Mar 31, 2012
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of POLAR INDUSTRIES LTD., as
at 31st March, 2012 and also the Profit and Loss account and the Cash
Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating, the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose
in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4
and 5 of the said Order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law, subject
to notes given in paragraph (vi) below, have been kept by the Company
so far as appears from our examination of those books. The reports on
the account of branches audited by other auditor have been forwarded to
us and have been appropriately dealt by us in preparing our report.
iii. The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and Cash Flow statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account
and with the returns from the sale depots.
iv. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956 subject to notes given in paragraph (vi) below.
v. We report that two of the directors are disqualified as on 31st
March 2012 from being appointed as directors in terms of clause (g) of
Sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956..
vi. (a) Regarding corporate guarantees given in excess of limit
approved by the shareholders and considered the same as contingent
liability by the management and not provided for as referred in note
no. 2 of Note No. 31.
(b) (i) Regarding debt acquired by ARCIL which is subject to compliance
of terms & Condition and recalling of loan and demanding of others
payments as referred in Note No.4 of note no 31 Pending negotiation
with the ARCIL we are unable to comment about impact on the liquidity
position of the company due to recalling of loan / demanding of others
payments and consequent impact on the ability of the company to
continue business.
(ii) Regarding sale of residential property and provisional adjustment
thereof in accounts and Possession of another property by ARCIL as
referred in note no 4(e) of Note no 31 . We are unable to comment about
impact on secured loan, and on the profit for the year and on debit
balance in the profit and loss account at year end due to non
availability of required information
(c) Regarding valuation of finished goods stock for Rs. 86,40,825
pertaining to discontinued business segment and non provision of
interest, demurrages etc on the goods lying in custom bonded warehouse
for which amount was not ascertained as referred in note no 5 of Note
No.31 . We are unable to comment about the extent of realization on
such stock and impact thereof including non-provision referred above on
profit for the year and consequently impact on debit balance in the
profit and loss account at year end.
(d ) Regarding preparation of accounts on going concern basis as
referred in Note No.6 of Note No. 31. The company has sold a
substantial part of its fixed assets in earlier year. According to the
information and explanations given to us, the company has so far not
made any plan to replace the substantial part of the fixed that have
been sold. The company has also negative net worth, substantial
negative working capital, inability to pay its debts repayments /
creditors etc indicating that going concern assumption may no longer be
appropriate. Therefore, in our opinion, there exists substantial doubt
that the company will be able to continue as a going concern for the
foreseeable future. Consequently, adjustment may be required to the
recorded amount of assets and classificatio n of liabilities. The
financial statement (and notes thereto) do not disclose this fact.
(e) Regarding pending recovery of advances / dues aggregating Rs
2,23,09,160 from various parties and ex- employees as referred Note No
7 of Note No. 31 . We are and unable to comment about the extent of
realization of such advances / dues due to uncertainty involved.
(f) Regarding refusal of insurance claim for Rs. 6, 76,27,254 by the
insurance company but considered good by the company as referred Note
No 12 of Note No. 31. We are unable to comment about the realizability
of the claim pending decision of the National Consumer Forum.
(g) Regarding remuneration paid in earlier year to an Ex-Executive
Director for which Company intent to file application with Central
Government for waiver of excess remuneration paid as referred in Note
No. 16 of Note No.31.
(h) Regarding non-provision and non-ascertainment of penalties on
various outstanding statutory dues as referred in note no 17 of Note
No. 31. We are unable to comment about the impact on the profit for the
year and debit balance in profit and loss account at year end due to
non ascertainment of amount.
(i) Regarding mortgage of one of the property having original book
value of Rs 2,47,26,244 in favor of a corporative bank as a collateral
security for obtaining loan by a body corporate as referred note no 13
of Note No.31 for which share holder approval not obtained by the
company. Due to non availability of the latest audited balance sheet of
the body corporate, we are not in a position to comments whether above
security given is prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
(j) Regarding the after sale services expenses aggregating to Rs
137,85,470 related to prior period reimbursement to a marketing Company
for which necessary details/documents were not available till date
hence we are unable to comments on such expenses.
vii. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us and considering our observations in vi
above, the said accounts read together with notes thereon, do not give
the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so
required and not give a true and fair view in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India;
a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2012.
b) In the case of the Profit and Loss account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date and
c) In the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company
for the year ended on that date.
Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date Re:
Polar Industries Limited
(i) a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of its fixed
assets.
b. According to the information and explanation given to us, fixed
assets of significant value have been physically verified by the
management during the year in accordance with a phased programme of
verification adopted by the company. In our opinion, the frequency of
verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and
the nature of its fixed assets. The discrepancies noticed on such
verification were not material and have been properly dealt with in the
books of account.
c. In our opinion and according to information and explanations given
to us, the Company has disposed off substantial
part of it's fixed assets during the previous year. The company has so
far not made any plan to replace the fixed assets that have been sold,
Therefore there are substantial doubt about the company's ability to
continue as a going concern in the foreseeable future.
