Mar 31, 2015
We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of
SUJANA UNIVERSAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED ("the Company"), which comprise the
Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2015, the Statement of Profit and Loss,
the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on 31st March, 2015, and a
summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory
information, in which are incorporated the audited returns of the
branches for the year ended on that date located at Chennai and Mumbai.
Management's Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements
The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated
in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the Act") with respect
to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a
true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and
cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards
specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the
Companies(Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes
maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the
provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and
for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection
and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments
and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design,
implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls,
that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and
completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and
presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view
and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone
financial statements based on our audit. We have taken into account
the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and
matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the
provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing
specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require
that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The
procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant
to the Company's preparation of the financial statements that give a
true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness
of the accounting estimates made by the Company's Directors, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone
financial statements.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements
give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and
give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as
at 31st March, 2015, and its loss and its cash flows for the year ended
on that date.
Emphasis of Matters
We draw attention to the following matters in the Notes to the
financial statements:
a) Note 2.14 and 2.16 forming part of the financial statements
regarding the Trade Receivables to the extent of Rs. 22,990.19 and
3,097.90 lakhs of advances are long overdue and the company considers
them as good and recoverable and estimates that provision for doubtful
debts is not necessary.
b) Note 2.36 to the financial statements which describes the
uncertainty related to the outcome of the lawsuit filed against the
Company by the Mauritius Commercial Bank which has financed to one of
its subsidiary - Hestia Holdings Ltd for which SUIL has given a
Corporate Guarantee.
c) Note 2.36 to the financial statements which describes the
uncertainty related to the outcome of the Bank Debt recalled by the
Standard Bank and Afrasia Bank which has financed to one of its
Sub-subsidiary - Selene Holdings Ltd for which SUIL has given a
Corporate Guarantee.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of these matters.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations
which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the
purposes of our audit.
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of
those books and proper returns adequate for the purposes of our audit
have been received from the branches not visited by us.
(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the
books of account and with the returns received from the branches not
visited by us.
(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements
comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the
Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.
(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors as on 31st March, 2015 taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2015
from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the
Act.
(f) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor's
Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors)
Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company does not have any pending litigations which would
impact its financial position.
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including
derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable
losses.
iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be
transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the
Company.
Annexure to the Auditors' Report
The Annexure referred to in our report to the members of Sujana
Universal Industries Limited for the year ended 31-03-2015. We report
that:
S Particulars
No.
(i) (a) Whether the company is maintaining proper
records showing full particulars, including
quantitative details and situation of fixed assets;
(b) Whether these fixed assets have been physically
verified by the management at reasonable
intervals; whether any material discrepancies were
noticed on such verification and if so, whether the
same have been properly dealt with in the books
of account;
(ii) (a) Whether physical verification of inventory has
been conducted at reasonable intervals by the
management;
(b) Are the procedures of physical verification
of inventory followed by the management
reasonable and adequate in relation to the size
of the company and the nature of its business. If
not, the inadequacies in such procedures should
be reported;
(c) Whether the company is maintaining proper
records of inventory and whether any material
discrepancies were noticed on physical verification
and if so, whether the same have been properly
dealt with in the books of account;
(iii) Whether the company has granted any loans, secured
or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties
covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of
the Companies Act. If so,
(a) whether receipt of the principal amount and
interest are also regular; and
(b) if overdue amount is more than rupees one lakh,
whether reasonable steps have been taken by the
company for recovery of the principal and interest;
(iv) Is there an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business,
for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale
of goods and services. Whether there is a continuing failure to
correct major weaknesses in internal control system.
(v) In case the company has accepted deposits, whether the
directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the
provisions of Sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions
of the Companies Act and the rules framed there under, where
applicable, have been complied with? If not, the nature of
contraventions should be stated; If an order has been passed
by Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal
or Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal,
whether the same has been complied with or not?
(vi) Where maintenance of cost records has been specified by the
Central Government under sub-section (1) of Section 148 of
the Companies Act, whether such accounts and records have
been made and maintained;
(vii) (a) Is the company regular in depositing undisputed
statutory dues including provident fund, employees'
state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax,
service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value
added tax, cess and any other statutory dues with the
appropriate authorities and if not, the extent of the
arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last day
of the financial year concerned for a period of more
than six months from the date they became payable,
shall be indicated by the auditor.
(b) In case dues of income tax or sales tax or wealth tax
or service tax or duty of customs or duty of excise or
value added tax or cess have not been deposited on
account of any dispute, then the amounts involved and
the forum where dispute is pending shall be mentioned.
(A mere representation to the concerned Department
shall not constitute a dispute).
