheme for reduction of share capital and issue of shares to the deposit holders in lieu of the principal held by them as on 01.04.2007. The scheme was approved by the deposit holders and shareholders and now pending before Hon''ble High Court at Calcutta for approval. Refer Note No. 2.3.v.

7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

8. As per the information and explanations given to us, the Company has given yearly maintenance job of its Wind Mills to outside agencies on contract. As explained to us, there are no other costs for which cost records are to be maintained.

9. (a) According to the records of the company, during the year the company has generally been regular in depositing with the appropriate authorities, undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employee state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and any other statutory dues whichever applicable, except for default in deposit of brought forward balances of Service Tax amounting to Rs. 1,06,306/-, Profession tax amounting to Rs. 8,020/-, Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) amounting to Rs. 24,071/-. Regarding unclaimed Fixed Deposits refer Note No. 2.7 (a) & (b) and Para No. (d) of our main audit report.

(b) According to the records of the company, the dues of sales tax, custom duty, wealth tax, income tax, excise duty, service tax and cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute and the forum where the disputes are pending are as under :

Name of the Statute Nature of Dues Amount Forum where pending

(Rs. in lacs)*

Central and States Sales Central and 27.50 W.B.Commercial Tax Laws State Sales Tax Taxes Appellate and Revisional Board

Karnataka Sales Tax Act, State Sales Tax 26.53 Karnataka High 1957 Court

Finance Act, 1994 Service Tax 29.33 Supreme Court

Total 83.36

* The above figures are as per the information made available to us.

10. The accumulated losses of the company are more than its net worth. The company has incurred cash losses during the current financial year covered by our audit and also in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. Consequent upon withdrawal of the petition filed u/s 391(1) and 391(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 interest on working capital and term loans aggregating to Rs. 37,608.26 Lacs provided for the period January, 2004 to March, 2014 remain unpaid. Working capital loan, term Loan to the tune of Rs. 12,312.86 Lacs and securitization installment payable to the extent of Rs. 992.95 Lacs also remain unpaid.

12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

13. The Company is not a chit fund or a Nidhi/ Mutual Benefit fund / Society.

14. The company has maintained records of transactions and contracts in respect of shares, securities, debentures and other investments. We also report that the company has held shares, securities, debentures and other investments in its own name.

15. The company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or Financial Institutions.

16. Based on the information and explanations given to us by the management, no term loan was obtained by the company during the year.

17. On the basis of our overall examination of the balance Sheet, the company raised no fund on short-term basis during the year. However the loss incurred by the company which is technically long term outflow of fund is observed to have been predominantly financed by erosion of short/long term resources.

18. The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares during the year to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

19. The company has not issued any Debentures during the year.

20. The Company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the year.

21. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.

For G. BASU & CO.

Chartered Accountants Firm Regn. No. 301174E

3, Chowringhee Approach G. Guha Kolkata - 700 072 Partner Dated, The 30th day of May, 2014 Membership No. 054702


Mar 31, 2013

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Nicco Uco Alliance Credit Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2013, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Row Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management''s Responsibility tor the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors''Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as weH as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified audit opinion.

Basis for QualMlsd Opinion

a) Note No. 2.21 regarding cancellation of certificate of registration of the company to carry out non-banking financial activities by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide its order dated 31stMarch 2005, against which the company has preferred an appeal before the Appellate Authority for Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC), Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Govt, of India, New Delhi, which, as stated, is pending.

As the decision with regard to appeal against cancellation of license is pending for reasons as stated in the note above, the accounts of the company have been prepared on going concern assumption on the basis of legal opinion obtained.

In the event of adverse decision/ development the financial statements may require necessary adjustments in the value of its assets and liabilities.

b) Note No. 2.3.x regarding default made by the Company in repayment ot its Fixed Deposits liability as per order of Company Law Board (CLB).

c) Note No.2.3.ix regarding non-confirmation of balances by Banks and Financial Institutions (Fl''s) in whose Books the account of Company has turned Non Performing Assets (NPAs). Non-confirmation is in respect of loan accounts, interest payable on such loan accounts. Due to such nofHionfirmation we are unable to comment on the amount of loans & interest payable on such loan accounts.

d) Note No. 2.7 (a) & (b) regarding the reasons for Non transferring of amounts in respect of ''Unclaimed Fixed Deposits (including interest accrued thereon till the maturity date)" to "Investors Education and Protection Fund", even after the expiry of more than seven years, as required by Sec 205(c) of the Companies Act 1956.

e) Non ascertainment of impairment of assets as required by Accounting Standard (AS)-28 issued by The Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006. Refer Note No. 2.24.

