Mar 31, 2024
We have audited the accompanying standalone financial results of Neogem India Limited (hereinafter referred to as the
"Company"), for the year ended on March 31, 2024 ("the statement") attached herewith, being submitted by the company
pursuant to the requirement of Regulation 33 and 52 of the SEBI (Listing Obligation and disclosure Requirements) Regulation,
2015, as amended (the "Listing Regulations").
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone annual
financial results:
i. is presented in accordance with the requirements of Regulation 33 and 52 of the Listing Regulations in this regard
and;
ii. does not give a true and fair view in conformity with the recognition and measurement principles laid down in the
applicable accounting standard and other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the net loss and its
cash flow other comprehensive income and other financial information of the Company for the year ended March
31, 2024.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) specified under section 143(10) of the Companies
Act, 2013, as amended ("the Act"). Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the "Auditor''s
Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Results" section of our report. We are independent of the Company in
accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with the ethical
requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the
Rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of
Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on
the standalone annual financial statement.
Basis of Adverse Opinion
The Company''s is unable to repay its liability (current & non-current) as on March 31, 2024. These events indicate a material
uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the Company''s ability to continue as a going concern and, therefore, it may be
unable to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements (and notes
thereto) do not disclose this fact.
Adverse Opinion
In our opinion, because of the omission of the information mentioned in the Basis for Adverse Opinion paragraph, the financial
statements do not give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 in the manner so required and also do not give a
true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India of the state of affairs of the Company
as at 31st March, 2024, and its profit/loss and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Emphasis of Matters
Attention is invited to Note No. 3 in the financial statement, which indicate that the company has incurred a loss of Rs.
80,16,827.54 during the year and as at 31st March, 2024 has a negative net worth of Rs. Rs. 35,40,69,560/-, if provision for the
unrealized sundry debtors outstanding for more than three years amounting to Rs. 41,10,67,159/- is made by the company, the
company''s current liability will exceed current assets of the company. Sundry debtor''s amount outstanding are unconfirmed by
the parties and outstanding for more than three years.
These condition along with Other Matters set forth, indicate the material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt about the
Company''s ability to continue as a going concern. In absence of sufficient appropriate audit evidence in support of management''s
assessment regarding going concern basis of accounting is appropriate. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
Other Matter
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to financial statement relating to cash credit limit from Punjab National Bank
and Bank of India for Rs. 10 crore and 5 crore respectively, which has been classified as "Non - Performing Assets" by the lead
banker as on 31-03-2016. The company has not received balance confirmation from the bankers since 31-03-2016. Pending
confirmation received the company has not provided for interest payable in the financial statement till 31-03-2024, since the
same is not quantifiable and accordingly the loss for the year is understated to that extent.
The company has stopped manufacturing activities since 01-01-2018 and no detailed plans are made available to us regarding
commencement of business activity in near future. The company is in the process of restructuring/revival of its business, in view
of the management''s expectation of the successful outcome of revival of its business the financial statement has been prepared
on going concern basis. However, in view of the above uncertainty we are unable to comment on the ability of the company to
continue as a going concern and the consequential adjustment to the accompanying financial statement if any that might have
been necessarily had the financial statement been prepared under liquidation basis.
We refer to the outstanding debtor''s receivable as reflected in current assets of Rs. 41,10,67,159/- which are outstanding for
more than three years. The amount outstanding are not confirmed by the parties. In our opinion the provision for the amount
outstanding for more than three years of Rs. 41,10,67,159/- be made as these are unrealized and unconfirmed by the parties, no
steps have been taken in the current year either to confirm the balances from parties or for recovery of amount from parties
outstanding for over three years.
We refer to the outstanding creditor''s payable as reflected in current liabilities of Rs. 15,82,47,094/- which are outstanding for
more than three years. The amount outstanding are not confirmed by the parties. In our opinion the amount outstanding for
more than three years be written back, no steps have been taken in the current year to pay the balances to parties or for
settlement of amount outstanding for over three years.