(c) Whether the amount required to be transferred
to in accordance with the relevant provisions of
the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules
made there under has been transferred to such
fund within time.
(viii) Whether in case of a company which has been registered
for a period not less than five years, its accumulated
losses at the end of the financial year are not less than
fifty per cent of its net worth and whether it has incurred
cash losses in such financial year and in the immediately
preceding financial year;
(ix) Whether the company has defaulted in repayment of
dues to a financial institution or bank or debenture
holders? If yes, the period and amount of default to be
reported;
(x) Whether the company has given any guarantee for
loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions,
the terms and conditions whereof are prejudicial to the
interest of the company;
(xi) Whether term loans were applied for the purpose for
which the loans were obtained;
(xii) Whether any fraud on or by the company has been noticed or
reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount
involved is
to be indicated.
S Auditors Remark
No.
(i) The Company is maintaining proper
records showing full particulars, including
quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
Yes, the fixed assets have been physically
verified by the management at reasonable
intervals. There was no material
discrepancies noticed during such physical
verification as per the management
(ii) Yes, the physical verification of inventories
has been conducted by the management
at reasonable intervals
Yes, the procedure of physical verification
followed by the management is reasonable
and adequate in relation to the size of the
company and the nature of its business.
Yes, the Company is maintaining proper
records of inventory and that no material
discrepancy was noticed on physical
verification.
(iii) According to the information and
explanations given to us, the Company
has not granted any loans, secured or
unsecured to the Companies, firms or other
parties listed in the register maintained
under Section 189 of the Companies Act,
2013.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
(iv) Yes, the Company has adequate internal control
system commensurate with the size of the
company and nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for
the sale of goods and services. We have not
observed any continuing failure or weaknesses
in the internal control system.
(v) The Company has not accepted any deposits
during the reporting period.
(vi) The Company maintains the cost records
pursuant to the Companies (Cost Accounting
Records) Rules, 2011 prescribed by the Central
Government under Section 148 (1) of the
Companies Act, 2013
(vii) Yes, the Company is regular in depositing the
undisputed statutory dues including provident
fund, employees state insurance, income tax,
sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of
customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess
and other statutory dues as on the last day of
the financial year for a period of more than six
months from the date it became payable except
the dividend distribution tax of Rs. 3.95 lakhs
for each financial year 2011-12, 2012-13 and
2013-14 and income tax for the financial year
2010-11 of Rs. 78.97 lakhs.
Yes, the disputed statutory dues that have not
been deposited on account of matters pending
before appropriate authorities are as follows:
Natureof financial Rs. In
Dues Year Lakhs Pending Before
Income tax 2005-06 542.35 ITAT
200940 596 29 itat
2010-11 1509.81 CIT-Appeals
TNGST Act, 2000-01 338.40 Special Committee,
1959 Sales Tax,
Tamilanadu
2001- 02 & 1697,05 Hon'ble High Court
of Tamilanadu
2002- 03
Customs & 1995-96 263.74 CESTAT, Chennai
Central Excise 2000-01 316.61 CESTAT, Bangalore
and Chennai
2007- 08 & 104.24 CESTAT, Bangalore
2008- 09
2008-09 37,15 Add. Commissioner
of CUS & CE,
Hyderabad.
(c) No amount required for transferring to
investor education and protection fund.
(viii) The Company does not have accumulated
losses at the end of the financial year. The
company has not incurred cash losses in
the current financial year and so also in the
financial year immediately preceding such
financial year.
(ix) The Company has not paid installments of
Rs. 715.20 Lakhs to IDBI Bank Ltd as at
the balance sheet date.
(x) The Company has given corporate
guarantees to Banks for the loans
extended to its subsidiary Companies
during the reporting period a) Hestia
Holdings Ltd and b) Selene Holdings Ltd,
where in the case of default in the former
the bank has moved legally against the
Holding Company and in the case of later
Sub-subsidiary the Bank has recalled the
loan.
(xi) The Company has applied the Term Loans
for the purpose for which the loans were
obtained.
(xii) No
For T Raghavendra & Associates
Chartered Accountants
FRN: 003329S
T. Raghavendra
Proprietor
(Membership No.023806)
Place: Hyderabad
Date: 27.05.2015
Mar 31, 2014
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Sujana
Universal Industries Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the
Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2014, and the Statement of Profit and
Loss, and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with
the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211
of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") read with the General Circular
15/2013 dated September 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in
respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. This responsibility
includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control
relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial
statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material
misstatement, whether due to froud or error.
Auditors'' Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
The audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the Auditor
considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity''s
internal control. The audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information
required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2014;
ii) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the loss for
the year ended on that date; and
iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the
Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by Section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and
Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in
sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956; read with
the General Circular 15/2013 dated september 2013 of the Ministry of
Corporated Affairs in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013
and
e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on March 31, 2014, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2014, from being
appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
f) Since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to
the rate at which the cess is to be paid under Section 441A of the
Companies Act, 1956 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section,
prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due
and payable by the Company.
