Mar 31, 2025
Commitments
1.13.1 Provisions are recognized when there is a present
obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event,
it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying
economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation
and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the
obligation.
1.13.2 The expenses relating to a provision is presented in the
Statement of Profit and Loss net of reimbursements, if any.
1.13.3 Contingent liabilities are possible obligations whose
existence will only be confirmed by future events not
wholly within the control of the Company, or present
obligations where it is not probable that an outflow of
resources will be required or the amount of the obligation
cannot be measured with sufficient reliability.
1.13.4 Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the financial
statements but are disclosed unless the possibility of an
outflow of economic resources is considered remote.
1.14.1 The Company measures certain financial instruments at
fair value at each reporting date.
1.14.2 Certain accounting policies and disclosures require the
measurement of fair values, for both financial and non¬
financial assets and liabilities.
1.14.3 Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date
in the principal or, in its absence, the most advantageous
market to which the Company has access at that date. The
fair value of a liability also reflects its non-performance
risk.
1.14.4 The best estimate of the fair value of a financial instrument
on initial recognition is normally the transaction price -
i.e. the fair value of the consideration given or received.
If the Company determines that the fair value on initial
recognition differs from the transaction price and the fair
value is evidenced neither by a quoted price in an active
market for an identical asset or liability nor based on a
valuation technique that uses only data from observable
markets, then the financial instrument is initially measured
at fair value, adjusted to defer the difference between the
fair value on initial recognition and the transaction price.
Subsequently that difference is recognised in Statement of
Profit and Loss on an appropriate basis over the life of the
instrument but no later than when the valuation is wholly
supported by observable market data or the transaction is
closed out.
Trade Receivables and debt securities issued are initially
recognised when they are originated. All other financial
assets are initially recognised when the Company becomes
a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. All
financial assets other than those measured subsequently
at fair value through profit and loss, are recognised initially
at fair value plus transaction costs that are attributable to
the acquisition of the financial asset.
Subsequent measurement is determined with reference
to the classification of the respective financial assets.
Based on the business model for managing the financial
assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of
the financial asset, the Company classifies financial assets
as subsequently measured at amortised cost, fair value
through other comprehensive income or fair value through
profit and loss.
In accordance with Ind AS 109, the Company applies
Expected Credit Loss ("ECL") model for measurement
and recognition of impairment loss on the financial
assets measured at amortised cost and debt instruments
measured at FVOCI.
Loss allowances on trade receivables are measured
following the ''simplified approach'' at an amount equal to
the lifetime ECL at each reporting date. The application
of simplified approach does not require the Company
to track changes in credit risk. Based on the past history
and track records the Company has assessed the risk of
default by the customer and expects the credit loss to be
insignificant. In respect of other financial assets such as
debt securities and bank balances, the loss allowance is
measured at 12 month ECL only if there is no significant
deterioration in the credit risk since initial recognition of
the asset or asset is determined to have a low credit risk at
the reporting date.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and
the net amount is reported in the Balance Sheet, if
there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the
recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on
a net basis, or to realise the assets and settle the liabilities
simultaneously.
1.17.1 Current Tax
Income-tax Assets and liabilities are measured at the
amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the
taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used
to compute the amount are those that are enacted or
substantively enacted, by the end of reporting period.
Current Tax items are recognised in correlation to the
underlying transaction either in the Statement of Profit and
Loss, other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
1.17.2 Deferred tax
Deferred tax is provided using the Balance Sheet method
on temporary differences between the tax bases of assets
and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial
reporting purposes at the reporting date.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable
temporary differences.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible
temporary differences, the carry forward of unused tax
credits and any unused tax losses. Deferred tax assets are
recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable
profit will be available against which the deductible
temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused
tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed
at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it
is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be
available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be
utilised. Unrecognised deferred tax assets are re-assessed
at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent
that it has become probable that future taxable profits will
allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax
rates that are expected to apply in the year when the asset
is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates and
tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted
at the reporting date.
Deferred Tax items are recognised in correlation to the
underlying transaction either in the Statement of Profit and
Loss, other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset if a
legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets
against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate
to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing
the profit or loss for the period attributable to equity
shareholders (after deducting preference dividends, if any,
and attributable taxes) by the weighted average number of
equity shares outstanding during the period.
For the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share,
the profit or loss for the period attributable to equity
shareholders and the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period are adjusted for the effect of
all dilutive potential equity shares.
All assets and liabilities are classified as current or non¬
current as per the Company''s normal operating cycle
(determined at 12 months) and other criteria set out in
Schedule III of the Act.
Cash and cash equivalents in the Balance Sheet include cash
at bank, cash, cheque, draft on hand and demand deposits
with an original maturity of less than three months, which
are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
For the purpose of Statement of Cash Flows, Cash and cash
equivalents include cash at bank, cash, cheque and draft on
hand. The Company considers all highly liquid investments
with a remaining maturity at the date of purchase of three
months or less and that are readily convertible to known
amounts of cash to be cash equivalents.
Cash flows are reported using the indirect method, where
by net profit before tax is adjusted for the effects of
transactions of a non-cash nature, any deferrals or accruals
of past or future operating cash receipts or payments and
item of income or expenses associated with investing
or financing cash flows. The cash flows from operating,
investing and financing activities are segregated.
Bank guarantees issued by banks on behalf of the Company
Rs. 214.30 Lakhs (Previous Year Rs. 217.26 Lakhs). These are
secured by the charge created in favour of the Company''s
bankers by way of pledge of Fixed Deposit Receipts.
II. Estimated amount of contracts (net of advances) remaining
to be executed on capital account and not provided for Rs.
NIL (P.Y. Rs. NIL)
III. Letter of credit issued by the bankers of the Company Rs.
7,703.24 Lakhs (P.Y. Rs. 6,078.64 Lakhs)
IV. The Company has cleared 19 MT of Pentaerythritol against
Bill of Entry No. 616414 dated 20.10.2005. The custom
department had asked the Company to pay 2.6 Lakhs on
account of Anti Dumping Duty for clearance of the said
goods as per Notification No. 93/2005 of customs issued
on 20.10.2005 wherein the said goods were covered
for levy of anti dumping duty imported from certain
countries. The Company has deposited the said amount
on 25.11.2008 as per CESTAT order No. S/603/WAB/
MUM/2008/CSTB/CN dated 20.10.2008, but no provision
has been made in books of accounts as the management is
of the view that the consignment will not be covered under
the notification, as on date of clearance of the goods the
notification was not published in Gazette of India. Further,
the said appeal has been upheld in CESTAT & remanded
back to the learned adjudicating authority.
The Company is mainly engaged in the business of
Manufacturing of Chemicals. Considering the nature
of business and financial reporting of Company, the
Company has only one segment viz "Chemicals" product
as reportable segment. The Company operates in Local/
Export segment geographically of which the exports have
amounted to Rs. 4,201.14 Lakhs (P.Y.Rs. 3,698.24 Lacs
Lacs) out of Total Turnover of Rs. 40,984.75 Lacs (P.Y.Rs.
40,543.35 Lacs). But due to the nature of business, the
assets/ liabilities and expenses for these activities cannot
be bifurcated separately.
The above sensitivity analyses are based on a change in an assumption while holding all other assumptions constant. In practice, this
is unlikely to occur, and changes in some of the assumptions may be correlated. When calculating the sensitivity of the defined benefit
obligation to significant actuarial assumptions the same method (present value of the defined benefit obligation calculated with the
projected unit credit method at the end of the reporting period) has been applied as when calculating the defined benefit liability
recognized in the balance sheet. The methods and types of assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analysis did not change
compared to the prior period.
The method of Valuation adopted was the Projected Unit Credit Method as specified in Ind AS-19.
reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, the Company has classified its financial instruments into three levels prescribed
under the Ind AS. An explanation for each level is given below.
Level 1: Level 1 hierarchy includes financial instruments measured using quoted prices. This includes listed equity instruments,
exchange traded funds and mutual funds that have quoted price. The fair value of all equity instruments which are traded in the stock
exchanges is valued using the closing price as at the reporting period. The mutual funds are valued using the closing Net Assets Value
(NAV), NAV represents the price at which, the issuer will issue further units and will redeem such units of mutual funds to and from
the investors.
Level 2: The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques which
maximise the use of observable market data and rely as little as possible on entity-specific estimates. If all significant inputs required
to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2. Instruments in the level 2 category for the Company
include foreign exchange forward contracts.
Level 3: If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in this level.
There are no internal transfers of financial assets and financial libilities between Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 during the period. The
Company''s policy is to recognise transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy level as at the end of the reporting period.
The carrying amounts of trade receivables, cash and cash equivalents, fixed deposit having maturity period upto 12 months and
its interest accrued, export benefits receivable, current loans, current borrowings, trade payables and other financial liabilities are
considered to be approximately same as their value, due to the short-term maturities of these financial assets/liabilities.
During the periods mentioned above, there have been no transfers amongst the levels of hierarchy.
The Company''s objectives when managing capital is to safeguard continuity, maintain a strong credit rating and healthy capital ratios in
order to support its business and provide adequate return to shareholders through continuing growth. The Company''s overall strategy
remains unchanged from previous year.
The Company determines the amount of capital required on the basis of annual business and long-term operating plans which include
capital and other strategic investments.
The funding requirements are met through a mixture of equity, internal fund generation and other long-term borrowings. The
Company''s policy is to use short-term and long-term borrowings to meet anticipated funding requirements.
For the purpose of the Company''s capital management, equity includes paid up capital, securities premium and other reserves. Net
debt are long term and short term liabilities. The Company''s strategy is to maintain a gearing ratio within 2:1.
The Company''s activities are exposed to market risk, liquidity risk and credit risk which may adversely impact the fair value of its
financial instruments. In order to minimise any adverse effects on the financial performance of the Company, derivative financial
The Company''s risk management is carried out by a central treasury department under policies approved by the Board of Directors.
Company''s treasury team identifies, evaluates and hedges financial risks in close cooperation with the Company''s respective
department heads. The Board provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as policies covering specific areas, such
as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, use of derivative financial instruments and nonderivative financial instruments,
and investment of excess liquidity.
Credit risk is the risk that counterparty will not meet its obligation under a financial instrument or customer contract, leading to a
financial loss. The Company is exposed to credit risk from its operating activities (primarily trade receivables) and from its financing
activities, including deposits with banks, investments in mutual funds, foreign exchange transactions and other financial instruments.
The credit risk encompasses both the direct risk of default and the risk of deterioration of credit worthiness as well as concentration
risks. To manage this, the Company periodically assesses the financial reliability of counter party, taking into account the financial
condition, current economic trends, analysing the risk profile of the counter party and the analysis of historical bad debts and ageing
of accounts receivable etc. Individual risk limits are set accordingly.
The Company determines default by considering the business environment in which the Company operates and other macro¬
economic factors. The Company considers the probability of default upon initial recognition of asset and whether there has been
a significant increase in credit risk on an ongoing basis throughout each reporting period. To assess whether there is a significant
increase in credit risk the Company compares the risk of a default occurring on the asset as at the reporting date with the risk of
default as at the date of initial recognition. It considers reasonable and supportive forwarding-looking information such as:
i) Actual or expected significant adverse changes in business;
ii) Actual or expected significant changes in the operating results of the counterparty;
iii) Financial or economic conditions that are expected to cause a significant change to the counterparty''s ability to meet its
obligations;
iv) Significant increase in credit risk on other financial instruments of the same counterparty;
v) Significant changes in the value of the collateral supporting the obligation or in the quality of the third-party guarantees.
None of the financial instruments of the Company result in material concentration of credit risk. The carrying value of financial assets
represent the maximum credit risk. Financial assets are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery, such as a
debtor failing to engage in a repayment plan with the Company.
i) Trade receivables
The Company extends credit to customers in normal course of business. The Company considers factors such as credit track
record in the market and past dealings for extension of credit to customers. Credit risk is managed through credit approvals,
establishing credit limits, payment track record, monitoring financial position of the customer and other relevant factors.
Outstanding customer receivables are regularly monitored and reviewed.
The Company evaluates the concentration of risk with respect to trade receivables as limited, as its customers are located in
several jurisdictions and industries and operate in largely independent markets. The exposure to customers is diversified and no
substantial concentration of risk as no single customer contributes more than 10% of revenue and of the outstanding receivables.
Sales made in domestic market predominantly are through agents appointed by the Company, the agents being del credere
agents most of the credit risk emanating thereto is borne by agents and the Company''s exposure to risk is limited to sales made
to customers directly. In case of direct sale, the Company has a policy of dealing only with credit worthy counter parties. The
credit risk related to such sales are mitigated by taking advance, security deposit, letter of credit, setting and monitoring internal
limits on exposure to individual customers as and where considered necessary.
An impairment analysis which includes assessment for indicators of impairment is performed at each reporting date on an
individual basis for all major customers and provision for impairment taken. The allowance reduces the net carrying amount.
ii) Financial Instruments and Cash Deposits
The Company maintains exposure in Cash and Cash equivalents, term deposits with banks and investments in mutual funds,
the same is done after considering factors such as track record, size of the institution, market reputation and service standards.
Generally, the balances are maintained with the institutions from whom the Company has also availed borrowings. Individual risk
limits are set for each counter party based on financial position, credit rating and past experience. Credit risk and concentration
of exposure are actively monitored by the Company. None of the financial instruments of the Company result in material
concentration of credit risk.
iii) The ageing analysis of the trade receivables (other than due from related parties) has been considered from the date the Invoice
falls due.
Liquidity risk is defined as the risk that the Company will not be able to settle or meet its obligations, by delivering cash or other
financial assets, on time or at a reasonable price. For the Company, liquidity risk arises from obligations on account of financial
liabilities - borrowings, trade and other payables, derivative instruments and other financial liabilities.
The Company''s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its
liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the
Company''s reputation. The Company manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate cash and drawable reserves, by continuously
monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of the financial assets and liabilities. The Company
regularly monitors liquidity position through rolling forecast based on estimated free cash flow generated from business. The Company
invests its surplus funds in bank fixed deposits and liquid schemes of mutual funds, which carry no/negligible mark to market risks.
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity or commodity prices will
affect the Company''s income/cash flows or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management
is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return. The sensitivity analysis
excludes the impact of movements in market variables on the carrying value of postemployment benefit obligations provisions and
on the non-financial assets and liabilities. Financial instruments affected by market risk include receivables, loans and borrowings,
advances, deposits, investments and derivative financial instruments. The sensitivity of the relevant profit and loss item is the effect
of the assumed changes in respective market risks.
The Company''s activities expose it to risks on account of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange forward contracts of varying maturity depending upon
the underlying contract as a risk management strategy to manage its exposures to foreign exchange fluctuations and interest rate.
