Notes to Accounts of Insilco Ltd.

Mar 31, 2024

(x) Provisions and contingent liabilities

Provisions are recognized when the company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past
events, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and the amount can be
reliably estimated. Provisions are not recognized for future operating losses. Where there are a number of similar
obligations, the likelihood that an outflow will be required in settlement is determined by considering the class of
obligations as a whole. A provision is recognized even if the likelihood of an outflow with respect to any one item
included in the same class of obligations may be small.

Provisions are measured at the present value of management’s best estimate of the expenditure required to settle
the present obligation at the end of the reporting period. The discount rate used to determine the present value is a
pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability.
The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as interest expense.

Contingent Liabilities: Contingent liabilities are disclosed when:

- there is a possible obligation arising from past events, the existence of which will be confirmed only by the
occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the Company,
or

- a present obligation that arises from past events where it is either not probable that an outflow of resources will
be required to settle or a reliable estimate of the amount cannot be made.

Contingent assets: Contingent assets are disclosed when the inflow of economic benefit is probable.

(y) Fair value measurement

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. Normally at initial recognition, the transaction price is the best
evidence of fair value.

However, when the Company determines that transaction price does not represent the fair value, it uses inter-alia
valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure
fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.

All financial assets and financial liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements are
categorized within the fair value hierarchy. This categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to
the fair value measurement as a whole:

• Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

• Level 2 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement
is directly or indirectly observable.

• Level 3 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement
is unobservable.

Financial assets and financial liabilities that are recognized at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company determines
whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorization at the end of each
reporting period.

(z) Employee benefits

(i) Short-term obligations

Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits that are expected to be settled wholly within
12 months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service are recognized in
respect of employees’ services up to the end of the reporting period and are measured at the amounts expected
to be paid when the liabilities are settled. The liabilities are presented as current employee benefit obligations in
the balance sheet.

(ii) Other long-term employee benefits obligations

The liabilities for earned leave, sick leave and long term service award are not expected to be settled wholly
within 12 months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service. They are therefore
measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by
employees up to the end of the reporting period using the projected unit credit method. The benefits are discounted
using the market yields at the end of the reporting period that have terms approximating to the terms of the
related obligation. Remeasurements as a result of experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions
are recognized in the statement of profit and loss.

The obligations are presented as current liabilities in the balance sheet if the entity does not have an unconditional
right to defer settlement for at least twelve months after the reporting period, regardless of when the actual
settlement is expected to occur.

(iii) Post-employment obligations

The Company operates the following post-employment schemes:

• Defined benefit plans such as gratuity

• Defined contribution plans such as provident fund, superannuation and national pension scheme

Defined benefit plans

The liability or asset recognised in the balance sheet in respect of gratuity plan is the present value of the
defined benefit obligation at the end of the reporting period less the fair value of plan assets. The defined benefit
obligation is calculated annually by actuaries using the projected unit credit method.

The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash
outflows by reference to market yields at the end of the reporting period on government bonds that have terms
approximating to the terms of the related obligation.

The net interest cost is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net balance of the defined benefit obligation
and the fair value of plan assets. This cost is included in employee benefit expense in the statement of profit and
loss.

Remeasurement gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions
are recognized in the period in which they occur, directly in other comprehensive income. They are included in
retained earnings in the statement of changes in equity and in the balance sheet.

Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation resulting from plan amendments or curtailments
are recognized immediately in the statement of profit and loss as past service cost.

Defined contribution plans

• Provident Fund:

Retirement benefit in the form of provident fund is a defined contribution scheme. The Company has no
obligation, other than the contribution payable to the provident fund. The Company recognizes contribution
payable to the provident fund scheme as expenditure, when an employee renders the related service, in
the statement of profit and loss.

• Superannuation:

The Company has taken group policy with Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to fund its liability
towards employee’s superannuation. Superannuation fund is administered by LIC and contributions made
to the fund are recognized as expenditure in the statement of profit and loss. The Company has no further
obligations under the plan beyond its monthly contributions.

• National Pension Scheme:

The Company has registered under the National Pension Scheme to provide postretirement benefit to
employees. This is an optional scheme available to employees. The Company has no further obligations
under the plan beyond its monthly contributions, which is recognized as expenditure when made, in the
statement of profit and loss.

• Bonus Plan

The Company recognizes a liability and an expense for bonuses. The Company recognize a provision
where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation.
Also refer Note 14.

• Termination benefits

Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated by the company before the normal
retirement date, or when an employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange for these benefits. The
company recognize termination benefits at the earlier of the following dates: (a) when the Company can no
longer withdraw the offer of those benefits: and (b) when the entity recognizes costs for a restructuring that
is within the scope of Ind AS 37 and involves the payment of terminations benefits. In the case of an offer
made to encourage voluntary redundancy, the termination benefits are measured based on the number of
employees expected to accept the offer.

(aa) Contributed equity

Equity shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are
shown as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.

(bb) Earnings per share

(i) Basic earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing:

• The net profit or loss for the period attributable to equity shareholders

• by the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average
number of equity shares outstanding during the period is adjusted for events such as bonus issue, bonus
element in a rights issue, share split, and reverse share split (consolidation of shares) that have changed
the number of equity shares outstanding, without a corresponding change in resources.

(ii) Diluted earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into
account:

• the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential equity
shares, and

• the weighted average number of additional equity shares that would have been outstanding assuming the
conversion of all dilutive potential equity shares.

(cc) Rounding of amounts

All amounts disclosed in the financial statements and notes have been rounded off to the nearest thousand as per the
requirement of Schedule III, unless otherwise stated.

Note 2: Critical estimates and judgements

The preparation of financial statements requires the use of accounting estimates which, by definition, will seldom equal
the actual results. Management also needs to exercise judgement in applying the Company’s accounting policies. This
note provides an overview of the areas that involved a higher degree of judgement or complexity, and of items which are
more likely to be materially adjusted due to estimates and assumptions turning out to be different than those originally
assessed. Detailed information about each of these estimates and judgements is included in relevant notes together with
information about the basis of calculation for each affected line item in the financial statements.

Critical estimates and judgements

The areas involving critical estimates and judgements are:

• Estimation of useful life and residual values of property, plant and equipment - Note 3(a)

• Classification of property, plant and equipment as non-current assets - Note 3(a)

• Impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets- Notes 3(a), 5 and 33

• Determination of lease term - Note 3(b)

• Impairment of Right of Use asset - Notes 3(b) and 33

• Fair value of investment properties - Note 4

• Classification of non-current assets as held for sale- Note 33 and 11 (a)

• Impairment of trade receivables - Note 9(a)

• Estimation of defined benefit obligation - Note 14(a) and 14(b)

• Estimation of provision for waste disposal - Note 13(d)

• Provision for litigations and contingent liabilities - Notes 13 (d) and 26

• Recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities and tax expense - Notes 15 and 24

• Preparation of financial statements not on a going concern - Note 33

• Estimation of amount payable to employees under retention agreement - Note 14

• Recognition of transfer levy charges and interest thereon - Note 34

Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated. They are based on historical experience and other factors, including
expectations of future events that may have a financial impact on the Company and that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances.

(ii) Post-employment obligations

Gratuity

Under the gratuity plan, every employee who has completed at least five years of service gets a gratuity on departure
at 15 days of last drawn salary for each completed year of service. The completion of continuous service of 5 years
shall not be applicable for an employee who attains the age of superannuation or normal age of retirement before
completion of the continuous service of 5 years. The Company has funded the gratuity liability with Life Insurance
Corporation of India (LIC) except in case of certain new employees, whose gratuity liability is unfunded. Rate of
return is as given by the insurance Company. The overall expected rate of return on assets is determined based on
the market prices prevailing on that date, applicable to the period over which the obligation is to be settled.

The reconciliation of opening and closing balances of the present value of the defined benefit obligations are as
below:

The above sensitivity analyses are based on a change in an assumption while holding all other assumptions
constant. In practice, this is unlikely to occur, and changes in some of the assumptions may be correlated. When
calculating the sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation to significant actuarial assumptions the same method
(present value of the defined benefit obligation calculated with the projected unit credit method at the end of the
reporting period) has been applied as when calculating the defined benefit liability recognised in the balance
sheet.

The methods and types of assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analyses have changed as compared
to the prior period. All the actuarial assumptions has been mentioned as N.A. in the current year as no actuarial
valuation has been performed considering the Company is in voluntary liquidation and all employees retired on
December 31, 2022. Accordingly, sensitivity analysis has been disclosed as N.A. as none of the above
assumptions are used in computing the liability.

(j) Risk exposure

Valuations are performed on certain basic set of pre-determined assumptions and other regulatory frame work
which may vary over time. Thus, the Company is exposed to various risks in providing the above gratuity benefit
which are as follows:

Interest rate risk: The plan exposes the Company to the risk of fall in interest rates. A fall in interest rates will
result in an increase in the ultimate cost of providing the above benefit and will thus result in an increase in the
value of the liability (as shown in financial statements).

Liquidity risk: This is the risk that the Company is not able to meet the short-term gratuity payouts. This may
arise due to non availability of enough cash / cash equivalents to meet the liabilities or holding of illiquid assets
not being sold in time.

Salary escalation risk: The present value of the defined benefit plan is calculated with the assumption of salary
increase rate of plan participants in future. Deviation in the rate of increase of salary in future for plan participants
from the rate of increase in salary used to determine the present value of obligation will have a bearing on the
plan’s liability.

Demographic risk: The Company has used certain mortality and attrition assumptions in valuation of the liability.
The Company is exposed to the risk of actual experience turning out to be worse as compared to the assumptions.

Asset liability mismatching or market risk: The duration of the liability is longer compared to duration of
assets, exposing the Company to market risk for volatilities/ fall in interest rate.

Investment risk: The probability or likelihood of occurrence of losses relative to the expected return on any
particular investment.

(iii) Defined contribution plans

• Provident Fund: Retirement benefit in the form of provident fund is a defined contribution scheme. The Company
has no obligation, other than the contribution payable to the provident fund. The Company recognizes contribution
payable to the provident fund scheme as expenditure, when an employee renders the related service.

• Superannuation: The Company has taken group policy with Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to fund its
liability towards employee’s superannuation. Superannuation fund is administered by LIC and contributions
made to the fund are charged to revenue. The Company has no further obligations under the plan beyond its
monthly contributions.

• National Pension Scheme: The Company has registered under the National Pension Scheme to provide post
retirement benefit to employees. This is an optional scheme available to employees. The Company has no
further obligations under the plan beyond its monthly contributions.

Level 1: Level 1 hierarchy includes financial instruments measured using quoted prices (in active market) the closing
Net Asset Value (NAV) of which the Company can access as on measurement date. The mutual funds are measured
using the closing NAV.

Level 2: The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation
techniques which maximize the use of observable market data and rely as little as possible on entity-specific estimates.
If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2.
Level 3: If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in
level 3.

Valuation technique used to determine fair value

There are no transfers between levels 1 and 2 during the year.

The Company’s policy is to recognise transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the
reporting period.

The carrying amounts of trade payables, cash and cash equivalents, other bank balances, other financial assets and
other financial liabilities are considered to be the same as their fair values, due to their short-term nature.

Majorly, the security deposits are redeemable on demand and hence the fair values of security deposits are
approximately equivalent to the carrying amount.

The fair values of loan to employees are based on discounted cash flows using a current perquisite valuation tax rate.
They are classified as level 3 fair values in the fair value hierarchy since significant inputs required to fair value an
instrument are not observable. There is no material difference between carrying amount and fair value of loan to
employees as on March 31,2024 and March 31,2023.

Note 27 : Financial risk management

The Board of Directors of the Company has overall responsibility for the determination of the Company’s risk management
objectives and policies. The Company’s overall risk management policy during the suspension of operations and the
ongoing voluntary liquidation process of the Company, as described in notes 33, focusses on conservation of cash,
management of other financial assets and liabilities; and regulatory and governmental processes.

The Company’s historic activities exposed it to liquidity risk, credit risk and market risk (foreign exchange and price). The
Company’s financial instruments comprise of cash and cash equivalents, deposits with bank and other items such as
prepayments and other receivable, accruals and other payables which arose from its operations. This note presents
information about the Company’s exposure to each of the above risks, the Board’s objectives, policies and processes for
measuring and managing risk and management of capital. Further quantitative disclosures are included throughout these
financial statements. The Company held no derivative financial instruments as at March 31,2024 (Previous Year: Nil). A
summary of the main risks is set out below:

(A) Credit risk

Credit risk mainly arises from cash and cash equivalents, deposits with banks, security deposits with others as well
as well as credit exposures to customers. The maximum exposure arising from these financial assets is their carrying
value as disclosed in the balance sheet.

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to
meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Company’s receivables from customers and deposits
with banking institutions. The carrying amounts of financial assets represent the maximum credit risk exposure.

The Company considers the probability of default upon initial recognition of asset and whether there has been a
significant increase in credit risk on an ongoing basis throughout each reporting period. To assess whether there is a
significant increase in credit risk the Company compares the risk of a default occurring on the asset as at the reporting
date with the risk of default as at the date of initial recognition. It considers available reasonable and supportive
forwarding-looking information.

A default on a financial asset is when the counterparty fails to make contractual payments within 180 days when they
fall due. This definition of default is determined by considering the business environment in which entity operates and
other macro-economic factors.