We refer to the outstanding provisions of Rs. 1,52,76,630/- towards expenses of Rent & Water charges as reflected under other
current liabilities are outstanding for more than three years. The amount outstanding are not confirmed by the parties. In our
opinion the amount outstanding for more than three years be written back, no steps have been taken in the current year to pay
the balances to parties or for settlement of amount outstanding for over three years.
Management''s and Board of Director Responsibilities for the Standalone Financial Results
The standalone financial results have been prepared on the basis of the standalone annual financial statements.
The Company''s management and the Board of Directors are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the statement
that gives a true and fair view of the net loss and other comprehensive income of the Company and other financial information
in accordance with the applicable accounting standard prescribed under section 133 of the Act read with relevant rules issued
thereunder and other accounting principles generally accepted in India and in compliance with Regulation 33 and 52 of the Listing
Regulation. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provision of the
Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities, selection and
application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and the
design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial control, that were operating effectively for ensuring the
accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the statement that gives
a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the statement, the Board of Directors are responsible for assessing the Company''s ability to continue as a going
concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless
management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
The Board of Directors are responsible for overseeing the Company''s financial reporting process.
Auditor''s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor''s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is
a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these standalone
financial results.
As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout
the audit. We also:
⢠Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and
perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide
a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting
from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal
control.
⢠Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate
in the circumstances. Under section 143(3) (i) of the Companies Act, 2013, we are also responsible for expressing our opinion
on whether the company has adequate internal financial controls system in place and the operating effectiveness of such
controls.
⢠Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related
disclosures made by management.
⢠Conclude on the appropriateness of management''s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit
evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on
the Company''s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to
draw attention in our auditor''s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are
inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor''s
report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.
⢠Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether
the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the
audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements
regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to
bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most
significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe
these matters in our auditor''s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely
rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences
of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, based on our audit we report that:
a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief
were necessary for the purposes of our audit.
b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears
from our examination of those books.
c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss including Other Comprehensive Income, Statement of Changes
in Equity and the Statement of Cash Flows dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the relevant books of
account.
d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act.
e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on March 31, 2024 taken on record by
the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2024 from being appointed as a director
in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.
f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the
operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in "Annexure A". Our report expresses an
unmodified opinion on the adequacy and operating effectiveness of the Company''s internal financial controls over
financial reporting.
g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with the requirements of
section 197(16) of the Act, as amended:
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the remuneration
paid by the Company to its directors during the year is in accordance with the provisions of section 197 of the Act.
h) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the
Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, as amended in our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its standalone financial
statements - Refer Note No 20 to the standalone financial statements;
ii. The Company has disclosed and made provision, as required under the applicable law or accounting standards,
for material foreseeable losses, if any, on long-term contracts including derivative contracts;
iii. There is not required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.
2. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government in terms of
Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in "Annexure B" a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration Number: 118677W
Ashish Jalan
Partner
Membership Number: 125707
UDIN: 24125707BKCSTU8001
Place : Mumbai
Date : 30th May, 2024
Mar 31, 2014
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Neogem India
Limited (''the Company'') which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31
March, 2014, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow
Statement for the year then ended and a summary of significant
accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statement
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with
the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211
of the Companies Act, 1956 (''the Act'') read with General circular
15/2013 dated 13th September 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs
in respect of section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 and in accordance
with the accounting principles generally accepted in India. This
responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of
internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the
financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The
procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the
Company''s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements
in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of
accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting
estimates made by Management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information
required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31 March, 2014;
ii) In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Profit for
the year ended on that date; and
iii) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (''the
Order''), as amended, issued by the Central Government of India in terms
of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the annexure
a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the
Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and
Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards notified under
the Act read with General circular 15/2013 dated 13th September 2013 of
the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of section 133 of the
Companies Act, 2013; except Leave Encashment which is provided on the
basis of actual calculation rather than actuarial valuation as per AS
15 and
e. on the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on 31 March, 2014, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the Directors are disqualified as on 31 March 2014, from being
appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Annexure to the Auditor''s Report
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date for the year
ended 31st March, 2014)
(i) (a) The company has maintained records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets on the
basis of available information.
b) As per the information and explanations given to us, all the major
assets have been physically verified by the management during the year
which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the
company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were
noticed on such verification.
