Harvard Wins Legal Battle Over International Students' Immigration Status 

A federal judge has halted the US government's plan to prevent foreign nationals from studying at Harvard University. This decision, made on Monday, allows Harvard to continue hosting international students. US District Judge Allison Burroughs issued a preliminary injunction against a June 4 proclamation that aimed to deny entry to these students, as reported by Bloomberg.

The injunction builds upon an earlier temporary restriction. Trump's proclamation initially sought to bar foreign nationals from entering the US for studies or exchange programs at Harvard for six months. It also directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider revoking visas of currently enrolled international students.

Harvard's Legal Battle

Judge Burroughs' ruling marks another victory for Harvard in its ongoing legal battle with the Trump administration over its international student body. On June 20, she blocked a May 22 order that revoked Harvard's certification to enroll foreign students. These actions targeted the university's ability to admit and retain international students.

Harvard has been a focal point of Trump's efforts to address antisemitism, political bias, and diversity programs in universities. The institution has also filed a lawsuit over a $2.6 billion funding freeze, which Burroughs has temporarily halted. Additionally, Trump threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status.

Impact on Students and Research

The visa proclamation affects a school where 27% of students are from abroad. At a June 16 hearing, Harvard attorney Ian Gershengorn highlighted the "devastating" impact of this action on the university's community and research initiatives. He stated it disrupts relationships among roommates, teammates, and classmates while threatening labs and pioneering research.

Gershengorn argued that it deprives students of mentors and teachers and fundamentally alters the learning experience at Harvard by removing diverse perspectives. The university contends that Trump's proclamation infringes on its First Amendment rights regarding governance and curriculum decisions.

Government's Stance

The Trump administration maintains that the president possesses broad authority over immigration and national security matters. Justice Department lawyer Tiberius Davis defended Trump's actions against Harvard as necessary due to concerns about campus unrest and antisemitic conduct.

Davis emphasized that the administration does not trust Harvard to adequately vet or discipline foreign students compared to other universities. He asserted that Trump's measures ensure proper monitoring and discipline of these students if they violate laws or standards.

Representatives from both Harvard and the White House have not yet commented on this recent court decision. Meanwhile, the legal proceedings continue as both sides navigate this complex issue involving constitutional rights and immigration policies.