The impact of above paragraphs on the toss After Tax" and "Shareholder''s Funds" of the company is unascertainable.

QusHflod Opinion

In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matters described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at March 31, 2013;

(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the loss for the year ended on that date; and

(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

Emphasis of matter

i) Note No. 2.5(1), UCO bank, the leader of the consortium of bankers moved an application in the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) on 29.11.2005 to recover the outstanding dues against the company, which the company has contested. The learned DRT has passed an order on 01.12.2005 appointing two receivers for making an inventory and taking a symbolic possession of secured properties of the company but at the same time directing that till disposal of the prayer for interim relief, the company will not deal with or transfer or dispose of any of fts secured properties. However, the company shall carry on its business as usual.

(if) Note No. 2.3.iv.a to 2.3.iv.d regarding applications filed by various banks and financial institutions to DRT and DRT 1 to recover their dues.

(Hi) Note No. 2.3.iv.e regarding suit initiated by International Finance Corporation, Washington in Hon''ble High Court at Calcutta.

(iv) Note number 2.3.iv.f regarding measures taken by UCO bank u/s 13(4) of theSARFESI act against the company.

(v) Note No. 2.11(d) regarding Serious Fraud Investigation against the company on recommendation of Registrar of Companies (ROC).

(vi) As per the information and explanations given to us, the land and building held by the company in excess of its own use amounting to Rs 292.85 Lacs and investments in unquoted shares of companies (other than subsidiary and company in the same group) amounting to Rs 6.80 Lacs is In violation of Para 19 of Non-Banking Financial (Deposit accepting or holding) Companies, Prudential Norms, (Reserve Bank) directions, 2007 in regards to "Restrictions on investments in land and building and unquoted shares".

Moreover as per requirement such land and buildings or unquoted shares acquired in satisfaction of debts are to be disposed off within a period of 3 years from the date of acquisition. In absence of the information regarding acquisition of such land & building and unquoted shares in satisfaction of debts and the period of holding of such assets, we are unable to comment on the same.

However we have been given to understand that most of such assets are charged with Banks and Financial Institutions and cannot be liquidated to bring the same within limits of prudential norms as mentioned above (Refer note no. 2.35).

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub- section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. we have obtained all the information and explanations, subject to our observations made in the above Para which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, subject to our observations made In the above Para, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. Except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.

e. In view of default in repayment of fixed deposits and interest thereon, all the directors of the company are disqualified as on 31st March, 2013 from being appointed as directors in other public companies in terms of clause (g) of subsection (1) of section 274 of The Companies Act, 1956.

Annexure to the Auditors''Report

The Annexure referred to in paragraph 1 of Our Report of even date to the members of Nicco Uco Alliance Credit Limited on the financial statements of the company for the year ended 31 st March, 2013.

1. (a) The Companyhas notmaintainedproper records showingfullparticulars.includingquantitative details and situation of ils fixed Assets. Due to fire which took place in Eastern Divisional Office (EDO) in an earlier year, fixed asset register was destroyed; however the same is yet to be prepared. Refer note no. 2.33.

Further, in the absence of Fixed Asset register, the Company is unable to identify the assets lost due to fire in 2009/sold during the year. Accordingly the same has not been accounted for.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, physical verification of Fixed Assets has not been carried out during the year; hence shortage, excesses, if any, has not been ascertained. Consequently we are unable to comment on the discrepancies if any.

(c) Substantial part of Fixed Assets has not been disposed off during the year so as to affect the going concern assumption.

2. (a) There is no live agreement for lease and hire purchase stock as on date. All such assets have turned Non-performing and necessary provision has been made for the same. Physical verification for the same has not been done during the year. However as explained to us by the management, there is little scope for doing the same.

(b) Since the company has not conducted the physical verification of its inventories the question of following proper procedure does not arise.

(c) All Assets under Hire Purchase have turned Non Performing Assets in the books of the company and necessary provision has been made for the same. List of such inventories submitted to us was not complete. We are unaware of any record available with the company in this regard in the light of the fire which took place in the office as mentioned in Para 1(a) above.

3. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us by the management, the company has not given any loan secured or unsecured during the year to Companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 except interest free unsecured advances (net) given to its subsidiary company, the maximum amount outstanding at any time during the year and closing balance as on 31.03.2013 were Rs.0.40 Lacs and Rs.0.40 Lacs respectively. As explained to us the above advance is repayable on demand. Accordingly clauses 4(111) (b) to (d) of the order are not applicable.