(c) As explained to us, the company has not disposed off any
substantial part of fixed assets during the year, so as to affect the
going concern.
(ii) (a) As explained to us, the inventory has been physically verified
by the management at reasonable intervals.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
(iii) (a) The company has not granted any loans secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956. Accordingly the paragraph
4iii(b), 4 iii(c) and 4 iii(d) of the order, are not applicable.
(b) The company has not taken unsecured interest free loan from parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
(c) In our opinion, as company has not taken interest free unsecured
loan hence the question of reporting whether the rate of interest and
other terms and conditions of such loans are prejudicial to the
interest of the company does not arise.
(d) Since there is no stipulation as to the time period for the
repayment of unsecured loans taken, we are unable to comment on the
regularity of the same.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of
goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not
observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal
controls.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements
that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301
of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in
respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant
time.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company has not accepted any deposits from the public
and hence the provisions of section 58A and 58AA or any relevant
provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance and
Deposits) Rules, 1975 are not applicable.
(vii) The company has no formal internal audit system; however the
company has build-in internal control system commensurate with the size
of the Company and the nature of its business.
(viii) The Central government has prescribed the maintenance of cost
records under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956, in
respect of certain manufacturing activity of the company. We have
broadly reviewed the accounts and records of the Company in this
connection and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not
however, made the detailed examination of the same.
(ix) (a) As per information and explanations given to us, undisputed
statutory dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance,
income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise
duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to the company
have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate
authorities though there has been delays in deposit in a few cases
which are not major.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
disputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales
tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess were in arrears,
as at 31st March, 2014 for a period of more than six months from the
date they became payable.
(x) In our opinion, there are no accumulated losses of the company at
the end of financial year. The company has not incurred cash losses
during the financial year covered by our audit and the immediately
preceding financial year.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company did not have any outstanding dues to any
financial institution, banks or debenture holders during the year.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a Chit fund or a Nidhi/Mutual
benefit fund/Society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of
the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in
Shares, Securities, Debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provision of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
(xvi) The company has not raised any term loans during the year. Hence
the question of application for the purpose for which they were raised
doesn''t arise.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report
that, prima facie, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used
for long-term investment.
(xviii) To the best of our knowledge and according to information &
explanation given to us, we report that the company has not made any
preferential share allotments of equity shares covered under the
register required to be maintained u/s. 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
(xxi) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company
was noticed or reported during the year.
For ASHOK BAIRAGRA & ASSOCIATES
Chartered Accountants
(Firm Reg. No. 118677W)
Ashish Jalan
Place: Mumbai Partner
Date: 30th May, 2014 (M.No. : F 125707)
Mar 31, 2013
Report on the Financial Statement
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Neogem India
Limited (''the Company'') which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31
March, 2013, the Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow
Statement for the year then ended and a summary of significant
accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statement
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with
the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211
of the Companies Act, 1956 (''the Act''). This responsibility includes
the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant
to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that
give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and
the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by Management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, the financial statements give the information
required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31 March, 2013; ii) in the case of the Statement of
Profit and Loss, of the Profit for the year ended on that date; and
iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (''the
Order''), as amended, issued by the Central Government of India in terms
of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the ANNEXURE
a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the
Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that :
a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow
Statement detail with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss,
and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards referred
to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
except Leave Encashment which is provided on the basis of actual
calculation rather than actuarial valuation as per AS15 and
e. on the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on 31 March, 2013, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the Directors are disqualified as on 31 March 2013, from being
appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Annexure to the Auditor''s Report
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date for the year
ended 31st March, 2013)
(i) (a) The company has maintained records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets on the
basis of available information.
(b) As per the information and explanations given to us, all the major
assets have been physically verified by the management during the year
which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the
company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were
noticed on such verification.
(c) As explained to us, the company has not disposed off any
substantial part of fixed assets during the year, so as to affect the
going concern.