Annexure referred to in our report of even date on the accounts for the
year ended 31st March 2014
1. a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of the fixed
assets.
b. The assets are physically verified, in phases, by the Management
during the year as per the regular programme of verification, which in
our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and
the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies have been noticed
on such verification. In respect of certain class of assets,
verification of which is in progress, discrepancies if any noticed,
will be dealt with appropriately later.
c. The assets disposed off during the period are not substantial and
therefore do not affect the going concern status of the company.
2. a. The stock of raw materials, stores, spare parts and finished
goods other than in transit have
been physically verified during the year by the Management. In our
opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the company and the nature of its business.
c. In our opinion the company has maintained proper records of
inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the
physical stocks and the book records were not material and have been
properly dealt with in the books of account.
3. a. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not taken any loans
from the companies, firms or other parties listed in the register
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans to the Companies, firms or other
parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
c. The Company has not given any loans or advances in the nature of
loans.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business, with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for
the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no
major weakness has been noticed in the internal control system.
5. a. Based on the audit procedures applied by us and according to the
information and explanations provided by the management, we are of the
opinion that the contracts or arrangements that need to be entered in
the register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 have been properly entered in the said register.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions entered in the register maintained under
Section 301 and exceeding during the period by Rupees five lakhs in
respect of each party have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
6. The company has not accepted any deposits from the public within the
meaning of Sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the
Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules,
1975 framed there under.
7. The company has an internal audit system, which in our opinion, is
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company persuant to the Rules 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for
maintainance of Cost Records and are of the opinion that, prima facie,
the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained.
9. a. According to the information and explanations given to us and on
perusal of the records of the company made available to us, the Company
is generally regular in depositing with appropriated authorities the
undisputed statutarty dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance, customs duty , excise duty, and other material statutaory
dues as applicable with the asppropriate authorities. According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable
in respect of the aforesaid dues were outstanding as at 31st March,
2014 for a period of more than six months from the date of becoming
payable except FBT dues of Rs.9.47 lakhs, Rs. 10.22 lakhs for the years
2008-09, 2007-08 respectively and Dividend Distribution Tax of Rs 3.95
lakhs each for the Financial years 2011-12 and 2012-13, respectively,
and Income Tax for the year 2010-11 amounting to Rs. 78.97 lakhs.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the company examined by us, the disputed statutory dues that
have not been deposited on account of matters pending before
appropriate authorities are as follows:
Amount Period to
Name of the Statute Rs. in which the
Lakhs amount due
TNGST Act, 1959 338.40 2000-01
1,182.28 2001-02
514.77 2002-03
2,344.55 2004-05
4,629.36 2005-06
2,006.86 2006-07
TNVAT Act, 2006 393.79 2008-09
1,109.53 2009-10
2,847.91 2010-11
18,616.51 2011-12
21,877.04 2012-13
14,203.41 2013-14
Income Tax Act, 1961 542.35 2005-06
297.10 2008-09
1,136.31 2009-10
1,509.81 2010-11
Workman Compensation 1.77
Customs & Central 316.61 2000-01
Excise 263.74 1995-96
104.24 2007-08 & 2008-09
37.15 2008-09
Name of the Statute Forum where dispute is pending
TNGST Act, 1959 Special Committee, Sales Tax, Tamilnadu
Hon''ble High Court of Tamilnadu
Hon''ble High Court of Tamilnadu
Hon''ble High Court of Tamilnadu
Hon''ble High Court of Tamilnadu
Hon''ble High Court of Tamilnadu
TNVAT Act, 2006 Hon''ble High Court of Tamilnadu
Hon''ble High Court of Tamilnadu
Hon''ble High Court of Tamilnadu
Hon''ble High Court of Tamilnadu
Hon''ble High Court of Tamilnadu
Got set aside the order 15.04.2014 and fresh
notice is to be issued on the same issue
Income Tax Act, 1961 The matter is pending with ITAT
Workman Compensation The Tribunal remanded back the matter to the
Assessing officer for fresh assessment.
The matter is pending with ITAT
The matter is pending with CIT Appeals
Interim Stay Granted by Hon''ble High Court
as against the Orders passed
by the Hon''ble Labour Commissioner.