(e) According to the information and explanations given to us by the management, the company has not taken any loan secured or unsecured during the year from Companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly clause 4(lll)(f) and (g) of the order are not applicable.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, considering the financial position, size and the nature of the business of the company, we observed weakness in the system of internal control in respect of non-furnishing of details/non reconciliation of certain accounts, repayment of fixed deposits, etc., which needs improvement. Refer Para 1, 2, 9 and 14 in this regard. Also, refer Note No. 2.5 vi(a), 2.9(a),(c) & (d).

5. According to the information and explanations provided by the management, there are no contracts or arrangements the particulars of which need to be entered into the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956. Accordingly, clause 4(v)(b) of the order is not applicable.

6. The Company has not accepted any deposit during the year from the public as per the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of Section S8A and S8AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules made there under. However the balance of the deposits as on 31st of March 2013 exceeded the ceiling limit fixed by Reserve Bank of India by Rs.943.38 Lacs (refer note no 2.3.vii) excluding interest payable on that. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by National Company Law Tribunal or any court or any other Tribunal on the company except the following orders passed by Reserve Bank of India and Company Law Board :

a) Not to accept fixed deposits w.e.f. 14.06.04 and do renewal of fixed deposits from 01.07.04 which, as stated, the company has duly complied with.

b) Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide order dated 31.03.05 has cancelled the Certificate of Registration of the company to cany on the business of a Non-banking Finance Company(NBFC) against which the company has preferred an appeal before Appellate Authority for NBFC, Joint Secretary Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, which, as stated, is pending. Refer Note No.2.21.

c) Honorable Company Law Board Eastern Region Bench has passed an order vide order dated 22nd March, 2005 against Company''s Petition No. 641 (58AA)/ERB/2004 for rescheduling the repayment of Company''s Fixed Deposit liability including interest accrued thereon u/s 45QA of the RBI Act 1934. As at 31.03.2013 there was default of Rs.943.38 Lacs in repayment of fixed deposit dues vis-a-vis the amount supposed to be paid as per Company Law Board (CLB) schedule. Refer Note No. 2.3.x & xi.

d) The Company has submitted a scheme for reduction of share capital and issue of shares to the deposit holders in lieu of the principal held by them as on 01.04.2007. The scheme was approved by the deposit holders and shareholders and now pending before Hon''ble High Court at Calcutta for approval. Refer Note No. 2.3.V.

7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

8. As per the information and explanations given to us, the Company has given yearly maintenance job of its Wind Mills to outside agencies on contract. As explained to us, there are no other costs for which cost records are to be maintained.

9. (a) According to the records of the company, during the year the company has generally been regular in depositing with the appropriate authorities, undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employee state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and any other statutory dues whichever applicable, except for default in deposit of brought forward balances of Service Tax amounting to Rs. 1,06,306/-, Profession tax amounting to Rs.8,020/-, Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) amounting to Rs.24,071/-. Regarding unclaimed Fixed Deposits refer Note No. 2.7 (a) & (b) and Para No. (d) of our main audit report.

(b) According to the records of the company, the dues of sales tax, custom duty, wealth tax, income tax, excise duty, service tax and cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute and the forum where the disputes are pending are as. under:

* The above figures are as per the information made available to us.

10. The accumulated losses of the company are more than its net worth. The company has incurred cash losses during the current financial year covered by our audit and also in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. Consequent upon Withdrawal of the petition filed u/s 391(1) and 391(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 interest on working capital and term loans aggregating to Rs. 30,969.92 Lacs provided for the period January, 2004 to March, 2013 remain unpaid. Working capital loan, term Loan to the tune of Rs. 12,194.43 Lacs and securitisation installment payable to the extent of Rs.992.95 Lacs also remain unpaid.

12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

13. The Company is not a chit fund or a Nidhi/ Mutual Benefit fund/ Society.

14. According to the information and explanations given to us, the company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, and other investments. The company has maintained records of transactions and contracts in respect of shares, securities, debentures and other investments however the same is not updated. We also report that the company has held shares, securities, debentures and other investments in its own name. During the year there has been increase/change in no. of certain shares, the value of which could not be ascertained and accounted for. Refer Note No. 2.9(a). 2.9(c) & (d).