Assets are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery, such as a debtor declaring bankruptcy or
failing to engage in a repayment plan with the Company. The Company categorises a loan or receivable for write off
when a debtor fails to make contractual payments greater than 3 years past due. Where loans or receivables have
been written off, the Company continues to engage in enforcement activity to attempt to recover the receivable due.
When recoveries are made , these are recognised in statement of profit and loss.

Where there has not been significant increase in credit risk in financial assets (other than trade receivables) expected
credit loss is measured on 12 months ECL approach. In case of significant increase in credit risk lifetime expected
credit loss approach is used. For trade receivables, expected credit loss is calculated using lifetime credit loss approach
(simplified approach).

(a) Credit risk management

Cash & cash equivalents and bank deposits

Credit risk related to cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits is managed by only accepting highly rated banks
and diversifying bank deposits account in different banks across the country. Also, no impairment loss has been
recorded in respect of fixed deposits that are with recognised commercial banks and are not past due.

Other financial assets measured at amortised cost

Other financial assets measured at amortised cost include security deposits and other assets. Credit risk related to
these other financial assets is managed by monitoring the recoverability of such amounts continuously.

Credit risk refers to risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the
Company. Credit risk arises primarily from financial assets such as trade receivables, investment in mutual funds,
other balances with banks, loans and other receivables.

The Company has developed guidelines for the management of credit risk from trade receivables. The Company’s
primary customers are with good credit ratings. Clients are subjected to credit assessments as a precautionary
measure, and the adherence of all clients to payment due dates is monitored on an on-going basis, thereby practically
eliminating the risk of default.

Credit risk arising from other balances with banks is limited and there is no collateral held against these because the
counterparties are banks and recognized financial institutions with high credit ratings assigned by the international
credit rating agencies.

The average credit period on sales of products is 30 - 90 days. Credit risk arising from trade receivables is managed
in accordance with the Company’s established policy, procedures and control relating to customer credit risk
management. Credit quality of a customer is assessed and accordingly individual credit limits are defined/modified.

Note 28 : Segment Information:

Description of segments and principal activities

The Company has been engaged in the manufacture of a single product viz. Precipitated Silica.

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting to the Chief Operating Decision Maker
(CODM) of the Company. The Company has identified Board of Directors as CODM. The CODM is responsible for allocating
resources and assessing performance of the operating segments. The Company has monthly review and forecasting
procedure in place and CODM reviews the operations of the Company as a whole, hence there are no reportable segments
as per Ind AS 108 “Operating Segments”. The Company’s operations remian shut down from October 27, 2019 as described
in Note 33.

i) The Company did not have any revenue from operations during current and previous year.

ii) All the non-current assets of the Company are located in India.

Note 29 : Capital management

For the purpose of the Company’s capital management, capital includes issued capital and all other equity reserves
attributable to the equity shareholders of the Company. The primary objective of the Company when managing capital is
to maintain an optimal capital structure so as to maximize shareholder value.

The Company has only one class of equity shares and has no debt. Consequent to such capital structure, there are no
externally imposed capital requirements.

Note 30 :

a) Preparation of financial statements not on a going concern

The Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (“UPPCB”) had, in October 2019 denied the Company’s application for
renewal of Consent to Operate its plant at Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh under the Water (Prevention and Control of
Pollution) Act, 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (“Consent to Operate”) inter alia on
the following ground:

“The unit is using fresh water for dilution of effluent to achieve the norms of Sodium Absorption Ratio (SAR) 26. The
study carried out by /IT Roorkee has not recommended any feasible method for treatment of the effluent to achieve
the prescribed norms. The process of dilution with fresh water cannot be allowed. Keeping the facts in view the
Consent to operate water/air application is hereby rejected. Unit may submit final report of I IT, Roorkee to Central
Pollution Control Board, (CPCB) and seek suitable direction.”

The Company thus suspended the operations of its plant located at Gajraula in October 2019. The Company filed
fresh applications on November 21,2019, for Consent to Operate, however, the same were dismissed by the UPPCB
vide order dated February 4, 2020. The Company challenged the aforesaid order by separate appeals under Section
28 of the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Section 31 of the Air (Prevention & Control of
Pollution) Act, 1981 respectively before the Special Secretary, Department of Environment, Forest and Climate, Uttar
Pradesh against the orders of UPPCB. However, the Special Secretary vide its order dated December 4, 2020,
dismissed the appeals filed by the Company. The operations at the plant located at Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh, which is
the only plant of the Company, has remained suspended since October 2019.

The Board had reviewed the legal options available and was of the view that there were no merits in pursuing the
matter any further. The Board of the Company reviewed various options of the way forward for the Company. The
Board is of the opinion that there is no availability of business prospects nor any long-term financial resources that
presents a financially viable alternative to carry on the business activities of the Company or to resume the operations
of the Company in the foreseeable future. The Board granted in principle approval for the voluntary liquidation of the
Company in its meeting dated March 30, 2021. The Board further passed a resolution dated May 31, 2021 and
accorded its consent to voluntarily liquidate the Company in accordance with Section 59 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the regulations made thereunder. The Board of Directors were of the view that there are
no realistic alternatives for resumption of the Company’s operations and accordingly, use of the going concern basis
of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is considered inappropriate and the financial statements
for the year ended March 31, 2023 and the financial results for the quarter/nine months ended December 31,2023
and December 31,2022 have not been prepared on a going concern.

b) Voluntary liquidation process:

(i) The Board of Directors of the Company had decided to initiate the voluntary liquidation process as envisaged
under the provisions of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”). In this regard, the Board granted its
in - principle approval for initiating the voluntary liquidation process of the Company in its meeting dated March
30, 2021 and accordingly on May 31,2021, the consent of the Board of Directors was accorded to initiate the
voluntarily liquidation process of the Company in accordance with the provisions of Section 59 of the Code and
appoint an Mr. Chandra Prakash, an Insolvency Professional who is duly registered with the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Board of India, as the Liquidator of the Company to conduct its liquidation process. The decision of
the Board was also followed by requisite resolutions being approved by the shareholders of the Company in the
Extra-Ordinary General Meeting held on June 25, 2021 in accordance with Section 59(3)(c)(i) of the Code.
Furthermore, on June 29, 2021 the said resolutions have also been approved by the creditors of the Company
representing two-thirds in value of the debt of the Company as required under the Section 59(3) of the Code.

(ii) Accordingly, with effect from June 25, 2021, the Company is under voluntary liquidation process and Mr. Chandra
Prakash (having registration no. IBBI/IPA-002/IP-N00660/2018-2019/12023) has been appointed as the Liquidator
of the Company, who is discharging his functions and duties provided in the Code and the IBBI (Voluntary
Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2017 (“VL Regulations”). Subsequently, the Board of Directors with the approval
of the members and creditors of the Company appointed Ms. Kapila Gupta, (having registration no. IBBI/I PA-
001 /IP-P-02564/2021 -2022/13955) an Insolvency Professional who is duly registered with the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Board of India, as the Liquidator of the Company to replace Mr. Chandra Prakash as the liquidator
of the Company.

(iii) Upon its appointment as the Liquidator, the Liquidator published a public announcement calling upon all the
stakeholders of the Company to submit their claims. The Public Announcement was published in accordance
with Regulation 14 of the VL Regulations on June 30, 2021 and the last date of submission of claims as per the
public announcement was July 25, 2021 (i.e. 30 days of the Liquidation Commencement Date).

As per the claims received by the Liquidator and consequent verification of the same, the status of claims as on
May 29, 2024 is as under:

(iv) The Board of Directors had, in the Board Meeting dated May 31, 2021, authorised the Liquidator to sell the
immovable and movable properties and actionable claims of the Company in the voluntary liquidation process,
by public auction or private contract, with power to transfer the properties to any person or body corporate as a
whole, or in parts as per Regulation 31 of the VL Regulations. Accordingly, the Liquidator in exercise of the
powers under Section 35 of the Code, had published a Sale Notice on August 23, 2021, wherein Expression of
Interests (EOI) were invited from prospective bidders to participate in the sale of the assets of the Company on
a “100% cash, as is where is and without recourse basis”. A Process Document containing details of assets,
process for participation in the sale and terms and conditions of the sale was also uploaded on the website of
the Company, for the benefit of the prospective bidders. The last date for submission of the EOIs was September
09, 2021 which was later extended to October 1, 2021 vide Addendum 1 to the Process Document dated
September 09, 2021. The eligible bidders who had submitted a full and complete set of EOI and pre-bid documents
in accordance with the Process Document, were allowed to access to the virtual data room and also site-visits
of the Plant of the Company. The Prospective Bidders were required to carry out their own comprehensive due
diligence in respect of the assets of Company and were deemed to have full knowledge of the title, conditions
etc. of the assets of the Company.

(v) In furtherance to the Sale Notice and the Process Document, an E-Auction Sale Notice was also issued by the
Liquidator on November 16, 2021 for sale of assets pertaining to the plant situated at Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh
(“Gajraula Plant”) and Non-Agricultural Freehold land admeasuring approx. 2,083 sq. yds. situated at Mehsana,
Gujarat (“Mehsana Land”). Pursuant to the E-Auction Sale Notice, the eligible bidders, who had duly submitted
the applicable Earnest Money Deposits (EMDs) for the respective assets, were invited to participate in the E-
Auction of the aforesaid assets of the Company. The said E-Auction was conducted on November 26, 2021 and
the results are as under:

a) Only one bid for INR 42 Cr (Reserve Price being INR 42 Cr) was received for composite sale of rights to the
leasehold land admeasuring approx. 67 acres located at Gajraula Industrial Area, Uttar Pradesh along with
the buildings and structures standing on the lands and all other fixed assets of the Company including
Plant & Machinery, Furniture & Fixtures, inventory etc. pertaining to Gajraula Plant (‘Disposal Group of
assets’). Accordingly, the bidder was declared a successful bidder and a Letter of Intent (LOI) was issued
by the Liquidator. As per the terms of the LOI, the successful bidder has paid the entire consideration of Rs.
42.00 Cr. by April 28, 2022.

A Sale Certificate dated April 14, 2023 has been issued by the Liquidator for transfer of the leasehold rights
for Gajraula Land of the Company on an “as is where is basis”, “as is what is basis”, “whatever there is
basis” and “no recourse” basis to the M/s. Dykes and Dunes Enterprises Private Limited (“Successful
Bidder”), which inter alia required the Successful Bidder to enter into a new lease deed with Uttar Pradesh
State Industrial Development Authority (“UPSIDA”) and complete all processes with UPSIDA or otherwise
to give effect to the transfer.

The Company has executed a surrender of lease deed in favour of UPSIDA for surrender of the leasehold
land in favour of UPSIDA on November 04, 2023.

Separately, a sale deed dated November 06, 2023 has been executed between the Company and the
Successful Bidder for transfer of the plant, built up area and structures on the leasehold land (but excluding
the leasehold land) in favour of the Successful Bidder.

The Successful Bidder has forwarded to the Company the Transfer Memorandum dated November 18,
2023 received by it from UPSIDA. The Company has issued letter dated November 27, 2023 to the Successful
Bidder confirming that pursuant to the sale deed and the surrender of lease deed the Company has
relinquished possession of the land, building & other assets in respect of the Gajraula Land.

Pursuant to such surrender, the Successful Bidder has informed the Company that the Successful Bidder
has executed a fresh lease deed with UPSIDA in respect of the grant of leasehold rights in the land in
favour of the Successful Bidder, and has shared the lease deed dated December 16, 2023 executed with
UPSIDA for the same.

Based on the above facts, the Company has booked the net gain from the aforementioned slump sale of
assets of the Company.

b) Company has sold Non-Agriculture Freehold Land at Mehsana Gujarat (Mehsana Land) Land by way to a
private sale for a consideration INR 23 Lakhs, which was higher than the Reserve Price fixed for the
Mehsana Land. The transfer processes and execution of definitive documents for transfer of Mehsana
Land was completed and the sale was recognised in the books during the quarter ended June 30, 2022.

(vi) Pursuant to Regulation 37 of VL Regulations, in the event of the liquidation process continues for a period of
more than 12 (twelve) months, the liquidator is required to hold a meeting of the contributories of the Company
within 15 (fifteen) days from the end of the 12 (twelve) months from the liquidation commencement date, and at
the end of every succeeding twelve months till dissolution of the Company. Accordingly, pursuant to Regulation
37(2)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Voluntary Liquidation Process), Regulations, 2017),
the Liquidator held 1st Annual Contributories Meeting of Insilco Limited (Under Voluntary Liquidation) on July
11, 2022 and subsequently 2nd Annual Contributories Meeting was held on July 06, 2023 through Video
Conferencing (VC)/Other Video Visual Means (OAVM) wherein an Annual Status Report indicating progress in
liquidation of the Company was presented to the contributories attending the meeting.

c) Adjustments to carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities

(i) The Company’s management has assessed carrying value of assets and liabilities and based on current estimates,
following adjustments have been made in the books of account:

a) Impairment loss to the carrying values of Property, Plant and Equipment’s (PPE) and Intangible assets
aggregating to INR 1,424 Lakhs has been recognized in the books of account based on valuation report of
an external independent valuer during the year ended March 31,2021. The valuation is considered to be
level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to unobservable inputs used in the valuation. Valuation of PPE has
been carried out on the basis of following key assumptions:

(i) Since the Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) is a mandatory requirement for setting up a new plant, the
plant can no longer operate for manufacturing of silica. In view of the same the liquidation values of
the assets have been considered by the independent valuer while making the estimate of recoverable
amount. The basis for liquidation value approach considers the amount that would be realized when
an asset or groups of assets are sold on a piecemeal basis that is without consideration of benefits (or
detriments) associated with a going-concern business. A forced sale basis transaction with a shortened
marketing period is considered for this valuation where the tangible assets are sold quickly, often for
an extremely low percentage of their original cost.