Currency risk is the risk that the fair value of a financial instrument or future cash flows fluctuate because of changes in market price
of the functional currency. The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk on their receivables and payables which are mainly held
in the United State Dollar ("USD"), the Euro ("EUR") and British Pound (''GBP''). Consequently, the Company is exposed primarily to the
risk that the exchange rate of the Indian Rupees ("Rs.") relative to the USD, the EUR, and the GBP may change in a manner that has a
material effect on the reported values of the Company''s assets and liabilities that are denominated in these foreign currencies.
The Company evaluates exchange rate exposure arising from foreign currency transactions and follows established risk management
policy wherein exposure is identified, a benchmark is set and monitored closely for suitable hedges, including minimizing cross
currency transactions, using natural hedge and the use of derivatives like foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge exposure to
foreign currency risk.
No transaction was done with stuck-off companies during the year.
The Code on Social Security 2020 (''Code'') has been notified in the Official Gazette on September 29, 2020. The Code is not yet
effective and related rules are yet to be notified. Impact if any of the change will be assessed and recognized in the period in which
said Code becomes effective and the rules framed thereunder are notified.
(i) The Company does not have any Benami property, where any proceeding has been initiated or pending against the Group for
holding any Benami property.
(ii) The Company do not have any charges or satisfaction which is yet to be registered with ROC beyond the statutory period.
(iii) The Company have not traded or invested in Crypto currency or Virtual Currency during the financial year.
(iv) The Company have not received any fund from any person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities (Funding Party) with the
understanding (whether recorded in writing or otherwise) that the Company shall:
(a) directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the
Funding Party (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or
(b) provide any guarantee, security or the like to or on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries.
(v) The Company is in compliance with the number of layers prescribed under clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013
read with the Companies (Restriction on number of Layers) Rules, 2017 (as amended).
(vi) The Company does not have any such transaction which is not recorded in the books of accounts that has been surrendered or
disclosed as income during the year in the tax assessments under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (such as, search or survey or any
other relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
There were no significant adjusting events that occurred subsequent to the reporting period other than the events disclosed in the
relevant notes.
The Standalone financial statements were approved for issue by the Board of Directors on May 10, 2025
As per Annexed Report of Even Date
NGST & Associates
Chartered Accountants Sd/- Sd/-
Firm Reg. No. 135159W Kamalkumar Dujodwala Pannkaj Dujodwala
Chairman Managing Director
Sd/- DIN- 00546281 DIN- 00546353
Bhupendra Gandhi
Partner
Membership No. 122296 Sd/- Sd/-
Shrirang V. Rajule Charmi Shah
Place: Mumbai Chief Financial Officer Company Secretary
Dated: May 10, 2025
Mar 31, 2024
1.13.1 Provisions are recognized when there is a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
1.13.2 The expenses relating to a provision is presented in the Statement of Profit and Loss net of reimbursements, if any.
1.13.3 Contingent liabilities are possible obligations whose existence will only be confirmed by future events not wholly within the control of the Company, or present obligations where it is not probable that an outflow of
resources will be required or the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability.
1.13.4 Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the financial statements but are disclosed unless the possibility of an outflow of economic resources is considered remote.
1.14.1 The Company measures certain financial instruments at fair value at each reporting date.
1.14.2 Certain accounting policies and disclosures require the measurement of fair values, for both financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities.
1.14.3 Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the principal or, in its absence, the most advantageous market to which the Company has access at that date. The fair value of a liability also reflects its non-performance risk.
1.14.4 The best estimate of the fair value of a financial instrument on initial recognition is normally the transaction price -i.e. the fair value of the consideration given or received. If the Company determines that the fair value on initial recognition differs from the transaction price and the fair value is evidenced neither by a quoted price in an active market for an identical asset or liability nor based on a valuation technique that uses only data from observable markets, then the financial instrument is initially measured at fair value, adjusted to defer the difference between the fair value on initial recognition and the transaction price. Subsequently that difference is recognised in Statement of Profit and Loss on an appropriate basis over the life of the instrument but no later than when the valuation is wholly supported by observable market data or the transaction is closed out.
Trade Receivables and debt securities issued are initially recognised when they are originated. All other financial assets are initially recognised when the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. All financial assets other than those measured subsequently at fair value through profit and loss, are recognised initially at fair value plus transaction costs that are attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset.
Subsequent measurement is determined with reference to the classification of the respective financial assets. Based on the business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset, the Company classifies financial assets as subsequently measured at amortised cost, fair value
through other comprehensive income or fair value through profit and loss.
In accordance with Ind AS 109, the Company applies Expected Credit Loss ("ECL") model for measurement and recognition of impairment loss on the financial assets measured at amortised cost and debt instruments measured at FVOCI.
Loss allowances on trade receivables are measured following the ''simplified approach'' at an amount equal to the lifetime ECL at each reporting date. The application of simplified approach does not require the Company to track changes in credit risk. Based on the past history and track records the Company has assessed the risk of default by the customer and expects the credit loss to be insignificant. In respect of other financial assets such as debt securities and bank balances, the loss allowance is measured at 12 month ECL only if there is no significant deterioration in the credit risk since initial recognition of the asset or asset is determined to have a low credit risk at the reporting date.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the Balance Sheet, if there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or to realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.
1.17.1 Current Tax
Income-tax Assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted, by the end of reporting period.
Current Tax items are recognised in correlation to the underlying transaction either in the Statement of Profit and Loss, other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
1.17.2 Deferred tax
Deferred tax is provided using the Balance Sheet method on temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes at the reporting date.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, the carry forward of unused tax credits and any unused tax losses. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable
profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilized.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be utilized. Unrecognized deferred tax assets are re-assessed at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profits will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
Deferred Tax items are recognised in correlation to the underlying transaction either in the Statement of Profit and Loss, other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the profit or loss for the period attributable to equity shareholders (after deducting preference dividends, if any, and attributable taxes) by the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the period.
For the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share, the profit or loss for the period attributable to equity shareholders and the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period are adjusted for the effect of all dilutive potential equity shares.
All assets and liabilities are classified as current or noncurrent as per the Company''s normal operating cycle (determined at 12 months) and other criteria set out in Schedule III of the Act.
Cash and cash equivalents in the Balance Sheet include cash at bank, cash, cheque, draft on hand and demand deposits with an original maturity of less than three months, which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
For the purpose of Statement of Cash Flows, Cash and cash equivalents include cash at bank, cash, cheque and draft on hand. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity at the date of purchase of three months or less and that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash to be cash equivalents.
Cash flows are reported using the indirect method, where by net profit before tax is adjusted for the effects of transactions of a non-cash nature, any deferrals or accruals of past or future operating cash receipts or payments and item of income or expenses associated with investing or financing cash flows. The cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities are segregated.
Bank guarantees issued by banks on behalf of the Company Rs. 217.26 Lacs (Previous Year Rs. 413.55 Lacs). These are secured by the charge created in favour of the Company''s bankers by way of pledge of Fixed Deposit Receipts.
II. Estimated amount of contracts (net of advances) remaining to be executed on capital account and not provided for Rs. NIL (P.Y. Rs. NIL)
III. Letter of credit issued by the bankers of the Company Rs. 60,78,64,440/- (P.Y. Rs. 98,60,29,659/-)
IV. The Company has cleared 19 MT of Pentaerythritol against Bill of Entry No. 616414 dated 20.10.2005. The custom department had asked the Company to pay Rs. 2,16,772/-on account of Anti Dumping Duty for clearance of the said goods as per Notification No. 93/2005 of customs issued on 20.10.2005 wherein the said goods were covered for levy of anti dumping duty imported from certain countries. The Company has deposited the said amount on 25.11.2008 as per CESTAT order no. S/603/WAB/MUM/2008/CSTB/CII dated 20.10.2008, but no provision has been made in books of accounts as the management is of the view that the consignment will not be covered under the notification, as on date of clearance of the goods the notification was not published in Gazette of India. Further, the said appeal has been upheld in CESTAT & remanded back to the learned adjudicating authority.
The Company is mainly engaged in the business of Manufacturing of Chemicals. Considering the nature of business and financial reporting of Company, the Company has only one segment viz "Chemicals" product as reportable segment. The Company operates in Local/Export segment geographically of which the exports have amounted to Rs. 3,698.24 Lacs (P.Y.Rs. 5,589.97 Lacs) out of Total Turnover of Rs. 40,543.35 Lacs (P.Y.Rs. 46,697.38 Lacs). But due to the nature of business, the assets/ liabilities and expenses for these activities cannot be bifurcated separately
The fair values of the financial assets and liabilities are included at the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This section explains the judgements and estimates made in determining the fair values of the financial instruments that are (a) recognised and measured at fair value and (b) measured at amortised cost and for which fair values are disclosed in the financial statements. To provide an indication about the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, the Company has classified its financial instruments into three levels prescribed under the Ind AS. An explanation for each level is given below.
Level 1: Level 1 hierarchy includes financial instruments measured using quoted prices. This includes listed equity instruments, exchange traded funds and mutual funds that have quoted price. The fair value of all equity instruments which are traded in the stock exchanges is valued using the closing price as at the reporting period. The mutual funds are valued using the closing Net Assets Value (NAV), NAV represents the price at which, the issuer will issue further units and will redeem such units of mutual funds to and from the investors.
Level 2: The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques which maximize the use of observable market data and rely as little as possible on entity-specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2. Instruments in the level 2 category for the Company include foreign exchange forward contracts.
Level 3: If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in this level.
There are no internal transfers of financial assets and financial liabilities between Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 during the period. The Company''s policy is to recognise transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy level as at the end of the reporting period.
The carrying amounts of trade receivables, cash and cash equivalents, fixed deposit having maturity period upto 12 months and its interest accrued, export benefits receivable, current loans, current borrowings, trade payables and other financial liabilities are considered to be approximately same as their value, due to the short-term maturities of these financial assets/liabilities.
During the periods mentioned above, there have been no transfers amongst the levels of hierarchy.
The Company''s objectives when managing capital is to safeguard continuity, maintain a strong credit rating and healthy capital ratios in order to support its business and provide adequate return to shareholders through continuing growth. The Company''s overall strategy remains unchanged from previous year.
The Company determines the amount of capital required on the basis of annual business and long-term operating plans which include capital and other strategic investments.
The funding requirements are met through a mixture of equity, internal fund generation and other long-term borrowings. The Company''s policy is to use short-term and long-term borrowings to meet anticipated funding requirements.
For the purpose of the Company''s capital management, equity includes paid up capital, securities premium and other reserves. Net debt are long term and short term liabilities. The Company''s strategy is to maintain a gearing ratio within 2:1.
The Company''s activities are exposed to market risk, liquidity risk and credit risk which may adversely impact the fair value of its financial instruments. In order to minimise any adverse effects on the financial performance of the Company, derivative financial instruments, such as foreign exchange forward contracts are entered to hedge certain foreign currency risk exposures. Derivatives are used exclusively for hedging purpose and not as trading or speculative instruments.
The Company''s risk management is carried out by a central treasury department under policies approved by the Board of Directors. Company''s treasury team identifies, evaluates and hedges financial risks in close cooperation with the Company''s respective department heads. The Board provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as policies covering specific areas, such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, and credit risk, use of derivative financial instruments and nonderivative financial instruments, and investment of excess liquidity.
Credit risk is the risk that counterparty will not meet its obligation under a financial instrument or customer contract, leading to a financial loss. The Company is exposed to credit risk from its operating activities (primarily trade receivables) and from its financing activities, including deposits with banks, investments in mutual funds, foreign exchange transactions and other financial instruments. The credit risk encompasses both the direct risk of default and the risk of deterioration of credit worthiness as well as concentration risks. To manage this, the Company periodically assesses the financial reliability of counter party, taking into account the financial condition, current economic trends, analyzing the risk profile of the counter party and the analysis of historical bad debts and ageing of accounts receivable etc. Individual risk limits are set accordingly.
The Company determines default by considering the business environment in which the Company operates and other macroeconomic factors. The Company considers the probability of default upon initial recognition of asset and whether there has been
a significant increase in credit risk on an ongoing basis throughout each reporting period. To assess whether there is a significant increase in credit risk the Company compares the risk of a default occurring on the asset as at the reporting date with the risk of default as at the date of initial recognition. It considers reasonable and supportive forwarding-looking information such as:
i) Actual or expected significant adverse changes in business;
ii) Actual or expected significant changes in the operating results of the counterparty;
iii) Financial or economic conditions that are expected to cause a significant change to the counterparty''s ability to meet its obligations;
iv) Significant increase in credit risk on other financial instruments of the same counterparty;
v) Significant changes in the value of the collateral supporting the obligation or in the quality of the third-party guarantees.
None of the financial instruments of the Company result in material concentration of credit risk. The carrying value of financial assets represent the maximum credit risk. Financial assets are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery, such as a debtor failing to engage in a repayment plan with the Company.
i) Trade receivables
The Company extends credit to customers in normal course of business. The Company considers factors such as credit track record in the market and past dealings for extension of credit to customers. Credit risk is managed through credit approvals, establishing credit limits, payment track record, monitoring financial position of the customer and other relevant factors. Outstanding customer receivables are regularly monitored and reviewed.
The Company evaluates the concentration of risk with respect to trade receivables as limited, as its customers are located in several jurisdictions and industries and operate in largely independent markets. The exposure to customers is diversified and no substantial concentration of risk as no single customer contributes more than 10% of revenue and of the outstanding receivables. Sales made in domestic market predominantly are through agents appointed by the Company, the agents being del credere agents most of the credit risk emanating thereto is borne by agents and the Company''s exposure to risk is limited to sales made to customers directly. In case of direct sale, the Company has a policy of dealing only with credit worthy counter parties. The credit risk related to such sales are mitigated by taking advance, security deposit, letter of credit, setting and monitoring internal limits on exposure to individual customers as and where considered necessary.
An impairment analysis which includes assessment for indicators of impairment is performed at each reporting date on an individual basis for all major customers and provision for impairment taken. The allowance reduces the net carrying amount.
ii) Financial Instruments and Cash Deposits
The Company maintains exposure in Cash and Cash equivalents, term deposits with banks and investments in mutual funds, the same is done after considering factors such as track record, size of the institution, market reputation and service standards. Generally, the balances are maintained with the institutions from whom the Company has also availed borrowings. Individual risk limits are set for each counter party based on financial position, credit rating and past experience. Credit risk and concentration of exposure are actively monitored by the Company. None of the financial instruments of the Company result in material concentration of credit risk.
iii) The ageing analysis of the trade receivables (other than due from related parties) has been considered from the date the Invoice falls due.
Liquidity risk is defined as the risk that the Company will not be able to settle or meet its obligations, by delivering cash or other financial assets, on time or at a reasonable price. For the Company, liquidity risk arises from obligations on account of financial liabilities - borrowings, trade and other payables, derivative instruments and other financial liabilities.
The Company''s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Company''s reputation. The Company manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate cash and drawable reserves, by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of the financial assets and liabilities. The Company regularly monitors liquidity position through rolling forecast based on estimated free cash flow generated from business. The Company invests its surplus funds in bank fixed deposits and liquid schemes of mutual funds, which carry no/negligible mark to market risks.