15. The company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or Financial Institutions.

16. Based on the information and explanations given to us by the management, no term loan was obtained by the company during the year.

17. On the basis of our overall examination of the balance Sheet, the company raised no fund on short-term basis during the year. However the loss incurred by the company which is technically long term outflow of fund is observed to have been predominantly financed by erosion of short/long term resources.

18. The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares during the year to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

19. The company has not issued any Debentures during the year.

20. The Company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the year.

21. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.

FOR SINGHI & CO.

Chartered Accountants

Firm Regn. No. 302049E

1B, Old Post Office Street ML. Shukla

Kolkata - 700 001 Partner

Dated, The 28th day of May, 2013 Membership No. 051505


Mar 31, 2011

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of NICCO UCO ALLIANCE CREDIT LIMITED as at 31st March, 2011, the Profit & Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 as amended by the Companies (Auditor's Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

1. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

2. In our opinion, subject to our observations made in para 6 below proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

3. The Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

4. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 except for AS-28 relating to the "Impairment of Assets" prescribed by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, refer note no. 9 of schedule 15B and subject to our observation mentioned in para 6 below.

5. In view of default in repayment of fixed deposits and interest thereon, all the directors of the company are disqualified as on 31st March, 2011 from being appointed as directors in other public companies in terms of clause (g) of subsection (1) of section 274 of The Companies Act, 1956.

6. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts subject to,

a) (i) Note No. 10 in Schedule 15B regarding cancellation of certificate of registration of the company to carry out non-banking financial activities by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide its order dated 31st March 2005, against which the company has preferred an appeal before the Appellate Authority for Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC), Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi which is pending.

As the decision with regard to appeal against cancellation of license is pending for reasons as stated in the note above, the accounts of the company have been prepared on going concern assumption on the basis of legal opinion obtained.

In the event of adverse decision/ development the financial statements may require necessary adjustments in the value of its assets and liabilities.

(ii) Note No. 11 (a) in schedule 15B, UCO bank, the leader of the consortium of bankers moved an application in the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) on 29.11.2005 to recover the outstanding dues against the company, which the company has contested. The learned DRT has passed an order on 01.12.2005 appointing two receivers for making an inventory and taking a symbolic possession of secured properties of the company but at the same time directing that till disposal of the prayer for interim relief, the company will not deal with or transfer or dispose of any of its secured properties. However, the company shall carry on its business as usual.

(iii) Note No. 11(b) to 11 (e) regarding applications filed by various banks and financial institutions to DRT and DRT 1 to recover their dues.

(iv) Note No. 11(f) regarding suit initiated by International Finance Corporation in High Court at Calcutta.

(v) Note number 11(g) in Schedule 15 B regarding measures taken by UCO bank u/s 13(4) of the SARFESI act against the company.

b) Note No. 14 of schedule 15B regarding default made by the Company In repayment of Its Fixed Deposits liability as per order of Company Law Board (CLB).

c) Note No. 12(a) of schedule 15B regarding non-confirmation of balances by Banks and Financial Institutions (Fl's) in whose Books the account of Company has turned Non Performing Assets. (NPA) Non-confirmation is in respect of loan accounts,

Interest payable on such loan accounts.

Current account balances with consortium and other banks include an amount of Rs. 209.25 Lacs, realisability of which appears to be negligible. No provision for the same has been made In the accounts. We are therefore unable to ascertain the actual position of these accounts with such Banks. Refer Note No. 12(b) & (c) of Schedule 1SB.

d) Note No. 21 regarding Serious Fraud Investigation against the company on recommendation of Registrar of Companies (ROC).

e) Non transferring of Rs. 16.48 Lacs regarding unclaimed Fixed Deposits (including interest accrued thereon till the maturity date) to "Investors Education and Protection Fund", even after the expiry of more than seven years, as required by Sec 205(c) of the Companies Act 1956. Refer Note No. 15 (b) of Schedule 15B.

f) Non ascertainment of impairment of assets as required by AS-28.

and read with other notes and in particular note no 3(b) and 11(h) in Schedule 15(b) give the information required under the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2011;

(b) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Loss for the year ended on that date; and

(c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash Flows for the year ended on that date.

Annexure to the Auditors' Report (Referred to In Paragraph 3 of our report of even date)

1. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets in respect of its Southern Divisional Office (SDO). Due to fire taken place in Eastern Divisional Office (EDO), fixed asset register was damaged; however the same is yet to be prepared.