(ii) (a) As explained to us, the inventory has been physically verified
by the management at reasonable intervals.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
(iii) (a) The company has not granted any loans secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956. Accordingly the paragraph
4 iii(b),4 iii(c) and4 iii(d) of the order, are not applicable.
(b) The company has taken unsecured interest free loan from three
parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was
Rs. 85,57,000/- and the year-end balance of loans taken from such
parties is Rs. 85,57,000/-.
(c) In our opinion, as company has taken interest free unsecured loan
hence the question of reporting whether the rate of interest and other
terms and conditions of such loans are prejudicial to the interest of
the company does not arise.
(d) Since there is no stipulation as to the time period for the
repayment of unsecured loans taken, we are unable to comment on the
regularity of the same.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of
goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not
observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal
controls.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements
that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301
of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in
respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant
time.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company has not accepted any deposits from the public
and hence the provisions of section 58A and 58AA or any relevant
provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance and
Deposits) Rules, 1975 are not applicable.
(vii) The company has no formal internal audit system; however the
company has build-in internal control system commensurate with the size
of the Company and the nature of its business.
(viii)The Central government has prescribed the maintenance of cost
records under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956, in
respect of certain manufacturing activity of the company. We have
broadly reviewed the accounts and records of the Company in this
connection and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have not
however, made the detailed examination of the same.
(ix) (a) As per information and explanations given to us, undisputed
statutory dues including provident fund, employees'' state insurance,
income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise
duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to the company
have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate
authorities though there has been delays in deposit in a few cases
which are not major.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
disputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales
tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess other than those
mentioned separately were in arrears, as at 31st March, 2013 for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
Name of the Name of Amount Forum where Financial Year
Statute Dues ('') dispute is
pending to which the amount
relates
Income Tax FBT 2,59,840/- ITO 2005-06
(x) In our opinion, there are no accumulated losses of the company at
the end of financial year. The company has not incurred cash losses
during the financial year covered by our audit and the immediately
preceding financial year.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company did not have any outstanding dues to any
financial institution, banks or debenture holders during the year.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a Chit fund or a Nidhi/
Mutual benefit fund / Society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not
applicable to the company.
(xiv)In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in
Shares, Securities, Debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provision of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
(xvi)The company has not raised any term loans during the year. Hence
the question of application for the purpose for which they were raised
doesn''t arise.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report
that, prima facie, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used
for long-term investment.
(xviii) To the best of our knowledge and according to information &
explanation given to us, we report that the company has not made any
preferential share allotments of equity shares covered under the
register required to be maintained u/s. 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix)The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
(xxi)To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company
was noticed or reported during the year.
For ASHOK BAIRAGRA & ASSOCIATES
Chartered Accountants
(Registration No. 118677W)
Ashish Jalan
Date : 30th May, 2013 Partner
Place: Mumbai Membership Number: 125707
Mar 31, 2012
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Neogem India Limited
as at 31st March, 2012 the Profit and Loss Account and also the Cash
Flow Statement of the company for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
CompanyH management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally acceptable in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to (as paragraph
3)above, we report that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956 Except leave encashment which is provided on
the basis of actual calculation rather than actuarial valuation as per
AS15:
(v) On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors as on 31st March, 2012 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31st March, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of the
clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act,
1956;
(vi) Subject to our remark in para 4(iv) above, In our opinion and to
the best of our information and according to the explanations given to
us, the said accounts read with significant accounting policies and
other notes thereon, give the information required by the Companies
Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give true and fair view in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2012;
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the PROFIT for the
year ended on that date and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITOR'S REPORT
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date for the year
ended 31st March, 2012)
(i) (a) The company has maintained records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of
fixed assets. However as explained to us management is in the process
of updating records for proper presentation and classification of the
fixed assets of the company.
(b) As per the information and explanations given to us, all the major
assets have been physically verified by the management during the year
which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the
company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were
noticed on such verification.
(c) As explained to us, the company has not disposed off any
substantial part of fixed assets during the year, so as to affect the
going concern.