Customs & Central CESTAT Bangalore and Chennai
Excise Commissioner (Appeals), Chennai & CESTAT
CESTAT, Bangalore
Add. Commissioner CUS & CE, Hyderabad-I
10. The Company does not have accumulated losses as at 31st March 2014
and it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on
that or in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the company examined by us, the company has defaulted in
repayment of dues to Financial Institution with respect to the Term
Loans and the interest overdue and LC''s devolved were converted into
FITL (Rs. 1089.98 lakhs) and WCTL (Rs. 1763.30 lakhs) inclusive of
current year figure respectively by the Term Lending Institution with
orginal loan (Rs.3605.02 Lakhs) being rescheduled. The company has
defaulted in the payment of LC acceptances with Bank of India, Central
Bank of India and UCO Bank to the tune of Rs. 944.99 laksh, Rs 4719.37
lakhs and Rs. 5837.45 lakhs respectively.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The provisions of any special statute applicable to chit
fund/mutual benefit fund / societies are not applicable to the Company.
14. As the Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments, paragraph 4(xiv) of the Companies
(Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 is not applicable to the Company for the
year.
15. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the terms and conditions on which the company has given
guarantee for loan taken by other company from bank are not prejudicial
to the interest of the Company.
16. The Company has not raised any new term loans during the year. The
term loans outstanding at the beginning of the year have been applied
for the purposes for which they were raised.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and an
overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that
no funds raised on a short-term basis which have been used for
long-term investment, and vice versa.
18. The Company has not issued any debentures during the year and
therefore paragraph 4(xix) of the Order is not applicable.
19. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us and as far as we could ascertain no personal expenses have
been charged to the revenue account.
20. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not covered within the definition of Sick
Industrial Company as contained in Section 3(I) (O) of the Sick
Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us there
were no damaged goods in the case of goods purchased for re-sale;
22. During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instance of
fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have we been informed of such case by the management.
For T Raghavendra & Associates
Chartered Accountants
FRN: 003329S
T Raghavendra
Mem. No. 023806
Place: Hyderabad
Date: 30th May 2014
Mar 31, 2013
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Sujana
Universal Industries Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the
Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2013, and the Statement of Profit and
Loss, and Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with
the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211
of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes
the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant
to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that
give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors'' Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
The audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we considers
internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair
presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. The audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and
the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information
required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2013;
ii) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for
the year ended on that date; and
iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the
Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b) In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and
Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred to in
sub- section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on March 31, 2013, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2013, from being
appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
f) Since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to
the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the
Companies Act, 1956 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section,
prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due
and payable by the Company.
Annexure referred to in our report of even date on the accounts for the
year ended 31st March 2013
1. a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of the fixed
assets.
b. The assets are physically verified, in phases, by the Management
during the year as per the regular programme of verification, which in
our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and
the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies have been noticed
on such verification. In respect of certain class of assets,
verification of which is in progress, discrepancies if any noticed,
will be dealt with appropriately later.
c. The assets disposed off during the period are not substantial and
therefore do not affect the going concern status of the company.
2. a. The stock of raw materials, stores, spare parts and finished
goods other than in transit have been physically verified during the
year by the Management. In our opinion the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the company and the nature of its business.
c. In our opinion the company has maintained proper records of
inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the
physical stocks and the book records were not material and have been
properly dealt with in the books of account.
3. a. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not taken any loans from the companies, firms or other
parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
companies Act, 1956.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans to the Companies, firms or other
parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
c. The Company has not given any loans or advances in the nature of
loans.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business, with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for
the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no
major weakness has been noticed in the internal control system.
5. a. Based on the audit procedures applied by us and according to the
information and explanations provided by the management, we are of the
opinion that the contracts or arrangements that need to be entered in
the register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 have been properly entered in the said register.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions entered in the register maintained under
Section 301 and exceeding during the period by Rupees five lakhs in
respect of each party have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
6. The company has not accepted any deposits from the public within
the meaning of Sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of
the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits)
Rules, 1975 framed there under.
7. The company has an internal audit system, which in our opinion, is
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
8. The company has appointed a Cost Auditor to review of the books of
account maintained by the Company persuant to the Rules 209(1)(d) of
the Companies Act, 1956 for maintainance of Cost Records and we have
taken cognigence of the Cost Auditor''s Report.
9. a. According to the information and explanations given to us and
the records of the company examined by us, the company is generally
regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory
dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance, customs
duty, excise duty, and other material statutory dues as applicable with
the appropriate authorities. According to the information and
explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of
the aforesaid dues were outstanding as at 31st March, 2013 for a period
of more than six months from the date of becoming payable except FBT
dues of Rs.9.47 lakhs, Rs.10.22 lakhs and Rs.9.65 lakhs for the years
ended 2008-09, 2007-08 and 2006-07 respectively and Dividend
Distribution Tax of Rs.3.95 lakhs for the financial year 2011-12 and
Income Tax for the year 2010-11 amounting to Rs.78.97 lakhs.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the company examined by us, the disputed statutory dues that
have not been deposited on account of matters pending before
appropriate authorities are as follows:
Rs. in lakhs
Sales Tax 2,429.93 2007-08 High Court disposed off
favourable and remanded the matter
to the Assessing Authorities for
fresh assessment.