Further, in the absence of Fixed Asset register, the Company is unable to identify the assets lost due to fire in 2009/sold during the year. Accordingly the same has not been accounted for.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, physical verification of Fixed Assets has not been carried out during the year; hence shortage, excesses if any has not been ascertained. Consequently we are unable to comment on the discrepancies if any.

(c) Substantial part of Fixed Assets has not been disposed off during the year so as to affect the going concern.

2. (a) There is no live agreement for lease and hire purchase stock as on date. All such assets have turned Non-performing and necessary provision has been made for the same. Physical verification for the same has not been done during the year. However as explained to us, there is little scope for doing the same.

(b) Since the company has not conducted the physical verification of its inventories the question of following proper procedure does not arise.

(c) All Assets under Hire Purchase have turned Non Performing Assets in the books of the company and necessary provision has been made for the same. List of such inventories submitted to us was not complete. We are unaware of any record available with the company in this regard in the light of the fire which took place in the office as mentioned in Para 1(a) above.

3. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us by the management, the company has not given any loan secured or unsecured during the year to Companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 except unsecured advances given to its subsidiary company, the maximum amount of which outstanding at any time during the year and closing balance as on 31.03.2011 was Rs. 5.12 Lacs and Rs. 0.35 Lacs respectively. As explained to us the above advance is repayable on demand. Accordingly clause 4(lll) (b) to (d) of the order are not applicable.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us by the management, the company has not taken any loan secured or unsecured during the year from Companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly clause 4(lll)(f) and (g) of the order are not applicable.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, considering the financial position, size and the nature of the business of the company, we observed weakness in the system of internal control in respect of non-reconciliation of certain accounts, repayment of Fixed deposits, etc, which needs improvement. Refer para 1, 2, 9 and 14 in this regard.

5. According to the information and explanations provided by the management, there are no contracts or arrangements the particulars of which need to be entered into the register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act 1956. Accordingly, clause 4(vXb) of the order is not applicable.

6. The Company has not accepted any deposit during the year from the public as per the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of Section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules made thereunder. However the balance of the deposits as on 31st of March 2011 exceeded the ceiling limit fixed by Reserve Bank of India by Rs. 1982.04 Lacs (refer note no 15(a) of Schedule 15B) excluding interest payable on that. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by National Company Law tribunal or any court or any other Tribunal on the company except the following orders passed by Reserve Bank of India and Company Law Board:

a) Not to accept fixed deposits w.e.f. 14.06.04 and do renewal of fixed deposits from 01.07.04 which, as stated, the company has duly complied with.

b) Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide order dated 31.03.05 has cancelled the Certificate of Registration of the company to carry on the business of a Non-banking Finance Company (NBFC) against which the company has preferred an appeal before Appellate Authority for NBFC, Joint Secretary Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, which is pending. Refer Note No. 10 of Schedule 15B.

c) Honourable Company Law Board Eastern Region Bench has passed an order vide order dated 22nd March, 2005 against Company's Petition No. 641(58AA)/ERB/2004 for rescheduling the repayment of Company's Fixed Deposit liability including interest accrued thereon u/s 45QA of the RBI Act 1934. As at 31.03.2011 there was default of Rs. 1982.04 Lacs in repayment of fixed deposit dues vis-a-vis the amount supposed to be paid as per Company Law Board (CLB) schedule. Refer Note No. 14 (a) & (d) of Schedule 15B.

d) The Company has submitted a scheme for reduction of share capital and issue of shares to the deposit holders in lieu of the principal held by them as on 01.04.2007. The scheme was approved by the deposit holders and shareholders and now pending before Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta for approval. Refer Note No. 14(b) of Schedule 15B.

e) The Company has not complied with prescribed liquidity requirement of Reserve Bank of India.

8. The Company has given yearly maintenance job of its Wind Mills to outside agencies on contract. As explained to us, there are no other costs for which cost records are to be maintained.

9. (a) According to the records of the (company, during the year the company has generally been regular in depositing with the appropriate authorities, undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employee state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and any other statutory dues whichever applicable, except for default in deposit of Service Tax amounting to Rs. 1,06,306/-, Profession tax amounting to Rs. 8,020/-, Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) amounting to Rs. 26,311/- and unclaimed Fixed Deposits OS referred to in Para no. 6 (e) of our audit report in this regard.