(ii) For buildings, the method is based on estimation of the cost spent in reproducing the present day
structure and thereafter applying liquidation discount in line with market norms and it is assumed that
steel structure will fetch more value than the Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) on a piecemeal
basis.

(iii) For Plant and Machinery and Other Assets, market approach of valuation has been adopted for
estimating the reinstatement value/GCRC (gross current replacement cost). Combination of
replacement method and comparison method is used for carrying out the valuation. Liquidation value
analysis is carried out in line with market experience and expertise. These assets were categorised
between specialised for silica plant and general items. The assets specific to the silica plant are
considered at scrap value as per the independent valuers’ report. whereas for general items the
balance useful life and type of asset has been considered for estimation of liquidation value by the
independent valuer.

b) Right of use assets (ROU) relating to leasehold land have been carried at cost as no loss is expected
based on valuation report of an external independent valuer and LOI to the successful bidder. Sales
comparison method under market approach of valuation has been adopted by the valuer for estimating the
fair value of land. In an active or open market, the identical type of land parcel with similar characteristics
are used for valuation. In case of unavailability of direct comparable, relevant adjustments are carried out
on available quotes or transaction details with consideration of different factors affecting values of land for
estimating the fair value. In order to determine the value of land parcel actual sales instances in the area
have been considered. The rate for the subject property has been arrived by adjusting the factor for elapsed
lease, size of the property and applying liquidation discount in line with market norms. Liquidation value
analysis is carried out in line with market experience and expertise. The valuation is considered to be level
3 in the fair value hierarchy due to unobservable inputs used in the valuation. (Also refer note 3 (B)).

c) Write down adjustment to the carrying values of Stores and spares aggregating to INR 130 Lakhs has been
recognized in the books of account during the year ended March 31, 2021 based on valuation report of an
external independent valuer. Valuation of stores and spares has been carried out on the basis of following
key assumptions:

- For spares of general plant and machinery scrap value is considered as per the expert valuation
report. For spares related to specialised plant and machinery NIL value has been considered.

d) Other assets have been recognised at current realizable value as per the Management’s current estimate
and loss allowance has been recognised during the year aggregating Rs. 4,899 (‘000) (Previous year Rs.
11,567 (’000)).

Note 31:

Proceedings before the Labour Court, Rampur

Consequent to the failure of conciliation proceedings between the Company and certain former employees in relation to
complaints of the former employees seeking their reinstatement in the Company along with certain other reliefs from the
Company, claiming that their services were illegally terminated by paying the voluntary retirement scheme (“VRS”) and
that the VRS was not specifically asked for by the employees.

Thereafter, the Company has on October 21, 2022 received 35 (Thirty-five) summons in Hindi language, each dated
October 17, 2022, from the Labour Court, Rampur, Uttar Pradesh (“Labour Court”), in relation to the applications filed by
the ex-employees of the Company.

Thereafter, noting that all the complaints pertain to the same subject matter, Case No. 24 of 2022 being Bijender Singh v
Insilco Ltd. was designated as the lead matter.

As on date, authority letters have been filed on behalf of the Company for all complaints. The local counsel has received
the written statements on behalf of the Company for all the cases, which are to be exchanged with the former employees’
own written statements. Further, we have been informed that the local counsel has filed the written statements on behalf
of the Company and has received the written statements on behalf of the ex-employees for all the cases, except that of (a)
Mr. Rohit Kumar Baliyan (Adj. Case No.28/2022), who has not yet filed a written statement; and that of (b) Mr. Zakir
Hussain (Adj. Case No. 32/2022), who we understand to have died and in his stead, his wife has filed an application for
being impleaded into the proceedings as his legal heir, and no written statement has been filed on behalf of Mr. Zakir
Hussain.

As such, we note that the ex-employees have sought the following prayers, vide their respective written statements: (a)
reinstatement to their old employment at the Company, on a continuous basis from the date of termination of employment,
along with full salary and other allowances payable to them from the date of the termination; and (b) interest at a rate of
20% per annum on the salary pertaining to the period when the ex-employees were allegedly out of work.

Furthermore, the local counsel has received the rejoinders on behalf of the Company for all the cases, which are to be
exchanged with the former employees’ rejoinders to the written statements filed on behalf of the Company. It has been
informed to us that while the local counsel has submitted the rejoinders on behalf of the Company in all the cases before
the Labour Court, the rejoinders on behalf of the ex-employees are yet to be submitted to the Labour Court for exchange
with the Company.

We have received certain objection applications that have been filed on behalf of the workmen, objecting to the signing of
the Company’s written statement by the Liquidator, Ms. Kapila Gupta, and seeking rejection of the Company’s written
statement on such grounds. We have filed individual replies to the aforementioned objection applications.

The Company has also filed applications before the Labour Court seeking that the Workmen be directed to refund the
amounts deposited by them under the VRS 2021 in order to continue prosecution of their claims before the Labour Court,
as well as applications seeking urgent hearing of the matter owing to the impending liquidation of the Company.
Pursuant to the hearing on March 14, 2024, the Ld. Labour Court was pleased to dismiss the objections raised by the
workmen regarding the pleadings filed on behalf of Insilco being signed by the Liquidator of the Company, in the favour of
Insilco.

The matters are now posted to the following date: May 23, 2024 for disposal of the application for refund of the amounts
received by the workmen under the VRS.

Note 32 :

a) During the quarter ended June 30, 2023, Mr.Rajeev Agarwal had been appointed as the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company by the members in their Extra-Ordinary General Meeting held on June 27, 2023.

b) in pursuant to the provisions of Section 196, 197 and 203 read with Schedule V of the Companies Act 2013, rules
made thereunder and all other applicable provisions, if any of the Companies Act, 2013 and Article 92 of the Articles
of Association of the Company, Mr. Vinod Paremal has been re-appointed as the Managing Director of the Company
w.e.f. 01.05.2023 by the Board of Directors in its meeting held on 24.04.2023 for a further term of 2 years without any
remuneration, which was approved by the members of the Company in their adjourned Extra-Ordinary General
Meeting held on 31.07.2023.

Note 34 :

Clarification has been sought by The Bombay Stock Exchange regarding Movement in Price dated 09.09.2022. Company
has replied to the said letter on 07.10.2022 mentioning that the Company is Under Voluntary Liquidation w.e.f. 25th June
2021 and there is no material relevant information / event having a bearing on the operations / performance of the Company
which requires disclosures as per Regulations 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosures Requirements) Regulations,
2015 (“Listing Regulations”). Further they have added that since the Shares of the Company are freely traded on the
Bombay Stock Exchange, the Company is unable to comment on the Movement in Share Price of the Company. Pursuant
to this Bombay stock exchange has suspended the trading in the share of company w.e.f., 07th October 2022.

Note 35:

a) Additional regulatory information required by Schedule III

(i) Details of benami property held

No proceedings have been initiated on or are pending against the group for holding benami property under the
Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 (45 of 1988) and Rules made thereunder.

(ii) Borrowing secured against current assets

The Company did not have any borrowings from banks and financial institutions on the basis of security of
current assets. Further, the Company has not been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of Rs. 5 crores,
in aggregate from banks and financial institutions on the basis of security of current assets.

(iii) Wilful defaulter

The Company has not been declared wilful defaulter by any bank or financial institution or government or any
government authority.

(iv) Relationship with struck off companies

The Company has no transactions with the companies struck off under Companies Act, 2013 or Companies Act,
1956.

(v) Compliance with number of layers of companies

The Company has complied with the number of layers prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013.

(vi) Compliance with approved scheme(s) of arrangements

The Company has not entered into any scheme of arrangement which has an accounting impact on current or
previous financial year.

(vii) Utilisation of borrowed funds and share premium

The Company has not advanced or loaned or invested funds to any other person(s) or entity(ies), including
foreign entities (Intermediaries) with the understanding that the Intermediary shall:

a. directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on
behalf of the Company (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or

b. provide any guarantee, security or the like to or on behalf of the ultimate beneficiaries

The Company has not received any fund from any person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities (Funding
Party) with the understanding (whether recorded in writing or otherwise) that the Company shall:

a. directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on
behalf of the Funding Party (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or

b. provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the ultimate beneficiaries

(viii) Undisclosed income

There is no income surrendered or disclosed as income during the current or previous year in the tax assessments
under the Income Tax Act, 1961, that has not been recorded in the books of account.

(ix) Details of crypto currency or virtual currency

The Company has not traded or invested in crypto currency or virtual currency during the current or previous
year.

(x) Valuation of PP&E, intangible asset and investment property

The Company has not revalued its property, plant and equipment (including right-of-use assets) or intangible
assets or both during the current or previous year. Further, the Company has chosen cost model for its Property,
Plant and Equipment (including Right of Use assets) and intangible assets.

(xi) Corporate social responsibility expenditure

The Company is not required to spend corporate social responsibility expenditure during the year.

b) Other regulatory information

(i) Title deeds of immovable properties not held in name of the company

There are no immovable properties held as on 31.03.2024.

(ii) Registration of charges or satisfaction with Registrar of Companies

There are no charges or satisfaction which are yet to be registered with the Registrar of Companies beyond the
statutory period.

(iii) Utilisation of borrowings availed from banks and financial institutions

The Company has not obtained any borrowings from banks and financial institutions during the year.

(iv) Cash loss

The Company has incurred cash losses of Rs. NIL in the financial year and of Rs. 80,747 (‘000) in the immediately
preceding financial year. Cash loss is computed after adjusting Depreciation and amortisation expense and
Impairment loss on Property, Plant and Equipment and intangible assets from Loss after tax.

Note 36:

Pursuant to amendment in Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 by Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide its notification
dated March 24, 2021, the comparative figures as disclosed in these financial statements have been regrouped/reclassified,
wherever necessary, to make them comparable to current period figures.

For Shiv & Associates For and on behalf of the Board of Directors

Chartered Accountants of Insilco Limited (Under Liquidation)

Firm Registration No.: 009989N

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

Manish Gupta Sonia Prashar Paremal Narayanan Vinod

Partner Director Managing Director

Membership No. 095518 DIN: 06477222 DIN: 08803466

Place: New Delhi Place: Mumbai

Sd/- Sd/-

Rajeev Agarwal Geetika Varshney

Chief Financial Officer Company Secretary

Place: Noida Place: New Delhi

Sd/-

Kapila Gupta

Liquidator of Insilco Limited

[Registration no.IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P-02564/2021-2022/13955]
Place: New Delhi Place: Noida

Date: May 29, 2024 Date: May 29, 2024

---

Mar 31, 2018

1. Company Background

Insilco Limited (the ‘Company'') is a subsidiary of Evonik Degussa GmbH, Germany. The Company is domiciled in India and its registered office is located at A-5, UPSIDC Industrial Estate, Bhartiagram, Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh. The Company is a public company and is incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. Its shares are listed on Bombay Stock Exchange. The Company is engaged in the manufacturing and selling of precipitated silica. Insilco produces different grades of precipitated silica, catering to the requirements of customers in different industries.

The financial statements were approved and authorized for issue with a resolution of the Company''s Board of Directors on May 28, 2018.

Note 2: Critical estimates and judgements

The preparation of financial statements requires the use of accounting estimates which, by definition, will seldom equal the actual results. Management also needs to exercise judgement in applying the Company''s accounting policies. This note provides an overview of the areas that involved a higher degree of judgement or complexity, and of items which are more likely to be materially adjusted due to estimates and assumptions turning out to be different than those originally assessed. Detailed information about each of these estimates and judgements is included in relevant notes together with information about the basis of calculation for each affected line item in the financial statements.

Critical estimates and judgements

The areas involving critical estimates and judgements are:

- Estimation of useful life of property, plant and equipment - Note 3

- Fair value of investment properties - Note 4

- Fair value of investment in mutual funds - Note 9(a)

- Impairment of trade receivables - Note 9(b)

- Estimation of defined benefit obligation - Note 13(a) and 13(b)

- Provision for litigations and contingent liabilities - Note 12 (d) and 28

- Recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities and tax expense - Note 14 and 26

Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated. They are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that may have a financial impact on the Company and that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

The land had been taken on lease from Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC), for a period of 90 years. The lease has been considered as finance lease and accordingly land is being amortised on straight line basis over the lease term.

(ii) Contractual obligation

Refer to Note 29(a) for disclosure of contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment.

(iii) Capital work-in-progress

Adjustment represents provision / write off of the coal project (Refer note 25).

Capital work-in-progress mainly comprises of expenditure towards the Distributed Control System and a New Dryer roof at Gajraula plant.

(i) Amounts recognised in the statement of profit or loss for investment properties

The Company has not recognised any amount related to investment properties in the Statement of Profit and Loss for the year ended March 31, 2018 and the year ended March 31, 2017.

Estimation of fair value :

The Company obtains independent valuation for its investment property at least annually. The best evidence of fair value is current prices in an active market for similar properties. Where such information is not available, the Company consider information from a variety of sources including:

- current prices in an active market for properties of different nature or recent prices of similar properties in less active markets, adjusted to reflect those differences

- discounted cash flow projections based on reliable estimates of future cash flows

- capitalised income projections based upon a property''s estimated net market income, and a capitalisation rate derived from an analysis of market evidence

The fair values of investment properties have been determined by Felix Advisory Private Limited. The main inputs used are the right to sell / transfer / lease the land, demand and prospective buyers for such medium sized plots of land, shape, size, prominence and location of land, the marketability, utility, demand and supply of similar land in the surrounding area, the land rates as evident form the sale Instances of comparable land found upon market enquiry, the land rates prevailing in nearby areas, legal and physical encumbrance on land, freehold and leasehold nature of land etc, usage - freehold land, locational advantages / disadvantages, easements / covenants regarding the usage of land, availability of infrastructure and civic amenities. All resulting fair value estimates for investment properties are included in level 3.