Income Tax 542.35 For F.Y.2005-06 and the matter is
pending with CIT Appeals
247.10 For F.Y. 2008-09 and the matter is
pending with CIT Appeals
1,236.30 For F.Y.2009-10 and the matter is
pending with CIT Appeals
Customs &
Central Excise 769.50 Company has preferred an appeal in the
CESTAT
Workman
Compensation 1.77 Interim Stay Granted by Hon''ble High
Court - as against the Orders passed
by the Hon''ble Labour Commissioner.
10. The Company does not have accumulated losses as at 31st March 2013
and it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on
that or in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the company examined by us, the company has defaulted in
repayment of dues to Financial Institution with respect to the Term
Loans and the interest overdue and LC''s devolved were converted into
FITL (Rs. 650.45 lakhs) and WCTL (Rs. 1763.30 lakhs) respectively by
the Term Lending Institution with original loan (Rs. 3605.02 lakhs)
being rescheduled. The Company has also defaulted in the payment of LC
acceptances with Central Bank of India to the tune of Rs. 8939.38
lakhs.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The provisions of any special statute applicable to chit
fund/mutual benefit fund / societies are not applicable to the company.
14. As the company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments, paragraph (xiv) of the Companies
(Auditors Report) Order, 2003 is not applicable to the company for the
year.
15. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the terms and conditions on which the company has given
guarantee for loan taken by other company from bank are not prejudicial
to the interest of the company.
16. The company has not raised any new term loans during the year. The
term loans outstanding at the beginning of the year have been applied
for the purposes for which they were raised.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and an
overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report that
no funds raised on a short-term basis which have been used for
long-term investment, and vice versa.
18. The Company has not issued any debentures during the year and
therefore paragraph 4(xix) of the Order is not applicable.
19. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us and as far as we could ascertain no personal expenses have
been charged to the revenue account.
20. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not covered within the definition of Sick
Industrial Company as contained in Section 3(I) (O) of the Sick
Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us there
were no damaged goods in the case of goods purchased for re-sale;
22. During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instance of
fraud on or by the company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have we been informed of such case by the management.
For T Raghavendra & Associates
Chartered Accountants
FRN: 003329S
T Raghavendra
Mem. No.023806
Place: Hyderabad
Date: 28th May 2013
Mar 31, 2012
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/s. SUJANA UNIVERSAL
INDUSTRIES LIMITED as at 31st March, 2012, the Statement of Profit and
Loss for the year ended on that date and the Cash Flow Statement of the
Company for the year ended on that date, annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
1. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
2. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 and
emended by the Companies (Auditor's Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
issued by the Central Government in terms of Sub-Section (4A) of
Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
3. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above and the
notes on accounts, we report that:
a. We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company, so far as it appears from our examination of
those books;
c. The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash
Flow statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the
books of account;
d. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss
and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in Sub-Section (3C) of Section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors
of the Company, as on 31st March, 2012 and taken on record by the Board
of Directors, we report that none of the directors are disqualified
from being appointed as a director of the Company in terms clause (g)
of Sub-Section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956 on the
said date;
f. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanation given to us, the said accounts, read together with the
notes thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956,
in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity
with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
i. In so far as it relates to the Balance Sheet, of the state of
affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2012.
ii. In so far as it relates to the Statement of Profit and Loss, of
the Profit of the Company for the year ended 31st March, 2012 and
iii. In so far as it relates to Cash Flow statement, of the Cash Flows
for the year ended on that date.
Annexure referred to in our report of even date on the accounts for the
year ended 31st March, 2012
1. a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of the fixed
assets.
b. The assets are physically verified, in phases, by the Management
during the year as per the regular programme of verification, which in
our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and
the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies have been noticed
on such verification. In respect of certain class of assets,
verification of which is in progress, discrepancies if any noticed,
will be dealt with appropriately later.
c. The assets disposed off during the year are not substantial and
therefore do not affect the going concern status of the Company.
2. a. The stock of raw materials, stores, spare parts and finished
goods other than in transit have been physically verified during the
year by the Management. In our opinion the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
c. In our opinion the Company has maintained proper records of
inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the
physical stocks and the book records were not material and have been
properly dealt with in the books of account.
3. a. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not taken any loans from the companies, firms or other
parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans to the companies, firms or other
parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
c. The Company has not given any loans or advances in the nature of
loans.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business, with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for
the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no
major weakness has been noticed in the internal control system.