(b) According to the records of the company, the dues of sales tax, custom duty, wealth tax, income tax, excise duty, service tax, and cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute and the forum where the disputes are pending are as under:

Name of the Statute Nature of Dues Amount Forum where pending (Rs. in lacs)*

Central and States Sales Central and State Sales Tax 27.50 W.B. Commercial Taxes Tax Laws Appellate and Revisional Board.

Karnataka Sales Tax Act, State Sales Tax 26.53 Karnataka High Court. 1957

Total 54.03

* The above figures are as per the information made available to us.

10. The accumulated losses of the company are more than its net worth. The company has incurred cash losses during the current financial year covered by our audit and also in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. Consequent upon withdrawal of the petition filed u/s 391(1) and 391(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 interest on working capital and term loans aggregating to Rs. 20518.53 Lacs provided for the period February, 2004 to March, 2011 remain unpaid. Working capital, term Loan to the tune of Rs. 12013.68 Lacs and securitisation installment payable to the extent of Rs. 992.95 Lacs also remain unpaid.

12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

13. The Company is not a chit fund or a Nidhi/ Mutual Benefit fund/ Society.

14. According to the information and explanations given to us, the company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, and other investments. The company has maintained records of transactions and contracts in respect of shares, securities, debentures and other investments however the same is not updated. We also report that the company has held shares, securities, debentures and other investments in its own name except in a few cases where transfer is pending in the name of the company.

15. The company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or Financial Institutions.

16. Based on the information and explanations given to us by the management, no term loan was obtained by the company during the year.

17. On the basis of our overall examination of the balance Sheet, the company raised no fund on short-term basis during the year. However the loss incurred by the company which is technically long term outflow of fund is observed to have been predominantly financed by erosion of short/long term resources.

18. The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares during the year to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

19. The company has not issued any Debentures during the year.

20. The Company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the year.

21. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.

FOR SINGHI & CO. Chartered Accountants Firm Regn. No. 302049E

L. N. Dey Partner M.No.- 3569

1B, Old Post Office Street Kolkata - 700 001

The 27th day of May, 2011


Mar 31, 2010

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of NICCO UCO ALLIANCE CREDIT LIMITED as at 31st March, 2010, and also the Profit & Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 as amended by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

1. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

2. In our opinion, subject to our observations made in para 6 below proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

3. The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

4. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 except for AS-28 relating to the "Impairment of Assets" prescribed by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, refer note no. 9 of schedule 15B and subject to our observation mentioned in para 6 below.

5. In view of default in repayment of fixed deposits and interest thereon, all the directors of the company are disqualified as on 31st March, 2010 from being appointed as directors in other public companies in terms of clause (g) subsection (1) of section 274 of The Companies Act, 1956.

6. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts subject to,

a) (i) Note No. 10 in Schedule 15B regarding cancellation of certificate of registration of the company to carry out non-banking financial activities by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide its order dated 31st March 2005, against which the company has preferred an appeal before the Appellate Authority for Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC), Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Govt, of India, New Delhi which is pending.

(ii) Note No. 11 (a) in schedule 15B, UCO bank, the leader of the consortium of bankers moved an application in the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) on 29.11.2005 to recover the outstanding dues against the company, which the company has contested. The learned DRT has passed an order on 01.12.2005 appointing two receivers for making an inventory and taking a symbolic possession of secured properties of the company but at the same time directing that till disposal of the prayer for interim relief, the company will not deal with or transfer or dispose of any of its secured properties. However, the company shall carry on its business as usual.

(iii) Note number 11(g) in Schedule 15 B regarding measures taken by UCO bank u/s 13(4) of the SARFESI act against the company.

As the decision with regard to appeal against cancellation of license is pending for reasons as stated in the note above, the accounts of the company have been prepared on going concern assumption on the basis of legal opinion obtained.

In the event of adverse decision/ development,the financial statements may require necessary adjustments in the value of its assets and liabilities.

b) Note No. 14 of schedule 15B regarding default made by the Company in repayment of its Fixed Deposits liability as per order of Company Law Board (CLB).

c) Note No. 3 (b) of schedule 1.5B regarding managing directors excess remuneration awaiting approval from Central Government for the financial year 2007-08. Further, for FY 2008-09 & 2009-10 company has received approval from Central Government tor paying Rs. 8.26 lakhs per annum; however, actual payment crossed the above limit in the above mentioned years by Rs.0.47 Lacs and Rs. 0.29 Lacs respectively.