(ii) (a) As explained to us, the inventory has been physically verified
by the management at reasonable intervals.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
(iii) (a) The company has not granted any loans secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in
the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956.
(b) As the company has not granted any loans to parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 this
clause relating to rate of interest and other terms and conditions of
the loan granted is not applicable.
(c) As the company has not granted any loans to parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 this
clause relating to receipt of the principal amount and interest are not
applicable.
(d) There is no overdue amount of unsecured loans given to parties
listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
(e) The company has taken unsecured interest free loan from three
parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs.
1,21,97,000/- and the year-end balance of loans taken from such parties
is Rs. 1,17,97,000/-.
(f) In our opinion, as company has taken interest free unsecured loan
hence the question of reporting whether the rate of interest and other
terms and conditions of such loans are prejudicial to the interest of
the company does not arise.
(g) Since there is no stipulation as to the time period for the
repayment of unsecured loans taken, we are unable to comment on the
regularity of the same.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of
goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not
observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal
controls.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the particulars of
contracts or arrangements that need to be entered into the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been
entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in
respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant
time.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company has not accepted any deposits from the public
and hence the provisions of section 58A and 58AA or any relevant
provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance and
Deposits) Rules, 1975 are not applicable. No order has been passed by
the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank
of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.
(vii) The company has no formal internal audit system, however the
company has build-in internal control system commensurate with the size
of the Company and the nature of its business.
(viii) According to the information given to us, Central Government has
not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1)
(d) of the Companies Act, 1956, in case of the Company.
(ix) (a) As per information and explanations given to us, undisputed
statutory dues including provident fund,
employeesfflstate insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service
tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues
applicable to the company have generally been regularly deposited with
the appropriate authorities though there has been delays in deposit in
a few cases which are not serious.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
disputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales
tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess other than those
mentioned separately were in arrears, as at 31st March, 2012 for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
Name
of the Name of Amount Forum where Financial Year
Statute Dues (Rs) dispute is
pending to which the
amount
relates
Income
Tax FBT_ 2,59,840/- CIT Appeals_ 2005-06
(x) In our opinion, there are no accumulated losses of the company at
the end of financial year. The company has not incurred cash losses
during the financial year covered by our audit and the immediately
preceding financial year.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not taken any term loans hence the
question of default in repayments of dues to the banks doesn't arise.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a Chit fund or a Nidhi/
Mutual benefit fund / Society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not
applicable to the company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in
Shares, Securities, Debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provision of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
(xvi) The company has not raised any term loans during the year. Hence
the question of application for the purpose for which they were raised
doesn't arise.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report
that, prima facie, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used
for long-term investment.
(xviii) To the best of our knowledge and according to information &
explanation given to us, we report that the company has not made any
preferential share allotments of equity shares covered under the
register required to be maintained u/s. 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
(xxi) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company
was noticed or reported during the year.
For ASHOK BAIRAGRA & ASSOCIATES
Chartered Accountants
(Registration No. 118677W)
Ashish Jalan
Place: Mumbai Partner
Date : 30th May, 2012 Membership Number: 125707
Mar 31, 2011
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Neogem India Limited
as at 31st March'2011 the Profit and Loss Account and also the Cash
Flow Statement of the company for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally acceptable in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to (as paragraph
3)above, we report that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956 Except leave encashment which is provided on
the basis of actual calculation rather than actuarial valuation as per
AS15:
(v) On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors as on 31st March, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31st March, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of the
clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act,
1956;
(vi) Subject to our remark in para 4(iv) above, In our opinion and to
the best of our information and according to the explanations given to
us, the said accounts read with significant accounting policies and
other notes thereon, give the information required by the Companies
Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give true and fair view in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2011;
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITOR'S REPORT
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date for the year
ended 31st March, 2011)
(i) (a) The company has maintained records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets. However
as explained to us management is in the process of updating records for
proper presentation and classification of the fixed assets of the
company.