5. a. Based on the audit procedures applied by us and according to
the information and explanations provided by the management, we are of
the opinion that the contracts or arrangements that need to the be
entered in the register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956 have been properly entered in the said register.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions entered in the register maintained under
Section 301 and exceeding during the period by Rupees five lakhs in
respect of each party have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
6. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public within
the meaning of Sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of
the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits)
Rules, 1975 framed there under.
7. The Company has an internal audit system, which in our opinion, is
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the Rules 209(1)(d) of Companies Act, 1956 for
maintenance of cost records and are of the opinion that, prima facie,
the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained.
9. a. According to the information and explanations give to us and
the records of the Company examined by us, the Company is generally
regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory
dues including provident fund, employees' state insurance, Customs
Duty, Excise Duty, and other material statutory dues as applicable with
the appropriate authorities. According to the information and
explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of
the aforesaid dues were outstanding as at 31st March, 2012 for a period
of more than six months from the date of becoming payable except FBT
dues of Rs. 9.47 lakhs, Rs. 10.22 lakhs and Rs. 9.64 lakhs for the
years ended 2008-09, 2007-08 and 2006-07 respectively.
b. According to the information and explanations give to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, the disputed statutory dues that
have not been deposited on account of matters pending before
appropriate authorities are as follows :
Rs. in lakhs
Sales Tax 929.01 2003-04 Pending for disposal before the
Appellate Deputy Commissioner.
944.94 2005-06 High Court Disposed off favourable
and remanded the matter to the Assessing
Authorities for fresh assessment.
1,660.28 2006-07 High Court Disposed off favourable
and remanded the matter to the Assessing
Authorities for fresh assessment.
2,429.92 2007-08 High Court Disposed off favourable
and remanded the matter to the Assessing
Authorities for fresh assessment.
Total 5,964.15
Income Tax 756.29 For F.Y. 2008-09 and the matter is pending
with CIT Appeals.
Customs & 839.02 Company has preferred an appeal in the
Central CESTAT.
Excise
Workman 1.77 Interim stay granted by Hon'ble High Court
Compensation as against the orders passed by the
Hon'ble Labour Commissioner.
10. The Company does not have accumulated losses as at 31st March 2012
and it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on
that or in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, the Company has not defaulted in
repayment of dues to financial institution and banks as per the One
Time Settlement proposal with the financial institutions and/or banks.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The provisions of any special statute applicable to chit
fund/mutual benefit fund/societies are not applicable to the Company.
14. As the Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments paragraph (xiv) of the Companies
(Auditors Report) Order. 2003 is not applicable to the Company for the
year.
15. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given
guarantee for loan taken by other Company from bank are not prejudicial
to the interest of the Company.
16. The Company has not raised any new term loans during the year. The
term loans outstanding at the beginning of the year have been applied
for the purposes for which they were raised.
17. According to the information and explanations give to us and an
overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that
no funds raised on a short-term basis which have been used for
long-term investment, and vice versa.
18. The Company has not issued any debentures during the year and
therefore paragraph 4(xix) of the order is not applicable.
19. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us and as far as we could ascertain no personal expenses have
been charged to the revenue account.
20. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not covered within the definition of Sick
Industrial Company as contained in Section 3(I) (O) of the Sick
Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us there
were no damaged goods in the case of goods purchased for re-sale.
22. During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instance of
fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have we been informed of such case by the management.
For T. Raghavendra & Associates
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
T. RAGHAVENDRA
Mem. No. 023806
FRN : 003329S
Place: Hyderabad
Dated: 28.05.2012
Mar 31, 2011
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/s. SUJANA UNIVERSAL
INDUSTRIES LIMITED as at 31st March, 2011, the Profit and Loss Account
for the period 01-10-2009 to 31-03-2011 annexed thereto and the Cash
Flow Statement of the Company for the period ended on that date,
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
1. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
2. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 and
emended by the Companies (Auditor's Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
issued by the Central Government in terms of Sub-Section (4A) of
Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
3. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above and the
notes on accounts we report that:
a. We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company, so far as it appears from our examination of
those books;
c. The Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in Sub-Section (3C) of Section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors
of the Company, as on 31st March, 2011 and taken on record by the Board
of Directors, we report that none of the directors are disqualified
from being appointed as a director of the Company in terms clause (g)
of Sub-Section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956 on the
said date;
f. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanation given to us, the said accounts, read together with the
notes thereon give the informaiton required by the Companies Act, 1956,
in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in confirmity
with the accounting priciples generally accepted in India.
i. In so far as it relates to the Balance Sheet, of the state of
affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2011.
ii. In so far as it relates to the Profit and Loss Account, of the
Profit of the Company for the period ended 31st March, 2011 and
iii. In so far as it relates to Cash Flow statement, of the Cash flows
for the period ended on that date.