d) Note No. 12 of schedule 15B regarding non-confirmation of balances by Banks and Financial Institutions (Fls) in whose Books the account of Company has turned Non Performing Assets (NPA). Non-confirmation is in respect of loan accounts, interest payable on such loan accounts; fixed deposit accounts & Current accounts held by the company with them. Fixed deposits and current account balances with lender Banks include an amount of Rs. 192.78 lacs, realisability of which appears to be negligible. No provision for the same has been made in the accounts. We are therefore unable to ascertain the actual position of these accounts with such Banks and Fls.

e) Note No. 19 of Schedule 15B regarding non ascertainment and accounting of losses arising out of fire on fixed assets etc. at the registered office of the company.

f) Note No. 21 regarding Serious Fraud Investigation against the company on recommendation of Registrar of Companies (ROC).

g) Non transferring of Rs. 10.57 lacs regarding unclaimed Bonds (including interest accrued thereon till the maturity date) and Rs. 3.13 lacs regarding unclaimed Fixed Deposits (including interest accrued thereon till the maturity date) to "Investors Education and Protection Fund", even after the expiry of more than seven years, as required by Sec 205(c) of the Companies Act 1956.

and read with other notes in Schedule 15 give the information required under the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India :

(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2010;

(b) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Loss for the year ended on that date; and

(c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash Flows for the year ended on that date.

Annexure to the Auditors Report (Referred to in Paragraph 3 of our report of even date)

1. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets in respect of its Southern Divisional Office (SDO). Due to fire taken place in Eastern Divisional Office (EDO), substantial part of fixed asset register was damaged; however the same is being recreated now.

(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, physical verification of Fixed Assets has not been carried out by the management/ other agencies during the year; hence we are unable to comment on the discrepancies if any.

(c) Substantial part of Fixed Assets has not been disposed off during the year so as to affect the going concern.

2. (a) There is no live agreement for lease and hire purchase stock as on date. All such assets have turned Non-performing and necessary provision has been made for the same. As such there is little scope for physical verification and accordingly the same has not been done during the year.

(b) Since the company has not conducted the physical verification of its inventories the question of following proper procedure does not arise.

(c) The company is maintaining proper records of the stocks on hire under Hire Purchase Contracts.

3. (a) According to the information and explanation given to us by the management, the company has not given any loan secured or unsecured during the year to Companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 except expenditure incurred on behalf of its subsidiary company, the maximum amount of which outstanding at any time during the year and closing balance as on 31.03.2010 was Rs. 0.06 lacs. As explained to us the above advance is repayable on demand. Accordingly clauses 4(lll)(b) to (d) of the order are not applicable.

(b) According to the information and explanation given to us by the management, the company has not taken any loan secured or unsecured during the year from Companies, firms or other parties covered in the Register maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly clauses 4(lll)(f) and (g) of the order are not applicable.

4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, there is an internal control system which is commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. During the year some weaknesses were noticed in the system as mentioned below:

(i) in respect of reconciliation of subsidiary ledger of interest payable on fixed deposits with such figure as appearing in the control ledger.

(ii) regarding repayment of fixed deposits.

However, the company is taking necessary steps to remove the weaknesses noticed in the system for repayment of fixed deposits.

5. As per the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of contracts and arrangements, which need to be entered into the register of contracts, maintained u/s 301 of the Companies Act.1956 have been so entered. As the amount of such transactions is not more than Rs. 5 lacs, Para 5(b) of the order is not applicable.

6. The Company has not accepted any deposit during the year from the public as per the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of Section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules made thereunder. However the balance of the deposits as on 31st of March 2010 exceeded the ceiling limit fixed by Reserve Bank of India by Rs. 2363.60 lakhs excluding interest payable on that. According to the information and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by National Company Law Tribunal or any court or any other Tribunal on the company except the following orders passed by RBI and Company Law Board:

a) Not to accept fixed deposits w.e.f. 14.06.04 and do renewal of fixed deposits from 01.07.04 which the company has duly complied with.

b) Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide order dated 31.03.05 has cancelled the Certificate of Registration of the company to carry on the business of a Non-banking Finance Company(NBFC) against which the company has preferred an appeal before Appellate Authority for NBFC, Joint Secretary Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, which is pending.

c) Honorable Company Law Board Eastern Region Bench has passed an order vide order dated 22nd March, 2005 against Companys Petition No. 641 (58AA)/ERB/2004 for rescheduling the repayment of Companys Fixed Deposit liability including interest accrued thereon u/s 45QA of the RBI Act 1934. As at 31.03.2010 there was default of Rs, 2015.85 lacs in repayment of fixed deposit dues vis-a-vis the amount supposed to be paid as per Company Law Board (CLB) schedule.