(ii) a. As explained to us, inventories (except stock lying with third
parties) were physically verified by the management during the year at
reasonable intervals.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and
no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
(iii) a. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not taken any loan during the year from any party covered
in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act,
1956. However, the company has taken unsecured interest free credit on
current account aggregating Rs 3,85,500 and debit aggregating Rs. Nil
on current account during the year from two bodies corporate listed in
the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Maximum balance during the year was Rs 60,32,894 (Net) as payable and
year end balance was Rs. 60,32,894 as payable. However, there is no
stipulation as to interest on these transactions.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not granted any loans during the year to any parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the
sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, no major
weakness has been noticed in internal control system.
(v) a. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
provided by the management, we are of the opinion that the particulars
of contract or arrangements that need to be entered into the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so
entered.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, no transactions were made exceeding the value of five
lakhs rupees from any party during the year.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with, the directives issued by
the Reserve Bank of India and provisions of Section 58A and 58AA of the
Companies Act, 1956 and rules framed there under with regard to the
deposits accepted from the public except not filing of Return of
Deposits. The order passed by Company Law Board in earlier year has
been complied with.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has no internal audit system during
the year.
(viii) As information provided to us that no major manufacturing
activities were carried out during the year, hence the Company has not
maintained cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act,
1956
(ix) a. According to the records of the Company, the Company was not
regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident
fund, investor education and protection fund, employees' state
insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, services tax, wealth tax, custom
duty, excise duty, cess and other statutory dues applicable to it with
the appropriate authorities. The undisputed outstanding statutory dues
as at the year end for a period of more than six months from the date
they became payable were Fringe Benefit Tax Rs 44,93,612, Sales Tax/
VAT Rs. 4,30,45,370, TDS Rs 46,44,237, TCS Rs. 49,430 Provident Fund Rs
62,24,446, and service tax Rs 2172. The company has applied for
remission of custom duty Rs 1,58,10,965 on stock lost on fire in
earlier year. Pending remission of duty by custom department, the
company has not deposited the same. The company has not provided and
ascertained interest / penalties on outstanding statutory dues except
partial interest Rs.64,56,806 on outstanding sale tax / VAT, hence same
have not been included in above.
b. According to the records of the Company, there are no dues
outstanding of sales tax, income tax, service tax, custom tax, wealth
tax, excise duty and cess on account of any dispute, other than the
following (to the extent quantified by the assessing authorities):
*Net of payments made.
(x) The Company has accumulated losses at the end of the financial year
which are not less than fifty percentage of its net worth. However, it
has not incurred cash loss in the current and immediately preceding
financial year.
(xi) As per information's and explanations provided to us, the Company
has made provisional adjustment of reserve price of property as
indicated in note 4(e) of Note No. 31 against secured loans dues to
ARCIL as on 31.03.2012, Pending final adjustment defaults in repayment
of dues, if any can not be ascertained. Further the Company has in
default in repayment of debenture Rs 1,51,61,000 due since December
2009 onwards.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
granted any loan and advance on the basis of security by way of pledge
of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual
benefit fund/society, therefore, the provisions of clause 4 of the
Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 (as amended), are not
applicable to the Company.
(xiv) The Company does not deal or trade in shares, securities,
debentures and other securities except that it has investments of
long-term nature in shares and these are held in the name of the
Company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given corporate guarantees aggregating Rs.1,37,61,99,219
(to the extent of outstanding dues) at year end in favour of financial
institution/bank & others for loans taken by other bodies
corporate/firms. In our opinion, terms and conditions of such corporate
guarantees is prejudicial to the interest of the Company in view of the
weak financial position of the said companies/firms.
(xvi) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, company has not obtained any
term loan during the year.
(xvii) According to the information and explanation given to us,
company has not raised any fund during the year on short term basis
(xviii) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties or
companies covered in register maintained under Section 301 of Companies
Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue
during the year.
(xx) Based on our examination of the books and records of the Company,
carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practice
in India and according to the information and explanations given to us,
no fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year.