- The Company has given a bank guarantee of Rs. 1,000 (‘000) [31 March 2017 - Rs. 1,000 (‘000), 01 April 2016 - Rs. Nil (‘000) to UP Pollution Control Board against which a fixed deposit of same amount has been made with the bank. Therefore, there is restriction to use these funds.

Amounts recognised in the statement of profit and loss

Write-downs of inventories to net realizable value amounted to Rs. 1,016 (‘000) [31 March 2017 - Rs. 1,985 (‘000)]. These were recognized as an expense during the year and included in ‘changes in value of inventories of work-in-progress and finished goods'' in statement of profit and loss.

(ii) Terms/rights attached to equity shares

The Company has only one class of equity shares having a par value of Rs. 10 per share. Each holder of equity shares is entitled to vote. Dividend if declared, then paid in Indian rupees. The dividend proposed by the Board of Directors is subject to approval of the shareholders in the ensuing Annual General Meeting. In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of equity shares will be entitled to receive remaining assets of the Company, after distribution of all preferential amounts. The distribution will be in proportion to the number of equity shares held by the shareholders.

Nature and purpose of other reserve

The Company uses hedging instruments as part of its management of foreign currency risk associated with its highly probable forecast as described within note 34. For hedging foreign currency risk, the Company uses foreign currency forward contracts and these are designated as cash flow hedges. To the extent these hedges are effective; the change in fair value of the hedging instrument is recognised in the cash flow hedging reserve. Amounts recognised in the cash flow hedging reserve is reclassified to profit or loss when the hedged item affects profit or loss (e.g. sales and interest payments). When the forecast transaction results in the recognition of a non-financial asset (e.g. property, plant & equipment), the amount recognised in the cash flow hedging reserve is adjusted against the carrying amount of the non- financial asset.

(i) Compensated absences

The amount of the provision of Rs. 5,683 (‘000) (31 March 2017 - Rs. 5,441 (‘000), 1 April 2016 - Rs. 5,352 (‘000) is presented as current, since the group does not have an unconditional right to defer settlement for any of these obligations. However, based on past experience, the group does not expect all employees to take the full amount of accrued leave or require payment within the next 12 months. The following amounts reflect leave that is not expected to be taken or paid within the next 12 months.

(ii) Post-employment obligations

- Gratuity

Under the gratuity plan, every employee who has completed at least five years of service gets a gratuity on departure at 15 days of last drawn salary for each completed year of service. The completion of continuous service of 5 years shall not be applicable for an employee who attains the age of superannuation or normal age of retirement before completion of the continuous service of 5 years. The Company has funded the gratuity liability with Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) except in case of certain new employees, whose gratuity liability is unfunded. Rate of return is as given by the insurance Company. The overall expected rate of return on assets is determined based on the market prices prevailing on that date, applicable to the period over which the obligation is to be settled.

In respect of Employees Gratuity Fund, composition of plan assets is not readily available from LIC of India. The expected rate of return on assets is determined based on the assessment made at the beginning of the year on the return expected on its existing portfolio, along with the estimated increment to the plan assets and expected yield on the respective assets in the portfolio during the year.

The above sensitivity analyses are based on a change in an assumption while holding all other assumptions constant. In practice, this is unlikely to occur, and changes in some of the assumptions may be correlated. When calculating the sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation to significant actuarial assumptions the same method (present value of the defined benefit obligation calculated with the projected unit credit method at the end of the reporting period) has been applied as when calculating the defined benefit liability recognised in the balance sheet.

The methods and types of assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analysis did not change compared to the prior period.

(j) Risk Exposure

Valuations are performed on certain basic set of pre-determined assumptions and other regulatory frame work which may vary over time. Thus, the Company is exposed to various risks in providing the above gratuity benefit which are as follows:

Interest Rate risk: The plan exposes the Company to the risk of fall in interest rates. A fall in interest rates will result in an increase in the ultimate cost of providing the above benefit and will thus result in an increase in the value of the liability (as shown in financial statements).

Liquidity Risk: This is the risk that the Company is not able to meet the short-term gratuity payouts. This may arise due to non availability of enough cash / cash equivalent to meet the liabilities or holding of illiquid assets not being sold in time.

Salary Escalation Risk: The present value of the defined benefit plan is calculated with the assumption of salary increase rate of plan participants in future. Deviation in the rate of increase of salary in future for plan participants from the rate of increase in salary used to determine the present value of obligation will have a bearing on the plan''s liability.

Demographic Risk: The Company has used certain mortality and attrition assumptions in valuation of the liability. The Company is exposed to the risk of actual experience turning out to be worse as compared to the assumptions.

Asset Liability Mismatching or Market Risk: The duration of the liability is longer compared to duration of assets, exposing the Company to market risk for volatilities/fall in interest rate.

Investment Risk: The probability or likelihood of occurrence of losses relative to the expected return on any particular investment.

Maturity Profile of Defined Benefit Obligation

Weighted average duration (based on discounted cash flows) 7 Years

(iii) Defined contribution plans

- Provident Fund: Retirement benefit in the form of provident fund is a defined contribution scheme. The Company has no obligation, other than the contribution payable to the provident fund. The Company recognizes contribution payable to the provident fund scheme as expenditure, when an employee renders the related service.

- Superannuation: The Company has taken group policy with Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to fund its liability towards employee''s superannuation. Superannuation fund is administered by LIC and contributions made to the fund are charged to revenue. The Company has no further obligations under the plan beyond its monthly contributions.

- National Pension Scheme: The Company has registered under the National Pension Scheme to provide post retirement benefit to employees. This is an optional scheme available to employees. The Company has no further obligations under the plan beyond its monthly contributions.

(iv) Other long term employee benefits

- Long Service Award

As per the Company policy, every employee is entitled for Long Service Award. The award is payable upon completion of 10 years and 20 years of continuous service.

Note (i) : Under tax laws, capital gain or loss cannot be set off with profit and gain from business or profession, therefore, deferred tax liability on capital losses has been recognized separately. As it was not probable that the Company will have future capital gain therefore, deferred tax asset was recognized to the extent of deferred tax liability as on 1 April 2016. The amount of deferred tax assets not recorded on the capital loss has been shown as part of ‘Unrecognised deferred tax assets'' included in the table below:

Note (ii) : As it is not probable that the Company will have future taxable profit against which deferred tax assets can be realized, hence the deferred tax asset has been recognized on deductible temporary differences only to the extent of deferred tax liability. Further, deferred tax asset has not been recognized in relation to carry forward unused tax losses/ unabsorbed depreciation/MAT credit entitlement. The details of such items on which deferred tax assets has not been recognised is as below:

Goods and service tax (GST) has been effected from 01 July 2017. Consequently excise duty, value added tax, service tax etc. have been replaced with GST. Until 30 June 2017 “Sale of products” included the amount of excise duty recovered on sale. With effect from 01 July 2017 sale of products excludes the amount of GST recovered. Accordingly, revenue from sale of products for the year ended 31 March 2018 is not comparable with that of the previous year. The following additional information is being provided to facilitate such understanding:

The exceptional items for the year ended March 31, 2017 includes expense of Rs. 14,163 (‘000) on account of provision for expenses incurred on coal project and carried forward as ‘Capital work-in-progress''. As the Company was also analyzing/ evaluating alternate source of energy and based on current position, there was strong view that based on feasibility of alternate options, coal project will be dropped. Therefore, keeping in view the current circumstances expenses incurred in respect of Coal project till March 31, 2017 was provided, which had been approved by the Company''s Board of Directors in their meeting on May 16, 2017. Further, during the year ended March 31, 2018 the entire expense incurred on coal project was written off after approval from Company''s Board of Directors in their meeting held on December 04, 2017. The additional expenditure of Rs. 886 (‘000) has been charged of to the statement of profit and loss under “Other Expenses”, being amount incurred during the year ended March 31, 2018.

The Company had received an advance of Rs.12,500 (‘000) against a total contract value of Rs. 13,000 (‘000) for the transfer of leasehold rights in residential flats at Patalganga for two set of properties. During the year ended March 31, 2017 the Company got necessary approvals from local authorities/executed necessary documents in relation to one set of properties accordingly transfer of the said flats in the name of buyer was completed and recognised income from sale of fixed assets of Rs. 10,000 (‘000). The transfer of leasehold rights in second set of properties i.e. worker''s flat is still subject to necessary approval from the authorities. However, the Company had executed an ‘Agreement of Assignment’ (which is not registered with local authority due to non-availability of required documents) for transfer of Leasehold Rights and had also given possession of the said worker''s flat. Accordingly, the advance consideration for the same of Rs. 2,500 (‘000) had been disclosed under head “Advance received against disposal of fixed assets” under Other Current Liabilities (Refer note 16) in the financial statements. The said Worker''s flat were fully depreciated in earlier years and were carried in books at a nominal value.

(d) Transfer Pricing Note

The Company has established a comprehensive system of maintenance of information and documents as required by the transfer pricing legislation under sections 92-92F of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For this purpose, the Company has appointed an independent consultant for conducting a Transfer Pricing study (the ‘study'') for the Assessment Year 2018 -19. In the unlikely event that any adjustment is required consequent to completion of the study for the year ended March 31, 2018, the same would be made in the subsequent year. However, management is of the opinion that its international transactions are at arm''s length so that the aforesaid legislation will not have any material impact on the financial statements, particularly on the amount of tax expense and that of provision for taxation.

Goods were sold to related party during the year based on the price and terms that would be available to third parties. Transactions relating to SAP license, Lotus Notes, Microsoft license fee, reimbursement of training and other expenses were on the basis of cost to cost reimbursement.

All other transaction were made on normal commercial terms and conditions and at market rates. All outstanding balances are unsecured and are repayable in cash.

(a) It is not practicable for the company to estimate the timings of cash outflows, if any, in respect of the above pending resolution of the respective proceedings.

(b) The Company does not expect any reimbursements in respect of the above contingent liabilities.

The Company has entered into Lease deed with Uttar Pradesh State Industrial development Corporation Limited (UPSIDC) for its land at Gajraula plant on March 20, 1991 for a period of 90 years. The lease deed, inter-alia, establishes various terms and conditions such as obtaining prior approval of UPSIDC for transfer/ relinquish / mortgage or assign the interest of the Company etc. The Company has made upfront payment of Rs. 12,371 (‘000) as per contract and is under the obligation to pay annual lease rent.

Level 1: Level 1 hierarchy includes financial instruments measured using quoted prices (in active market) the closing Net Asset Value (NAV) of which the Company can access as on measurement date. The mutual funds are measured using the closing NAV.

Level 2: The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques which maximize the use of observable market data and rely as little as possible on entity-specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2.

Level 3: If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in level 3.

Valuation technique used to determine fair value

The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined using forward exchange rates at the balance sheet date

There are no transfers between levels 1 and 2 during the year.

The Company''s policy is to recognise transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the reporting period.

The carrying amounts of trade receivables, trade payables, capital creditors, cash and cash equivalents, other bank balances, other financial assets and other financial liabilities are considered to be the same as their fair values, due to their short-term nature.

Majorly, the security deposits are redeemable on demand and hence the fair values of security deposits are approximately equivalent to the carrying amount.

The fair values of non-current borrowings are based on discounted cash flows using a current borrowing rate. They are classified as level 3 fair values in the fair value hierarchy since significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable. There is no material difference between carrying amount and fair value of non-current borrowings (Finance lease obligation) as on 31 March 2018, 31 March 2017 and 1 April 2016.

The fair values of loan to employees are based on discounted cash flows using a current perquisite valuation tax rate. They are classified as level 3 fair values in the fair value hierarchy since significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are not observable. There is no material difference between carrying amount and fair value of loan to employees as on 31 March 2018, 31 March 2017 and 1 April 2016.

Note 3 : Financial risk management

The Company''s activities expose it to liquidity risk, credit risk and market risk (forex and price). In order to minimise any adverse effects on the financial performance of the group, derivative financial instruments, such as foreign exchange forward contracts, are entered to hedge certain foreign currency risk exposures. Derivatives are used exclusively for hedging purposes and not as trading or speculative instruments.

(A) Credit risk

Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents and deposits with banks and other financial assets as well as credit exposures to customers.

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Company''s receivables from customers and deposits with banking institutions. The carrying amounts of financial assets represent the maximum credit risk exposure. The Company considers the probability of default upon initial recognition of asset and whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk on an ongoing basis throughout each reporting period. To assess whether there is a significant increase in credit risk the Company compares the risk of a default occurring on the asset as at the reporting date with the risk of default as at the date of initial recognition. It considers available reasonable and supportive forwarding-looking information.

A default on a financial asset is when the counterparty fails to make contractual payments within 180 days when they fall due. This definition of default is determined by considering the business environment in which entity operates and other macro-economic factors.

Assets are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery, such as a debtor declaring bankruptcy or failing to engage in a repayment plan with the Company. The Company categorises a loan or receivable for write off when a debtor fails to make contractual payments greater than 3 years past due. Where loans or receivables have been written off, the Company continues to engage in enforcement activity to attempt to recover the receivable due. When recoveries are made, these are recognised in profit or loss.