The tables below analyse the Company''s financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on their contractual maturities for:
- all non derivative financial liabilities, and
- net and gross settled derivative financial instruments for which the contractual maturities are essential for an understanding of the timing of the cash flows.
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity or commodity prices will affect the Company''s income/cash flows or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimizing the return. The sensitivity analysis excludes the impact of movements in market variables on the carrying value of postemployment benefit obligations provisions and on the non-financial assets and liabilities. Financial instruments affected by market risk include receivables, loans and borrowings, advances, deposits, investments and derivative financial instruments. The sensitivity of the relevant profit and loss item is the effect of the assumed changes in respective market risks.
The Company''s activities expose it to risks on account of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange forward contracts of varying maturity depending upon the underlying contract as a risk management strategy to manage its exposures to foreign exchange fluctuations and interest rate.
Currency risk is the risk that the fair value of a financial instrument or future cash flows fluctuate because of changes in market price of the functional currency. The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk on their receivables and payables which are mainly held in the United State Dollar ("USD"), the Euro ("EUR") and British Pound (''GBP''). Consequently, the Company is exposed primarily to the risk that the exchange rate of the Indian Rupees ("Rs.") relative to the USD, the EUR, and the GBP may change in a manner that has a material effect on the reported values of the Company''s assets and liabilities that are denominated in these foreign currencies.
The Company evaluates exchange rate exposure arising from foreign currency transactions and follows established risk management policy wherein exposure is identified, a benchmark is set and monitored closely for suitable hedges, including minimizing cross currency transactions, using natural hedge and the use of derivatives like foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge exposure to foreign currency risk.
The Code on Social Security 2020 (''Code'') has been notified in the Official Gazette on September 29, 2020. The Code is not yet effective and related rules are yet to be notified. Impact if any of the change will be assessed and recognized in the period in which said Code becomes effective and the rules framed thereunder are notified.
(i) The Company does not have any Benami property, where any proceeding has been initiated or pending against the Group for holding any Benami property.
(ii) The Company do not have any charges or satisfaction which is yet to be registered with ROC beyond the statutory period.
(iii) The Company have not traded or invested in Crypto currency or Virtual Currency during the financial year.
(iv) The Company have not received any fund from any person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities (Funding Party) with the understanding (whether recorded in writing or otherwise) that the Company shall:
(a) directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or
(b) provide any guarantee, security or the like to or on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries.
(v) The Company is in compliance with the number of layers prescribed under clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the Companies (Restriction on number of Layers) Rules, 2017 (as amended).
(vi) The Company does not have any such transaction which is not recorded in the books of accounts that has been surrendered or disclosed as income during the year in the tax assessments under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (such as, search or survey or any other relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
There were no significant adjusting events that occurred subsequent to the reporting period other than the events disclosed in the relevant notes.
The Standalone financial statements were approved for issue by the Board of Directors on May 30, 2024.
As per Annexed Report of Even Date
NGST & Associates
Chartered Accountants Sd/- Sd/-
Firm Reg. No. 135159W Kamalkumar Dujodwala Pannkaj Dujodwala
Chairman Managing Director
Sd/- DIN-00546281 DIN-00546353
Bhupendra Gandhi
Partner
Membership No. 122296 Sd/- Sd/-
Shrirang V. Rajule Nitin Kore
Place: Mumbai Chief Financial Officer Company Secretary
Dated: May 30, 2024
Mar 31, 2023
Contingent liabilities - Not provided for in respect of
|
31st March 2023 (^) |
31st March 2022 (^) |
|
|
Bank Guarantee |
4,13,55,160 |
3,15,56,840 |
Bank guarantees issued by banks on behalf of the Company ?413.55 Lacs (Previous Year ?315.57 Lacs). These are secured by the charge created in favour of the Company''s bankers by way of pledge of Fixed Deposit Receipts.
II. Estimated amount of contracts (net of advances) remaining to be executed on capital account and not provided for ?NIL (P.Y. ?NIL)
III. Letter of credit issued by the bankers of the Company ?98,60,29,659 /- (P.Y. ?62,97,36,618/-)
IV. The Company has cleared 19 MT of Pentaerythritol against Bill of Entry No. 616414 dated 20.10.2005. The custom department had asked the Company to pay ?2,16,772/-on account of Anti Dumping Duty for clearance of the said goods as per Notification No. 93/2005 of customs issued on 20.10.2005 wherein the said goods were covered for levy of anti dumping duty imported from certain countries. The Company has deposited the said amount on 25.11.2008 as per CESTAT order No. S/603/WAB/MUM/2008/CSTB/CII dated 20.10.2008, but no provision has been made in books of accounts as the management is of the view that the consignment will not be covered under the notification, as on date of clearance of the goods the notification was not published in Gazette of India. Further, the said appeal has been upheld in CESTAT & remanded back to the learned adjudicating authority.
The Company is mainly engaged in the business of Manufacturing of Chemicals. Considering the nature of business and financial reporting of Company, the Company has only one segment viz "Chemicals" product as reportable segment. The Company operates in Local/Export segment geographically of which the exports have amounted to Rs. 5,589.97 Lacs (P.Y.Rs. 5,783.68 Lacs) out of Total Turnover of Rs. 46,697.38 Lacs (P.Y.Rs. 49,091.50 Lacs). But due to the nature of business, the assets/ liabilities and expenses for these activities cannot be bifurcated separately.
The above sensitivity analyses are based on a change in an assumption while holding all other assumptions constant. In practice, this is unlikely to occur, and changes in some of the assumptions may be correlated. When calculating the sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation to significant actuarial assumptions the same method (present value of the defined benefit obligation calculated with the projected unit credit method at the end of the reporting period) has been applied as when calculating the defined benefit liability recognized in the balance sheet. The methods and types of assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analysis did not change compared to the prior period.
The method of Valuation adopted was the Projected Unit Credit Method as specified in Ind AS-19.
31. The balance of Sundry Debtors, Sundry Creditors, Loans & Advances and others are shown net of advances from/to Customers/ Suppliers of the same party and are as per books and subject to confirmations and reconciliation if any.
32. In the opinion of the Board and to the best of their knowledge the value of realization of current assets, loans & advances in the ordinary course of business, would not be less than the amount at which they are stated in the Balance Sheet.
33. Payments to Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises are made in accordance with the agreed credit terms and to the extent ascertained from available information, there is no overdue payable to MSME units beyond the period specified in Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006
Expenditure related to Corporate Social Responsibility is Rs. 167.44 Lakhs (Previous Year Rs. 196.38 Lakhs).
a) This note provides an analysis of the Company''s income tax expense, show amounts that are recognised directly in equity and how the tax expense is affected by nonassessable and non-deductible items. It also explains significant estimates made in relation to the Company''s tax positions.
The fair values of the financial assets and liabilities are included at the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This section explains the judgements and estimates made in determining the fair values of the financial instruments that are (a) recognised and measured at fair value and (b) measured at amortised cost and for which fair values are disclosed in the financial statements. To provide an indication about the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, the Company has classified its financial instruments into three levels prescribed under the Ind AS. An explanation for each level is given below.
Level 1: Level 1 hierarchy includes financial instruments measured using quoted prices. This includes listed equity instruments, exchange traded funds and mutual funds that have quoted price. The fair value of all equity instruments which are traded in the stock exchanges is valued using the closing price as at the reporting period. The mutual funds are valued using the closing Net Assets Value (NAV), NAV represents the price at which, the issuer will issue further units and will redeem such units of mutual funds to and from the investors.
Level 2: The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques which maximise the use of observable market data and rely as little as possible on entity-specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2. Instruments in the level 2 category for the Company include foreign exchange forward contracts.
Level 3: If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in this level.
There are no internal transfers of financial assets and financial libilities between Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 during the period. The Company''s policy is to recognise transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy level as at the end of the reporting period.
The carrying amounts of trade receivables, cash and cash equivalents, fixed deposit having maturity period upto 12 months and its interest accrued, export benefits receivable, current loans, current borrowings, trade payables and other financial liabilities are considered to be approximately same as their value, due to the short-term maturities of these financial assets/liabilities.
During the periods mentioned above, there have been no transfers amongst the levels of hierarchy.
The Company''s objectives when managing capital is to safeguard continuity, maintain a strong credit rating and healthy capital ratios in order to support its business and provide adequate return to shareholders through continuing growth. The Company''s overall strategy remains unchanged from previous year.
The Company determines the amount of capital required on the basis of annual business and long-term operating plans which include capital and other strategic investments.
The funding requirements are met through a mixture of equity, internal fund generation and other long-term borrowings. The Company''s policy is to use short-term and long-term borrowings to meet anticipated funding requirements.
For the purpose of the Company''s capital management, equity includes paid up capital, securities premium and other reserves. Net debt are long term and short term liabilities. The Company''s strategy is to maintain a gearing ratio within 2:1.
The Company''s activities are exposed to market risk, liquidity risk and credit risk which may adversely impact the fair value of its financial instruments. In order to minimise any adverse effects on the financial performance of the Company, derivative financial instruments, such as foreign exchange forward contracts are entered to hedge certain foreign currency risk exposures. Derivatives are used exclusively for hedging purpose and not as trading or speculative instruments.
The Company''s risk management is carried out by a central treasury department under policies approved by the Board of Directors. Company''s treasury team identifies, evaluates and hedges financial risks in close cooperation with the Company''s respective department heads. The Board provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as policies covering specific areas, such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, use of derivative financial instruments and nonderivative financial instruments, and investment of excess liquidity.
Credit risk is the risk that counterparty will not meet its obligation under a financial instrument or customer contract, leading to a financial loss. The Company is exposed to credit risk from its operating activities (primarily trade receivables) and from its financing activities, including deposits with banks, investments in mutual funds, foreign exchange transactions and other financial instruments. The credit risk encompasses both the direct risk of default and the risk of deterioration of credit worthiness as well as concentration risks. To manage this, the Company periodically assesses the financial reliability of counter party, taking into account the financial condition, current economic trends, analysing the risk profile of the counter party and the analysis of historical bad debts and ageing of accounts receivable etc. Individual risk limits are set accordingly.
The Company determines default by considering the business environment in which the Company operates and other macroeconomic factors. The Company considers the probability of default upon initial recognition of asset and whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk on an ongoing basis throughout each reporting period. To assess whether there is a significant increase in credit risk the Company compares the risk of a default occurring on the asset as at the reporting date with the risk of default as at the date of initial recognition. It considers reasonable and supportive forwarding-looking information such as:
i) Actual or expected significant adverse changes in business;
ii) Actual or expected significant changes in the operating results of the counterparty;
iii) Financial or economic conditions that are expected to cause a significant change to the counterparty''s ability to meet its obligations;
iv) Significant increase in credit risk on other financial instruments of the same counterparty;
v) Significant changes in the value of the collateral supporting the obligation or in the quality of the third-party guarantees.
None of the financial instruments of the Company result in material concentration of credit risk. The carrying value of financial assets represent the maximum credit risk. Financial assets are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery, such as a debtor failing to engage in a repayment plan with the Company.
i) Trade receivables
The Company extends credit to customers in normal course of business. The Company considers factors such as credit track record in the market and past dealings for extension of credit to customers. Credit risk is managed through credit approvals, establishing credit limits, payment track record, monitoring financial position of the customer and other relevant factors. Outstanding customer receivables are regularly monitored and reviewed.
The Company evaluates the concentration of risk with respect to trade receivables as limited, as its customers are located in several jurisdictions and industries and operate in largely independent markets. The exposure to customers is diversified and no
substantial concentration of risk as no single customer contributes more than 10% of revenue and of the outstanding receivables. Sales made in domestic market predominantly are through agents appointed by the Company, the agents being del credere agents most of the credit risk emanating thereto is borne by agents and the Company''s exposure to risk is limited to sales made to customers directly. In case of direct sale, the Company has a policy of dealing only with credit worthy counter parties. The credit risk related to such sales are mitigated by taking advance, security deposit, letter of credit, setting and monitoring internal limits on exposure to individual customers as and where considered necessary.
An impairment analysis which includes assessment for indicators of impairment is performed at each reporting date on an individual basis for all major customers and provision for impairment taken. The allowance reduces the net carrying amount.
ii) Financial Instruments and Cash Deposits
The Company maintains exposure in Cash and Cash equivalents, term deposits with banks and investments in mutual funds, the same is done after considering factors such as track record, size of the institution, market reputation and service standards. Generally, the balances are maintained with the institutions from whom the Company has also availed borrowings. Individual risk limits are set for each counter party based on financial position, credit rating and past experience. Credit risk and concentration of exposure are actively monitored by the Company. None of the financial instruments of the Company result in material concentration of credit risk.
iii) The ageing analysis of the trade receivables (other than due from related parties) has been considered from the date the Invoice falls due.
Liquidity risk is defined as the risk that the Company will not be able to settle or meet its obligations, by delivering cash or other financial assets, on time or at a reasonable price. For the Company, liquidity risk arises from obligations on account of financial liabilities - borrowings, trade and other payables, derivative instruments and other financial liabilities.
The Company''s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Company''s reputation. The Company manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate cash and drawable reserves, by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of the financial assets and liabilities. The Company regularly monitors liquidity position through rolling forecast based on estimated free cash flow generated from business. The Company invests its surplus funds in bank fixed deposits and liquid schemes of mutual funds, which carry no/negligible mark to market risks.
The working capital facilities may be drawn at any time and may be terminated by the bank without notice. ii) Maturities of Financial liabiliities
The tables below analyse the Company''s financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on their contractual maturities for:
- all non derivative financial liabilities, and
- net and gross settled derivative financial instruments for which the contractual maturities are essential for an understanding of the timing of the cash flows.
The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows:
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity or commodity prices will affect the Company''s income/cash flows or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return. The sensitivity analysis excludes the impact of movements in market variables on the carrying value of postemployment benefit obligations provisions and on the non-financial assets and liabilities. Financial instruments affected by market risk include receivables, loans and borrowings, advances, deposits, investments and derivative financial instruments. The sensitivity of the relevant profit and loss item is the effect of the assumed changes in respective market risks.
The Company''s activities expose it to risks on account of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange forward contracts of varying maturity depending upon the underlying contract as a risk management strategy to manage its exposures to foreign exchange fluctuations and interest rate.
Currency risk is the risk that the fair value of a financial instrument or future cash flows fluctuate because of changes in market price of the functional currency. The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk on their receivables and payables which are mainly held in the United State Dollar ("USD"), the Euro ("EUR") and British Pound (''GBP''). Consequently, the Company is exposed primarily to the risk that the exchange rate of the Indian Rupees ("Rs.") relative to the USD, the EUR, and the GBP may change in a manner that has a material effect on the reported values of the Company''s assets and liabilities that are denominated in these foreign currencies.