(b) As per the information and explanations given to us, all the major
assets have been physically verified by the management during the year
which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the
company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were
noticed on such verification.
(c) As explained to us, the company has not disposed off any
substantial part of fixed assets during the year, so as to affect the
going concern.
(ii) (a) As explained to us, the inventory has been physically verified
by the management at reasonable intervals.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
(iii) (a) The company has not granted any loans secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956.
(b) As the company has not granted any loans to parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 this
clause relating to rate of interest and other terms and conditions of
the loan granted is not applicable.
(c) As the company has not granted any loans to parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 this
clause relating to receipt of the principal amount and interest are not
applicable.
(d) There is no overdue amount of unsecured loans given to parties
listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
(e) The company had taken unsecured interest free loan from three
parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was
Rs. 1,88,87,000/- and the year-end balance of loans taken from such
parties is Rs. 1,21,97,000/-.
(f) In our opinion, as company had taken interest free unsecured loan
hence the question of reporting whether the rate of interest and other
terms and conditions of such loans are prejudicial to the interest of
the company does not arise.
(g) Since there is no stipulation as to the time period for the
repayment of unsecured loans taken, we are unable to comment on the
regularity of the same.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of
goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have not
observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal
controls.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements
that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301
of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in
respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant
time.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company has not accepted any deposits from the public
and hence the provisions of section 58A and 58AA or any relevant
provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance and
Deposits) Rules, 1975 are not applicable. No order has been passed by
the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank
of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.
(vii) The company has no formal internal audit system, however the
company has build-in internal control system commensurate with the size
of the Company and the nature of its business.
(viii) According to the information given to us, Central Government has
not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1)
(d) of the Companies Act, 1956, in case of the Company.
(ix) (a) As per information and explanations given to us, undisputed
statutory dues including provident fund, employees' state insurance,
income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise
duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to the company
have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate
authorities though there has been delays in deposit in a few cases
which are not serious.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales
tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess were in arrears,
as at 31st March, 2011 for a period of more than six months from the
date they became payable.
(c) According the information and explanation given to us, there are no
dues of income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, Service tax, custom duty,
excise duty and cess, which have not been deposited on account of any
dispute.
(x) In our opinion, there are no accumulated losses of the company at
the end of financial year. The company has not incurred cash losses
during the financial year covered by our audit and the immediately
preceding financial year.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayments of dues to the
banks.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a Chit fund or a Nidhi/
Mutual benefit fund / Society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not
applicable to the company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in
Shares, Securities, Debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provision of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
(xvi) The company has not raised any term loans during the year. Hence
the question of application for the purpose for which they were raised
doesn't arise.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report
that, prima facie, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used
for long-term investment.
(xviii) To the best of our knowledge and according to information &
explanation given to us, we report that the company has not made any
preferential share allotments of equity shares covered under the
register required to be maintained u/s. 301 of the Companies Act,
1956.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
(xxi) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company
was noticed or reported during the year.
For ASHOK BAIRAGRA & ASSOCIATES
Chartered Accountants
(Registration No. 118677W)
Ashish Jalan
Partner
Membership Number: 125707
Place Mumbai
Date 30th May, 2011
Mar 31, 2010
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Neogem India Limited
as at 31st March2010 the Profit and Loss Account and also the Cash
Flow Statement of the company for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally acceptable in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to (as paragraph
3)above, we reportthat:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(iv) Company has not made provision against doubtful debts amounting to
Rs.51,30,836/-. As a result profit for the year is overstated and
debtors are overstated to that extent.
(v) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956 Except leave encashment which is provided on the
basis of actual calculation rather than actuarial valuation asperAS15:
(vi) On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors as on 31st March, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31st March, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of the
clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act,
1956;
(vii) Subject to our remark in para 4(iv) & 4(v) above, In our opinion
and to the best of our information and according to the explanations
given to us, the said accounts read with significant accounting
policies and other notes thereon, give the information required by the
Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31s1 March, 2010;
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the PROFIT for the
year ended on that date and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditors Report (Referred to in paragraph 3 of our
report of even date for the year ended 31st March, 2010)
(i) (a) The company has maintained records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets. However
as explained to us management is in the process of updating records for
proper presentation and classification of the fixed assets of the
company.