Annexure referred to in our report of even date on the accounts for the
period ended 31st March, 2011
1. a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of the fixed
assets.
b. The assets are physically verified, in phases, by the Management
during the year as per the regular programme of verification, which in
our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and
the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies have been noticed
on such verification. In respect of certain class of assets,
verification of which is in progress, discrepancies if any noticed,
will be dealt with approximately later.
c. The assets disposed off during the period are not substantial and
therefore do not affect the going concern status of the Company.
2. a. The stock of raw materials, stores, spare parts and finished
goods other than in transit have been physically verified during the
year by the Management. In our opinion the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
c. In our opinion the Company has maintained proper records of
inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the
physical stocks and the book records were not material and have been
properly dealt with in the books of account.
3. a. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not taken any loans from the companies, firms or other
parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans to the companies, firms or other
parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
c. The Company has not given any loans or advances in the nature of
loans.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business, with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for
the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no
major weakness has been noticed in the internal control system.
5. a. Based on the audit procedures applied by us and according to
the information and explanations provided by the management, we are of
the opinion that the contracts or arrangements that need to the be
entered in the register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956 have been properly entered in the said register.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions entered in the register maintained under
Section 301 and exceeding during the period by Rupees five lakhs in
respect of each party have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
6. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public within
the meaning of Sections 58A. 58AA or any other relevant provisions of
the Companies Act. 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits)
Rules, 1975 framed there under.
7. The Company has an internal audit system, which in our opinion is
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the Rules 209(1)(d) of Companies Act. 1956 for
maintenance of cost records and are of the opinion that, prima facie,
the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained.
9. a. According to the information and explanations give to us and
the records of the Company examined by us, the Company is generally
regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory
dues including provident fund, employees' state insurance, Customs
Duty, Excise Duty, and other material statutory dues as applicable with
the appropriate authorities. According to the information and
explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of
the aforesaid dues were outstanding as at 31st March, 2011 for a period
of more than six months from the date of becoming payable.
b. According to the information and explanations give to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, the disputed statutory dues that
have not been deposited on account of matters pending before
appropriate authorities are as follows :
Rs. in lakhs
Sales Tax 929.01 2003-04 Pending for disposal before
the Appellate Deputy Commissioner.
944.94 2005-06 High Court Disposed off
favourable and remanded the
matter to the Assessing Authorities
for fresh assessment.
1,660.28 2006-07 High Court Disposed off favourable
and remanded the matter to the Assessing
Authorities for fresh assessment.
2,429.92 2007-08 High Court Disposed off favourable
and remanded the matter to the Assessing
Authorities for fresh assessment.
Total 5,864.15
Customs & 839.02 Company has preferred an appeal in the
Central Excise CESTAT.
10. The Company does not have accumulated losses as at 31st March 2011
and it has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year ended on
that or in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, the Company has not defaulted in
repayment of dues to financial institution and banks as per the One
Time Settlement proposal with the financial institutions and / or
banks.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund /
mutual benefit fund / societies are not applicable to the Company.
14. As the Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments paragraph (xiv) of the Companies
(Auditors Report) Order. 2003 is not applicable to the Company for the
year.
15. In my opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given
guarantee for loan taken by other Company from bank are not prejudicial
to the interest of the Company.
16. The Company has not raised any new term loans during the year. The
term loans outstanding at the beginning of the year have been applied
for the purposes for which they were raised.
17. According to the information and explanations give to us and an
overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that
no funds raised on a short-term basis which have been used for
long-term investment, and vice versa.
18. The Company has not issued any debentures during the year and
therefore paragraph 4(xix) of the order is not applicable.
19. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us and as far as we could ascertain no personal expenses have
been charged to the revenue account.
20. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not covered within the defnition of Sick
Industrial Company as contained in Section 3(I) (O) of the Sick
Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act. 1985.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us there
were no damaged goods in the case of goods purchased for re-sale.
22. During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instance of
fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have we been informed of such case by the management.
For T. Raghavendra & Associates
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
T. RAGHAVENDRA
Mem. No. 023806
FRN : 003329S
Place : Hyderabad
Dated : 21.07.2011
Sep 30, 2009
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/s. SUJANA UNIVERSAL
INDUSTRIES LIMITED as at 30th September, 2009, the Profit and Loss
Account for the year ended 30th September 2009 annexed thereto and the
Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date,
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
1. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
2. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 and
emended by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
issued by the Central Government in terms of Sub-Section (4A) of
Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
3. Future to our comments in the Annexure referred to above we, report
that:
a. We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company, so far as it appears from our examination of
those books;
c. The Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in Sub-Section (3C) of Section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors
of the company, as on 30th September, 2009 and taken on record by the
Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors are
disqualified from being appointed as a director of the Company in terms
of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956 on the said date;
f. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanation given to us, the said accounts, read together with the
notes thereon give the informaiton required by the Companies Act, 1956,
in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in confirmity
with the accounting priciples generally accepted in India.
i. In so far as it relates to the Balance Sheet, of the state of
affairs of the Company as at 30th September, 2009. ii. In so far as
it relates to the Profit and Loss Account of the Profit of the Company
for the year ended 30th September 2009 and iii. In so far as it
relates to Cash Flow statement, of the Cash flows for the year ended on
that date.