The Company has submitted a scheme for reduction of share capital and issue of shares to the deposit holders in lieu of the principal held by them as on 01.04.2007. The scheme was approved by the deposit holders and shareholders and now pending before Honble High Court at Calcutta for approval.

d) The Company has not complied with prescribed liquidity requirement of Reserve Bank of India.

7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

8. The Company has given yearly maintenance job of its Wind Mills to outside agencies on contract. There are no other costs for which cost records are to be maintained.

9. (a) According to the records, of the company, the company has generally been regular in depositing with the appropriate authorities, undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and protection fund, employee state insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and any other statutory dues whichever applicable, during the year except for default in deposit of Service Tax (of SDO) amounting to Rs. 1,06,306/- , Profession tax (of SDO) amounting to Rs. 5,077/- and regarding deposit of unclaimed Bonds amounting to Rs. 10,57,756/- and regarding unclaimed Fixed Deposits amounting to Rs. 3,12,628/- which were due for more than six months as on 31st March 2010. Also refer para no 6 (g) of audit report in this regard.

(b) According to the records of the company, the dues of sales tax, custom duty, wealth tax, income tax, excise duty, service tax and cess which have not been deposited on account of dispute and the forum where the disputes are pending are as under;

Nature of Contingent liability Status of case As at 31.03.2010 As at 31.03.2009 (Rs. in lacs) (Rs. in lacs)

Contingent liability w.r.t Central The disputed demand is pending 27.50 27.50 and States Sales Tax before W.B. Commercial Taxes

(A.Y. 1995-1996 to 2002-2003) Appellate and Revisional Board

Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, Matter is pending with 26.53 26.53 Karnataka High Court karnataka High Court.

Contingent Liability w.r.t. Income Disputed demand is pending - 114.01 Tax Act, 1961 (A.Y. 2000-01, before C.I.T. (Appeals) - VI 2001-02 & 2003-04)

Service Tax applic- able on Lease & Disputed demand is pending 29.33 - Hire Purchase Transactions at SDO before Supreme Court

Total 83.36 168.04

10. The accumulated losses of the company are more than its net worth. The company has incurred cash losses during the current financial year covered by our audit and also in the immediately preceding financial year.

11. Consequent upon withdrawal of the petition filed u/s 391(1) and 391(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 interest on working capital and term loans aggregating to Rs. 16,289.22 lakhs provided for the period February, 2004 to March, 2010 remain unpaid. Term Loan to the tune of Rs. 1,348.97 lakhs and securitisation instalment payable to the extent of Rs. 992.95 lakhs also remain unpaid.

12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

13. The Company is not a chit fund or a Nidhi/Mutual Benefit fund/ Society.

14. According to the information and explanations given to us, the company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities and other investments. The company has maintained proper records of transactions and contracts in respect of shares, securities, debentures and other investments and timely entries have been made therein. We also report that the company has held shares, securities, debentures and other investments in its own name except in a few cases where transfer is pending in the name of the company.

15. The company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by other companies from banks or Financial Institutions.

16. Based on the information and explanations given to us by the management, no term loan was obtained by the company during the year.

17. On the basis of our overall examination of the balance Sheet, the company raised no fund on short-term basis during the year. However the loss incurred by the company which is technically long term outflow of fund is observed to have been predominantly financed by erosion of short/long term resources.

18. The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares during the year to parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

19. The company has not issued any Debentures during the year.

20. The Company has not raised any money by way of public issue during the year.

21. We have been informed by the management regarding the fraud perpetrated on the company by a few employees of the company in the F.Y 2008-09 and there after which has been stated in Note No. 20 in Schedule 15B. As investigation is in progress so exact amount can be quantified only on completion of investigation.



FOR SINGHI & CO.

Chartered Accountants

Firm Regn. No. 302049E

L. N. Dey

M.No.- 3569

Partner

1B, Old Post Office Street

Kolkata - 700 001

The 31st day of May, 2010

Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article

Notifications
Settings
Clear Notifications
Notifications
Use the toggle to switch on notifications
  • Block for 8 hours
  • Block for 12 hours
  • Block for 24 hours
  • Don't block
Gender
Select your Gender
  • Male
  • Female
  • Others
Age
Select your Age Range
  • Under 18
  • 18 to 25
  • 26 to 35
  • 36 to 45
  • 45 to 55
  • 55+