The Company evaluates exchange rate exposure arising from foreign currency transactions and follows established risk management policy wherein exposure is identified, a benchmark is set and monitored closely for suitable hedges, including minimizing cross currency transactions, using natural hedge and the use of derivatives like foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge exposure to foreign currency risk.
The Code on Social Security 2020 (''Code'') has been notified in the Official Gazette on September 29, 2020. The Code is not yet effective and related rules are yet to be notified. Impact if any of the change will be assessed and recognized in the period in which said Code becomes effective and the rules framed thereunder are notified.
(i) The Company does not have any Benami property, where any proceeding has been initiated or pending against the Group for holding any Benami property.
(ii) The Company do not have any charges or satisfaction which is yet to be registered with ROC beyond the statutory period.
(iii) The Company have not traded or invested in Crypto currency or Virtual Currency during the financial year.
(iv) The Company have not received any fund from any person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities (Funding Party) with the understanding (whether recorded in writing or otherwise) that the Company shall:
(a) directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or
(b) provide any guarantee, security or the like to or on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries.
(v) The Company is in compliance with the number of layers prescribed under clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the Companies (Restriction on number of Layers) Rules, 2017 (as amended).
(vi) The Company does not have any such transaction which is not recorded in the books of accounts that has been surrendered or disclosed as income during the year in the tax assessments under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (such as, search or survey or any other relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
There were no significant adjusting events that occurred subsequent to the reporting period other than the events disclosed in the relevant notes.
The Standalone financial statements were approved for issue by the Board of Directors on May 26, 2023.
Mar 31, 2018
1. Segment reporting
The Company is mainly engaged in the business of Manufacturing of Chemicals. Considering the nature of business and financial reporting of company, the company has only one segment viz "Chemicals" product as reportable segment. The company operates in Local/Export segment geographically of which the exports have amounted to Rs. 1,238.62 Lacs (P.Y.Rs. 828.01 Lacs) out of Total Turnover of Rs. 24,082.82 Lacs (P.Y.Rs. 17,650.59 Lacs). But due to the nature of business, the assets/ liabilities and expenses for these activities cannot be bifurcated separately.
2. Related parties'' disclosure as per Ind AS-24 Related Party Disclosures "(Specified under Section 133 of the Companies Act 2013, read with Rule 7 of Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2015.):
[A] Key Management Personal (KMP) and their Relatives.
Mr. Kamalkumar Dujodwala Chairman
Mr. Pannkaj Dujodwala Managing Director
Mr. Akshay Dujodwala Son of Chairman
Mrs. Manisha Dujodwala Spouse of Managing Director
Mrs. Alka Dujodwala Spouse of Chairman
[B] Companies /Firm controlled by Directors/Relatives who have the authority and controlling their activities.
- Balaji Pine Chemicals Ltd
- Speciality Chemicals
- Dujodwala Resin & Terpenes Ltd.
- Indo-Euro Securities Ltd.
- Dujodwala Exports Pvt. Ltd.
- Inspirations.
- Dujodwala Charities
- Pine Forest Products & Investment Pvt. Ltd.
- Chemexil Corporation
The Directors are the Key Management Personal (KMP) who has the authority and controlling the activities of the Company.
Note: - Related party relationship is as identified by the Company and relied upon by the Auditors.
3. Disclosure in accordance with Ind AS - 19 on "Employee Benefits"
The Company has classified the various benefits provided to employees as under: -(i) Defined Contribution Plans
During the year, the Company has recognized the following amounts in the Statement of Profit and Loss:
4. The balance of Sundry Debtors, Sundry Creditors, Loans & Advances and others are shown net of advances from/to Customers/Suppliers of the same party and are as per books and subject to confirmations and reconciliation if any.
5. In the opinion of the Board and to the best of their knowledge the value of realization of current assets, loans & advances in the ordinary course of business, would not be less than the amount at which they are stated in the Balance Sheet.
6. Payments to Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises are made in accordance with the agreed credit terms and to the extent ascertained from available information, there is no overdue payable to MSME units beyond the period specified in Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006
7. There was major fire in the Company''s plant at Kumbhivali in the first quarter of financial year 2015-16, for which claim of Rs. 30.60 crore was lodged with the insurance company. Out of this claimed amount, Company had received Rs. 24 Lakhs in 4th quarter of F.Y. 2015-16. Further, Management was confident of expediting and settling balance claim amount from the insurance Company and therefore claim amount of Rs. 30.36 crore was disclosed as "Insurance Claim Receivable" under Short Term Loans and Advances. However, during the year, Company has received surveyor''s final report dated 24th December 2016 wherein final loss was assessed at Rs. 18.02 crores and therefore balance amount of Rs. 12.33 crores not recoverable was written off in Statement of Profit & Loss during year ended 31st March 2017. Further, during the current year amount of Rs. 8.09 crores have been received from insurance company and balance amount is still receivable.
8. Notes to first time adoption:
9. Employee Benefit Cost:
Under Ind AS the actuarial gains and losses form part of the remeasurement of the net defined benefit Liability / Assets and is recognized in other comprehensive income. Under IGAAP, actuarial gains and losses were recognized in profit or loss. Consequently, the deferred tax effect of the same has also been recognized in other comprehensive income under Ind AS instead of profit or loss.
10. Fair Valuation of Investment:
Under IGAAP investment in equity / other instruments were classified into long term and current investments. Long term investments were carried at cost less provision, other than temporary in nature. Current investments were carried at lower of cost as fair value. Under Ind AS, these investments are required to be measured at fair value either through other comprehensive income or through profit and loss. The company has opted to fair value of these investments through profit & loss.
11. Deferred Taxes:
Under previous GAAP, deferred taxes were recognized based on profit and loss approach i.e. tax impact on difference between the accounting income and taxable income. Under Ind AS deferred tax is recognized by following Balance Sheet approach i.e. tax impact on temporary difference between the carrying value of assets and liabilities in the books and their respective tax base. Also deferred tax has been recognized on the adjustments made on transition to Ind AS.
12. Excise Duty:
Under previous GAAP, revenue from sale of goods was presented net of excise duty on sale. Under Ind AS, revenue from sale of goods is presented inclusive of excise duty. Excise duty is presented in statement of profit and loss as an expense.
5. Other Equity:
Adjustments to retained earnings and other comprehensive income have been made in accordance with Ind AS, for the above-mentioned items.
6. Optional Exemption availed:
Deemed Cost
The Company has elected to continue with the carrying value for all of its property, plant and equipment and intangible assets as recognized in the financial statement as at 31.03.2016 measured as per the previous GAAP and use that as its deemed cost as at the transition date.
13. Applicable Mandatory Exceptions
a) Estimates
An entity''s estimates in accordance with Ind AS at the date of transition to Ind AS shall be consistent with estimates made for the same date in accordance with previous GAAP (after adjustments to reflect any difference in accounting policies)
Ind AS estimates as at 1st April 2016 are consistent with the estimates as at the same date made in conformity with previous GAAP. The Company made estimates for following items in accordance with Ind AS at the date of transition as these were not required under previous GAAP.
(i) Impairment of financial assets based on expected credit loss model.
b) Depreciation of financial assets and financial liabilities
Ind AS 101 requires first time adopter to apply the derecognition provisions of Ind AS 109 prospectively for transactions occurring on or after the date of transition to Ind AS. However, Ind AS 101 allows the first time adopter to apply the de-recognition requirement in Ind AS 109 retrospectively from the date to the entities choosing, provided that the information needed to apply Ind AS 109 to financial assets and financial liabilities to derecognized as a result of past transactions was obtained at the time of initially accounting for those transactions. The Company has elected to apply the de-recognition provision of Ind AS 109 prospectively from the date of transition to Ind AS.
c) Classification and measurement of financial assets
As required under Ind AS 101 the Company has assessed the classification and measurement of financial assets on the basis of the facts and circumstances that exist at the date of transition Ind AS. Where practicable, measurement
of financial assets accounted at amortized cost has been done retrospectively.
d) Impairment of financial assets
Ind AS 101 requires an entity to apply the Ind AS requirements retrospectively if it is practicable, without undue cost and effort to determine the credit risk that debt financial instruments where initially recognized. The Company has measured impairment losses on financial assets as on the date of transition i.e. 1st April 2016 in view of cost and effort.
Transition to Ind AS -Reconciliations
The following reconciliations provide a quantification of the effect of significant differences arising from the transition from previous GAAP to Ind AS as required under Ind AS 101:
(i) Reconciliation of Balance sheet as at 1st April 2016 (Transition Date);
(ii) Reconciliation of Balance sheet as at 31st March 2017;
(iii) Reconciliation of Total Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31st March 2017;
(iv) Reconciliation of Total Equity as at 1st April 2016 and as at 31st March 2017;
(v) Adjustments to Cash Flow Statements as at 31st March, 2017
The presentation requirements under previous GAAP differs from Ind AS, and hence, previous GAAP information has been regrouped for ease of reconciliation with Ind AS. The re-grouped previous GAAP information is derived from the Financial Statements of the Company prepared in accordance with previous GAAP.
Mar 31, 2016
Note 1: Of these 431080 equity shares of Rs. 10 each fully paid up issued at premium of Rs. 11.09 per share upon conversion of convertible warrants issued on preferential basis in the F.Y.2010-11)
C) Terms/ rights attached to Equity Shares:
The Company has only one class of equity shares having par value of Rs.10/-. Each holder of equity share is entitled to one vote per share. The Company declares and pays dividend in Indian Rupees. The dividend proposed by the Board of Directors is subject to the approval of the shareholders in the ensuing Annual General Meeting.
In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of the equity shares will be entitled to receive remaining assets of the Company after distribution of all preferential amounts. The distribution will be in proportion to the number of equity shares held by the share holders. - -
F) Bonus shares / Buy Back / Shares for consideration other than cash issued during the period of five years immediately preceding the financial year ended on 31st March 2016.
(i) Aggregate number of equity shares allotted as fully paid up pursuant to contracts without payment being received in cash: Nil
(ii) Aggregate number of equity shares allotted as fully paid up by way of Bonus Shares: Nil
(iii) Aggregate number of equity shares bought back: Nil
NOTE 2.
The borrowings are secured by:
a) Against hypothecation of Inventories and Book Debts.
b) Equitable mortgage of Factory Land and Building at Kumbhivali village, Savroli Kharpada Road, Tal. Khalapur, Khopoli -410202, Dist. Raigad, Maharashtra.
c) Hypothication of Plant and Machinery.
d) Personal Guarantee of Mr. Kamalkumar Dujodwala and Mr. Pannkaj Dujodwala Directors of the Company.
NOTE-3.
Due to small-scale industrial undertakings and due to micro enterprises and small enterprises:
The Company is in process of compiling relevant information from its suppliers about their coverage under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. Since the relevant information is not readily available, no disclosure have been made in the accounts. However, in view of the Management the impact of interest, if any, that may be payable in accordance with the provisions of this Act is not expected to be material.
Note 4
Trade payable includes Rs. 8,21,32,608/-to foreign creditors which is sub-juiced and therefore rupees liability is freeze.
Note 5.
Trade payables are subject to confirmations.
Note 6) Sundry creditors for expenses, advance from customers and advance from contractors / service providers are subject to confirmation.
Note 7) Advance from customers includes Rs.3097958 from the related party as per transactions specified in business parlance.
6. Contingent liabilities - Not provided for in respect of
Bank guarantees issued by banks on behalf of the Company Rs. 32.59 Lacs (Previous Year Rs 29.57 Lacs). These are secured by the charge created in favor of the Company''s bankers byway of pledge of Fixed Deposit Receipts,
ii. Estimated amount of contracts (net of advances) remaining to be executed on capital account and not provided for Rs.NIL (P.Y.Rs. 86,81,151/-)
a) In the earlier year the Company received Show Cause Notice from the Excise Department for the period February 2004 to May 2005 demanding sum of Rs. 2, 47, 49, 315/- for Excise Duty on price difference. The Company has received order in its favour from CESTAT against the Order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom against which the department has filed an civil appeal in Supreme Court for condemnation of delay in filling the Petition of appeal, hence no provision has which was allowed as per Order dated 18th November 2015, giving direction to Commissioner to arrive at correct transaction value after giving deduction and on the basis of our calculation submitted, we have debited Rs 11,12,067/- in RG 23 Part II on 31s1 March 2016 and hence no provision has been made in books of account for Excise duty of Rs 2,47,49,315/- as
b) In the earlier year the Company has received notice from Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs determining interest on excise duty liability for the period July 1999 to January 2004 of Rs. 1,68,38,001/- as against interest of Rs. 77,07,386/- calculated and paid by the company in financial year 2011-12. The excise department has demanded balance interest of Rs. 91,30,615/- (Rs. 1,68,38,001/- minus Rs. 77,07,386/-) from the Company and recovered an amount of Rs. 35,19,301/-out of export rebate of the Company and an amount of Rs. 56,11,314/-was paid by the Company by crediting RG23 balance. Since the Company has not agreed to the interest calculation of the department, it has filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs (Appeals) and the amount of Rs. 91,30,615/- paid has been shown as paid under protest.
c) The Excise department has gone in appeal against the Show Cause Notice decided in favor of Company by Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs (Appeals) for Rs.11,58,94,818/- in respect of Excise Duty on Turpentine & Rosin manufactured (exempted from excise manufactured without aid of power) for the period April 99 to March 04. The Company has further received Show Cause Notice from the Department for the period April 04 to November 04 of Rs. 1,01,92,867/- for which the Company has obtained Stay Order from the CESTAT against the Order passed by the Commissioner against it. Against all the above show cause notices for the period from April-99 to November-04 CESTAT passed order confirming cum-duty demand for the normal period. Against the said order, during the current financial year, the Company paid under protest Rs. 1,45,58,818/- towards excise duty as demanded by Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs for the period September-03 to November-04 and for which Appeal has been filed by the Company and is pending for adjudication before Commissioner (Appeals) .For the show cause notice received for the period December 04 to September 05 for Rs 81,44,105/-,appeal has been filed in CESTAT for adjudication against the order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom confirming the demand has been provided for in books of account and an amount of Rs 6,10,808 has been paid in cash for the appeal and for the balance amount of Rs 63,90,658/-the duty has been debited in RG 23 Part II on 01.09.2015. During the previous year the Company has also received notice from Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, determining interest on excise duty for the period Sept-03 to Nov-04 amounting to Rs. 2,20,73,762/- against which Company has paid Rs. 20,00,000/- under protest in the last financial year and during the current financial. Export rebate for amount of Rs 1,63,52,526/- have been further appropriated in current financial year under protest and for the balance interest amount no provision has been made in books of account as for the entire demand amount for the period from April-1999 to November 2004, appeal is pending before the Mumbai High Court and Appeal before Commissioner Appeal for the duty demand for the period September 03 to November 04.
d) Company''s petition for IIC notification was rejected by Delhi High Court and Company has filed SLP in Supreme Court. If decision comes in Company''s favour, then the above excise liabilities will be null and void and
iv. Letter of credit issued by the bankers of the Company Rs. 21,40,70,143/- (P.Y. Rs. 35,04,74,495/-)
v. The Company has cleared 19 MT of Pentair thriftily against Bill of Entry No. 616414 dated 20.10.2005. The custom department had asked the Company to pay Rs. 2,16,772/- on account of Anti Dumping Duty for clearance of the
said goods as per Notification No. 93/2005 of customs issued on 20.10.2005 wherein the said goods were covered for levy of anti dumping duty imported from certain countries. The Company has deposited the said amount on 25.11.2008 as per CESTAT order No. S/603/WAB/MUM/2008/CSTB/CII dated 20.10.2008, but no provision has been made in books of accounts as the management is of the view that the consignment will not be covered under the notification, as on date of clearance of the goods the notification was not published in Gazette of India.
vi. The company has imported certain raw materials during the earlier years of which the supplies being defective have been disputed by the Company with the suppliers and accordingly payment has not been made to the suppliers of Rs.79053366/-. The party has filed litigation for the same during current financial year for which the Company has not acknowledged the claim. The Company is contingently liable to pay interest & foreign exchange fluctuation impact, if any. The necessary RBI permission either for write backs or payments will be made based on the judicial decision, since the matter is sub-juice in the Bombay High Court.