1. a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including
quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.
b. The assets are physically verified, in phases, by the Management
during the year as per the regular programme of verification, which in
our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and
the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies have noticed on
such verification. In respect of certain class of assets, verification
of which is in progress, discrepancies if any noticed, will be dealt
with approximately later.
c. The assets disposed off during the year are not substantial and
therefore do not affect the going concern status of the Company.
2. a. The stock of raw materials, stores, spare parts and finished
goods other than in
transit have been physically verified during the year by the
Management, In our opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
c. In our opinion the Company has maintained proper records of
inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the
physical stocks and the book records were not material and have been
properly dealt with in the books of account.
3. a. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not
taken any loans from the companies, firms or other parties listed in
the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act. 1956.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans to the companies, firms or other
parties listed in the register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act. 1956.
c. The Company has not given any loans or advances in the nature of
loans.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business, with regard to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for
the sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no
major weakness has been noticed in the internal control system.
5. a. Based on the audit procedures applied by us and according to
the information and
explanations provided by the management, we are of the opinion that the
contracts or arrangements that need to the be entered in the register
maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies Act. 1956 have
been properly entered in the said register.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions entered in the register maintained under
Section 301 and exceeding during the financial year by Rupees five
lakhs in respect of each party have been made at prices which are
reasonable having record to the prevailing market prices at the
relevant time.
6. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public within
the meaning of Sections 58A. 58AA or any other relevant provisions of
the Companies Act. 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits)
Rules, 1975 framed there under.
7. The Company has an internal audit system, which in our opinion is
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the Rules 209(l)(d) of Companies Act. 1956 for
maintenance of cost records and are of the opinion that, prima facie,
the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained.
9. a. According to the information and explanations give to us and
the records of the
Company examined by us, the Company is generally regular in depositing
with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including
provident fund, employees state insurance, Customs Duty, Excise Duty
and other material statutory dues as applicable with the appropriate
authorities. According to the information and explanations given to us,
no undisputed amounts payable in respect of the aforesaid due were
outstanding as at 30th September, 2009 for a period of more than six
months from the date of becoming payable.
b. According to the information and explanations give to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, the disputed statutory dues that
have not been deposited on account of matters pending before
appropriate authorities are as follows :
Rs. in lakhs
Sales Tax 2575.93 2002-03 Company has preferred on appeal in
the High Court.
856.01 2003-04 Company has preferred on appeal in
the High Court.
1446.51 2004-05 Company has preferred on appeal in
the High Court.
944.94 2005-06 Company has preferred on appeal in
the High Court.
Income Tax 163.81 Company has preferred and appeal in the
appellate tribunal.
Customs &
Central Excise 570.36 Company has preferred an appeal in the CESTAT.
10. The Company does not have accumulated losses as at 30th September
2009 and is has not incurred any cash losses in the financial year
ended on that or in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, the Company has not defaulted in
repayment of dues to financial institution and banks as per the One
Time Settlement proposal with the financial institutions and / or
banks.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund /
mutual benefit fund / societies are not applicable to the company.
14. As the Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments paragraph (xiv) of the Companies
(Auditors Report) Order. 2003 is not applicable to the company for the
year.
15. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given
guarantee for loan taken by other company from bank are not prejudicial
to the interest of the company.
16. The Company has not raised any new term loans during the year. The
term loans outstanding at the beginning of the year have been applied
for the purposes for which they were raised.
17. According to the information and explanations give to us and an
overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report that
no funds raised on a short-term basis which have been used for
long-term investment, and vice versa.
18. The Company has not issued any debentures during the year and
therefore paragraph 4(xix) of the order is not applicable.
19. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us and as far as we could ascertain no personal expenses have
been charged to the revenue account.
20. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not covered within the definition of Sick
Industrial Company as contained in Section 3(1) (O) of the Sick
Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act. 1985.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us there
were no damaged goods in the case of goods purchased for re-sale.
22. During the course of our examinations of the books and records of
the company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have neither come across any instance of
fraud on or by the company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have been informed of such case by the management.
For T. Raghavendra & Associates
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Place: Hyderabad T. RAGHAVENDRA
Dated: 29.12.2009
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article