Why Taxpayers Who Claim Too Many Deductions End Up On The Audit Radar?

The Income-tax Act, 1961 provides a wide range of deductions and exemptions designed to reduce the tax burden of individuals and businesses. Some of the significant deductions include investments under section 80C, health insurance premiums under section 80D, interest on housing loans under section 24(b), contributions to pension schemes under section 80CCD, etc.

While the law encourages legitimate tax planning, there is a difference between prudent tax optimization and fabricated claims that may attract scrutiny.

As per CA (Dr.) Suresh Surana, taxpayers who attempt to maximize deductions beyond what their income profile reasonably supports often find themselves flagged for audit or detailed examination by the tax authorities as follows:

Data-driven compliance and analytics

Over the past decade, the Indian Income-tax Department has significantly strengthened its data analytics capabilities. With systems such as the Annual Information Statement (AIS) and Taxpayer Information Summary (TIS), authorities now have access to taxpayers' financial transactions.

These include investments, high-value purchases, property registrations, securities transactions, and even foreign remittances. When deductions claimed in the income-tax return do not reconcile with the data available in AIS, or appear disproportionately high compared to reported income, the case is automatically flagged for further review.

Disproportionate claims relative to income

One of the potential red flags arises when deductions claimed appear inconsistent with a taxpayer's financial capacity. For instance, an individual reporting an annual income of Rs. 8 lakh but claiming Rs. 3.5-4 lakh in housing loan interest and Rs. 1.5 lakh under section 80C may likely attract queries. While such scenarios may still be possible, they are statistically unusual. Disproportionate claims are often treated as indicators of potential misreporting.

Claiming a deduction without adequate documentation

Another common trigger is the simultaneous use of multiple deduction provisions without proper documentation. A taxpayer may, for instance, claim benefits for life insurance premiums, tuition fees, ELSS investments, NPS contributions, medical insurance, donations, and housing loan interest, all in the same year.

Although each of these deductions is permissible, claiming them all together without adequate supporting evidence tends to raise suspicion. The department may scrutinize whether the taxpayer has actually made all these payments or whether some are artificially inflated to reduce taxable income.

Frequent discrepancies between Form 16, 26AS, and ITR

For salaried taxpayers, Form 16 issued by the employer and the details available in Form 26AS/AIS serve as the primary sources of verification. If the deductions claimed in the return materially exceed what is reported by the employer or captured in tax databases, the mismatch may lead to a potential inquiry.

For instance, if Form 16 reflects only Rs. 60,000 of eligible 80C investments but the return claims Rs. 1.5 lakh, the significant difference may be inquired by the income tax authorities. Such discrepancies may not only lead to the denial of the deduction but could also result in penalties for misreporting if found to be wrongly claimed by the taxpayer.

When a case is selected for scrutiny, the taxpayer may be required to furnish detailed supporting evidence such as investment receipts, bank statements, loan sanction letters, and proof of payments. If the claims are found to be inflated or fabricated, the consequences can include disallowance of deductions and recomputation of tax liability, along with the levy of interest and penal consequences.

Claiming tax deductions is a legitimate right available to every taxpayer, but wrongful or disproportionate claims may be a potential risk for scrutiny. Thus, taxpayers need to balance tax planning with compliance, ensuring that all claims are reasonable, well-documented, and consistent with their income profile.

Disclaimer: The views and recommendations expressed are solely those of the individual analysts or entities and do not reflect the views of GoodReturns.in or Greynium Information Technologies Private Limited (together referred as “we”). We do not guarantee, endorse or take responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any content, nor do we provide any investment advice or solicit the purchase or sale of securities. All information is provided for informational and educational purposes only and should be independently verified from licensed financial advisors before making any investment decisions.