Where there have not been significant increase in credit risk in financial assets (other than trade receivables) expected credit loss is measured on 12 months ECL approach. In case of significant increase in credit risk lifetime expected credit loss approach is used. For trade receivables, expected credit loss is calculated using lifetime credit loss approach (simplified approach).

(a) Credit risk management

Cash & cash equivalents and bank deposits

Credit risk related to cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits is managed by only accepting highly rated banks and diversifying bank deposits account in different banks across the country. Also, no impairment loss has been recorded in respect of fixed deposits that are with recognised commercial banks and are not past due.

Other financial assets measured at amortised cost

Other financial assets measured at amortised cost includes security deposits and others. Credit risk related to these other financial assets is managed by monitoring the recoverability of such amounts continuously.

Credit risk refers to risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Company. Credit risk arises primarily from financial assets such as trade receivables, investment in mutual funds, other balances with banks, loans and other receivables.

The Company has developed guidelines for the management of credit risk from trade receivables. The Company''s primary customers are with good credit ratings. Clients are subjected to credit assessments as a precautionary measure, and the adherence of all clients to payment due dates is monitored on an on-going basis, thereby practically eliminating the risk of default.

Credit risk arising from investment in mutual funds and other balances with banks is limited and there is no collateral held against these because the counterparties are banks and recognized financial institutions with high credit ratings assigned by the international credit rating agencies.

The average credit period on sales of products is 30 - 90 days. Credit risk arising from trade receivables is managed in accordance with the Company''s established policy, procedures and control relating to customer credit risk management. Credit quality of a customer is assessed and accordingly individual credit limits are defined/modified.

(B) Liquidity risk

Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities and the availability of funding to meet obligations when due. Management monitors rolling forecasts of the company''s liquidity position and cash and cash equivalents on the basis of expected cash flows.

Maturities of financial liabilities

The table below analyses the group''s financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on their contractual maturities for:

- all non-derivative financial liabilities and

- gross settled derivatives financial instruments for which the contractual maturities are essential for an understanding of the timing of the cash flows.

(i) The limits under the facilities 2 to 4 above are inter-changeable at the Bank''s discretion, subject to total utilisation not to exceed an aggregate limit of Rs. 20,000 (‘000) [2017: The limits under the facilities 2 to 4 above are interchangeable at the Bank''s discretion, subject to total utilisation not to exceed an aggregate limit of Rs. 20,000 (‘000), 2016: ‘The limits under the facilities 1, 5 to 7 above are inter-changeable at the Bank''s discretion, subject to total utilisation not to exceed an aggregate limit of Rs. 5,000 (‘000) ].

(ii) The facilities listed at 1 to 4 (2017- 1 to 3 ; 2016- 1 to 7) above shall be secured by first pari passu charge on stocks and book debts, with a margin of 25%.

(iii) The facility listed at 4 above (2017) shall be secured by 100% cash/fixed deposit margin from the Borrower.

(C) Market risk

(i) Foreign currency risk

The Company operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from foreign currency transactions, primarily with respect to Euro and USD. Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions and recognized assets and liabilities denominated in a currency that is not the Company''s functional currency (INR). However, the Company does not have significant foreign currency exposure as major import and export are done in functional currency except for few immaterial transactions. Accordingly, the Company, generally does not take any financial instrument to hedge its foreign exchange currency risk exposure. However, in one particular transaction of firm commitment for import of an item of property, plant and equipment, as the amount was significant, therefore, the Company had taken a foreign exchange forward contract to hedge foreign currency risk exposure and applied hedge accounting.

(iii) Price risk

The Company''s exposure to price risk arises from mutual funds held by the Company and classified in the Balance Sheet as fair value through profit or loss. To manage its price risk arising from investments in mutual funds, the Company invests in Government Interest Liquidity Funds, which are highly rated.

Sensitivity

The table below summarises the impact of increases/decreases of the NAV on the Company''s profit for the period. The analysis is based on the assumption that the Mutual fund NAV had increased / decrease with all other variables held constant. Further there is no change in assumptions from last year.

Note 4 : Segment Information:

Description of segments and principal activities

The Company is engaged in the manufacture of a single product viz. precipitated Silica.

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) of the Company. The Company has identified Board of Directors as CODM. The CODM is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments. The Company has monthly review and forecasting procedure in place and CODM reviews the operations of the Company as a whole, hence there are no reportable segments as per Ind AS 108 “Operating Segments”.

Note 35 : Capital management

For the purpose of the Company''s capital management, capital includes issued capital and all other equity reserves attributable to the equity shareholders of the Company. The primary objective of the Company when managing capital is to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern and to maintain an optimal capital structure so as to maximize shareholder value.

The Company has only one class of equity shares and has no debt. Consequent to such capital structure, there are no externally imposed capital requirements. In order to maintain or achieve an optimal capital structure, the Company allocates its capital for re-investment into business based on its long term financial plans.

Note 5 : The Company was informed by the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) that pursuant to the order of Hon''ble National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated April 26, 2017 in the matter of ‘M. C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and Others'' relating to cleaning of river Ganga, 15 industrial units of 13 companies in Gajraula including unit of Insilco Limited, in the catchment of the river Bagad which leads to the river Ganga, had been ordered to be shut down. In compliance with the same, the Company had shut down its Plant at Gajraula. The matter was again heard on May 8, 2017, where the Company''s plant was allowed to resume its operations with certain directions and the Company restarted its plant on May 9, 2017. The directions of NGT, inter-alia, included that the Company would put forward its case before a Joint Inspection Team (JIT) and the JIT will submit its report within two weeks from May 8, 2017. Pursuant to such directions, the JIT visited the plant of the Company on May 23, 2017 and the Company demonstrated and put its case before the said team. The JIT has not yet submitted its report to the NGT for river Bagad. The Company has filed a Caveat in NGT so that no orders are passed without giving the Company an opportunity of being heard. On July 13, 2017, NGT pronounced its detailed judgement, which has, inter-alia, given powers to the JIT to issue directions to various companies under the provisions of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. In response to the Company''s application for renewal of water and air consent for its plant, the Company received a letter dated January 12, 2018 from UPPCB, pursuant to observations from the inspection of the JIT, asking the Company, inter-alia, to recalculate the dosing of magnesium sulphate to meet prescribed Sodium Absorption Ratio (SAR), in a time bound manner to discontinue present chemical addition and further dilution of effluent with ground water to meet SAR value or instead the unit may switch over to Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) system. The letter also states that closure of unit may be considered if the unit fails to provide a time bound action plan for achieving ZLD. The Company has filed its response thereto, a summary of which was sent to Bombay Stock Exchange vide the Company''s letter dated January 22, 2018. Management believes that the Company has a strong case in its favour, as the Company continues to comply with all the current pollutions norms applicable to it as per consent letter. However, it is possible that the pollution authorities may come up with fresh requirement(s) for compliance in the conditions of consent letter, which will then have to be examined and considered.

Meanwhile, the Company has received UPPCB''s approval vide an e-mail dated May 11, 2018 against the application for renewal of water and air consent for its plant. The physical consent letter from UPPCB along with detailed conditions to operate, is yet to be received by the Company.

Note 6 : Trade receivables as at March 31, 2018 include Rs 517 (‘000) which were due for more than 9 months in respect of sales made to foreign companies. Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI'') master direction on export of goods and services vide FED Master Direction No. 16/2015-16 dated January 1, 2016 requires that the export realisations should be completed not later than 9 months from the date of export. The outstanding amount could not be received due to guidelines issued by Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on Asian Clearing Union (ACU) transactions in respect of Company''s export to Bangladesh. In view of the management this amount is doubtful and accordingly the Company has filed an application for obtaining permission from RBI to write off the same.

Note 7 : First-time adoption of Ind AS

Transition to Ind AS

These are the Company''s first financial statements prepared in accordance with Ind AS.

The accounting policies set out in note 1 have been applied in preparing the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2018, the comparative information presented in these financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2017 and in the preparation of an opening Ind AS balance sheet at 1 April 2016 (the date of transition). In preparing its opening Ind AS balance sheet, the Company has adjusted the amounts reported previously in financial statements prepared in accordance with the accounting standards notified under Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 (as amended) and other relevant provisions of the Act (Previous GAAP). An explanation of how the transition from previous GAAP to Ind AS has affected the Company''s financial position, financial performance and cash flows is set out in the following tables and notes.

A. Exemptions and exceptions availed

Set out below are the applicable Ind AS 101 optional exemptions and mandatory exceptions applied in the transition from previous GAAP to Ind AS.

1. Ind AS optional exemptions

(a) Deemed cost-Property, plant and equipment, Intangible assets, Investment property.

Ind AS 101 permits a first-time adopter to elect to continue with the carrying value for all of its property, plant and equipment as recognised in the financial statements as at the date of transition to Ind AS, measured as per the Previous GAAP and use that as its deemed cost as at the date of transition. This exemption can also be used for intangible assets covered by Ind AS 38 Intangible Assets and investment property covered by Ind AS 40 Investment Properties.

The Company has availed the option to continue with the Previous GAAP carrying value of Property, Plant and Equipment, Intangible Assets and Investment Properties and use that as its deemed cost as at the date of transition.

(b) Fair value measurement of financial assets and liabilities at initial recognition:

The Company has exercised the option to consider ‘initial recognition'' gains and losses to transactions entered into on or after the date of transition to Ind AS.

2. Ind AS mandatory exceptions

(a) Classification and measurement of financial assets:

The Company has applied the exception to assess classification and measurement of financial assets (Security deposits, Investment in Mutual Funds and Loan to Employee etc.) on the basis of the facts and circumstances that exist at the date of transition to Ind AS.

(b) Impairment of financial assets:

The Company has availed this exception to analyse credit risk of the financial assets as on the date of transition instead of the date of initial recognition, loss allowance to be provided at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses at each reporting date until de-recognition.

(c) Estimates :

The Company estimates in accordance with Ind AS at the date of transition to Ind AS shall be consistent with estimates made for the same date in accordance with Previous GAAP (after adjustments to reflect any difference in accounting policies), unless there is objective evidence that those estimates were in error.

Ind AS estimates as at 1 April 2016 are consistent with the estimates as at the same date made in conformity with Previous GAAP The Company made estimates for following items in accordance with Ind AS at the date of transition as these were not required under Previous GAAP:

- Impairment of financial assets based on expected credit loss model

- Finance lease obligation

- Loan to employees

(d) De-recognition of financial assets and liabilities :

Ind AS 101 requires a first-time adopter to apply the de-recognition provisions of Ind AS 109 prospectively for transactions occurring on or after the date of transition to Ind AS. However, Ind AS 101 allows a firsttime adopter to apply the de-recognition requirements in Ind AS 109 retrospectively from a date of the entity''s choosing, provided that the information needed to apply Ind AS 109 to financial assets and financial liabilities derecognised as a result of past transactions was obtained at the time of initially accounting for those transactions.

The Company has elected to apply the de-recognition provisions of Ind AS 109 prospectively from the date of transition to Ind AS.

I) Reconciliations between Previous GAAP and Ind AS

Ind AS 101 requires an entity to reconcile equity, total comprehensive income and cash flows for prior periods. The following tables represent the reconciliations from Previous GAAP to Ind AS.

- Fixed deposits with banks amounting to Rs. 45,200 (‘000) having an original maturity period of more than three months were classified and presented under ‘Cash and cash equivalents'' both in the balance sheet and in the cash flow statement for the year ended March 31, 2017, prepared under the Previous GAAP This has been rectified in the comparative financial information included in these financial statements and the impact on each affected financial statement line item and cash flow statement is disclosed above.

Notes to first-time adoption:

Note 1: Fair valuation of investment in mutual funds

Under the Previous GAAP, investments in mutual funds were classified as current investments based on the intended holding period and realisability. Current investments were carried at lower of cost and fair value. Under Ind AS, these investments are required to be recognised at fair value. Consequent to this change, the amount of current investments as at 31 March, 2017 increased by Rs. 34,800 (‘000) with corresponding impact in the statement of profit and loss and current investments as at 1 April, 2016 increased by (Rs. 55,123 (‘000) with a corresponding impact in retained earnings.

Note 2: Deferred tax

Previous GAAP requires deferred tax accounting using the income statement approach, which focuses on differences between taxable profits and accounting profits for the period. Ind AS 12, “Income taxes”, requires entities to account for deferred taxes using the balance sheet approach, which focuses on temporary differences between the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the Balance Sheet and its tax base. The application of Ind AS 12 has resulted in recognition of deferred tax on new temporary differences, which was not required under Previous GAAP In addition, the various transitional adjustments lead to additional temporary differences. Consequently, net deferred tax liabilities as on March 31, 2017 increased by Rs.655 (‘000) with a corresponding impact on statement of profit and loss. No change in net deferred tax liabilities as at 1 April 2016.

Note 3: Cash discount

Under Ind AS, all cash discounts are netted off from revenue, whereas in Previous GAAP, cash discounts were shown as part of other expenses. This change has resulted in decrease in total revenue and total expenses by Rs. 3,141 in the year ended 31 March 2017. There is no impact on total equity and profit.

Note 4: Excise duty

Under the Previous GAAP, revenue from sale of products was presented exclusive of excise duty. Under Ind AS, revenue from sale of goods is presented inclusive of excise duty. The excise duty paid is presented on the face of the statement of profit and loss as part of expenses. This change has resulted in an increase in total revenue and total expenses for the year ended 31 March 2017 by Rs. 91,427 (‘000). There is no impact on the total equity and profit.