For SINGHI & CO.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Regn. No.302049E
B. K. SIPANI
Place: Kolkata Partner
Date: 14th August, 2012 Membership No. 88926
Mar 31, 2010
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of POLAR INDUSTRIES LTD., as
at 31st March, 2010 and also the Profit and Loss account and the Cash
Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating, the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose
in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4
and 5 of the said Order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law, subject
to notes given in paragraph (vi) below, have been kept by the Company
so far as appears from our examination of those books and proper
returns adequate for the purpose of our audit, have been received from
the Sales depots not visited by us. The reports on the account of
branches audited by other auditor have been forwarded to us and have
been appropriately dealt by us in preparing our report.
iii. The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and Cash Flow statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account
and with the returns from the sale depots.
iv. In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956 subject to notes given in paragraph (vi) below.
v. On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on 31st March 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
we report that two of the directors are disqualified as on 31st March
2010 from being appointed as directors in terms of clause (g) of
Sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
vi. (a) Regarding corporate guarantees given in excess of limit
approved by the shareholders and considered the same as contingent
liability by the management and not provided for as referred in note
no. 3 in Schedule 20.
b ) (i) Regarding debt acquired by ARCIL which is subject to compliance
of terms & condition and recalling of loan and demanding of others
payments as referred in Note No B-4 (a) to (f) . Pending negotiation
with the ARCIL we are unable to comment about impact on the liquidity
position of the company due to recalling of loan / demanding of others
payments and consequent impact on the ability of the company to
continue business.
(ii) Regarding sale of residential property and provisional adjustment
thereof in accounts and Possession of another property by ARCIL as
referred in note no B-4(e) & (g) in Schedule 20. We are unable to
comment about impact on the profit for the year due to non -
availability of required information.
(iii) Regarding non-provision of Interest Rs. 37, 71,900 (till date
Rs.75,43,800 ) on remaining loan as referred in Note no B-4(h) and
consequent impact thereof on profit for the year.
(c) Regarding valuation of finished goods stock for Rs. 86, 40,825
pertaining to discontinued business segment and non provision of
interest, demurrages etc on the goods lying in custom bonded warehouse
for which amount was not ascertained as referred in note no.6 in
Schedule 20. We are unable to comment about the extent of realization
on such stock and impact thereof including non-provision referred above
on profit for the year.
(d ) Regarding preparation of accounts on going concern basis as
referred in Note No.B-7 in Schedule 20. The company has sold a
substantial part of its fixed assets during the year covered by our
report. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has so far not made any plan to replace the substantial part of
the fixed assets that have been sold. The company has also negative net
worth, substantial negative working capital, inability to pay its debts
repayments / creditors etc indicating that going concern assumption may
no longer be appropriate. Therefore, in our opinion, there exists
substantial doubt that the company will be able to continue as a going
concern for the foreseeable future. Consequently, adjustment may be
required to the recorded amount of assets and classification of
liabilities. The financial statement (and notes thereto) do not
disclose this fact.
(e) Regarding pending recovery of advances / dues aggregating Rs 2, 63,
01,835 from various parties and ex- employees as referred in Note No
B-8 in Schedule 20 . We are unable to comment about the extent of
realization of such advances / dues due to uncertainty involved.
(f) Regarding refusal of insurance claim for Rs. 6, 76,27,254 by the
insurance company but considered good by the company as referred in
Note No B-15 in Schedule 20. We are unable to comment about the
readability of the claim pending decision of the National Consumer
Forum.
(g) Regarding remuneration paid in earlier year to an Ex-Executive
Director for which Central Government approval is awaited as referred
in Note No. B- 23(b) in Schedule 20.
(h) Regarding non-provision and non-ascertainment of interest /
penalties on various outstanding statutory dues as referred in note no
B-26 in Schedule 20. We are unable to comment about the impact on the
profit for the year due to non ascertainment of amount. vii. Subject
to our comments given in (vi) above, in our opinion and to the best of
our information and according to the explana- tions given to us, the
said accounts read together with notes thereon, in particular Note
No.B-10, ,B-13, B-14 and B-17, in Schedule 20, give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India;
a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2010.
b) In the case of the Profit and Loss account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date and
c) In the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the Company
for the year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE
Re : Polar Industries Limited
(i) a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of its fixed
assets.
b. According to the information and explanations given to us, fixed
assets of significant value have been physically verified by the
management during the year in accordance with a phased programme of
verification adopted by the company. In our opinion, the frequency of
verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and
the nature of its fixed assets. The discrepancies noticed on such
verification were not material and have been properly dealt with in the
books of account.
c. In our opinion and according to information and explanations given
to us, the Company has disposed off substantial part of its fixed
assets during the year. The company has so far not made any plan to
replace the fixed assets that have been sold, Therefore there are
substantial doubt about the companys ability to continue as a going
concern in the foreseeable future.
(ii) a. As explained to us, inventories (except stock lying with third
parties) were physically verified by the management during the year at
reasonable intervals.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
c. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and
no material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
(iii) A. According to the information and explanations given to us,
the Company has not taken any loan during the year from any party
covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
B. (a) The company has granted in earlier years advances including
capital advance, loans and other receivables in the nature of
interest-free unsecured loans to a company-covered u/s 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year and
year end balance were Rs.31,84,83,228.
(b) No interest was charged on the above advances In our opinion other
terms & condition were prejudicial to the interest of the Company due
to non-charging of interest, unsecured in nature & no covenants with
regard to the repayment & weak financial position of the above company.