9. Segment reporting
The Company is mainly engaged in the business of Manufacturing of Chemicals. Considering the nature of business and financial reporting of company, the company has only one segment viz "Chemicals" product as reportable segment. The company operates in Local/Export segment geographically of which the exports have amounted to Rs. 1428.89 Lacs (P.Y.Rs. 1793.67 Lacs) out of Total Turnover of Rs.16963.34 Lacs (P.Y.Rs.23909.66 Lacs). But due to the nature of business, the assets/ liabilities and expenses forthese activities cannot be bifurcated separately.
10. In consonance with the Accounting Standards on Inventory Valuation (AS2) and Guidance Note on Accounting Treatment for Excise issued by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the Company has provided for liability of excise duty payable on finished goods amounting to Rs.256.76 Lacs (P.Y. Rs.156.82 Lacs).
11. Related parties'' disclosure as per Accounting Standard 18.
[A] Key Management Personal (KMP) and their Relatives.
Kamalkumar R. Dujodwala Chairman
Pannkaj R. Dujodwala Managing Director
Akshay Dujodwala Son of Chairman
Mrs. Manisha P. Dujodwala Spouse of Managing Director
Mrs. Alka K Dujodwala Spouse of Chairman
[B] Companies/Firm controlled by the Directors & their relatives who have the authority for controlling their activities.
- Balaji Pine Chemicals Ltd
- SpecialityChemicals
- Dujodwala Resin&Terpenes Ltd.
- Indo-Euro Securities Ltd.
- Dujodwala Exports Pvt. Ltd.
- Inspirations.
- Dujodwala Charities
- Pine Forest Products & Investment Pvt. Ltd.
The Directors are the Key Management Personal (KMP) who have the authority for controlling the activities of the Company.
[C] Information on related party transactions as required by accounting Standard-18 for the year ended on 31-03 2016.
Note: - Related party relationship is as identified by the Company and relied upon by the Auditors.
12. Disclosure in accordance with Revised AS -15 on "Employee Benefits"
The Company has classified the various benefits provided to employees as under:-(i) Defined Contribution Plans
During the year, the Company has recognized the following amounts in the Statement of Profit and Loss:
iii) Defined Benefit Plan for Leave Encashment Benefits
a) The following assumptions are made by the actuary for the calculation of leave Encashment Benefits:
Valuation Basis
i. Mortality rate : IALM (2006-08) Ultimate Table
ii. Discount rate : 7.85% p.a.
iii. Salary Escalation : 5% p.a.
iv. Withdrawal Rate : 2% p.a.
Valuation Method
i. The method of Valuation adopted was the Projected Unit Credit Method as specified in AS-15 (Revised 2005) of I.C.A.I.
ii. A suitable allowance has been made for a ailment of leave during the future service of employees.
iii. The computation of Leave liability is based on the basis of the data and information furnished by the Company. A summary of data is given below:
13. No provision for current taxation is made for the current accounting period (reporting period) in accordance with Income Tax Act 1961 for relevant assessment year, in view of losses.
14. In the opinion of the management, there is no impairment of assets in accordance with Accounting Standard (AS-28) as on 8alance Sheet date.
15. The balance of Sundry Debtors, Sundry Creditors, Loans & Advances and others are shown net of advances from/to Customers/Suppliers of the same party and are as per books and subject to confirmations and reconciliation if any.
16. In the opinion of the Board and to the best of their knowledge the value of realization of current assets, loans & advances in the ordinary course of business, would not be less than the amount at which they are stated in the Balance Sheet.
17. Previous year figures have been regrouped, rearranged and reclassified, wherever necessary, to conform to current year''s presentation.
18. With the major fire in Companies plant during first quarter of the F.Y. 2015-16, there was a loss of inventory of Rs. 3059.51 Lakhs and to that extent inventory has been written off.
19. The Company has initiated the CSR spending in accordance with section 135 of the Companies Act 2013, though the full required amount as per the provisions was not spent during the year. The Company has, since close of the year further initiated various objectives for full spending during the next year as per CSR provisions.
20. During the previous year amount of Rs. 292.70 Lakhs has been taken as insurance claim receivable but of which the final settlement with the insurance Company is done for Rs. 64.19 Lakhs and balance amount of Rs. 228.51 has been written off during the current year.
21. There was major fire in the Companies plant at Kumbhivali in the first quarter of financial year 2015-16, for which claim of Rs. 30.60 crore was lodged with the insurance company. Out of this claimed amount, Company has received Rs. 24 Lakhs in 4rth quarter of F.Y. 2015-16. Further management is confident of expediting and settling balance claim amount from the insurance Company and virtual certainty of the claim lodged the amount of Rs. 30.36 crore as insurance claim receivable is taken as other income in the profit and loss account.
22. The Balance-sheet of the Company has been prepared as per schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013.
Mar 31, 2015
1. Of these 4,31,080 equity shares of Rs. 10 each fully paid up
issued at premium of Rs. 8.59 per share upon conversion of convertible
warrants issued on preferential basis in the financial year 2010-11.
2. The calls unpaid of Rs. 152000/- as conveyed by the
Management has received and relied upon by the Auditors.
3. Terms/ rights attached to Equity Shares:
The Company has only one class of equity shares having par value of
Rs.10/-. Each holder of equity share is entitled to one vote per share.
The Company declares and pays dividend in Indian Rupees. The dividend
proposed by the Board of Directors is subject to the approval of the
shareholders in the ensuing Annual General Meeting.
In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of the equity
shares will be entitled to receive remaining assets of the Company,
after distribution of all preferential amounts. The distribution will
be in proportion to the number of equity shares held by the share
holders.
4. Bonus shares / Buy Back / Shares for consideration other than cash
issued during the period of five years immediately preceding the
financial year ended on 31st March 2015:
(i) Aggregate number of equity shares allotted as fully paid up
pursuant to contracts without payment being received in cash: Nil
(ii) Aggregate number of equity shares allotted as fully paid up by way
of Bonus Shares: Nil
(iii) Aggregate number of equity shares bought back: Nil
5.Due to small-scale industrial undertakings and due to micro
enterprises and small enterprises:
The Company is in process of compiling relevant information from its
suppliers about their coverage under the Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises Development Act, 2006. Since the relevant information is
not readily available, nodisclosure have been made in the accounts.
However,in view of the Management, the impact of interest, if any, that
may be payable in accordance with the provisions of this Act is not
expected to be material.
6. Trade payable includes Rs. 8,21,32,608/-to foreign creditors which is
sub-judiced and therefore rupees liability is freezed.
7. Contingent liabilities - Not provided for in respect of
31th March 2015 (Rs.) 31TH March 2014 (Rs.)
Bank Guarantee 29,57,420 38,76,420
Bank guarantees issued by banks on behalf of the Company Rs. 29.57 Lacs
(Previous Year Rs 38.76 Lacs). These are secured by the charge created
in favour of the Company's bankers by way of pledge of Fixed Deposit
Receipts, ii. Estimated amount of contracts (net of advances) remaining
to be executed on capital account and not provided for
Rs. 86,81,151/- (P.Y. Rs. 25,31,459/-)
iii. Excise Duty
31ST March 31st March
2015 (Rs.) 2014 (Rs.)
Feb 04 to May 05 (Price Difference) 2,47,49,315 2,47,49,315
April 99 to March 04 (Central excise duty) 11,58,94,818 11,58,94,818
April 04 to Nov 04 (Central excise duty) 1,01,92,867 1,01,92,867
Dec 04 to Sept 05 (Central excise duty) 81,44,105 81,44,105
July 99 to Jan-04 91,30,615 91,30,615
Sept-03 to Nov-04 1,45,58,818 -
Sept-03 to Nov-04 2,20,73,762 -
a) In the earlier year the Company received Show Cause Notice from the
Excise Department for the period February 2004 to May 2005 demanding
sum of Rs. 2,47,49, 315/- for Excise Duty on price difference. The
Company has received order in its favour from CESTAT against the Order
passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom against which the
department has filed an civil appeal in Supreme Court for condemnation
of delay in filling the Petition of appeal, hence no provision has been
made in books of account for Excise duty of Rs 2,47,49,315/-.
b) In the earlier year the Company has received notice from
Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs determining interest on excise
duty liability for the period July 1999 to January 2004 of Rs.
1,68,38,001/- as against interest of Rs. 77,07,386/- calculated and
paid by the company in financial year 2011-12. The excise department
has demanded balance interest of Rs. 91,30,615/-(Rs. 1,68,38,001/-minus
Rs. 77,07,386/-) from the Company and recovered an amount of Rs.
35,19,301/- out of export rebate of the Company and an amount of Rs.
56,11,314/- was paid by the Company by crediting RG23 balance. Since
the Company has not agreed to the interest calculation of the
department, it has filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Central
Excise and Customs (Appeals) and the amount of Rs. 91,30,615/- paid has
been shown as paid under protest.
c) The Excise department has gone in appeal against the Show Cause
Notice decided in favour of Company by Commissioner of Central Excise
and Customs (Appeals) for Rs.11,58,94,818/- in respect of Excise Duty
on Turpentine & Rosin manufactured (exempted from excise manufactured
without aid of power) for the period April 99 to March 04. The Company
has further received Show Cause Notice from the Department for the
period April 04 to November 04 of Rs. 1,01,92,867/- for which the
Company has obtained Stay Order from the CESTAT against the Order
passed by the Commissioner against it. Against all the above show cause
notices for the period from April-99 to November-04 CESTAT passed order
confirming cum-duty demand for the normal period. Against the said
order, during the current financial year, the Company paid under
protest Rs. 1,45,58,818/- towards excise duty as demanded by
Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs for the period September-03 to
November-04. For the show cause notice received for the period December
04 to September 05 for Rs 81,44,105/-,appeal has been filed in CESTAT
for adjudication against the order passed by the Commissioner of
Central Excise & Custom confirming the demand has not been provided for
in books of account. During the current year the Company has also
received notice from Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs,
determining interest on excise duty for the period Sept-03 to Nov-04
amounting to Rs. 2,20,73,762/-against which Company has paid
Rs. 20,00,000/- under protest in the current financial year and for
which no provision has been made in books of account as for the entire
demand amount for the period from April-1999 to November 2004, appeal
is pending before the Mumbai High Court.
iv. Claim not acknowledged
31st March 2015 31ST March 2014
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Others 9,10,000 9,10,000
The (Other) claim against Company not acknowledged as debt is for suite
filed in Mumbai High court for Rs 7.65 lac by Mumbai Port Trust and
claim for Rs 1.27 Lacs by Marine Container Service Ltd and Rs 0.18 lac
by Pacific International Ltd as damages charges for container received
through them.
v. Letter of credit issued by the bankers of the Company Rs.
35,04,74,495/- (P.Y. Rs. 30,15,58,334/-)
vi. In respect of income tax matter: For AY 2009-10 claim of set off of
unabsorbed depreciation of Rs. 22,57,397/- was disallowed by AO and
appeal of the Company was rejected by Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) Also. Aggrieved by the order of CIT-A, the Company has
preferred an appeal before Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which
is not yet heard and hence no provision is made in books.
vii. The Company has cleared 19 MT of Pentaerythritol against Bill of
Entry No. 616414 dated 20.10.2005. The custom department had asked the
Company to pay Rs. 2,16,772/- on account of Anti Dumping Duty for
clearance of the said goods as per Notification No. 93/2005 of customs
issued on 20.10.2005 wherein the said goods were covered for levy of
anti dumping duty imported from certain countries. The Company has
deposited the said amount on 25.11.2008 as per CESTAT order No.
S/603/WAB/MUM/2008/CSTB/CII dated 20.10.2008, but no provision has been
made in books of accounts as the management is of the view that the
consignment will not be covered under the notification, as on date of
clearance of the goods the notification was not published in Gazette
of India.
viii. The Company has imported certain raw materials during the earlier
years of which the supplies being defective have been disputed with the
suppliers and accordingly payment has not been made to the suppliers of
Rs.79053366/- which is under negotiation with the party and same shall
be dealt as per RBI guidelines. As the party has filed litigation for
the same during current financial year for which the Company has not
acknowledged the claim. The Company is contingently liable to pay
interest & foreign exchange fluctuation impact, if any.
8. Segment reporting
The Company is mainly engaged in the business of Manufacturing of
Chemicals. Considering the nature of business and financial reporting
of Company, the Company has only one segment viz "Chemicals" product as
reportable segment. The Company operates in Local/Export segment
geographically of which the exports have amounted to Rs. 1793.67 Lacs
(P.Y.Rs. 2481.58 Lacs) out of Total Turnover of Rs.23909.66 Lacs
(P.Y.Rs.23165.85 Lacs). But due to the nature of business, the assets/
liabilities and expenses for these activities cannot be bifurcated
separately.
9. The advances recoverable includes a sum of Rs. 292.70 Lacs (P.Y.
Rs. 165.00 Lacs) of Insurance claim receivable on account of claims
lodged on insurance companies due to fire and other losses suffered of
Company's various assets & under business interruption policy due to
the fire as on 29th January, 2014. The said claims are under active
consideration of the insurance Company.
10. In consonance with the Accounting Standards on Inventory Valuation
(AS2) and Guidance Note on Accounting Treatment for Excise issued by
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the Company has
provided for liability of excise duty payable on finished goods
amounting to Rs. 156.82 Lacs (P.Y. Rs. 129.24 Lacs).
11. The Company was earlier enjoying the benefit of sales tax
deferment under State Incentive Package Scheme as the unit was situated
in a state notified backward area. During the earlier period i.e.
1997-98 to 2001-02 the company has included in the income the sales tax
deferment amount but has not created liability till previous years.
Since the current years outstanding amount was Rs. 38,16,769/- towards
Sales tax deferment Liability which is paid and debited to Profit &
Loss since taken as income in the earlier years as per the management.