Note 5: Foreign exchange forward contracts

Under the Previous GAAP, the Company had adopted the hedge accounting principles in accordance with guidance note on accounting for derivative contracts used for hedging foreign exchange risk related to firm commitment for purchase transaction. In accordance with guidance note, the Company had taken the effective portion of cash flow hedge in relation to firm commitment amounting to Rs. 1,067 (‘000) to hedging reserve under reserve and surplus as at 31 March 2017.Under Ind AS, effective portion of cash flow hedge are accumulated within equity and are adjusted against the carrying value of the hedged item. Consequently, the deferred costs amounting to Rs. 1,067 (‘000) have been reclassified within equity from retained earnings to cash flow hedging reserve through other comprehensive income as at 31 March 2017.

Note 6: Investment property

Under the Previous GAAP, investment properties were presented as part of Property, plant and equipment. Under Ind AS, investment properties are required to be separately presented on the face of the Balance Sheet. There is no impact on the total equity or profit as a result of this adjustment.

Note 7: Remeasurements of post-employment benefit obligations

Under Ind AS, remeasurements i.e. actuarial gains and losses and the return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in the net interest expense on the net defined benefit liability are recognised in other comprehensive income instead of the statement of profit or loss. Under the Previous GAAP, these remeasurements were recognized in statement of profit and loss. As a result of this change, the profit for the year ended March 31, 2017 increased by Rs. 1,563 (‘000). There is no impact on total equity as at 31 March 2017.

Note 8: Loan to employees

Under the Previous GAAP, interest free loan to employees (that are refundable in cash on completion of the loan term) were recorded at their transaction value. Under Ind AS, all financial assets are required to be initially recognised at fair value. Accordingly, the Company has fair valued these loans under Ind AS. Difference between the fair value and transaction value of the loans has been recognised as deferred employee cost. Consequent to this change, the equity as on 1 April, 2016 and 31 March, 2017 increased by Rs. 14 (‘000) and Rs. 30 (‘000), respectively and other income and other expenses for the year ended March 31, 2017 increased by Rs. 88 (‘000) and Rs. 71 (‘000), respectively.

Note 9: Finance lease obligation - leasehold land

Under Previous GAAP, lease of land was specifically excluded from the scope of Accounting Standard - 19. However under Ind AS, land is included within the scope of Ind AS-17. The change has resulted in land to be classified as a finance lease. Consequent to this change, the equity as on 1 April, 2016 and 31 March, 2017 decreased by Rs. 38 (‘000) and Rs. 40 (‘000), respectively and expenses recognised in the statement of profit and loss for the year ended March 31, 2017 increased by Rs. 2 (‘000).

Note 10: Capitalisation of spare parts

Under Previous GAAP spares were recognised as property, plant and equipment (PPE) when they meet the recognition criteria under Revised AS 10 (these were similar to the requirement under Ind AS). Accordingly the Company had recognised additional depreciation amounting to Rs. 5,119 (‘000) for the year ended 31 March, 2017 (including depreciation on spare existing on 1 April, 2016 amounting to Rs. 3,457 (‘000)). In accordance with transitional provisions of Ind AS, depreciation expense on spares existing as at 1 April, 2016 should be recognised in retained earning. Consequently, profit and equity for the year ended 31 March, 2017 increased by Rs. 3,457 (‘000) with corresponding increase in total equity. While total equity as on 1 April, 2016 decreased by Rs. 3,457 (‘000) consequent to this change.

Note 11: Retained earnings

Retained earnings as at 1 April, 2016 has been adjusted consequent to the above Ind AS transition adjustments.

Note 12: Other comprehensive income

Under Ind AS, all items of income and expense recognised in a period should be included in profit or loss for the period, unless a standard requires or permits otherwise. Items of income and expense that are not recognised in profit or loss but are shown in the statement of profit and loss as ‘other comprehensive income'' includes remeasurements of defined benefit plans and deferred gains/losses on cash flow hedges. The concept of other comprehensive income did not exist under Previous GAAP.

---

Mar 31, 2016

b. Terms/rights attached to equity shares

The Company has only one class of equity shares having a par value of Rs. 10 per share. Each holder of equity shares is entitled to vote. Dividend if declared, then paid in Indian rupees. The dividend proposed by the Board of Directors is subject to approval of the shareholders in the ensuing Annual General Meeting.

In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of equity shares will be entitled to receive remaining assets of the Company, after distribution of all preferential amounts.

The distribution will be in proportion to the number of equity shares held by the shareholders.

1. Gratuity and other employee benefit plans

The Company has calculated the various benefits provided to employees as per Accounting Standard-15’Employee Benefits’ as under:

a. Defined Contribution Plans

(i) Provident Fund

(ii) Superannuation Fund

(iii) Employers Contribution to Employee State Insurance

(iv) Employers Contribution to Employees'' Pension Scheme 1995

b. Defined Benefit Plans

Employees’ Gratuity Fund:

Under the gratuity plan, every employee who has completed at least five years of service gets a gratuity on departure at 15 days of last drawn salary for each completed year of service. The completion of continuous service of 5 years shall not be applicable for an employee who attains the age of superannuation or normal age of retirement before completion of the continuous service of 5 years. The Company has funded the gratuity liability with Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) except incase of certain new employees, whose gratuity liability is unfunded. Rate of return is as given by the insurance Company. The overall expected rate of return on assets is determined based on the market prices prevailing on that date, applicable to the period over which the obligation is to be settled.

The estimates of future salary increases, considered in actuarial valuation, take account of inflation, seniority, promotion and other relevant factors, such as supply and demand in the employment market.

The overall expected rate of return on assets is determined based on the market prices prevailing on that date, applicable to the period over which the obligation is to be settled.

Gratuity:

The Company expects to contribute Rs. 811 (‘000) to gratuity in next year [previous year Rs.1,041 (‘000)].

c. Other Long Term Employee Benefits

(i) Leave Encashment

Under this plan, employees are entitled to encash their leaves at the time of leaving the service. Upto certain level of employees may encash leaves every year subject to the limits specified.

(ii) Long Service Award

As per the Company policy, every employee is entitled for Long Service Award. The award is payable upon completion of 10 years and 20 years of continuous service.

(iii) Compensated Absence

Under this plan every employee is entitled to Sick leave, which can be accumulated up to the limit specified. However the same is not encashable.

2. Leases

The Company has taken its corporate office at Noida with effect from 1 May 2013 under non-cancellable operating lease for a period of 3 years having terms of renewal option. The Lease deed is coming to an end on 30 April 2016. The Company is not interested to extend the Lease deed for another period of 3 years. However, the Company has extended the lease deed by 5 months i.e. till 30 September, 2016.

The lease rental expense recognized in the statement of profit and loss for the year in respect of lease transaction is Rs.1,512 [previous year Rs. 1,512 (‘000)].

3. Segment Information

Disclosure regarding segment reporting as per Accounting Standard 17 ‘Segment Reporting'', have not been provided since the Company has a single business segment namely Precipitated Silica.

The following table shows the distribution of the Company''s consolidated sales by geographical market, regardless of where the goods were produced.

There were overseas trade receivables of Rs.68,388(‘000) [previous year Rs.11,446(‘000)] as at year end. The Company has common other assets for producing goods to domestic and overseas market. Hence separate figures for other assets/addition to fixed assets have not been furnished.

* The Company is contesting the demands and the management, including its tax advisors, believe that its position will likely be upheld in the appellate process. No tax expense has been accrued in the financial statements for the above contingent liabilities. The management believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

** The Company has received notice for demand of Rs. 12,500 (‘000) from office of Nagar Palika, Gajraula for payment of House tax including penalty from the Financial Year 1995-1996 to Financial Year 20142015. Additional liability from April 2015 to March2016 proportionately works out to Rs.625 (‘000). The Company believes that the demand notice of Nagar Palika is not tenable in law pursuant to Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) between Town Area Committee/ Nagar Panchayat, Gajraula and Gajraula Industries Association, Gajraula. Nagar Palika has contended that the waiver of tax as per MoS is not as per UP Municipal Act 1916. The Company has also obtained legal opinion on the matter. Based on legal opinion and MoS, the Company does not anticipate any liability in this regard. Pending resolution of above dispute, demand of Rs 13,125 (‘000) has been disclosed under contingent liability.

*** The Company acquired assets including land, building and machineries etc from MTZ India Ltd (hereinafter referred as ‘MTZ’) in 1999.MTZ had terminated service of one employee with full and final settlement in the year 1995.

The said employee filed a complaint of unfair labour practice before Labour Court. The Labour Court passed the order directing payment of full back wages and service benefit from 1995 till date of his retirement. MTZ filed a revision application before Industrial Court at Thane which passed the order for payment of back wages from 1995 till 1999 i.e. the date of transfer of business to Insilco Limited. Aggrieved by the said Order, the ex-employee filed a writ petition in Bombay High Court.

**** An amendment was passed on December 31, 2015 called “The Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015 which amended the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The said amendment came into force retrospectively w.e.f. April 1, 2014 and immediately after enactment of The Payment of Bonus (amendment) Act, 2015, the Company made provision of bonus for Rs. 1,584(000) for the previous year 2014-15 and published quarterly results for the quarter ended December 31, 2015 as on February 4, 2016. Subsequent to publication of Limited review results, the management came to know that the various High Courts including High Court of Allahabad have already provided interim stay of payment of bonus for the year 2014-15 in case of stay application of various other companies. The Company’s registered office at Gajraula is in the State of Uttar Pradesh and the High Court of Allahabad also in its order dated February 12, 2016 in the matter of Benara Udyog Limited vs. Union of India (WP 6098/2016) has issued a notice to the Attorney General of India upholding the decision of the Honourable High Court of Karnataka (Karnataka Employees Association vs. Union of India) regarding stay on the retrospective effect of Payment of Bonus(Amendment) Act, 2015 and issued its interim order to the effect that amendment would take effect only from Financial Year 2015-16.

The Company also obtained external Legal opinion from an expert that the subject matter is currently disputed as unconstitutional and under Constitution of India, the decision of High Court in such writ petitions applies to the Company too. Allahabad High Court has granted stay herein and as the Company has both corporate office and plant in U.P. On the basis of Legal Opinion from such expert the Company believes such decision of High Court of Allahabad applies on them too.

After the interim stay order of Allahabad High Court which having jurisdictional power of over the state of Uttar Pradesh, the Company took a view that this stay order also applied on the Company also and reversed provision of Rs.1,584(000) related to Financial Year 2014-15 and has allowed the same as a Contingent Liability in the Financial Statement for the year ended March 31, 2016.

(b) The Company is also under litigation for following cases, where based on management’s assessment, the chances of liability devolving on the Company are considered as not probable:

(i) A notice was received from Zila Panchayat, Amroha, J.P. Nagar in October 2000 raising demand of Rs. 49,400 (‘000) regarding water pollution from the Company''s plant. The Company has replied to the said Notice in October 2000 and has not received any response to their reply from the Panchayat. The Company believes that the Supreme Court judgement in the case of Imtiaz Ahmed vs. Union of India & Ors. strengthens the Company’s stand in the matter and confident of no liability against the said matter shall arise in future.

(ii) A notice was received from Sub Divisional Magistrate, Dhanaura under Section 133 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 in February 2006, on complaint of general public nearby the plant stating that the emission of gas and effluent released from our factory is causing loss to their crops, plants and vegetation. The case is currently under hearing.

(iii) A summon was received from Civil Judge, Hasanpur in November 2006, regarding a complaint by an individual alleging damage / harm to the gram panchayat land and claim of compensation there against. The case is currently under hearing.

(iv) Writ petition filed by an individual at Hon’ble High Court at Allahabad in September 2007 for stopping process of the Company on the ground that the Company is running factory infringing the rules and regulations of the Pollution Act and causing damage to environment by producing chemicals, dangerous gases and effluent in public localities. The matter is under hearing.

(v) A notice was received from Niyat Pradhikari/Upper Ziladhikari in November 1995 and from Moradabad Development Authority in September 1997 for not taking approval from the said authority for construction of residential complex in Gajraula plant. The Company has duly replied to both the notices in November 1995 and October 1997 respectively and has not received a response from the said authorities.

(vi) A notice was received from Tehsildar Dhanaura under Section 122-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 in May 1993 alleging illegal encroachments of Gaon Sabha land. The said land has been subsequently mutated in name of UPSIDC and thus, the Company expects the said proceedings to be dropped by the Tehsildar shortly.

(vii) Two cases are pending with Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Meerut since February and March 2013 respectively for accident with Company''s vehicles, which are under progress.

(viii) A matter is pending before West Bengal Taxation Tribunal since April 2011 where the Company''s vehicle was seized by the VAT Authority due to deficiency in Way Bill under new VAT Act of West Bengal. The Company has challenged the validity of the said relevant section/ rule of the said Act and the matter is currently pending.

(ix) A Shareholder of the company filed a case in March 2012 before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM), Muzaffar Nagar against the Company and MCS Limited (‘MCS''), the Transfer Agent of the Company, under section 403 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) alleging the misappropriation of his shares by the Company and MCS. The Company had filed an Application before the High Court of Allahabad for stay of criminal proceedings in the matter which was granted vide order dated 22 May, 2013. The said order of High Court has been duly taken on record by Muzaffar Nagar Court. The Shareholder has been summoned for his Reply by High Court.

(x) The Company have received order on 4 April 2016 from Assistant Commissioner Custom and Central Excise, Hapur, by confirming demand of Rs. 54 (‘000) with Interest and equal amount of penalty, The Company will file appeal against the demand. Expected liability as on31 March 2016 is Rs. 149(‘000).

