1 Year Absolute Returns
-
NAV (₹) on 18 Dec 2025
20.25
1 Day NAV Change
0.18%
Risk Level
Very High Risk
Rating
-
Zerodha Silver ETF is a Debt mutual fund categorized under ETF, offered by Zerodha Asset Management Private Limited. Launched on 10 Mar 2025, investors can start with a lumpsum investment of ₹1,000. ... Read more
AUM
₹ 470.77 Cr
| Sectors | Weightage |
|---|---|
| Others | 95.88% |
| Net Receivables/(Payables) | 2.88% |
| Treps/Reverse Repo | 1.25% |
| Name | Weightage | Value (in Cr.) | Sector |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silver | 95.88% | ₹ 19.22 | Others |
| Net Receivable / Payable | 2.88% | ₹ 0.58 | Others |
| Clearing Corporation of India Limited | 1.25% | ₹ 0.25 | Others |
| Annualised returns | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9M | 1Y | 2Y | 3Y | |
| Fund returns | - | - | - | - |
| Category returns | 13.54% | 3.88% | 14.83% | 25.46% |
The investment objective of the scheme is to generate returns that are in line with the performance of physical silver in domestic prices, subject to tracking error. There is no assurance or guarantee ... Read more
|
Scheme Name
|
NAV
|
Returns
1Y
3Y
5Y
|
AUM (Cr)
|
Expense Ratio
|
Risk Meter
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Franklin India NSE Nifty 50 Index Fund - Direct Plan
Index
Direct
|
₹199.65 | 3.00% | 32.07% | 77.99% | ₹788 | 0.28% |
Very High
|
|
Franklin India NSE Nifty 50 Index Fund - Direct Plan
Index
Direct
|
₹199.65 | 3.00% | 32.07% | 77.99% | ₹788 | 0.28% |
Very High
|
|
Tata Nifty Private Bank Exchange Traded Fund
ETF
Regular
|
₹292.38 | 12.34% | 30.54% | 71.38% | ₹12 | 0.20% |
Very High
|
|
HDFC NIFTY Private Bank ETF
ETF
Regular
|
₹28.78 | 12.34% | 30.48% | 0.00% | ₹349 | 0.15% |
Very High
|
|
ICICI Prudential Nifty Private Bank ETF
ETF
Regular
|
₹28.53 | 12.32% | 30.47% | 70.76% | ₹3,406 | 0.15% |
Very High
|
|
SBI Nifty Private Bank ETF
ETF
Regular
|
₹288.47 | 12.33% | 30.42% | 70.30% | ₹533 | 0.15% |
Very High
|
|
Franklin India NSE Nifty 50 Index Fund
Index
Regular
|
₹188.86 | 2.36% | 29.95% | 73.77% | ₹788 | 0.63% |
Very High
|
|
Franklin India NSE Nifty 50 Index Fund
Index
Regular
|
₹188.86 | 2.36% | 29.95% | 73.77% | ₹788 | 0.63% |
Very High
|
|
Sundaram NIFTY 100 Equal Weight Fund - Direct Plan
Index
Direct
|
₹81.82 | -3.09% | 28.04% | 64.42% | ₹132 | 0.61% |
Very High
|
|
Sundaram NIFTY 100 Equal Weight Fund - Direct Plan
Index
Direct
|
₹81.82 | -3.09% | 28.04% | 64.42% | ₹132 | 0.61% |
Very High
|
What is the current NAV of Zerodha Silver ETF Regular Growth?
The current Net Asset Value (NAV) of Zerodha Silver ETF Regular Growth is ₹20.25 as of 18 Dec 2025. NAV represents the per-unit market value of the fund and is updated daily based on the closing prices of the underlying securities.
What is the fund size (AUM) of Zerodha Silver ETF Regular Growth?
The Assets Under Management (AUM) of Zerodha Silver ETF Regular Growth is ₹470.77 Crores. AUM indicates the total market value of assets managed by the fund and reflects investor confidence and fund popularity.
What are the historical returns of Zerodha Silver ETF Regular Growth?
Zerodha Silver ETF Regular Growth has delivered returns of 0.00% (1 Year), 0.00% (3 Year), 0.00% (5 Year). Past performance does not guarantee future results, and investors should consider their risk appetite before investing.
What is the risk level of Zerodha Silver ETF Regular Growth?
Zerodha Silver ETF Regular Growth has a risk rating of 'Very High' as per the SEBI Riskometer. This indicates the fund is suitable for very aggressive investors comfortable with significant market volatility. Investors should align their investment choices with their personal risk tolerance and financial goals.
What is the minimum investment amount for Zerodha Silver ETF Regular Growth?
The minimum lumpsum investment required for Zerodha Silver ETF Regular Growth is ₹1,000. This allows investors to start their mutual fund journey with a manageable amount.
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article