11. Related parties' disclosure as per Accounting Standard 18.
[A] Key Management Personal (KMP) and their Relatives.
Kamalkumar R. Dujodwala Chairman
Pannkaj R. Dujodwala Managing Director
Akshay Dujodwala Son of Chairman
Mrs. Manisha P. Dujodwala Spouse of Managing Director
Mrs. Alka K Dujodwala Spouse of Chairman
[B] Companies/Firm controlled by the Directors & their relatives who
have the authority for controlling their activities.
* Balaji Pine Chemicals Ltd
* Speciality Chemicals
* Dujodwala Resin&Terpenes Ltd.
* Indo-Euro Securities Ltd.
* Dujodwala Exports Pvt. Ltd.
* Inspirations.
* Dujodwala Charities
* Pine Forest Products & Investment Pvt. Ltd.
The Directors are the Key Management Personal (KMP) who have the
authority for controlling the activities of the Company.
12. Provision for current taxation is made for the current accounting
period (reporting period) on the basis of the taxable profits computed
in accordance with Income Tax Act 1961 for relevant assessment year. As
per the normal provision of Income Tax Act, 1961, there are taxable
profits and hence tax provision has been made as per provisions of the
IT Act, 1961.
13. In the opinion of the management, there is no impairment of assets
in accordance with Accounting Standard (AS-28) as on Balance Sheet
date.
14. The balance of Sundry Debtors, Sundry Creditors, Loans & Advances
and others are shown net of advances from/to Customers/Suppliers of the
same party and are as per books and subject to confirmations and
reconciliation if any.
15. In the opinion of the Board and to the best of their knowledge the
value of realization of current assets, loans & advances in the
ordinary course of business, would not be less than the amount at which
they are stated in the Balance Sheet.
16. Previous year figures have been regrouped, rearranged and
reclassified, wherever necessary, to conform to current year's
presentation.
17. The Company has been supporting varies charity projects, however
in view of recent guidelines for the expenditure on CSR activities; the
Board of Directors of the Company will be appointing CSR committee
which will be exploring best avenues within the allowable expenditure
on CSR pending same. The Company, through has not spent any amount
during the year; however it has decided to carry CSR activities during
the next financial year onwards.
18. The Balance sheet of the Company has been prepared as per schedule
III of the Companies Act, 2013.
Mar 31, 2014
NOTE 1
a) Secured against hypothecation of Inventories and book debts of the
Company.
b) Equitable mortgage of Factory Land and Building at Kumbhivali
village, Savroli Kharpada Road, Tal. Khalapur, Khopoli -410202, Dist.
Raigad, Maharashtra.
c) Hypothication of Plant and Machinery.
d) Personal Guarantee of Shri Kamalkumar Dujodwala and Shri Pannkaj
Dujodwala Directors of the Company
NOTE 2
Due to small-scali industrial undertakings and due to micro enterprises
and small enterprises:
The Company is in process of compiling relevant information from its
suppliers about their coverage under the Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises Development Act, 2006. Since the relevant information is
not readily avilable, no disclosure have been made in the accounts.
However,in view of the mangement, the impact of interest, if any, that
may be payable in accodance with the provisions of this Act is not
expected to be material.
3. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES - Not provided for in respect of:
i. 31st March 2014 31st March 2013
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Bank Guarantee 38,76,420 41,21,420
Bank guarantees issued by banks on behalf of the Company Rs. 38.76 Lacs
(Previous Year Rs. 41.21 Lacs). These are secured by the charge created
in favour of the Company''s bankers by way of pledge of Fixed Deposit
Receipts.
ii. Estimated amount of contracts (net of Advances) remaining to be
executed on capital account and not provided for Rs. 25,31,459/- (P.Y.
Rs. 35,77,367/-)
iii. Excise Duty
31st March 2014 31st March 2013
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Feb 04 to May 05
(Price Difference) 2,47,49,315 2,47,49,315
April 99 to March 04
(Central excise duty) 11,58,94,818 11,58,94,818
April 04 to Nov 04
(Central excise duty) 1,01,92,867 1,01,92,867
Dec 04 to Sept 05
(Central excise duty) 81,44,105 81,44,105
July 99 to Jan-04 91,30,615 91,30,615
a) In the earlier year the Company received Show Cause Notice from the
Excise Department for the period February 2004 to May 2005 demanding
sum of Rs. 2,47,49,315/- for Excise Duty on price difference. The
Company has received order in its favour from CESTAT against the Order
passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom against which the
department has filed an civil appeal in Supreme Court for condemnation
of delay in filling the Petition of appeal, hence no provision has been
made in books of account for Excise Duty of Rs. 2,47,49,315/-.
b) In the last year the Company has received notice from Commissioner
of Central Excise & Customs determining interest on Excise Duty
liability for the period July 1999 to January 2004 of Rs. 1,68,38,001/-
as against interest of Rs. 77,07,386/- calculated and paid by the
Company in financial year 2011-12. The Excise Department has demanded
balance interest of Rs. 91,30,615/- (Rs. 1,68,38,001/- minus Rs.
77,07,386/-) from the Company and recovered an amount of Rs.
35,19,301/- out of export rebate of the Company and an amount of Rs.
56,11,314/- was paid by the Company by crediting RG23 balance. Since
the Company has not agreed to the interest calculation of the
department, it has filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Central
Excise and Customs (Appeals) and the amount of Rs. 91,30,615/- paid by
it has been shown as paid under protest.
c) The Excise department has gone in appeal against the Show Cause
Notice decided in favour of Company by Commissioner of Central Excise
and Customs (Appeals) for Rs.11,58,94,818/- in respect of Excise Duty
on Turpentine & Rosin manufactured (exempted from excise manufactured
without aid of power) for the period April 99 to March 04. The Company
has further received Show Cause Notice from the Department for the
period April 04 to November 04 of Rs. 1,01,92,867/- for which the
Company has obtained Stay Order from the CESTAT against the Order
passed by the Commissioner against it, hence no provision has been made
in books of account. Further show cause notice for the period December
04 to September 05 for Rs 81,44,105/- have been received, and the same
is pending before the Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom for
adjudication, not provided for in books of account.
iv. Claim not acknowledged
31st March 2014 (Rs.) 31st March 2013 (Rs.)
Others 9,10,000/- 9,10,000/-
The (Other) claim against Company not acknowledged as debt is for suite
filed in Mumbai High court for Rs 7.65 lac by Mumbai Port Trust and
claim for Rs 1.27 Lacs by Marine Container Service Ltd and Rs 0.18 lac
by Pacific International Ltd as da mages charges for container received
through them.
v. Letter of credit issued by the bankers of the Company Rs.
30,15,58,334/-(P.Y. Rs. 24,89,89,815/-)
vi. In respect of Income Tax matter: For AY 2009-10 claim of set off
of unabsorbed depreciation of Rs. 22,57,397/- was disallowed by AO and
appeal of the Company was rejected by Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) Also.
Aggrieved by the order of CIT-A, the Company has preferred an appeal
before Hon''ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which is not yet heard and
hence no provision is made in books.
vii. The Company has cleared 19 MT of Pentaerythritol against Bill of
Entry No. 616414 dated 20.10.2005. The Custom Department had asked the
Company to pay Rs. 2,16,772/- on account of Anti Dumping Duty for
clearance of the said goods as per Notification No. 93/2005 of customs
issued on 20.10.2005 wherein the said goods were covered for levy of
anti dumping duty imported from certain countries. The Company has
deposited the said amount on 25.11.2008 as per CESTAT order No.
S/603/WAB/MUM/2008/CSTB/CII dated 20.10.2008, but no provision has been
made in books of accounts as the management is of the view that the
consignment will not be covered under the notification, as on date of
clearance of the goods the notification was not published in Gazette of
India.
4. Segment reporting
The Company is mainly engaged in the business of Manufacturing of
Chemicals. Considering the nature of business and financial reporting
of Company, the Company has only one segment viz "Chemicals" product as
reportable segment. The Company operates in Local/Export segment
geographically of which the exports have amounted to Rs. 2481.58 Lacs
(P.Y.Rs. 2323.96 Lacs) out of Total Turnover of Rs. 23165.85 Lacs
(P.Y.Rs. 20952.32 Lacs). But due to the nature of business, the assets/
liabilities and expenses for these activities cannot be bifurcated
separately.
5. The advances recoverable includes a sum of Rs. 1,65,00,500 (P.Y.
Rs. Nil) of Insurance claim receivable on account of claims lodged on
insurance companies due to fire and other losses suffered of Company''s
various assets from the fire as on 29th January, 2014. The said claims
are under active consideration of the Insurance Company.
6. The Company has imported certain raw materials during the earlier
years of which the supplies being defective have been disputed with the
suppliers and accordingly payment has not been made to the suppliers of
Rs. 7,90,53,366/- which is under negotiation with the party and same
shall be dealt as per RBI guidelines.
7. In consonance with the Accounting Standards on Inventory Valuation
(AS2) and Guidance Note on Accounting Treatment for Excise issued by
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the Company has
provided for liability of excise duty payable on finished goods
amounting to Rs. 129.24 Lacs (Rs.172.41 Lacs).
8. The Company was earlier enjoying the benefit of Sales Tax deferment
under State Incentive Package Scheme as the unit was situated in a
state notified backward area. During the earlier period i.e. 1997-98 to
2001-02 the Company has included in the income the Sales Tax deferment
amount but has not created liability till previous years. Since the
current year the amount created is Rs. 55,80,715/- is credited as Sales
Tax deferment Liability which is pending & the same amount is debited
as Sales Tax Deferment Asset which will be nullified as & when it is
paid and debited to Statement of Profit & Loss in the coming years.
During the current year Rs. 56,43,730/- Is paid as Sales Tax Deferment
and debited to Statement of Profit & Loss since taken as income in the
earlier years as per the management.
9. Provision for current taxation is made for the current accounting
period (reporting period) on the basis of the taxable profits computed
in accordance with Income Tax Act 1961 for relevant assessment year. As
per the normal provision of Income Tax Act, 1961, there are taxable
profits and hence tax provision has been made as per provisions of the
IT Act, 1961.
10. In the opinion of the management, there is no impairment of assets
in accordance with Accounting Standard (AS-28) as on Balance Sheet
date.
11. The balance of Sundry Debtors, Sundry Creditors, Loans & Advances
and others are shown net of advances from/to Customers/Suppliers of the
same party and are as per books and subject to confirmations and
reconciliation if any.
12. In the opinion of the Board and to the best of their knowledge the
value of realization of current assets, loans & advances in the
ordinary course of business, would not be less than the amount at which
they are stated in the Balance Sheet.
13. Previous year figures have been regrouped, rearranged and
reclassified, wherever necessary, to conform to current year''s
presentation.
14. The quantitative and other details as required under para 3 and 4
of Part II of the Schedule VI of the Companies Act, 1956 are annexed
here to as per Annexure ''A''
15. The details as required under Part- IV of the schedule VI of the
Companies Act, 1956 as amended are given as per Annexure-B.
Mar 31, 2013
A) In the earlier year the Company received Show Cause Notice from the
Excise Departmentfortheperiod February 2004 to May 2005 demanding sum
of Rs. 2,47, 49, 315/- for Excise Duty on price deference. The Company
has received order in its favour from CESTAT against the Order passed
by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom against which the
department has filed a civil appeal in Supreme Court for condemnation
of delay in filling the Petition of appeal, hence no provision has been
made in books of account for Excise duty of Rs 2,47,49,315/-.
B) During the year the Company has received notice from Commissioner of
Central Excise & Customs determining interest on excise duty liability
for the period July 1999 to January 2004 of Rs. 1,68,38,001/- as
against interest of Rs. 77,07,386/- calculated and paid by the Company
in financial year 2011-12. The excise department has demanded balance
interest of Rs. 91,30,615/- (Rs. 1,68,38,001/- minus Rs. 77,07,386/-)
from the Company and recovered an amount of Rs. 35,19,301/- out of
export rebate of the Company and an amount of Rs. 56,11,314/- was paid
by the Company by crediting RG23 balance. Since the Company has not
agreed to the interest calculation of the department, it has filed an
appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs (Appeals)
and the amount of Rs. 91,30,615/- paid by it has been shown as paid
under protest.
C) The Excise department has gone in appeal against the Show Cause
Notice decided in favour of Company by Commissioner of Central Excise
and Customs (Appeals) for Rs.11,58,94,818/- in respect of Excise Duty
on Turpentine & Rosin manufactured (exempted from excise manufactured
without aid of power) for the period April 99 to March 04. The Company
has further received Show Cause Notice from the Department for the
period April 04 to November 04 of Rs. 1,01,92,867/- for which the
Company has obtained Stay Order from the CESTAT against the Order
passed by the Commissioner against it, hence no provision has been made
in books of account. Further show cause notice for the period December
04 to September 05 for Rs 81,44,105/- have been received, and the same
is pending before the Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom for
adjudication, not provided for in booksof account.
The (Other) claim against Company not acknowledged as debt is for suite
filed in Mumbai High court for Rs 7.65 lac by Mumbai Port Trust and
claim for Rs 1.27 lac by Marine Container Service Ltd and Rs 0.18 lac
by Pacific International Ltd as damages chargesfor container received
through them.
d) Letter of credit issued by the bankers of the Company Rs.
24,89,89,815/- (P.Y. Rs. 26,36,50,194/-)
e) In respect of income tax matter: For AY 2009-10 claim of set off of
unabsorbed depreciation of Rs. 22,57,397/- was disallowed by AO and
appeal of the Company was rejected by Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) also. Aggrieved by the order of CIT-A, the Company has
preferred an appeal before Hon''ble IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal which
is not yet heard and hence no provision is made in books.
f) The Company has cleared 19 MT of Pentaerythritol against Bill of
Entry No. 616414 dated 20.10.2005. The custom department had asked the
Company to pay Rs. 2,16,772/- on account of Anti Dumping Duty for
clearance of the said goods as per Notification No. 93/2005 of customs
issued on 20.10.2005 wherein the said goods were covered for levy of
anti dumping duty imported from certain countries. The Company has
deposited the said amount on 25.11.2008 as per CESTAT order No.
S/603/WAB/MUM/2008/CSTB/CII dated 20.10.2008, but no provision has been
made in books of accounts as the management is of the view that the
consignment will not be covered under the notification, as on date of
clearance ofthegoods the notification was not published in Gazetteof
India.
NOTE 1
Segment reporting
The Company is mainly engaged in the business of Manufacturing of
Chemicals. Considering the nature of business and financial reporting
of Company. The Company has only one segment viz "Chemicals" product as
reportable segment. The Company operates in Local/Export segment
geographically of which the exports have amounted to Rs. 2323.96 Lacs
(P.Y.Rs. 1373.16 lacs) out of Total Turnover of Rs. 20952.32 Lacs
(P.Y. Rs. 22022.72 lacs). But due to the nature of business, the
assets/ liabilitiesandexpensesfortheseactivitiescannot be bifurcated
separately.