4. As against the installed capacity of 15,000 MT (of the total of 21,000 MT installed capacity, 6,000 MT was impaired in the year 2013-14), the production during the year was 12,070 MT (previous year 11,207 MT). As per the report from an external expert, the management believes that no impairment is likely. Further, the holding company has confirmed that they will continue to fulfill their obligation as ultimate holding Company. Further, the Company has sufficient liquid funds as at the balance sheet date. Accordingly, these financial statements have been prepared on going concern assumption and do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of carrying amounts of assets and the amount of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

5. The Company had received an advance of Rs.12,500 (‘000) against a total contract value of Rs. 13,000 (‘000) for the transfer of leasehold rights in residential flats at Patalganga, the transfer of said flats in the name of buyer is still pending. The transfer is subject to necessary approvals from the local authorities. These said assets were fully depreciated and recorded under ‘Fixed Assets held for Sale’ in the financial statements at nominal value.

6. The Company is in the process of getting an evaluation done for certain transactions to determine whether the transactions with associated enterprises were undertaken at “arm''s length price”. The Company believes that all domestic and international transactions with associate enterprises are undertaken at negotiated contracted prices on usual commercial terms and is confident of there being no adjustments on completion of such evaluation/study.

7. Previous year comparatives

The Company has reclassified previous year figures to conform to this year’s classification.

---

Mar 31, 2013

1. Corporate Information

Insilco Limited is a subsidiary of Evonik Degussa GmbH, Germany. The Company is a public company and is incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. Its shares are listed on Bombay Stock Exchange. The Company is engaged in the manufacturing and selling of precipitated silica. Insilco produces different grades of precipitated silica, catering to the requirements of customers in different industries.

2. Basis of preparation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in India (Indian GAAP). The Company has prepared these financial statements to comply in all material respects with the accounting standards notified under the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006, (as amended) and the relevant provisions of the Companies Act,1956. The financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis and under the historical cost convention.

The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of financial statements are consistent with those of previous year.

a. Terms/rights attached to equity shares

The Company has only one class of equity shares having a par value of Rs. 10 per share. Each holder of equity shares is entitled to vote. Dividend if declared, then paid in Indian rupees. The dividend proposed by the Board of Directors is subject to approval of the shareholders in the ensuing Annual General Meeting.

In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of equity shares will be entitled to receive remaining assets of the Company, after distribution of all preferential amounts.

The distribution will be in proportion to the number of equity shares held by the shareholders.

Having regard to the income tax matters for various years settled/pending before the Income tax department/ appellate authorities, the Company as a matter of prudence in the year ending 31st December 2004, had over and above the provision for taxation made in the books of accounts as was considered appropriate and adequate, set apart Rs. 10,000(''000) as ''Reserve for Taxation''. Based on the management assessment, in the previous year ended March 31, 2012 such separate reserve is not required, therefore same has been transferred back to the surplus in statement of Profit & Loss account.

The Company follows Accounting Standard (AS 22) "Account for taxes on Income", as notified by the Companies Accounting Standard Rules, 2006. Due to carried forward losses, the Company has deferred tax asset on unabsorbed depreciation besides on other components. Since the Company has sufficient timing differences, against which such deferred tax assets can be realised in future, hence the deferred tax asset has been recognized to the extent of deferred tax liabilities.

*Sweep fixed deposits with bank have been considered as part of current account balances with banks.

**Deposit of Rs. 115 (''000) [previous year Rs. 106 (''000)] are under lien on account of debenture interest.

The Company has credit facilities amounting to Rs. 5,000 (''000) from a Bank which includes cash credit, export packing credit, export post shipment credit and bill discounting facilities. This limit is secured by hypothecation of stock of finished goods, work in progress, raw materials and book debts both present and future of the Company on first pari passu charge basis.

3. The Company has calculated the various benefits provided to employees as per Accounting Standard-15 (revised 2005) ''Employee Benefits'' as under:

A. Defined Contribution Plans

a. Provident Fund.

b. Superannuation Fund.

c. Employers Contribution to Employee State Insurance.

d. Employers Contribution to Employees'' Pension Scheme 1995.

During the year, the Company has recognized the following amounts in the Profit and Loss account:

* Included in Contribution to Provident, and other funds under Employee Benefit expenses (Refer note 20) Bl Defined Benefit Plans Employees'' Gratuity Fund:

Under the gratuity plan, every employee who has completed at least five years of service gets a gratuity on departure at 15 days of last drawn salary for each completed year of service. The completion of continuous service of 5 years shall not be applicable for an employee who attains the age of superannuation or normal age of retirement before completion for the continuous service of 5 years. The Company has funded the gratuity liability with Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC). Rate of return is as given by the insurance company. The overall expected rate of return on assets is determined based on the market prices prevailing on that date, applicable to the period over which the obligation is to be settled.

The estimates of future salary increases, considered in actuarial valuation, take account of inflation, seniority, promotion and other relevant factors, such as supply and demand in the employment market.

The overall expected rate of return on assets is determined based on the market prices prevailing on that date, applicable to the period over which the obligation is to be settled.

Investment details of plan assets:

The Plan assets are maintained with Life Insurance Corporation Gratuity Scheme. The details of investment maintained by Life Insurance Corporation are not available with the Company and have not been disclosed.

Gratuity:

The Company expects to contribute Rs. 3,201 (''000) to gratuity in next year [31 March 2012 Rs.3,445 (''000)].

C. Other Long Term Employee Benefits

a. Leave Encashment.

Under this plan, employees are entitled to encash their leaves at the time of leaving the service. Upto certain level of employees may encash leaves every year subject to the limits specified.

b. Long Service Award

As per the Company policy, every employee is entitled for Long Service Award. The award is payable upon completion of 10 years & 20 years of continuous service.

c. Compensated Absence

Under this plan every employee is entitled to Sick leave, which can be accumulated up to the limit specified. However the same is not encashable.

4. Leases

(i) The Company has taken its corporate office at Gurgaon under non cancelable operating lease for a period of 3 years. The said lease period will be expiring on 13.06.2013. The Company had the option to get the said lease period renewed and has given a notice to vacate the premises, by giving six months prior notice to the lessor. The Company has not opted for such renewal so there will be no future minimum lease payments for the said Gurgaon office after the said date i.e. 13.06.2013.

(ii) The Company has taken a new corporate office at Noida under operating lease for a period of 9 years. The lease agreement is cancellable at the option of the lessee after the lock-in period of 3 years. Accordingly considered as non cancellable by the management.

The lease rental expense recognized in the profit & loss account for the year in respect of lease transaction is Rs. 5,762 (''000) [previous year Rs. 11,520 (''000)] (refer note 23).

5. Segment Information

Disclosure regarding segment reporting as per Accounting Standard 17 ''Segment Reporting'', issued by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, have not been provided since the Company has a single business segment namely Precipitated Silica.

The following table shows the distribution of the Company''s consolidated sales by geographical market, regardless of where the goods were produced:

* The future cash flows on account of the same cannot be determined unless the judgement/ decisions are received from the appropriate forums/parties.

** The company has received notice for demand of Rs. 11,250 (''000) from Nagar Panchayat office, Gajraula for payment of House tax including penalty from the year 1995 to 2013. The company believes that the demand notice of Nagar Panchayat is not tenable in law pursuant to Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) between Town Area Committee/ Nagar Panchayat, Gajraula and Gajraula Industries Association, Gajraula. Nagar Panchyat has contended that the waiver of tax as per MoS is not as per UP Municipal Act 1916. The Company has also obtained legal opinion on the matter, based on legal opinion and MoS, the Company do not anticipate any liability in this regard. Pending resolution of above dispute, demand of Rs. 11,250 (''000) has been disclosed under contingent liability.

The information has been given in respect of such vendors to the extent they could be identified as "Micro and Small" enterprises on the basis of information available with the Company.

6. (i) The plant & machinery on which impairment provision amounting to Rs. 4,598 (''000) was created in earlier years has been disposed off in the current year and the difference between the carrying value and net realizable value has been disclosed in profit on sale of fixed assets.

(ii) Some assets (plant and machinery) were shifted from the Company''s erstwhile plant in Patalganga to Gajraula plant at the time of closure of Patalganga Plant in the financial year ended March 31, 2009. At that time it was not evident whether all of these assets would be successfully used in the expansion project. Accordingly, these assets had been tested for impairment and an impairment provision of Rs. 9,320 (''000) was recorded in the financial year ended March 31, 2010. During the previous year, a significant part of such impaired assets have been utilized in the expansion project. The impairment provision related to these amounting to Rs. 4,722 (''000) had accordingly been reversed and disclosed as an exceptional item in the financial statements during previous financial year ended 31st March 2012.

(iii) An impairment provision of Rs.1,980 (''000) was reported in the financial year ended March 31, 2011 on assets held for sale representing idle plant & machinery. The Company has in the previous year awarded tender for sale of these assets and has reversed impairment provision of Rs. 1,980 (''000) as the expected realizable value is higher than written down value of the asset. This reversal of provision had been disclosed as a part of exceptional items in the financial statements during previous financial year ended 31st March 2012. During the current year, idle plant & machinery has been disposed resulting in profit of Rs. 6,974(''000) disclosed under the head profit on sale of fixed assets.

7. a) The Company had received an advance of Rs.12,500 (''000) against a total contract value of Rs. 13,000 (''000) for the transfer of leasehold rights in residential flats at Patalganga, the transfer of said flats in the name of buyer is still pending. The transfer is subject to necessary approvals from the local authorities. These said assets were fully depreciated and recorded under ''Fixed Assets held for Sale'' in the financial statements at nominal value.

b) During the year Company has transferred Gasifier plant to fixed assets held for sale. The Company had made significant efforts to align Gassifier plant in the production line. However it failed to produce adequate results on a consistent and is not likely to result in desired cost saving. Therefore after a detailed technical evaluation, management has decided to discontinue with its operations and has transferred it to fixed assets held for sale. The difference between the carrying amount of Gassifier plant of Rs. 26,419 (''000) at the year end and net realizable value of Rs. 480 (''000) has been disclosed under note 24 exceptional item of the statement of profit & loss.

8. Previous year comparatives:

The Company has reclassified previous year figures to conform to this year''s classification.

---

Mar 31, 2012

1. Corporate Information

Insilco Limited is a subsidiary of Evonik Degussa GmbH, Germany. The Company is a public company and is incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. Its shares are listed on Bombay Stock Exchange. The Company is engaged in the manufacturing and selling of Precipitated Silica. Insilco produces different grades of Precipitated Silica, catering to the requirements of customers in different industries.

2. Basis of preparation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted account- ing principles in India (Indian GAAP). The Company has prepared these financial statements to comply in all material respects with the accounting standards notified under the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006, (as amended) and the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis and under the historical cost convention.

The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of financial statements are consistent with those of previous year, except for the change in accounting policy explained below.

a. Terms/rights attached to equity shares

The Company has only one class of equity shares having a par value of Rs. 10 per share. Each holder of equity shares is entitled to vote. Dividend if declared, then paid in indian rupees. The dividend proposed by the Board of Directors is subject to approval of the shareholders in the ensuing Annual General Meeting.

In the event of liquidation of the company, the holders of equity shares will be entitled to receive remaining assets of the company, after distribution of all preferential amounts.

The distribution will be in proportion to the number of equity shares held by the shareholders.

Having regard to the income tax matters for various years settled/pending before the income tax department/appellate authorities, the Company as a matter of prudence in the year ending 31st December, 2004, had over and above the provision for taxation made in the books of accounts as was considered appropriate and adequate, set apart Rs. 10,000('000) as 'Reserve for Taxation'. Based on the management assessment, now such separate reserve is not required, therefore same has been transferred back to the surplus in statement of profit and loss account.

The Company follows Accounting Standard (AS-22) "Account for taxes on Income", as notified by the Companies Accounting Standard Rules, 2006. Due to carried forward losses, the company has deferred tax asset on unab- sorbed depreciation besides on other components. Since the company has sufficient timing differences, the reversal of which will result in sufficient taxable income against which such deferred tax assets can be realised in future, hence the deferred tax asset has been recognized to the extent of deferred tax liabilities.

*Sweep fixed deposits with bank have been considered as part of current account balances with banks.

**Deposit of Rs. 106 ('000) [previous year Rs. 2,407 ('000)] are under lien on account of debenture interest.

The Company has credit facilities amounting to Rs. 5,000 ('000) from a bank which includes cash credit, export packing credit, export post shipment credit and bill discounting facilities. This limit is secured by hypothecation of stock of finished goods, work in progress, raw materials and book debts both present and future of the Company on first pari passu charge basis.

3. The Company has calculated the various benefits provided to employees as per Accounting Standard-15 (revised 2005) 'Employee Benefits' as under:

A. Defined Contribution Plans

a. Provident Fund

b. Superannuation Fund

c. Employers Contribution to Employee State Insurance

d. Employers Contribution to Employees' Pension Scheme 1995

B. Defined Benefit Plans

Employees' Gratuity Fund:

Under the gratuity plan, every employee who has completed at least five years of service gets a gratuity on departure at 15 days of last drawn salary for each completed year of service. The completion of continu- ous service of 5 years shall not be applicable for an employee who attains the age of superannuation or normal age of retirement before completion for the continuous service of 5 years. The Company has funded the gratuity liability with Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC). Rate of return is as given by the insurance company. The overall expected rate of return on assets is determined based on the market prices prevailing on that date, applicable to the period over which the obligation is to be settled.