The company has written off Rs 27,84,83,228 during the year against the
provision made in earlier year as referred in Note no B-14 in Schedule
20.
(c) The company has taken unsecured interest free credit on current
account aggregating Rs. 38,83,974 and debit aggregating Rs. 2,70,17,504
on current account during the year from two bodies corporate listed in
the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Maximum balance during the year was Rs. 2,53,84,204 (Net) as payable
and year end balance was Rs.4,03,550(Net) as receivable. However, there
is no stipulation as to interest on these transactions.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, no major weakness has been
noticed in internal control system.
(v) a. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
provided by the management, we are of the opinion that the particulars
of contract or arrangements that need to be entered into the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been so
entered.
b. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements and exceeding the value of five lakhs rupees in respect of
any party during the year, have been made at prices, which are, prima
facie, reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the
relevant time.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with, the directives issued by
the Reserve Bank of India and provisions of Section 58A and 58AA of the
Companies Act, 1956 and rules framed there under with regard to the
deposits accepted from the public except non filing of Return of
Deposits. The order passed by Company Law Board in earlier year has
been complied with.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has no internal audit system during
the year except in one division upto September, 2009, commensurate with
the size and nature of its business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of accounts maintained by the
Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209(1 )(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained.
(ix) a. According to the records of the Company, the Company was not
regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues includ- ing provident
fund, investor education and protection fund, employees state
insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, services tax, wealth tax, custom
duty, excise duty, cess and other statutory dues applicable to it with
the appropriate authorities. The undisputed outstanding statutory dues
as at the year end for a period of more than six months from the date
they became payable were Fringe Benefit Tax Rs 44,93,612, Sales Tax/VAT
Rs.4,41,55,700, TDS Rs.47,61,732, TCS Rs. 48,872 PF Rs 87,95,590,
Professional tax Rs 9045 and service tax Rs 2172 . The company has
applied for remission of custom duty Rs 1,58,10,965 on stock lost on
fire in earlier year. Pending remission of duty by custom department,
the company has not deposited the same. The company has not provided
and ascertained interest / penalties on outstand- ing statutory dues
except partial interest on outstanding sale tax /VAT, hence name have
not been included in above.
b. According to the records of the Company, there are no dues
outstanding of sales tax income tax, service tax, custom tax, wealth
tax, excise duty and cess on account of any dispute, other than the
following (to the extent quantified by the assessing authorities):
Nature of Dues Amount (Rs.)* Forum where disputes
are pending
Central and States
Sales Tax 1,05,07.748 Sales Tax Appellate
Authorities
148,56,050 Rajasthan High Court
76,95,597 Sales Tax Tribunal
Central Excise Duty 3,11,449 Central Excise Tribunal
3,44,60,124 Allahabad High Court
8,52,792 Commissioner of Excise
64,72,404 In the process of filing
appeal with CESTAT
*Net of payments made.
(x) The Company has accumulated losses at the end of the financial year
which are not less than fifty percentage of its net worth. However, it
has not incurred cash loss in the current financial year but has
incurred cash loss in immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures and on the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has defaulted in repayments of Rs 6,79,75,501 to Industrial
Investment Bank of India Limited, which were due from the year 2004-05
and onwards. In view of CDR sanction, interest amounting to
Rs.75,43,800 has not been provided and not included in the above.
Subsequent to restructuring of loans under CDR mechanism and
acquisition of loans by ARCIL, the company has defaulted in payments of
Rs 12,50,00,000 to ARCIL which were due from 2007-08 and onwards.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
granted any loan and advance on the basis of security by way of pledge
of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual
benefit fund/society, therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of
the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended), are not
applicable to the Company.
(xiv) The Company does not deal or trade in shares, securities,
debentures and other securities except that it has investments of
long-term nature in shares and these are held in the name of the
Company except to the extent of the exemption granted under Section 49
of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given in earlier years corporate guarantees aggregating
Rs.116,69,65,819 (to the extent of outstanding dues) and pledging of
investment having carrying value of Rs. 20,66,250 at year end in
favour of financial institution/bank & others for loans taken by other
bodies corporate/firms. In our opinion, terms and conditions of such
corporate guarantees and pledging of investments are prejudicial to the
interest of the Company in view of the weak financial position of the
said companies/firms.
(xvi) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, company has not obtained any
term loan during the year.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us,
company has not raised any fund during the year on short term basis.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties or
companies covered in register maintained under Section 301 of Companies
Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company has yet to create securities in respect of debentures
outstanding at the year end.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during
the year.
(xxi) Based on our examination of the books and records of the Company,
carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing practice
inlndia and according to the information and explanations given to us,
no fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year.
For SINGH I& CO.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Regn. No. 302049E
B. K. Sipani
Place : Kolkata
Partner
Date : 29th May, 2010 Membership No. 88926
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article