NOTE 2
The Company does not have complete information to determine Micro,
Small and Medium Enterprises as specified in Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises Development Act, 2006 hence it is not possible for us to
verify the amount due to such enterprises.
NOTE 3
In consonance with the Accounting Standards on Inventory Valuation
(AS2) and Guidance Note on Accounting Treatment for Excise issued by
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the Company has
provided for liability of excise duty payable on finished goods
amounting to Rs 60.57 Lacs (Rs. 100.99 Lacs).
NOTE 4
The Company was earlier enjoying the benefit of sales tax deferment
under state incentive package scheme as the unit was situated in a
state notified backward area. During the earlier period i.e.
1997-98 to 2001-02 the deferred sales tax liability of Rs.
4,23,76,294/- was included in sales and not shown as liability.
Therefore the unsecured liability of sales tax deferment as shown in
the balance sheet is understated to an extent of Rs. 4,23,76,294/- for
which no provision was made and Reserve & Surplus have been overstated
to that extent. In current year the Company has paid Rs. 1,10,41,222/-
(P.Y. Rs. 1,12,69,801/-) out of the above mentioned deferred sales tax
liability which is debited to General Reserve hence reserve & surplus
as on 31a March 2013 is now overstated to the extent of Rs. 96,57,869/-
only.
NOTE 5
Pursuant to the approval of the members by way of special resolution
passed at the Extra-Ordinary General Meeting of the Company held on
28th December 2009, the Company has allotted 19,42,857 warrants on 25th
February 2010. Each warrant carried entitlement to subscribe for one
equity share of Rs. 10/- each at a premium of Rs. 8.59/- per share. The
subscriber to warrant had paid 25% amount being Rs. 90.29 lacs on
application. The holders of the warrants were entitled to exercise the
right to apply for Equity Shares in one or more tranches but within 18
months from the date of allotment of Warrants, subject to full payment
of the exercise price. In the event the proposed allottees does not
exercise the right to subscribe to the equity shares within a period of
18 months from the date of allotment of warrants, the amount paid by
the proposed allottees shall stand forfeited and the proposed allottees
shall not be entitled for refund of the same. Out of the above,
4,31,080 warrants have been converted into equity shares during the
year ended 31st March 2011 and full payment have been received by the
Company from the allottees of the above stated equity shares and an
additional premium of Rs. 2.50/- per share was also paid by the said
allottees as per the revised price calculation in accordance with SEBI
regulations. Since the holders of balance 15,11,777/- warrants have not
exercise their right to subscribe to the equity shares of the Company
within the period of 18 months, amount of Rs. 70,25,984/- being 25%
advance money received on subscription of warrants is forfeited and
transferred to capital reserve account.
NOTE 6
Provision for current taxation is made for the current accounting
period (reporting period) on the basis of the taxable profits computed
in accordance with Income Tax Act 1961 for relevant assessment year. As
per the normal provision of Income Tax Act, 1961, there are no taxable
profits and hence tax provision has been made as per provisions of
section 115JB of the IT Act, 1961.
NOTE 7
As at March 31, 2013, the Company has reviewed the future earnings of
all the cash generating units in accordance with the Accounting
Standard 28 "Impairment of Assets. As the carrying amount of assets
does not exceed the future recoverable
amount,consequently,noadjustmenttocarryingamountof assetsisconsidered
necessary bytheManagement.
NOTE 8
The balance of Sundry Debtors, Sundry Creditors, Loans & Advances and
others are as per books and subject to confirmations and reconciliation
if any.
NOTE 9
In the opinion of the Board and to the best of their knowledge the
value of realization of current assets, loans & advances in the
ordinary course ofbusiness, would not be less
thantheamountatwhichtheyare stated in the BalanceSheet.
NOTE 10
Till the year ended 31st March 2011, the Company was using pre-revised
Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956, for preparation and
presentation of its financial statements. During the year ended 31st
March 2012, the revised Schedule VI notified under the Companies Act,
1956 has become applicable to the company. The Company has reclassified
previous year figures to conform to this year''s classification.
Mar 31, 2012
A) Terms/ rights attached to Equity Shares:
The company has only one class of equity shares having par value of
Rs.10/-. Each holder of equity share is entitled to one vote per share.
The company declares and pays dividend in Indian Rupees. The dividend
proposed by the Board of Directors is subject to the approval of the
shareholders in the ensuing annual general meeting. In the event of
liquidation of the Company, the holders of the equity shares will be
entitled to receive remaining assets of the Company, after distribution
of all preferential amounts. The distribution will be in proportion to
the number of equity shares held
NOTE 1
Contingent liabilities - Not provided for in respect of
a) 31st March 2012 (Rs.) 31st March 2011 (Rs.)
Bank Guarantee 32,72,420 2,05,000
Bank guarantees issued by banks on behalf of the company Rs. 34.72 Lacs
(Previous Year Rs.2.05 Lacs). These are secured bythe charge created in
favour of the company's bankers by way of pledge of Fixed Deposit
Receipts.
b) Excise Duty
31st March 2012 (Rs.) 31st March 2011 (Rs.)
Feb 04 to May 05 (Price
Difference) 2,47,49,315 2,47,49,315
April 99 to March 04
(Central excise duty) 11,58,94,818 11,58,94,818
April 04 to Nov 04 (
Central excise duty) 1,01,92,867 1,01,92,867
Dec 04 to Sept 05
(Central excise duty) 81,44,105 81,44,105
A) In the earlier year the Company received Show Cause Notice from the
Excise Department for the period July 1999 to May 2005 demanding sum of
Rs.6,89,27,843/- for Excise Duty on price difference which included Rs.
4,41,78,530/- related to July 1999 to January 2004. As per the order of
Customs & Central Excise Settlement Commission dated 06.11.2006 demand
for period July 1999 to January 2004 was determined at Rs 3,80,84,939
with simple interest of 10% p.a. from the date the duty was due till it
was paid. Aggrieved by the said order the Company filed writ petition
on H'ble High Court, Mumbai challenging the calculation of excise duty
determined/settled for Rs. 3,80,84,939/-. According to the direction of
the H'ble High Court the Settlement Commission, Additional Bench,
Mumbai passed an order dated 24th June 2009 and reduced
determined/settled excise duty from Rs. 3,80,84,939/- to Rs.
3,34,06,319/-. The company sought review and direction from Settlement
Commission regarding credit of payment made by it of Rs. 4,06,24,448/-
during the pendency of writ petition and thereafter. Now as per the
Settlement Commission order dated 26th July 2011, the duty amount has
reached to finality and is settled at Rs. 3,34,06,319/- and it was also
clarified the manner of payment and credit to be granted to company.
Thus the proceedings conducted earlier in the case could not reach
finality as to the quantum of total duty liability and mode of payment
till final order dated 26th July 2011 passed by settlement commission
wherein it was also directed to recalculate the interest amount and the
manner in which credit for payment is to be availed by the company. Now
as per the Settlement Commission order dated 26th July 2011, the duty
amount has reached to finality and is settled at Rs. 3,34,06,319/- The
Company has paid an aggregate amount of Rs. 4,06,24,448/- during the
pendency of writ petition and proceeding thereafter which was debited
to general reserve during the financial year ended 31st March 2007 as
payment of earlier period and had not claimed as expenses. Since the
liability has been finalised during the current year and has been
reduced by Rs. 72,18,129/- the said amount is again credited to general
reserve account by debiting appropriate excise duty account. Further,
with respect to the final liability of Rs. 3,34,06,319/-,. the company
should have credited the said amount to General Reserve and debited
equal amount to Statement of Profit & Loss but had not done so as a
result profit has been over stated to that extent for the year.
For the demand of Rs. 2,47,49,315/- for the period Feb 04 to May 05,
the Company has received order in its favour from the CESTAT against
the Order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom against
which the department has filed an civil appeal in Supreme Court for
condonation of delay in filling the Petition of appeal.; hence no
provision has been made in books of account for Excise duty of Rs
2,47,49,315/-.
B) The Excise department has gone in appeal against the Show Cause
Notice decided in favour of Company by Commissioner of Central Excise
and Customs (Appeals) for Rs.11,58,94,818/- in respect of Excise Duty
on Turpentine & Rosin manufactured (exempted from excise manufactured
without aid of power) for the period April 99 to March 04. The Company
has further received Show Cause Notice from the Department for the
period April 04 to November 04 of Rs. 1,01,92,867/- for which the
Company has obtained Stay Order from the CESTAT against the Order
passed by the Commissioner against it, hence no provision has been made
in books of account. Further show cause notice for the period December
04 to September 05 for Rs 81,44,105/- have been received, and the same
is pending before the Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom for
adjudication, not provided for in books of account.
The (Other) claim against company not acknowledged as debt is for suite
filed in Mumbai High court for Rs 7.65 lac by Mumbai Port Trust and
claim for Rs 1.27 lac by Marine Container Service Ltd and Rs0.18 lac by
Pacific International Ltd as damages charges for container received
through them.
d) Letter of credit issued by the bankers of the company Rs.
26,36,50,194/- (P.Y. Rs. 15,95,45,533/-)
e) In respect of income tax matter: During the year, assessment for AY
2009-10 was completed wherein the assessing officer (AO) has disallowed
claim of set off of unabsorbed depreciation of Rs. 22,57,397/-.
Aggrieved by the order of AO, the company has preferred an appeal
before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) which is not yet heard and
hence no provision is made in books.
f) The Company has cleared 19 MT of Pentaery thritol against Bill of
Entry No. 616414 dated 20.10.2005. The custom department had asked the
Company to pay Rs. 2,16,772/- on account of Anti Dumping Duty for
clearance of the said goods as per Notification No. 93/2005 of customs
issued on 20.10.2005 wherein the said goods were covered for levy of
anti dumping duty imported from certain countries. The Company has
deposited the said amount on 25.11.2008 as per CESTAT order No.
S/603/WAB/MUM/2008/CSTB/CII dated 20.10.2008, but no provision has been
made in books of accounts as the management is of the view that the
consignment will not be covered under the notification, as on date of
clearance of the goods the notification was not published in Gazette of
India.
NOTE 2
Segment reporting
The Company is mainly engaged in the business of Manufacturing of
Chemicals. Considering the nature of business and financial reporting
of company, the company has only one segment viz "Chemicals" product as
reportable segment. The company operates in Local/Export segment
geographically of which the exports have amounted to Rs. 1,373.16 Lacs
(P.Y.Rs. 2,147.52 lacs) out of Total Turnover of Rs. 22,022.72 Lacs
(P.Y.Rs. 19,075.20 lacs). But due to the nature of business, the
assets/ liabilities and expenses for these activities cannot be bifurcated
separately.
NOTE 3
The Company does not have complete information to determine Micro,
Small and Medium Enterprises as specified in Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises Development Act, 2006 hence it is not possible for us to
verify the amount due to such enterprises.
NOTE 4
In consonance with the Accounting Standards on Inventory Valuation
(AS2) and Guidance Note on Accounting Treatment for Excise issued by
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the Company has
provided for liability of excise duty payable on finished goods
amounting to Rs 60.57 Lacs (Rs. 100.99 Lacs).
NOTE 5
The Company was earlier enjoying the benefit of sales tax deferment
under state incentive package scheme as the unit was situated in a
state notified backward area. During the earlier period i.e. 1997-98 to
2001-02 the deferred sales tax liability of Rs. 4,23,76,294/- was
included in sales and not shown as liability. Therefore the unsecured
liability of sales tax deferment as shown in the balance sheet is
understated to an extent of Rs. 4,23,76,294/- for which no provision
was made and Reserve & Surplus have been overstated to that extent. In
current year the company has paid Rs. 1,12,69,801/- (P.Y. Rs.
96,66,695/-) out of the above mentioned deferred sales tax liability
which is debited to General Reserve hence reserve & surplus as on 31st
March 2012 is now overstated to the extent of Rs. 2,06,99,091 only.
NOTE 6
Pursuant to the approval of the members by way of special resolution
passed at the Extra-Ordinary General Meeting of the Company held on
28th December 2009, the Company has allotted 19,42,857 warrants on 25th
February 2010. Each warrant carried entitlement to subscribe for one
equity share of Rs. 10/- each at a premium of Rs. 8.59/- per share. The
subscriber to warrant had paid 25% amount being Rs. 90.29 lacs on
application. The holders of the warrants were entitled to exercise the
right to apply for Equity Shares in one or more tranches but within 18
months from the date of allotment of Warrants, subject to full payment
ofthe exercise price. In the event the proposed allottes does not
exercise the right to subscribe to the equity shares within a period of
18 months from the date of allotment of warrants, the amount paid by
the proposed allottes shall stand forfeited and the proposed allottes
shall not be entitled for refund of the same. Out of the above ,
4,31,080 warrants have been converted into equity shares during the
year ended 31st March 2011 and full payment have been received by the
company from the allottees of the above stated equity shares and listing
of the aforesaid 4,31,080 shares is still pending with Bombay Stock
Exchange.
NOTE 7
Provision for current taxation is made for the current accounting
period (reporting period) on the basis of the taxable profits computed
in accordance with Income Tax Act 1961 for relevant assessment year. As
per the normal provision of Income Tax Act, 1961, there are no taxable
profits and hence tax provision has been made as per provisions of
section 115JB of the IT Act, 1961.
NOTE 8
As at March 31, 2012, the company has reviewed the future earnings of
all the cash generating units in accordance with the Accounting
Standard 28 "Impairment of Assets. As the carrying amount of assets
does not exceed the future recoverable amount, consequently, no
adjustment to carrying amount of assets is considered necessary by the
Management.
NOTE 9
The balance of Sundry Debtors, Sundry Creditors, Loans & Advances and
others are as per books and subject to confirmations and reconciliation
if any.
NOTE 10
In the opinion of the Board and to the best of their knowledge the value
of realization of current assets, loans & advances in the ordinary
course of business, would not be less than the amount at which they are
stated in the Balance Sheet.
NOTE 11
Till the year ended 31st March 2011, the company was using pre-revised
Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956, for preparation and
presentation of its financial statements. During the year ended 31st
March 2012, the revised Schedule VI notified under the Companies Act,
1956 has become applicable to the company. The company has reclassified
previous year figures to conform to this year's classification.
Mar 31, 2011
1] CONTINGENT LIABILITIES-Not provided for in respect of
Current Year Previous Year
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Bank Guarantee 2,05,000 1,05,000
Bank Guarantees issued by Banks on behalf of the company Rs. 2.05 Lacs
(Previous Year Rs.1.05 Lacs). These are secured by the charge created
in favour of the company's bankers byway of pledge of Fixed Deposit
Receipts.
d) Letter of credit issued by the bankers of the company Rs.