Investment details of plan assets:

The Plan assets are maintained with Life Insurance Corporation Gratuity Scheme. The details of investment maintained by Life Insurance Corporation are not available with the Company and have not been disclosed.

Gratuity:

The Company expects to contribute Rs. 3,445 ('000) to gratuity in next year [31st March, 2011 - Rs.3,920 ('000)].

C. Other Long Term Employee Benefits

a. Leave Encashment

Under this plan, employees are entitled to encash their leaves at the time of leaving the service. Upto certain level of employees may encash leaves every year subject to the limits specified.

b. Long Service Award

As per the Company policy, every employee is entitled for Long Service Award. The award is payable upon completion of 10 years & 20 years of continuous service.

4. Leases

The Company has taken its corporate office under operating lease for a period of 7 years and 6 months. The lease agreement is cancellable at the option of the lessee after the lock in period of 3 years, accordingly, considered as non cancellable by the management. There is an escalation clause for the increase in lease rent at the end of every 3 years. The Company has also taken a residential accommodation on lease, which is cancellable in nature.

The lease rental expense recognized in the profit & loss account for the year in respect of lease transaction is Rs. 11,520 ('000) [previous year Rs. 9,496 ('000)] (refer note 23).

5. Segment Information

Disclosure regarding segment reporting as per Accounting Standard-17 'Segment Reporting', issued by, The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, have not been provided since the Company has a single business segment namely, Precipitated Silica and the segment revenue from external customers by geographical area is less than the stipulated percentage requiring disclosure under the aforesaid Accounting Standard in both the current and previous year.

Moreover, there are no assets located outside India, hence no disclosure for geographical segments are required.

6. Contingent Liabilities*

(Rupees in '000)

Sl. Particulars 31-March- 2012 31-March- 2011 No.

a Sales tax/Entry tax claims disputed by the Company relating to 2,644 24,356 issues of applicability and determination

b Income tax claims disputed by the Company relating to issues of 15,601 61,068 applicability and determination pertaining to various assessment years

c Other tax matters disputed by the Company relating to availment of 74 74 CENVAT credit on outdoor catering services

d Adjudication order issued under Foreign Trade (Development & 479,066 - Regulation) Act, 1992, disputed by the Company**

e Show cause notice received under Foreign Trade (Development & Amount not Amount not Regulation) Act, 1992*** as certainable ascertainable

f Other claims against the Company not acknowledged as debts 77 256

Total 497,462 85,754

* The future cash flows on account of the same cannot be determined unless the judgment/ decisions are received from the appropriate forums/parties.

** The Company had imported certain capital goods under Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) Scheme during the Financial Year 1999-2000 under the EXIM Policy 1997-2002 ('Policy'). As per the Scheme, the Company had an export obligation of Rs. 369,660 ('000) to be met by 18th July, 2005. The Company has met the export obligations by the said date, however due to certain reasons, the filings of the evidence of fulfillment of the export obligation was delayed. The Zonal Joint Director General of Foreign Trade passed an adjudication order, for non submission of any evidence in the requisite manner with Bank Certificates/ Documents towards fulfillment of Export Obligation attached with an EPCG license amounting to Rs. 61,610 ('000) dated 19th July, 1999 granted to the Company. Said adjudication order has been issued under Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992. However, management believes that the said adjudication order is likely to be set aside as the Company had fulfilled the export obligation under the EPCG license and suo-motto submitted the evidence of the completion of the export obligation before the receipt of the above said adjudication order.

*** The Company had made certain imports in earlier years under the advance license dated 24th May, 1994 issued under Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992. A show cause notice was received from Deputy Director General of Foreign Trade seeking submission of documentation within prescribed time in proof of fulfillment of export obligation attached with an advance license amounting to Rs. 44,086 ('000).

7. Disclosure under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006

The Company has amounts due to suppliers under The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act) as at 31st March, 2012. The disclosure pursuant to the said act is as under:

8. (i) Some assets (plant and machinery) were shifted from the Company's erstwhile plant in Patalganga to Gajraula plant at the time of closure of Patalganga plant in the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2009. At that time it was not evident whether all of these assets would be successfully used in the expansion project. Accordingly, these assets had been tested for impairment and an impairment provision of Rs. 9,320 ('000) was recorded in the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2010. During the year, a significant part of such impaired assets have been utilized in the expansion project. The impairment provision related to these amounting to Rs. 4,722 ('000) has accordingly been reversed and disclosed as an exceptional item in the financial statements.

(ii) An impairment provision of Rs.1,980 ('000) was reported in the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2011 on assets held for sale representing idle plant & machinery. The Company has in the current year awarded tender for sale of these assets and has reversed impairment provision of Rs. 1,980 ('000) as the expected realizable value is higher than written down value of the asset. This reversal of provision has been disclosed as a part of exceptional items in the financial statements.

9. The Company had received an advance of Rs.12,500 ('000) against a total contract value of Rs. 13,000 ('000) for the transfer of leasehold rights in residential flats at Patalganga, the transfer of said flats in the name of buyer is still pending. The transfer is subject to necessary approvals from the local authorities. These said assets were fully depreciated and recorded under 'Fixed Assets held for Sale' in the financial statements at nominal value.

The Company has also received another advance of Rs. 2,250 ('000) against a total contract value of Rs.9,380 ('000) for sale of certain idle plant & machinery relating to Gajraula unit. The said assets have been recorded at its written down value of Rs. 5,827 ('000), which is lower than its realizable value as at 31st March, 2012 have been shown as 'Fixed Assets held for Sale' in the financial statements.

10. Previous year comparatives

Till the year ended 31st March, 2011, the Company was using pre-revised Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956, for preparation and presentation of its financial statements. During the year ended 3131 March, 2012, the revised Schedule VI notified under the Companies Act, 1956, has become applicable to the Company. The Company has reclassified previous year figures to conform to this year's classification.

The figures of previous year were audited by a firm of Chartered Accountants other than S.R. Batliboi & Associates.

---

Mar 31, 2011

1. Background

Insilco Limited, a subsidiary of Evonik Degussa GmbH, Germany is engaged in the manufacturing and selling of precipitated silica. Insilco produces different grades of precipitated silica, catering to the requirements of customers in rubber and non-rubber industries.

1. Contingent Liabilities

A. (Rs. in 000)

Particulars 31.03.11 31.03.10

Bank guarantee outstanding - 1,000

Disputed tax matters :

(a) Sales tax/Entry tax claims disputed by the Company relating to 24,356 68,211 issues of applicability and determination

(b) Income tax claims disputed by the Company relating to issues of 61,068 63,087 applicability and determination

(c) Other tax matters 74 74

Claim against the Company not acknowledged as debts 256 -

TOTAL 85,754 132,372

B. Show cause notice received from Deputy Director General of Foreign Trade seeking submission of documentation within prescribed time in proof of fulfillment of export obligation attached with an advance license amounting to Rs. 44,086 (000) dated May 24, 1994 granted to the Company. Said show cause notice has been issued under Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992.

The future cash flows on account of A & B above cannot be determined unless the judgment/ decisions are received from the appropriate forums/parties.

3. Related Party Disclosure

Disclosure of related parties / related party transactions

List of Related Parties

Name of Related Party Relationship

1. RAG-Stiftung Ultimate Holding Company

1. Evonik Industries AG Intermediate Holding Company

1. Evonik Degussa GmbH Holding Company (Formerly known as Degussa GmbH)

1. Evonik Degussa Africa PTY Ltd. Fellow Subsidiaries with whom 2. Evonik Degussa India Pvt. Ltd. the Company has transacted

3. Thai Aerosil

4. Evonik Degussa (China) Co. Ltd.

5. Evonik United Silica Industrial Ltd.

6. Evonik Services GmbH

1. Mr. Matthias Hau, Managing Director Key Management Personnel

4. The Company has credit facilities amounting to Rs. 10,000 (000) from a Bank which includes cash credit, export packing credit, export post shipment credit and bill discounting facilities. This limit is secured by hypothecation of stock of finished goods, work in progress, raw materials and book debts both present and future of the Company on first pari passu charge basis.

5. Having regard to the income tax matters for various years settled/pending before the Income tax department/ appellate authorities, the Company as a matter of prudence in the year ending 31st December 2004, had over and above the provision for taxation made in the books of accounts as was considered appropriate and adequate, set apart Rs. 10,000 (000) as Reserve for Taxation. Based on the management assessment of the pending tax matters, no further transfer to/from the said reserve in the current year is considered necessary.

6. Assets held for sale represents certain idle plant and machinery relating to Gajraula unit having net book value of Rs. 7,227 (000) at the year end. Impairment provision created during the year on these assets amounts to Rs. 1,981 (000).

7. Disclosure under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006

The Company has amounts due to suppliers under The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act) as at March 31, 2011. The disclosure pursuant to the said act is as under:

11. The Company has calculated the various benefits provided to employees as per Accounting Standard-15 (revised 2005) Employee Benefits as under:

A. Defined Contribution Plans

a. Provident Fund.

b. Superannuation Fund.

B. State Plans

a. Employers Contribution to Employee State Insurance.*

b. Employers Contribution to Employees Pension Scheme 1995.*

*Included in Contribution to Provident, Gratuity and other fund under Personnel expenses (Refer schedule 17)

C. Defined Benefit Plans

a. Employees Gratuity Fund.

b. Leave Encashment.

c. Long Service Award.

Investment details of plan assets:

The Plan assets are maintained with Life Insurance Corporation Gratuity Scheme. The details of investment maintained by Life Insurance Corporation are not available with the Company and have not been disclosed.

Expected Rate of Return:

The enterprise has funded the liability with Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC). Rate of return is as given by the Insurance Company.

Gratuity:

The company has paid the contribution for Gratuity on May 20, 2011.

13. Disclosure regarding segment reporting as per Accounting Standard 17 Segement Reporting, issued by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, have not been provided since the Company has a single business segment namely Precipitated Silica and the segment revenue from external customers by geographical area is less than the stipulated percentage requiring disclosure under the aforesaid Accounting Standard in both the current and previous year.

14. Previous Year figures have been reclassified and regrouped wherever necessary to confirm to the classifi cation adopted in these accounts.

---

Mar 31, 2010

1. Background

Insilco Limited, a subsidiary of Evonik Degussa GmbH, Germany is engaged in the manufacturing and selling of precipitated silica. Insilco produces different grades of precipitated silica, catering to the requirements of customers in rubber and non-rubber industries.

2. Diluted earnings per share: For the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share, the net profit or loss for the year attributable to equity shareholders and the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period are adjusted for the effects of all dilutive potential equity shares.

3. Provisions and contingencies

The Company creates a provision when there is present obligation as a result of a past event that probably requires an outflow of resources and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of obligation. A disclosure for a contingent liability is made when there is a possible obligation or a present obligation that probably will not require an outflow of resources or where a reliable estimate of the obligation cannot be made.

1. Contingent Liabilities

(Rs. in 000)

Particulars 31.3.10 31.3.09

Bank guarantee outstanding 1,000 3,101

Show cause notice for shortfall in stamp duty / registration charges (including penalty) - 133,640 on debenture trust deed

Disputed tax matters:

(a) Sales tax/ Value added tax 68,211 55,181

(b) Income tax 63,087 31,939

(c) Other tax matters 74 374

TOTAL 132,372 224,235

2. Segment Information

Geographical segments

The following table shows the distribution of the Companys sales by geographical market, regardless of where the goods were produced:

3. Related Party Disclosure

Disclosure of related parties / related party transactions List of Related Parties

Name of Related Party Relationship

Evonik Industries Ultimate holding company

1. Evonik Degussa GmbH (Formerly known as Degussa GmbH) Holding company

1. Evonik Degussa Africa PTY Ltd. Fellow subsidiaries with

2. Evonik Degussa India Pvt. Ltd. whom the company has

3. Thai Aerosil transacted

4. Evonik Degussa (China) Co. Ltd.

1. Mr. Matthias Hau, Managing Director Key management personnel

2. Dr. Florian Bertram Kirschner resigned as Whole Time Director, w.e.f. May 31, 2009. Non executive director from June 01, 2009 till October 15, 2009.

4. The company has credit facilities amounting to Rs. 10,000(000) from a Bank which includes cash credit, export packing credit, export post shipment credit and bill discounting facilities. This limit is secured by hypothecation of stock of finished goods, work in progress, raw materials and book debts both present and future of the company on first pari passu charge basis.

5. Having regard to the income tax matters for various years settled/pending before the Income tax department/ appellate authorities, the company as a matter of prudence in the year ending 31st December 2004, had over and above the provision for taxation made in the books of accounts as was considered appropriate and adequate, set apart Rs. 10,000(O00) as Reserve for Taxation. Based on the management assessment of the pending tax matters, no further transfer to/from the said reserve in the current year is considered necessary.

6. Assets held for sale represents certain-fixed assets ( primarily land, building and plant and machinery) related to the closed Patalganga plant having net book value of Rs. 55,282 (000) [previous year Rs. 78,097 (000)] at the year end. This is net of impairment provision of Rs. 961 (000) [previous year Rs. 24,956 (000)].

7. The company has at the year end tested for impairment the carrying value of certain assets (mainly representing plant and machinery) transferred from Patalganga to Gajraula plant and accordingly created a provision for impairment amounting to Rs. 9,320 (000).

Provision for impairment created in the past amounting to Rs. 659 (000) relating to certain plant & machinery have been written back during the current year on their disposal.

8. Previous Year figures have been reclassified and regrouped wherever necessary to confirm to the classification adopted in these accounts.