(b) As per the information and explanations given to us, all the major
assets have been physically verified by the management during the year
which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the
company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were
noticed on such verification.
(c) As explained to us, the company has not disposed off any
substantial part of fixed assets during the year, so as to affect the
going concern.
(ii) (a) , As explained to us, the inventory has been physically
verified by the management atreasonable intervals.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material. -
(iii) (a) The company has not granted any loans secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained-under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956.
(b) As the company has not granted any loans to parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 this
clause relating to rate of interest and other terms and conditions of
the loan granted is not applicable.
(c) As the company has not granted any loans to parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 this
clause relating to receipt of the principal amount and interest are not
applicable.
(d) There is no overdue amount of unsecured loans given to parties
listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
(e) The company had taken unsecured interest free loan from three
parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. The maximum amount involved during the year was
Rs. 1,87,62,000/- and the year-end balance of loans taken from such
parties is Rs. 1,85,62,000/-.
(f) In our opinion, as company had taken interest free unsecured loan
hence the question of reporting whether the rate of interest and other
terms and conditions of such loans are prejudicial to the interest of
the company does not arise.
(g) Since there is no stipulation as to the time period for the
repayment of unsecured loans taken, we are unable to comment on the
regularity of the same.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of
goods and services. During.the course of our audit, we have not
observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal
controls.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements
that need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301
of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in
respect of any party during the year have been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant
time.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company has not accepted any deposits from the public
and hence the provisions of section 58A and 58AA or any relevant
provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Acceptance and
Deposits) Rules, 1975 are not applicable. No order has been passed by
the Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank
of India or any Court or any other Tribunal.
(vii) The company has no formal internal audit system, however the
company has build-in internal control system commensurate with the size
of the Company and the nature of its business.
(viii) According to the information given to us, Central Government has
not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1)
(d) of the Companies Act, 1956, in case of the Company.
(ix) (a) As per information and explanations given to us, undisputed
statutory dues including provident fund, employees state insurance,
income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty, excise
duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to the company
have generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate
authorities though there has been delays in deposit in a few cases
which are not serious.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales
tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess were in arrears,
as at 31st March, 2010 for a period of more than six months from the
date they became payable.
(c) According the information and explanation given to us, there are no
dues of income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, Service tax, custom duty,
excise duty and cess, which have not been deposited on account of any
dispute except in the case of income tax wherein the following disputes
are pending:
Name of the Nature of Amount Period to Forum where
dispute is
statute dues (Rs) which the
amount
relates pending
Income
Tax Act,
1961 Income Tax 6,10,834/- A.Y.
1998-99 Deputy
Commissioner
of Income Tax,
Mumbai.
TOTAL 6,10,834/-
(x) The Company does not have accumulated losses at the end of the
year; The Company has incurred cash profit during the current financial
year. However the company has incurred cash losses of Rs.2,73,06,644/-
during the previous F.Y.2008-09.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not defaulted in repayments of dues to the
banks.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities:
(xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a Chit fund or a Nidhi/
Mutual benefit fund / Society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not
applicable to the company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in
Shares, Securities, Debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provision of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
(xvi) The company has not raised any term loans during the year. Hence
the question of application for the purpose for which they were raised
doesnt arise.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report
that, prima facie, no funds raised on short-term basis have been used
for long-term investment.
(xviii) The company has made preferential allotment of 3,90,000 equity
share of Rs.10 each at par to the parties covered in the register
maintained u/s 301 of the Company Act 1956. In our opinion the price at
which the shares are issued is not prima face prejudicial to the
interest of the company.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
(xxi) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the company
was noticed or reported during the year.
For ASHOK BAIRAGRA & ASSOCIATES
Chartered Accountants
(Registration No. 118677W)
ASHISHJALAN
Partner
Membership Number: 125707
Place: Mumbai
Date: 30th June, 2010
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article