15,95,45,533/- (P.Y. Rs. 16,29,63,915/-)
e) The Company has cleared 19 MT of Pentaerythritol against Bill of
Entry No. 616414 dated 20.10.2005. The custom department had asked the
Company to pay Rs. 2,16,772/- on account of Anti Dumping Duty for
clearance of the said goods as per Notification No. 93/2005 of customs
issued on 20.10.2005 wherein the said goods were covered for levy of
anti dumping duty imported from certain countries. The Company has
deposited the said amount on 25.11.2008 as per CESTAT order No.
S/603/WAB/MUM/2008/CSTB/CII dated 20.10.2008, but no provision has been
made in books of accounts as the management is of the view that the
consignment will not be covered under the notification, as on date of
clearance of the goods the notification was not published in Gazette of
India.
3] Additional information pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs 3,4C
and 4D of Part-ll of Schedule-VI to the Companies Act, 1956. (As per
Annexure Attached)
4] The balance of Sundry Debtors, Sundry Creditors, Loans & Advances
and others are as per books and subject to confirmations and
reconciliation if any.
5] In the opinion of the Board and to the best of their krtowledge the
value of realization of current assets, loans & advances in the
ordinary course of business, would not be less than the amount at which
they are stated in the Balance Sheet.
6] EXCISE & CUSTOM DUTY
A) The Company had received Show Cause Notice from the Excise
Department for the period July 1999 to May 2005 of Rs.6,89,27,843/- for
Excise Duty on price difference. Out of the said show cause, the demand
in relation to July 1999 to January 2004 was Rs. 4,41,78,530/-. The
Company had filed application with the Office of Customs & Central
Excise Settlement Commission for such demand of Rs. 4,41,78,S30/-,
which had passed an Final Order on 06.11.2006 confirming Demand of Rs
3,80,84,939 with simple interest of 10% p.a after the date the duty was
due till it was paid. The Company has paid an aggregate amount of
Rs.3,80,84,936/- and furthers an amount of Rs.25,39,508 toward Interest
against the Interest demand of Rs. 1,89,31,646/-. The Company filed
writ petition on Honorable High Court challenging the calculation of
excise duty settled to Rs. 3,80,84,939/-. According to the direction of
the Honorable High Court the Settlement Commission, Additional Bench,
Mumbai passed an order dated 24* June 2009 and the settled excise duty
was reduced from Rs. 3,80,84,939/- to Rs. 3,34,06,319/-. For the demand
of Rs. 2,47,49,315/- for the period Feb 04 to May 05, the Company has
received order in its favour from the CESTAT against the Order passed
by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom against which the
department has filed an civil appeal in Supreme Court for condonation
of delay in filling the Petition of appeal.; hence no provision has
been made in books of account for Excise duty of Rs 2,47,49,315/- &
Interest liability of Rs 1,63,92,138/-
B) The Excise department has gone in appeal against the Show Cause
Notice decided in favour of Company by Commissioner of Central Excise
and Customs (Appeals) for Rs.11,58,94,818/- in respect of Excise Duty
on Turpentine & Rosin manufactured (exempted from excise manufactured
without aid of power) for the period April 99 to March 04. The Company
has further received Show Cause Notice from the Department for the
period April 04 to November 04 of Rs. 1,01,92,867/- for which the
Company has obtained Stay Order from the' CESTAT against the Order
passed by the Commissioner against it, hence no provision has been made
in books of account. Further show cause notice for the period December
04 to September 05 for Rs 81,44,105/- have been received, and the same
is pending before the Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom for
adjudication, not provided for in books of account.
9] SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company is mainly engaged in the business of Manufacturing of
Chemicals. Considering the nature of business and financial reporting
of company, the company has only one segment viz "Chemicals" product as
reportable segment. The company operates in Local/Export segment
geographically of which the exports have amounted to Rs. 2,147.52 Lacs
(P.Y.Rs. 819.14 lacs) out of Total Turnover of Rs. 19,075.20 Lacs (P.Y.
Rs. 14,582.99 lacs). But due to the nature of business, the assets/
liabilities and expenses for these activities cannot be bifurcated
separately.
10] The Company does not have complete information to determine Micro,
Small and Medium Enterprises as specified in Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises Development Act, 2006 hence it is not possible for us to
verify the amount due to such enterprises.
11] In consonance with the Accounting Standards on Inventory Valuation
(AS2) and Guidance Note on Accounting Treatment for Excise issued by
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the Company has
provided for liability of Excise duty payable on finished goods
amounting to Rs 100.99 Lacs (Rs. 13.36 Lacs).
12] The Company was earlier enjoying the benefit of sales tax
deferement under state incentive package scheme as the unit was
situated in a state notified backward area. During the earlier period
i.e. 1997-98 to 2001-02 the deferred sales tax liability of Rs.
4,23,76,294/- was included in sales and not shown as liability.
Therefore the unsecured liability of sales tax deferement as shown in
the balance sheet is understated to an extent of Rs. 4,23,76,294/- for
which no provision was made and Reserve & Surplus have been overstated
to that extent. In current year the company has paid Rs. 96,66,695/-
(P.Y. Rs. 7,40,707/-) out of the above mentioned deferred sales tax
liability which is debited to General Reserve hence reserve & surplus
as on 31st March 2011 is now overstated to the extent of Rs. 3,19,68,892
only.
14] Related parties disclosure as per Accounting Standard 18.
[A] Key Management Personal (KMP) and their Relatives.
Kamalkumar R. Dujodwala Chairman
Pannkaj R. Dujodwala Managing Director
S.CSen Whole Time Director
Mrs. Manisha P. Dujodwala Spouse of Managing Director
Mrs. Alka K Dujodwala Spouse of Chairman
Mrs. Shampa Sen Spouse of whole time Director
[B] Companies/Firm controlled by Directors/Relatives who have the
authority and controlling their activities.
Balaji Pine Chemicals Ltd
Speciality Chemicals
Dujodwala Resin & Terpenes Ltd.
Indo-Euro Securities Ltd.
Dujodwala Exports Pvt. Ltd.
Pine Forest & Investment Ltd.
The directors are the key management Personal (KMP) who have the
authority and controlling the activities of the Company.
17] Pursuant to the approval of the members by way of special
resolution passed at the Extra-Ordinary General Meeting of the Company
held on 28th December 2009, the Company has allotted 19,42,857 warrants
on 25th February 2010. Each warrant carries entitlement to subscribe
for one equity share of Rs. 10/- each at a premium of Rs. 8.59/- per
share. The subscriber to warrant has paid 25% amount being Rs. 90.29
lacs on application. The holders of the warrants would be entitled to
exercise the right to apply for Equity Shares in one or more tranches
but within 18 months from the date of allotment of Warrants, subject to
full payment of the exercise price. In the event the proposed allottees
does not exercise the right to subscribe to the equity shares within a
period of 18 months from the date of allotment of warrants, the amount
paid by the proposed allottees shall stand forfeited and the proposed
allottees shall not be entitled for refund of the same. Out of the
above, 4,31,080 warrants have been converted into equity shares during
the year and full payment have been received by the company from the
allottees of the above stated equity shares.
18] As at March 31,2011, the Company has reviewed the future earnings
of all the cash generating units in accordance with the Accounting
Standard 28 "Impairment of Assets. As the carrying amount of assets
does not exceed the future recoverable amount, consequently, no.
adjustment to carrying amount of assets is considered necessary by the
Management.
19] Previous year's figures have been rearranged/ regrouped wherever
found necessary.
20] The balance sheet abstract and company general balance sheet
profile as required by part IV of schedule VI to the Companies Act,
1956 are given in the Annexure.
Mar 31, 2010
2] CONTINGENT LIABILITIES - Not provided for in respect of
a)
Current Year (Rs.) Previous Year (Rs.)
Bank Guarantee 1,05,000 1,05,000
Bank Guarantees issued by Banks on behalf of the company Rs. 1.05 Lacs,
(Previous Year Rs.1.05 Lacs). These are secured by the charge created
in favour of the companys bankers by way of pledge of Fixed Deposit
Receipts.
The (Other) claim against company not acknowledged as debt is for suite
filed in Mumbai High court for Rs 7.65 lac by Mumbai Port Trust and
claim for Rs 1.27 lac by Marine Container Service Ltd. and Rs 0.18 lac
by Pacific International Ltd. as damages charges for container received
through them.
b) Letter of credit issued by the bankers of the company Rs.
16,29,63,915/-
c) The Company has cleared 19 MT of "Pentaerythritol" against Bill of
Entry No. 616141 dated 20.10.2005. The
custom department has asked the company to pay Rs. 216772/- on account
of Anti Dumping Duty for clearance of the said goods as per
Notification No. 93/2005 of customs issued on 20.10.2005. Wherein the
said goods were covered ,for levy of anti dumping duty imported from
certain countries. The Company has deposited the said amount on
25.11.2008 as per CESTAT Order No.S/603A/VAB/MUM/2008/CSTB/CII dated
20.10.2008, but no provision has been made in books of accounts as the
management is of the view that the consignment will not be covered
under the notification as on the date of clearance of the goods, as the
notification was not published in Gazette of India.
2] Additional information pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs 3,
4C and 4D of Part-ll of Schedule-VI to the Companies Act, 1956. (As per
Annexure Attached)
3] The balance of Sundry Debtors, Sundry Creditors, Loans & Advances
and others are as per books and subject to confirmations and
reconciliation if any.
4] In the opinion of the Board and to the best of their knowledge the
value of realization of current assets, loans & advances in the
ordinary course of business, would not be less than the amount at which
they are stated in the Balance Sheet.
5] EXCISE & CUSTOM DUTY
a) The Company had received Show Cause Notice from the Excise
Department for the period July 1999 to May 2005 of Rs.6,89,27,843/- for
Excise Duty on price difference. Out of the said show cause, the demand
in relation to July 1999 to January 2004 was Rs. 4,41,78,530/-. The
Company had filed application with the Office of Customs & Central Excise
Settlement Commission for such demand of Rs. 4,41,78,530/-, which had
passed an Final Order on 06.11.2006 confirming Demand of Rs 3,80,84,939
with simple interest of 10% p.a after the date the duty was due till it
was paid. The Company has paid an aggregate amount of Rs.3,80,84,936/-
and furthar amount of Rs 25,30,500 toward interst against the demand of
Rs. 1,89,31 .646. The Company and with on Honornble High Court chalaging
the calculation of excise duty settled to Rs. 3,80,84,939/-. According
to the direction of the Honorable High Court the Settlement Commission,
Additional Bench, Mumbai passed an order dated 24th June 2009 and the
settled excise duty was reduced from Rs. 3,80,84,939/- to
Rs. 3,34,06,319/-. For the demand of Rs. 2,47,49,315/- for the period
Feb 04 to May 05, the Company has received order in its favour from the
CESTAT against the Order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise &
Custom against which the department has filed an civil appeal in Supreme
Court for condonation of delay in filling the Petition of appeal.; hence
no provision has been made in books of account for Excise duty of
Rs 2,47,49,315/- & Interest liability of Rs 1,63,92,138/-
b) The Excise department has gone in appeal against the Show Cause
Notice decided in favour of Company for Rs.11,58,94,818/- in respect of
Excise Duty on Turpentine & Rosin manufactured (exempted from excise
manufactured without aid of power) for the period April 99 to March 04.
The Company has further received Show Cause Notice from the Department
for the period April 04 to November 04 of Rs. 1,01,92,867/- for which
the Company has obtained Stay Order from the CESTAT against the Order
passed by the Commissioner against it, hence no provision has been made
in books of account. Further show cause notice for the period.
December 04 to September 05 for Rs 81,44,105/- have been received, and
the same is pending before the - Commissioner of Central Excise &
Custom for adjudication, not provided for in books of account.
9] SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company is mainly engaged in the business of Manufacturing of
Chemicals. Considering the nature of business and financial reporting
of company, the company has only one segment viz "Chemicals" product as
reportable segment. The company operates in Local/Export segment
geographically of which the exports have amounted to Rs. 819.14 lacs
out of Total Turnover of Rs.14,582.99 lacs. But due to the nature of
business, the assets/ liabilities and expenses for these activities
cannot be bifurcated separately.
6] The Company does not have complete information to determine Micro,
Small and Medium Enterprises as specified in Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises Development Act, 2006 hence it is not possible for us to
verify the amount due to such enterprises.
7] In consonance with the Accounting Standards on Inventory Valuation
(AS2) and Guidance Note on Accounting Treatment for Excise issued by
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, the Company has
provided for liability of Excise duty payable on finished goods
amount to Rs. 13.36 Lacs.
8] The Company was earlier enjoying the benefit of sales tax
deferement under state incentive package scheme as the unit was
situated in a state notified backward area. During the earlier period
i.e. 1997-98 to 2001-02 the deferred sales tax liability was included
in sales and not shown as liability. Therefore the unsecured liability
of sales tax deferement as shown in the balance sheet is understated to
an extent of Rs. 4,23,76,294 /- for which no provision has been made
and Reserve & Surplus have been overstated to that extent. In current
year the company has paid Rs. 7,40,707/- out of the above mentioned
deferred sales tax liability which is debited to General Reserve hence
reserve & surplus as on 31st March 2010 is now overstated to the extent
of Rs. 4,16,35,587 only.
9} Related parties disclosure as per Accounting Standard 18.
[B] Companies/Firm controlled by Directors/Relatives who have the
authority controlling their activities.
- Sterling Products - Balaji Pine Chemicals Ltd. - Speciality Chemicals
- Dujodwala Resin & Terpenes Ltd.. - Indo-Euro Securities Ltd.
The directors are the key management Personal (KMP) who have the
authority and controlling the Activities of the Company.
10] In accordance with Accounting Standard 22 - "Accounting for Taxes
on Income" issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
deferred tax assets on account of timing difference for current year is
Rs.25.34 Lacs (Previous year Rs. 29.63 Lacs is charged to Profit & Loss
Account). The significant component and classification of deferred tax
assets and liabilities on account of timing difference are as under: -
11] Disclosure in accordance with Revised AS -15 on "Employee Benefits"
The Company has classified the various benefits provided to employees
as under:-
12] Pursuant to the approval of the members by way of special
resolution passed at the Extra-Ordinary General Meeting of the Company
held on 28th December 2009, the Company has allotted 19,42,85i
warrants on 25th February 2010. Each warrant carries entitlement to
subscribe for one equity share o Rs. 10/- each at a premium of Rs.
8.59/- per share. The subscriber to warrant has paid 25% amoun being
Rs. 90.29 lacs on application. The holders of the warrants would be
entitled to exercise the right to apply for Equity Shares in one or
more tranches but within 18 months from the date o allotment of
Warrants, subject to full payment of the exercise price. In the event
the proposed allottes does not exercise the right to subscribe to the
equity shares within a period of 18 months from the date of allotment
of warrants, the amount paid by the proposed allottes shall stand
forfeited and the proposed allottes shall not be entitled for refund of
the same.
13] Previous years figures have been rearranged/ regrouped wherever
found necessary.
14] The balance sheet abstract and company general balance sheet
profile as required by part - IV o schedule - VI to the Companies Act,
1956 aregiven in the Annexure.
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article